Fiction

twilight of the old goats

Salon magazine: Mailer, Roth and Bellow refuse to go quietly. By D.T. Max

  • more
    • All Share Services

“I think if ‘Portnoy’s Complaint’ were written today, it would be taken as
a humorous novelty,” Joseph Heller said. “Today even women write books in
which they happily masturbate.”

I particularly liked that “even.”

I was talking to the 74-year-old Heller because three works of fiction
by his grizzled Jewish peers have recently come out: Saul Bellow’s “The
Actual,” Norman Mailer’s “The Gospel According to the Son,” and Philip Roth’s
“American Pastoral.” I doubt this literary equivalent of harmonic convergence has ever
happened before, and though it’s obviously mere coincidence, the
simultaneous appearance of the Father, the Son and the Ghost Writer
seemed to me to suggest a cultural watershed of sorts, or at least a
chance to take stock as the twilight of the machers draws near.

These were the novelists who took over American culture at precisely the
moment when American culture was taking over the world. Bellow wrestled
American writing from the grip of Hemingway; Mailer, through his protean,
highly uneven talent, moved the American intellectual from bookworm past
activist to showman; and Roth invested American fiction with a depth many
thought beyond our national capacity. They were an aggressive clan —
offensive to women, to the squeamish and, most of all, by their very
prominence, to the WASP establishment. And as part of the power shift
that carried the Jew from outsider to insider, for all the jangled nerves
they caused among caretakers of the Jewish image, they made other
American Jews — particularly urban Jews — proud.

But that was a long time ago. In “Humboldt’s Gift,” Bellow writes that
Americans like their poets to die young because it makes the rest of us
feel tough. I had begun to wonder whether something similar hadn’t become
true for novelists. These writers have left no heirs, and nearly 40
years after the youngest, Roth, debuted with “Goodbye, Columbus,” we know
they won’t. Thirty-one-year-old fiction writer Thomas Beller met Bellow at a
cocktail party in 1991 and introduced himself. “Beller?” he recalls the
response, “that sounds enough like Bellow that I think I can remember
it.” No, mentoring is not in their make-up. Either they are still the
game or the game is over.

Having grown up across the street from the West Side’s old New Yorker
bookstore, I can remember people climbing the treacherous stairs in
search of the new Bellow, the new Roth, the new Malamud (Bellow dubbed
their troika Hart, Schaffner & Marx). You knew writers from their work
and the black-and-white photograph on the dust jacket. That peek-a-boo
was all you got. But how do such literary lions play now that fiction
readers are addicted to memoirs? As Bellow might put it, you’d have to be
a fool not to realize the literary racket has changed. In 1964, Esquire
ran a map of the literary universe that placed the Partisan Review in the
“red hot center.” Twenty-five years later, Esquire updated the feature,
with ICM agent Amanda “Binky” Urban where the Review had been. Today
it would have to be “Oprah.”

Still, the machers have shown remarkable staying power in our cultural
imagination, outlasting not only their contemporaries but changes that
have altered beyond recognition the vast literary and cultural machine
that created them. Literacy rates have plummeted, the Web competes with
television for scarcer and scarcer free time, universities that gave
shelter to novelists after the magazine fiction market disappeared are
out of money, and women have come to dominate not just publishing, but
the means — bookstores, talk shows, college courses — by which authors’
reputations are made. This would seem like a death sentence. And yet, a
book by Norman Mailer is still an event. The question should perhaps be,
then, not how much these male writers have lost, but how well they’ve
come through. They are routinely portrayed as static or even reactionary
talents in a swirling cultural cauldron, but in truth Mailer, Bellow and
Roth have shown a keen ability to adapt, to stay current, to remain, in
that favorite ’60s phrase, relevant. Compare them, for example, to Heller
today. For that matter, where is Susan Sontag?

I called the novelists for their own take. Mailer’s assistant said he
would agree to be interviewed only if the article were solely about him.
I thought of Woody Allen’s suggestion that he donate his ego to science.

I next turned to Bellow, who is the most collegial of the three. He
helped put Roth on the map when the Weequahican was his graduate student
at the University of Chicago. Soon after, he exercised droit du seigneur
and picked Roth’s pocket of a girlfriend who would later become his
second wife, Susan Glassman. Roth got a bit of his own back in “The Ghost
Writer” with his portrait of Chicago literary mandarin Felix Abravamal, a
novelist so hoity-toity he lives in his own “egosphere.” Bellow was not
amused, but somehow the friendship survived. Bellow recently suggested
Roth for the Nobel Prize. (He also joked he would give Mailer the one he
had if Mailer had anything to trade for it.) But Bellow turned out to be
a tease. His assistant said he might call; he would call; if he did call,
it would be without warning, stay by the phone. I felt like Tommy Wilhelm
in “Seize the Day,” a “childish mind that thinks people are ready to give
it just because (you) need it.” And I wound up just as disappointed. It
turned out that he’d already given a long, raunchy interview to Playboy.
He was tapped out.

Roth exhibited a bunker mentality worthy of “Operation Shylock.” His
Manhattan and Connecticut numbers had been changed. He prefers to
initiate calls to people outside his inner circle to keep his number secret. “He
wants to stay away from interviews and that sort of thing for the
moment,” says William Styron, a longtime friend, adding that Claire
Bloom’s memoir, “Leaving the Doll House,” caused Roth “a lot of pain.”

In “The Ghost Writer,” Nathan Zuckerman, essentially Roth with libel
protection, tells novelist E.I. Lonoff, a stand-in for Bernard Malamud, “No one
with seven books in New York City settles for one piece of ass. That’s
what you get for a couplet.” Bellow and Mailer, with 39 books
and 11 wives between them, are bracing for a taste of what Roth (two
wives, 21 books) got last year from Bloom. “They obviously aren’t
anything you’d want your sister to date,” says a publisher friendly with
all three.

In “Handsome Is,” Harriet Wasserman, Bellow’s longtime agent, recounts
their one-night stand, their intense collaboration and the end of their
professional romance, a Bellovian denouement in which he tried to get her
to fire herself. Ultimately Bellow joined Mailer and Roth at the Andrew
Wylie agency. He and the woman he talked to every day for more than
20 years have not spoken since. Like Bloom, Wasserman, equally
unconvincingly, says she isn’t interested in revenge. “I always felt like
a character in a Saul Bellow novel,” she says, “so I thought, why not
write it?”

And Mailer’s second wife, Adele Mailer, in her new memoir, “Life of the
Party,” details a nightmarish marriage to a ’50s Mailer even more
drug-addled, horny and socially ambitious than he has portrayed himself
to be. This was the period when “Barbary Shore” and “Deer Park” were
landing with a thud not equaled until the Brat Packers stumbled in the
late ’80s. We already know that Mailer stabbed this wife during a drunken
rage after a poor turnout at a campaign fund-raiser for his mayoral race.
But now we learn Mailer liked to unwind by listening to Dave Brubeck
played at full volume. And that at a 1961 nudist party in Provincetown
thrown by Dwight MacDonald, he was too shy to take off his undershorts.
Recently, Gloria Steinem’s biographer wrote that when Steinem and
Mailer went to bed, Mailer could not perform. For the man who dubbed
himself the Prizewinner in “The Prisoner of Sex,” this is rough stuff.

It’s been a tough few years all around for Mailer.
Michiko Kakutani crucified “The Gospel According to the Son” in the New York Times, calling it “a pale,
user-friendly version of … the Bible … flattened out (with) New Agey
language.” It was Kakutani’s second killer review in a row of Mailer’s
work. And both ran ahead of the book’s publication date, as if Kakutani
wanted to make sure no one missed her point. In truth, “Gospel” has
little to recommend it — a more timid writer would have put it in the
drawer — but Mailer could be forgiven for sharing a little of Roth’s
paranoia as he goes back to work. Besides, with “Gospel” now on the
bestseller list and “American Pastoral” and “The Actual” nowhere in
sight, Mailer may have achieved the long-sought grail of the novelist: he
may be review-proof.

Kakutani has slapped Roth’s hand too, though the blow seemed delivered
more for instruction than punishment. His “Sabbath’s Theatre” features an
unrepentant sexual harasser named Mickey Sabbath who is ultimately
brought up on charges before a humorless dean named by Roth, perhaps
unwisely, Kimiko Kakuzaki. Kakutani trounced “Sabbath’s Theatre” so
thoroughly that even Mailer, who feels little love for Roth, came to his
defense in a letter to the Times. “It was pretty funny, Norman chinning
himself up on Philip,” remembers novelist Richard Stern, a friend of Roth’s
and Bellow’s from their Chicago days. The book went on to win the
National Book Award.

But Kakutani has fallen in love with “American
Pastoral,” Roth’s big novel of the turmoil of the ’60s, praising in
particular its handling of women, especially the character of Dawn, the
wife of the protagonist, aging sports legend Seymour “Swede” Levov. Dawn,
Kakutani wrote, with somewhat confusing syntax, is “a woman who is
neither a castrating witch nor a passive doormat — something of a rare
occurrence in recent Roth novels — but a fully fashioned human being.”

Most critics have agreed with Kakutani this time, similarly relieved
that Roth/Zuckerman bows out one-quarter of the way through “American
Pastoral” and leaves the field to a more likable fellow. I felt the
exact opposite, missing every page the solipsistic and prickly
Roth/Zuckerman was gone. “Sabbath’s Theatre” may be the less uplifting but it is
by far the better of the two novels: “American Pastoral” reads like a
self-conscious try at a book with Big Themes, full of undigested American
history, undigested Newark history, undigested glove-industry history. It
is as if Thomas Wolfe, whom Roth loved as an adolescent, had reinfected
him.

It is also the first of Roth’s novels, according to his friends, to
be composed on a word processor. “The muse needs its harness,” cautions
John Updike. According to Bloom’s memoir, Roth blamed Updike’s harsh New
Yorker review of “Operation Shylock” for his decision to check into a
psychiatric hospital. But Updike says he is not honing the blade for “American Pastoral,” which seems to take more than a page
from “Rabbit Redux.”

“You
could as well say I’ve gone Rothean,” says Updike, “My last novel (‘In the Beauty of the Lillies’) starts out
in New Jersey.”

Like Roth, Updike knows what it’s like to be tagged as a misogynist. He has had his
own battles, especially after “The Witches of Eastwick.” “I responded by
trying to write more about women and to write more deeply. You look into
your heart and ask, ‘Am I really a male chauvinist? Am I really a sexist?’”

Friends say Bellow resists such introspection. “He’s smart about the
money he’s made,” says a longtime friend. “He doesn’t live high. He
doesn’t give a shit.” “Bellow’s writing for the angels,” is Updike’s take.

Bellow’s new novella confirms both opinions. “The Actual” is a brief,
elegant, unapologetic story of a retired Chicago businessman and the
zaftig woman he has loved and fantasized about through four decades. It
proves, if nothing else, that Bellow, is still a tit man. In the end he
wins his beloved’s hand in a cemetery.

Bellow too feels the hot breath of the P.C. culture on his back. His
too-quotable defense of Western literature in 1994 — “Who is the Tolstoy
of the Zulus? The Proust of the Papuans?” — left him working damage
control on the op-ed page of the Times, claiming he had been
misunderstood. Novelists, after all, need young readers if they are to
last. The year after “Herzog” became a hit in 1964, Glamour magazine
dispatched a correspondent to Chicago to interview the then-little-known
writer. “It’s so easy to play a role before the public,” Bellow told a
kittenish freelancer, none other than Gloria Steinem. “Women write you
letters asking how they should entertain a Jewish intellectual. (But) how
much time have you got?”

Eleven years later Vivian Gornick wrote a cover story for the Village
Voice with mug shots of Roth, Mailer, Bellow and Henry Miller, and the
cover line “Why Do These Men Hate Women?” Part of the evidence was the
very same “Herzog” book, whose women Gornick found “dreadful
caricatures.” “When I read Mailer, Roth and the later Bellow,” Gornick
wrote, “not much lives except the self-absorption … the sullen
vanities … the forfeited talents.” The article was a sensation. Gornick
recalls Susan Glassman, now divorced from Bellow, coming up to her at a
party and shaking her hand. Today Gornick says she would not bother. “At
the time they were in the cat-bird seat. They were the enemy. Now their
readership is limited to the Jewish Community Center.”

Some rough numbers suggest she has a point. Roth’s three-book contract
for “Deception,” “Patrimony” and “Operation Shylock,” said to be for
$1.7 million, left Simon & Schuster deeply in the red. For “Sabbath’s
Theatre,” he changed publishers. Mailer, his new bestseller
notwithstanding, has been a huge loss-leader for his publisher. “I can
see why Mailer writes the books he’s writing,” a writer who admires him
told me. “What I can’t see is why Random House lets him.”

Bellow’s fastest selling book was “Herzog,” which sold 430,000 hardcover
copies in 1964-65 alone. “More Die of Heartbreak,” his last full-length
novel, published in 1985, sold 60,000 copies. “Bellow said to me once,”
recalls his biographer, James Atlas, “and it was very touching actually,
that he had no idea that their moment would be so brief. They feel
superseded by the advent of multiculturalism and the demands of other
literary constituencies.”

But the streets of Chicago, Newark and Brooklyn made these writers
nothing if not tough. Bellow, 81, Mailer, 74, Roth, 64 — with a Nobel
Prize, three Pulitzers and six National Book Awards among them — aren’t
giving up the brass ring yet. Roth, despite a recent bypass operation,
has said he expects to maintain his current book-every-other-year clip.
Bellow, who nearly died two years ago from contaminated seafood he ate on
vacation, has two novels started. In one, he has told friends, he will
lay to rest the myth he cannot write a fully-fleshed out female
character. And Mailer is now supposed to be at work on his “Harlot’s
Ghost” Part II.

“That’s the one thing you have to say for the boys,” says
Roger W. Straus, president of Farrar, Straus & Giroux. “In many instances
they still succeed in writing serious books. They don’t just sit there
and fart around.”

50 shades of Shutterstock

Slide show: Everyone's favorite light-bondage bestseller illustrated by inexplicable stock photography SLIDE SHOW

  • more
    • All Share Services

50 shades of Shutterstock

View the slide show

This week, for roughly the millionth time, E.L. James’ romance-bondage trilogy “50 Shades” nabs the No. 1, 2 and 3 spots on the New York Times bestseller lists. We don’t get it either. Every page of that book, which famously began as “Twilight” fan fiction, elicits a sigh of confusion and weird secondary embarrassment. The question is: Who would read this? (The answer is: Apparently everyone.) It’s the same baffled, helpless feeling we get when we sort through stock photos on a daily basis. Stock photos – which have been the subject of recent outstanding Internet satire – are used by this site, and many others, to illustrate our flood of content. Many are plain and simple, but a good portion are flat-out mind-blowing. Why did anyone think that photo was a good idea? It only made sense to join these forces. And so, we present to you passages from the most head-scratching bestseller of our time, illustrated with the assistance of inexplicable stock photography.

View the slide show

Megaphone by Natalie Bakopoulos

Miracles happen, even in an Athens crippled by a garbage strike, to a young mother unsure of her ability to love

  • more
    • All Share Services

Megaphone by Natalie Bakopoulos (Credit: iStockphoto/caracterdesign)

It’s the third week of the garbage strike and Athens has begun to smell. Bright-colored trash bags fill the curbs and alleyways, and we have learned to step over the rubbish and avoid the blocks that had become unnavigable. We know which stretches are particularly foul — a stretch along Mavili Square, or the entire top end of Monastiraki. Odos Athinas is a sea of trash, and Omonia is ghastly but we don’t go there anyway. May has gone from unseasonably cool to raging hot, and the garbage seems to be melting. In front of the museum it’s like yet another installation project. When I arrive each morning I want to wretch.

My 5-year-old son, Alekos, sits on the balcony of our apartment. Visible from there are pine trees and details of other people’s lives, audible are the sounds of morning, the birds above and voices below. Evenings, Alekos lies on the divan on the balcony in his pajamas, watching the moon. He is obsessed with it, and his father made him a playlist of all the Greek songs that mention it. When he was smaller he’d stare at the moon until he fell asleep.

This morning, though, Alekos lies flat on the ground, peering down through the slats of the railing, staring at the trash. Next to him is his iPad ­– a gift from his father, and yes, I know, but his father doesn’t live with us and what can you do?­ — and now he favors bad pop music like the older kids at school. So I’m surprised this morning when I hear the sounds of Elmo counting. He’s embarrassed by this favorite YouTube clip­­ – it’s for babies, he says ­­­­– but it comforts him. The tension these days is overwhelming.

Alekos looks up when he sees me, furrows his brow, and tells me if he were a deputy like his father, he’d force everyone to clean up the garbage. “And to make a new government,” he says.

I tell him that would be nice.

“At least I can fly,” he says. He is wearing the Spider-Man costume my sister brought him from the States.

I tell him Spider-Man jumps and leaps and sticks to things. He doesn’t fly. “Besides,” I quickly add, thinking of all the balconies around us. “You’re not Spider-Man.” Even I have wondered what it might be like to jump from one to the next. I smooth his light hair, which is growing long. “You need a haircut,” I say.

I hold out two polos, one white, one blue, so he feels he has a choice. He pulls the blue shirt over the costume, and I hope that his teachers aren’t too upset by this because I am too exhausted to argue with him.

Outside, the trash has piled up, and Alekos can’t get into the car from the curb. I tell him I’ll pull the car up so he can get in without pushing his way through the refuse. He wrinkles his nose at the smell. But when I get to the driver’s side, Alekos is no longer standing there.

Instead he is floating 12 feet above the curb, his Spider-Man-clad arms stretched out like wings.

Alekos,” is all I can say, “get down.” He swoops over to me, hovering just above my reach, and finally glides gracefully to my feet as if he has been practicing this move for months. Bending down to face him and gripping the straps of his backpack, I have the panicked feeling that if I let go he will fly away.

“How long has this been going on?” I whisper. “Tell me.”

One old man walks past us with his hands behind his back and says nothing. He barely notices us. Across the street a woman hurries along in heels, yelling into her phone. No one else is around.

Alekos shrugs, aloof, and looks away with those dark eyes, almost black, like his father’s. “I tried to tell you.”

“Does Babas know about this?” I ask, suddenly sure his father would keep this from me, just the way he failed to mention his girlfriend was staying the night, reading Alekos bedtime stories when he stayed there. Oh, the flying? I thought you knew?

“No,” Alekos says.

“Just at home, OK?” I say. I don’t want to alarm him, but I want to be firm.

He digs in his backpack and tells me he saw his father on the news that morning. This is one reason I don’t like him to watch television at all. For the rest of the drive, we’re quiet.

“I know I’m not Spider-Man,” he says finally, when we arrive.

“OK,” I say. “Do you fly at school?” I ask.

“No.” He looks at me in the rearview mirror, completely incredulous. “Nobody does.”

He gets out of the car and hurries off to meet some other kids, who admire his Spider-Man arms as if they are tattooed. I wait for him to turn around and wave but he doesn’t, and for a moment it seems his feet levitate off the ground. But maybe I am imagining it; he walks in, one foot after the other, like everyone else. I park at the metro station and take the train into the city center, turning up the ringer on my phone.

I call his father three times but get his voice mail. I text him to call me. He texts me an hour later — Ola kala? — and I trip over a split-open trash bag, as if these sidewalks weren’t already treacherous enough. I answer, Yes, everything’s fine. This will have to wait until we are face to face, which is not often.

We met when I was teaching art classes on Paros one summer. I soon got pregnant, and we didn’t get married, but I stayed in Greece. I think he still resents me for not marrying him. To be honest, I can’t even remember my reasons. It all seems like another lifetime, decades ago, when Athens felt proud and vibrant those few years after the Olympics.

A few more messages come from him but I’m busy and don’t answer. Then, when I’m outside the museum, finishing my installation, he shows up.

“You don’t call me three times in a row with no message,” he says, frustrated. “You barely call me at all, unless the kid is on fire.”

No, not fire, I think.

He surveys my project, one giant megaphone outside the  museum, the size of a kiosk, with cameras inside that will film street activity and project it onto a screen inside. Tiny figurines in various stages of undress shoot out from the megaphone, suspended by invisible wire. I’ve compiled old Greek footage of both celebrations and protests, which will air inside the museum, and the outdoor footage will be superimposed on those old clips. I wonder if anyone is inside now, watching us, or what we’re matched with: a hectic street scene, a political rally, a brilliant August moon?

“I like it,” he says, in English, in that supportive tone he uses when he doesn’t know what to say about my work but wants to convey he approves.

“Oh, stop it,” I say.

“And with the garbage,” he says. “A nice touch.”

And the two of us laugh, the first time we have laughed together in a long time, since before the elections, since before the crisis, probably not since Alekos was an infant and we marveled at every smile and uttered “word.” Suddenly I think I should have thought to make those tiny figures children, with wings. I wonder why I didn’t think of it before, why it always takes the manifestation of something so crazy to make me realize something so simple.

“Let me take you for a coffee,” he says, “or something stronger? We can sit outside, where it’s quiet.” The trash stench is so bad that everyone sits inside, smoking.

“You have time for that?” I ask, knowing he doesn’t. I can hear his phone buzzing in his pocket. “I should keep working.”

One night, right before these last elections, he came to pick Alekos up and he kissed me when Alekos went to grab his toys. “Not yet,” I said. My attempt at self-preservation while the rest of the country implodes. It’s hard enough just to be friends.

“OK,” he said then. “We’ll get there, one day.”

Now, I lean into him a moment. Together we survey what I’ve made. I want to tell him, Our son can fly. I want to tell him, Stay.

“Are we there yet,” he says quietly, distantly, not as question but statement, and he rests his chin on my head and looks out into the street: the sleepy shops, the political posters pasted over the boarded-up kiosks, the hot afternoon sun beating down on it all. “Are we?”

And then my phone is ringing­­ — it’s the school office — and I know of course what has happened. I imagine Alekos flying around his classroom like an angry bee, out into the schoolyard, beyond the trash, beyond the protests and our land in limbo. Or maybe he is more relaxed, gliding effortlessly the way I fly in my dreams, his superhero costume and sandy hair glowing in the afternoon sun, until he finds us here, his parents who don’t know where we are or where we’re going, and taking us up with him, catapulting us into the vast unknown. Our images would flicker on the screen inside, soaring above that old footage of our shattered, magnificent city.

Continue Reading Close

Natalie Bakopoulos's first novel, "The Green Shore," will be published by Simon & Schuster in June 2012. Her work has appeared in Tin House, Ninth Letter, Granta Online, and The O. Henry Prize Stories 2010, and she is a contributing editor for the online journal Fiction Writers Review.

Almost by Chris Pavone

She never thought of herself as ambitious, until motherhood and career collided in one horrifying hospital ride

  • more
    • All Share Services

Almost by Chris Pavone (Credit: iStockphoto/caracterdesign)

It’s just before dawn when Isabel puts the final page down on the fat stack of paper that sits on the rumpled bedspread, next to an overflowing crystal ashtray and a crumpled soft-pack of cigarettes. She’d tried Wellbutrin and Xanax; she’d used patches and gum. In the end, the only thing that made her quit smoking was being pregnant.

But then, after everything, she couldn’t help but start up again. At first it was just a single cigarette per day, or two. Then it became a few, and within months she was back to full-throttle. Over the past couple of years, she’s tried to quit a few times, but not seriously. She anticipates — she accepts — failure. Because she doesn’t want to quit, not really. She wants instead to try, and fail.

Isabel picks up the manuscript with both hands, flips it over, and uses her thumbs to align the pages. She takes a deep breath, lets out a long sigh.

Another night lying in bed, working. She’d fallen asleep at 11, then woke sometime after 2, her mind unquiet. But it wasn’t until 3 that she admitted she was awake. She then picked up a manuscript and a pencil, and started working, page after page, all through the desperate hours. Vaguely reminiscent of those days when Nicky was an infant, in the middle of the night, sleep-deprived, awake in a dormant world. The small hours when a blanket of quiet smothers the city, but through the moth-eaten holes there’s the occasional lowing of a railroad in New Jersey, the distant Dopplered wail of an ambulance siren. Then the inevitable thump of the newspaper on the doormat, the end of the idea of night, even though it’s still dark out.

She stares across the room, off into the black nothingness of the picture window on the opposite wall, its severe surface barely softened by the half-drawn shades, an aggressive void invading the serene cocoon of her bedroom. The room is barely lit by a small bullet-shaped reading sconce mounted over the headboard, aiming a beam of light directly at the top of her head, creating a halo in the reflection in the window. An angel. Except she’s not.

Isabel shuffles into the dark hall, flips the light switch. She turns on the kitchen lights, and the coffee — switched from auto-on, which is set to start brewing an hour from now, to on — and the small television on the counter. Filling the lonely apartment with humming electronic life.

The coffee machine hisses and sputters, big plops falling into the tempered glass. She watches the contraption’s clock, changing from 5:48 to 5:49. Grabs the plastic handle of the carafe and fills the mug with hot, viscous, bitter, bracing caffeination. She takes a small sip, then a larger one.

She walks down the hall, lined with the photographs that she’d unearthed four years ago, when she was moving out of her matrimonial apartment, into this single-woman space in a new neighborhood, far from the painful memories of her home — of her life — downtown, where she’d been running into too many mothers, often with their children. Women she’d known from the playgrounds and the toy stores and the mommy-and-me music classes, from the gyms and grocers and coffee shops, from preschool drop-off and the waiting room at the pediatrician’s. All those other little children growing older, getting bigger.

So she’d bought herself a one-bedroom in an uptown full-service building, the type of apartment that a woman chooses when she reconciles herself that she’s not going to be living with another human being, probably forever. That she’s making her loneliness comfortable. Palliative care.

She lined this nice new hallway with framed photos. There she is, herself, a smiling little toddler. And with her mother on the first day of second grade. At college graduation with her two best friends. There are her grandparents, at the final family reunion before they both died, within weeks of each other. Isabel in a big white dress, aglow, in the middle of the panoramic-lens group shot. A much smaller print, lying in a hospital bed, beaming at Nicky in her arms, tiny and red and angry in his swaddling blanket and blue cap. A grainy shot of herself onstage in a little black dress, accepting an award, beaming again, but not as wide. Some joys aren’t as joyous as others.

It was more than possible — it was inevitable — to blame herself, her ambition, even though she’d never thought of herself as especially ambitious. But everyone has important moments, in any job, at any level of ambition. In the Supreme Court or a fourth-grade classroom, on an assembly line or a fishing boat, there are crucial days.

For Isabel the literary agent, this day was dominated by an auction she was running for a hotly anticipated second novel, whose author needed a lot of hand-holding, and whose bidders kept increasing their offers every half-hour, from mid-five figures to high-sixes in the course of the day. This lucrative 9-to-6 was followed by a 7 o’clock black-tie that included an honor for, and an interminable speech by, a different author of hers. So this frantic day, it featured a wardrobe change. And the evening portion was just as important work as the daytime; just because there was liquor and food and fancy dress didn’t mean it wasn’t work.

The nanny called a couple times during Isabel’s 16 hours at work, worrying that Nicky’s cold or flu or whatever was getting worse. Dave was away on a business trip, and Isabel didn’t want Lupe to be the one to go to the doctor with Nicky; the nanny’s English would be generously described as weak, and sometimes that mattered. So Isabel made an appointment for first thing the next morning. Anyone would’ve done the same thing.

Isabel returned home after midnight, exhausted. She thanked Lupe and sent her home in a taxi, and let her cocktail dress fall to the floor, and collapsed into bed.

She was awakened at dawn by the screaming. Nicky was burning up, 106. She rushed downstairs with the boy in her arms, and ran around the block, panting and desperate, until she found a taxi.  “Don’t worry, Sweetie,” she said. “We’ll be at the doctor’s in a minute.” The hospital was only a mile away.

The taxi peeled away from the curb, the eerie blue light washing over the dingy white garbage trucks, the Mexican kids swabbing down the sidewalks in front of all-night delis, the street-cart vendors positioning their pastries in front of office buildings, the joggers with reflective stripes down their shorts, the normal business of a city’s day starting, coming to life.

“Are we there yet?” Nicky asked, as he had so many times. From the back seat of the shiny SUV that was cleaned every week by the guys in the garage, on their way out to the weekend house in East Hampton, back when her life looked like something to be envied. He had said it on the way to visit Dave’s parents in Oyster Bay, or hers upstate in the Hudson Valley. While heading to Vermont, for a ski weekend; to Cape Cod, to visit friends; to the Bronx Zoo and the Brooklyn Aquarium, Yankee Stadium and Citi Field. It was something the little boy asked, all the time.

But this was the last time.

In the back of the moldy-smelling taxi she pushed the fever-damp hair off her son’s hot forehead. “Nearly,” she said. He shut his eyes, and then slipped silently into a coma, there on the slippery silver vinyl seat of the taxi.

An hour later, Nicky was dead. A supervirus, said the young doctor, who had been up all night, up for who knows how long, working; he was tired and frustrated, and perhaps not as tactful as he could’ve been.

At the end of the hall Isabel stops at the spotlit photograph, a small black-and-white in the center of a vast expanse of stark white matting. A little boy, her baby, laughing on a rocky beach, running out of gentle surf, holding a little toy hammer. Isabel reaches her hand to her lips, plants a kiss on her fingers, and transfers the kiss to the little boy. As she does every morning.

There was, the doctor added, almost nothing she could’ve done. Almost.

Continue Reading Close

Memorial Day fiction: Are we there yet?

Salon exclusive: At the start of the summer fiction season, new stories from Chris Pavone and Natalie Bakopoulos

  • more
    • All Share Services

Memorial Day fiction: Are we there yet? (Credit: iStockphoto/caracterdesign)

“Are we there yet?”

It’s a dreaded sentence. When it’s spoken by an anxious child from the back seat, it’s enough to make stressed-out parents wish they’d never taken a family vacation in the first place. And even if it’s delivered as a sing-songy punch line, from an impatient partner or spouse on a long road trip, it’s an irritating eye-roller of a joke.

So this Memorial Day weekend — the unofficial start of the summer vacation season, and therefore the summer fiction season — we asked two novelists to reclaim the sentence in a new and adult context. For our latest fiction project, there was only one simple rule: Each story had to include the line “Are we there yet?” in a fresh and surprising way.

Our authors are two people you should be taking to the beach with you this summer. Chris Pavone is the author of “The Expats,” the New York Times best-selling thriller with more satisfying twists than the Pacific Coast Highway. Natalie Bakopoulos is the author of “The Green Shore,” one of 2012′s most anticipated debut novels, a beautiful family drama that is set during another Greek crisis — the 1967 military coup.

To read the stories, just follow the links below:

“Megaphone” by Natalie Bakopoulos

“Almost” by Chris Pavone

Continue Reading Close

David Daley is the senior culture editor of Salon.

“Frankenstein” remixed

This masterful new adaptation of Mary Shelley's classic novel may be the best interactive fiction yet

  • more
    • All Share Services

This originally appeared on The Chimerist, a site devoted to the intersection of art, stories, and technology.

Whatever interactive fiction is (and we’re still figuring that out) it suffers from all the problems of traditional fiction and then some. The vast majority of novels and short stories aren’t much good, but when a branching fiction — along the lines of the old “Choose Your Own Adventure” children’s books — fails to engage, the first impulse is to blame the form rather than the content. Let “Frankenstein,” just released by Inkle Studios and Profile Books, serve as a reproach to that reflex. The app is a creative, subtle and sensitive adaptation of Mary Shelley’s classic novella, and it has singlehandedly renewed this critic’s hopes for interactive fiction.

What this “Frankenstein” isn’t is a replication of the source text with the addition of a lot of digital doohickeys like sound effects and illustrations that animate when tapped. The app is all about the text, even if it is beautifully framed by period art and anatomical illustrations. The reader is presented with a screenful of narration and then offered one or more responses to it. The preferred response, when tapped, delivers up another screen of text. (In an absurdly pleasing visual touch, these appear as sheets of paper fasted together by straight pins.) According to the press materials, the reader’s responses will shape the way the narrative is presented, although not to the degree of substantively changing the plot.

This is an important point. The pleasure of storytelling lies in the dynamic between the surprising and the inevitable. The reader wants to feel the story is going somewhere, that its events follow from each other in meaningful, but not too obvious ways. When a story can go anywhere, it feels meaningless. In Mary Shelley’s novella, which is saturated with the Western tradition of the tragedy, Viktor Frankenstein’s character is such that he must create a monster, and the monster’s body is such that he can never belong among human beings however much he yearns to. A “Frankenstein” that ended with either misfit finding a comfortable place in the world would be a travesty.

But that doesn’t mean the reader doesn’t long for the story to unfold otherwise; that’s the nature of tragedy. The great insight that writer Dave Morris brings to this adaptation of the novel is that while a reader cannot significantly change the outcome of the story, the interactive element can change the shading and flavor of the tale. It can be mournful and reflective or action-packed. The creature and his creator can show greater or lesser ambivalence about their own behaviors. The ambiguity of both figures is baked into Mary Shelley’s novella, and while Morris has nearly doubled the word count of the original, this mostly amounts to playing up or down what’s already there.

Morris — a novelist who has written graphic novels, games and, yes, Choose-Your-Own-Adventure stories for kids — has changed the original text in other ways, as well. (Let’s take a moment here to point out to all future narrative app developers that hiring a real writer who actually knows what he or she is doing is totally worth it.) He’s moved the setting to revolutionary France, a choice that shows shrewd understanding of the idealistic political climate that affected Shelley’s thinking; the new Republic is its own kind of Frankenstein’s monster. He’s also eliminated much of the 19th-century framing of the tale and converted it into two present-tense narrations. One is Frankenstein’s dialogue with either himself or a (possibly imaginary) companion. The other is a second-person account of the monster’s first weeks of life as it spies on a family of dispossessed French nobility and has the chance to observe the loving relationships it can never enjoy itself.

Morris presents the reader with choices I’ve not encountered in other interactive fictions. Is humanity mostly good, or mostly evil? Does the most recent development make you (the monster) feel hope or despair? Is the revolution the dawn of a brave new world or a descent into chaos and barbarity? While I’m usually skeptical that present-tense narration increases the “immediacy” of a story, in this case, it really does work, particularly in the sections concerning the monster. Depending on your own outlook, you may urge him to keep trying to connect with humanity, or promptly forward him on to homicidal rage.

In either case, the narrative is shaped not by the reader deciding to turn left or right, to go down into the cellar or to get out of the house — the usual actions offered on the choose-your-own menu. Instead, the options have more to do with personality and interpretation, beliefs and ideas. As a result of the reader’s choices, the characters seem more like him- or herself, with a concurrent ratcheting up of emotional investment. To my surprise, I found myself more moved by this adaptation of the Shelley novel than I have been by the source text. (Although the app does include the original if you want to compare and contrast.) This is the only interactive fiction I’ve ever read with that quintessential, old-fashioned readerly avidity: the hunger to know what happens next. Of course, I already knew, but that didn’t matter at all.

Continue Reading Close
Laura Miller

Laura Miller is a senior writer for Salon. She is the author of "The Magician's Book: A Skeptic's Adventures in Narnia" and has a Web site, magiciansbook.com.

Page 1 of 130 in Fiction