ABC

Media Circus: With “education” like this, who needs infomercials?

Thanks to the new FCC guidelines mandating more educational TV, kids have learned essential facts -- like the NBA is really cool and always to watch for spies when leaving the house.

  • more
    • All Share Services

It may be the least edifying lesson of the budding school year. Starting in September, under new Federal Communications Commission guidelines, TV stations are supposed to be airing three hours of “educational or informational” programming each week, at some reasonable time of day. And you know what, kids? A lot of the stuff the networks have programmed to fulfill their stations’ obligations has the pedagogical value of one of those paper place mats at a pancake house. Of course, this has nothing, nothing at all, to do with the FCC’s decision to leave it up to broadcasters themselves to decide what goes on the curriculum.

NBC might as well not have bothered with “T-NBC,” a chintzy Saturday-morning lineup of live-action shows aimed at adolescents, including “Saved by the Bell,” “Hang Time” and “City Guys” — educational, one must suppose for lack of other evidence, because they’re set in high schools. That’s not to leave out “NBA Inside Stuff,” which continues to teach viewers that the NBA is really, really cool. The other networks just barely pick up the slack. While the squiggly animation of ABC’s “Science Court” might send some youngsters reaching for their Ritalin, amazingly it’s the only new offering that has solid educational content — and, as a bonus, it’s even funny.

“Sports Illustrated for Kids,” on CBS, wraps clunky social lessons in irresistible packages, such as an interview with NBA basketball player Chris Webber’s dad explaining that he stood by his son after his bonehead timeout cost his team a chance to win in the NCAA finals because — now listen carefully, kids — “Chris took responsibility for his actions.” CBS’s “Wheel 2000,” a revamp of the evergreen game show “Wheel of Fortune,” takes the letter-but-not-the-spirit of the law tack. The show offers many useful lessons, such as that a computer generated co-host named “Cyber Lucy,” whose legs are four times as long as her torso, can teach girls to be pretty accessories just as well as Vanna White can.

Later in the morning, “The Weird Al Show” — imagine, if you will, “Pee-wee’s Playhouse” relocated to Mineola, Long Island — shows us how big a joke the FCC rules really are. “When you’re out in public, always check to make sure no spies are following you,” intones a narrator of a reappropriated ’50s educational film. “And if there are spiders on you, roll, roll on the ground. Spiders are icky.” Educational? No, yes, maybe and whatever.

Much effort on the part of our legislators brought us to this pretty pass. Enacted by Congress in 1990, the Children’s Television Act became law without the signature of President Bush, who whined that legislation limiting commercials during kids’ shows, prohibiting infomercials for toys and calling for a commitment to educational programming would compromise broadcasters’ First Amendment rights. It was one of those doozies of the era, like Reagan’s insistence that trees cause pollution. Given the chance, Congress knew better than to pass up an opportunity to score easy points with parents.

In the years since children’s TV was deregulated wholesale in 1983, cable has come into its own, with the luxury to take risks the networks and established syndicators didn’t think they could afford. The results are obvious in any week’s Nielsen’s: Nickelodeon consistently ranks at the top of the cable ratings. The year-old “Blue’s Clues,” Nick’s sublime quiz show for preschoolers, rocketed into the top 10 — despite the fact that each week’s episode airs for five days in a row, just the way 3-year-olds like it. My statistical sample of one indicates that 6-year-olds watch the Discovery Channel the way the White House tuned into CNN during the Gulf War. “Edutainment” CD-ROMs like “Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?” — which was so popular it inspired a long-running TV version on PBS — have, like the kid-friendly cable offerings, seized the minds of the privileged minority of children who have nice computers at home and moms and dads who can afford a lot of high-tech “educational” toys.

Educational TV is a way for networks to convince advertisers they’re reaching the same high-status audience. The problem is you can’t expect children to soak up the educational programs and then filter out the commercials that fill a third of every hour. Disney-owned ABC has been particularly shameless in its advertising abuse, airing a barrage of commercials for the video release of “Cinderella” in the middle of “101 Dalmatians” and “Winnie the Pooh” broadcasts. Cyber Lucy may be on hand to provide factoids about the solutions to the Wheel 2000 puzzles — “See, most people think spa-ghetti came from Italy, right? But it actually originated in Chi-na, and was brought to Italy by Marco Polo, who traveled there on one of his many journeys as a world explorer!” she informs her young viewers. But Lucy, the shadow of the valley girl of death, is also the one designated to describe “fabulous prizes,” like “a Jeep boombox with CD, cassette and AM-FM radio!” Let’s see if I got this straight … Marco Polo brought a box of spaghetti back to his Jeep … oh, never mind.

Advocates for educational TV are counting on “Sesame Street” as a model, which it is by default. (Presumably someone’s noticed it isn’t bad for product licensing, either, with a billion dollars in sales each year.) But as ill-equipped as commercial television is to deliver the same goods, things aren’t so simple even when Mattel doesn’t own the hour. Who decides what messages to beam into impressionable brains? Should it be William Bennett, whose “Book of Virtues” was translated not long ago into a PBS show that, by implication, teaches the values “Sesame Street” doesn’t? (Guess which program features African-American girls extolling the joys of hard work.) The credits of the new Saturday morning shows are filled with more letters than a box of Alpha-Bits, representing the credentials of educational consultants who’ve decided they have a calling to a higher place than the classroom. Let’s hope they know what they’re doing.

Continue Reading Close

Alyssa Katz is television critic for the Nation.

Krugman: America is heading for a “lost decade”

The economist repeats his grim forecast for a budget deal based on spending cuts

  • more
    • All Share Services

Krugman: America is heading for a Paul Krugman

Speaking at a roundtable on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday, New York Times columnist and economist, Paul Krugman repeated his long-held position, that we should not slash spending while the economy is depressed.

“The worst thing you can do in these circumstances is slash government spending, since that will depress the economy even further,” he wrote in the Times Sunday, with a sentiment echoed during his Sunday show appearance.

Before party leaders Sunday night announced a debt ceiling deal that is “all spending cuts,” as House Speaker John Boehner described it, Krugman offered a grim analysis. He predicted that unemployment would rise again to nine percent again and that America will experience economic consequences comparable to Japan’s “lost decade,” (when an economic program of frugality hindered recovery from an asset bubble collapse in the 1990s).

Krugman criticized the debt negotiations:

Basically the Republicans said we’ll blow up the world economy unless you give us exactly what we want, and the President said OK. That’s what happened. . . . We’re having a debate in Washington which is all about, “we’re going to make this economy worse, but are we going to make it worse on 90 percent of the Republican’s terms or 10o percent of the Republican’s terms?” And the answer is 100 percent.

Watch Krugman’s appearance below, including a brief spat with conservative columnist, George Will:

 

Continue Reading Close

Natasha Lennard covers the Occupy movement for Salon. A British-born, Brooklyn-based journalist, she has been covering Occupy Wall Street since before the first sleeping bag was unrolled in Zuccotti Park. One of the first journalists arrested at an Occupy action, she has managed to enrage Andrew Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. You can follow her on Twitter (@natashalennard), and email her any Occupy updates/videos/ideas to natasha.lennard@gmail.com

DSK maid goes public

Nafissatou Diallo -- named for the first time in U.S. press -- says she wants the former IMF chief to go to jail

  • more
    • All Share Services

DSK maid goes publicNafissatou Diallo speaks to ABC News' Robin Roberts

Although the French media disclosed Nafissatou Diallo’s name weeks ago, in the American press she has been known only as “Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s accuser” or the “DSK maid” — until now.

Guinean-born Diallo, who goes by “Nafi,” spoke out about her sexual assault charges against the former IMF chief, first in a lengthy Newsweek interview and then in an interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts, which aired Monday on “Good Morning America.”

“I want him to go to jail. I want him to know there are some places you cannot use your power, you cannot use your money,” Diallo told Newsweek. She repeated a similar sentiment to Roberts.

ABC’s Roberts called Diallo’s media blitz “an unusual and risky move.” But Diallo and her team are trying to regain control over the narrative after several weeks of stories in which her background and credibility have been questioned. “Because of him they call me a prostitute,” Diallo told ABC.

Prosecutors are currently undecided on whether to proceed with the charges against Strauss-Kahn, after raising doubts about Diallo’s credibility, largely based on issues unrelated to the alleged incident in Strauss-Kahn’s New York hotel suite. These include lies found on Diallo’s asylum application and findings that she had ties to petty criminals.

Diallo’s account of events, as she told them to both Newsweek and ABC News, cohere with hospital records detailing minor injuries on her body — including the fact that “doctors observed five hours afterward that there was ‘redness’ in the area of the vagina where she alleges Strauss-Kahn grabbed her.”

However, as Newsweek notes, “If there is one inconsistency for defense lawyers to dwell on in the hospital records, it is a passage that says her attacker got dressed and left the room, and ‘said nothing to her during the incident.’ In her interview with police and her account to Newsweek, Diallo recalled several statements Strauss-Kahn made during the alleged attack.”

Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers have described Diallo’s interviews as “an unseemly circus,” but Diallo says she felt she had “no choice” but to go public after staying silent for almost two months.

Watch the video below of Diallo speaking with ABC News’ Robin Roberts:

Continue Reading Close

Natasha Lennard covers the Occupy movement for Salon. A British-born, Brooklyn-based journalist, she has been covering Occupy Wall Street since before the first sleeping bag was unrolled in Zuccotti Park. One of the first journalists arrested at an Occupy action, she has managed to enrage Andrew Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. You can follow her on Twitter (@natashalennard), and email her any Occupy updates/videos/ideas to natasha.lennard@gmail.com

2 out of 3 Americans may vote against their current member of Congress

A new poll shows the highest level of discontent with Washington in decades

  • more
    • All Share Services

2 out of 3 Americans may vote against their current member of CongressRep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the Republican Study Committee chairman, far left, leaves the Capitol with fellow House GOP members after passage of the conservative deficit reduction plan known as "Cut, Cap and Balance" that prevailed 234-190, in Washington, Tuesday, July 19, 2011. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)(Credit: AP)

A new Washington Post/ABC News poll finds that nearly two-thirds of registered voters say they plan to “look around” to vote for someone other than their current member of Congress in 2012. Just 32 percent say they’re content to vote for their incumbent.

This is the highest level of dissatisfaction with Washington ever seen in Post/ABC polling, which dates back to 1989, notes the Post’s Chris Cillizza. A striking 80 percent of all respondents said they were either dissatisfied or angry about the way Washington works.

This discontent — although spread almost evenly across party lines — is more likely to more negatively impact Republicans, says Cillizza, simply because they are the majority party in the House.

 

Natasha Lennard covers the Occupy movement for Salon. A British-born, Brooklyn-based journalist, she has been covering Occupy Wall Street since before the first sleeping bag was unrolled in Zuccotti Park. One of the first journalists arrested at an Occupy action, she has managed to enrage Andrew Breitbart, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. You can follow her on Twitter (@natashalennard), and email her any Occupy updates/videos/ideas to natasha.lennard@gmail.com

How the news covers Friday the 13th

Anchors try to put a friendly spin on the year's worst holiday -- and just end up embarrassing themselves

  • more
    • All Share Services

How the news covers Friday the 13thFriday the 13th on the news.

Friday the 13th is the one time of the year that everyone gets together, renounces their religions, and starts believing entirely in the power of luck for a day. It’s true! Superstition trumps common sense on the 13th, and as someone who once got fired and evicted on one of these days, I’m more of a believer in its power than anyone. Still, I know how ridiculous it sounds to be scared of a day because of bad mojo. That’s why it’s always funny to watch news anchors try to cover Friday the 13th. Is it a holiday? Should they make fun of it? (Or is that just tempting the bad luck gods?)

We take a look at some of the more egregious examples of stations trying to make this non-story work below.

In 2009, Katie Couric did a short segment on Friggatriskaidekaphobia, a phobia of Friday the 13th, which raises the question: Why do we need a name for something everyone has?

Then this year, Jeff Glor repeated Katie’s segment almost verbatim.

Also in 2009 was the amazing CBS exposé on the Friday the 13th Insane Clown Posse show. One of the most unintentionally funny segments in news history.

Other network news anchors took a different tack, asking if this could mean a bad day for the markets. But first: walking under a ladder!

 ABC  affiliates take a nontraditional route and go out to find some fun stuff to do on this bad luck holiday, because why not?

I’m starting to think the worst part of today is making it through corny TV spots.

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Botox mommy goes on TV to defend giving child cosmetic surgery

It's never too early to start injecting needles into your daughter's face, says crazy woman

  • more
    • All Share Services

Botox mommy goes on TV to defend giving child cosmetic surgeryKerry Campbell says it's safe to inject small daughter with Botox.

The whole spectacle of shows like “Toddlers and Tiaras” is unappealing to me, because it strikes right at that “Celebrity Rehab”/”Hoarders” voyeurism but adds a cherry topping of sad children to the mix. If I wanted to watch innocence lost in real time, I’d go down to a jail and ask to be locked up, because who wants to see that?!

So when the Sun first broke the story of 8-year-old Britney Campbell and the routine Botox injections foisted on her by her pageant mom, I tried not to pay attention. What this little girl needs is less public attention, not more. She also needs Child Protective Services, but somehow none of the media outlets that have jumped to interview Britney’s mom, Kerry (who administers the injections, as well as waxes her daughter’s upper thighs), have bothered to call the authorities.

Next stop on the Campbells’ tour of horrors would be”Good Morning America,” where Kerry today went on with Britney to discuss the controversy as well as defend her decision to put needles full of poison into her daughter’s face to “get rid of the lines.”

Man, calm down, everyone! What’s the big deal? This all seems totally safe and legitimate: The mom does it to herself (she’s a part-time aesthetician so it’s kosher) and she gets the Botox to inject into her child’s head through an unnamed source who is “behind the doctor scene.” It’s all on the up-and-up. If anything, Kerry Campbell’s only crime is being too good of a mother.

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Page 1 of 24 in ABC