Joan Walsh

A dozen questions Congress should ask Kenneth Starr

  • more
    • All Share Services

Congress finally gets to interrogate the great interrogator. On Thursday, independent counsel Kenneth Starr will appear before the House Judiciary Committee as it decides whether to pursue an impeachment inquiry against President Clinton.

The committee chairman, Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., has announced his intention to limit questions to Starr. The 37 committee members will be given five minutes each to question the independent counsel about the allegations of bias, leaks, conflicts of interest and collaboration with Clinton’s enemies that have plagued his inquiry from the outset.

As Salon has revealed, Starr pursued his initial investigation into Whitewater with the key assistance of David Hale, a tainted witness who stands accused of taking money and legal help from anti-Clinton activists at the Arkansas Project, a secret $2.4 million project to undermine Clinton financed by Starr’s former patron, Richard Mellon Scaife. When Starr’s Whitewater inquiry went nowhere, he latched onto Paula Jones’ civil suit, and then when that failed, he wired Linda Tripp and finally snared Clinton on adultery. The ties between Starr, Tripp and Jones — which have not been satisfactorily explained — helped the independent counsel create a perjury trap for the president in his Jones deposition that would lead to the impeachment crisis.

To enable committee members to use their five minutes well, Salon has prepared a list of questions that Starr should be asked.

1) What was the nature of your contacts with the Paula Jones legal team prior to your appointment as independent counsel?

2) Did you know that your partner at Kirkland and Ellis, Richard W. Porter, was assisting the Paula Jones legal team?

3) When did your office first learn of allegations of payments to David Hale by conservative political activists?

4) Was your office aware of attempts by David Hale to suborn perjury from his brother Milas regarding Whitewater?

5) Did you ever discuss with your friend and former Justice Department colleague Theodore Olson the Arkansas Project and/or David Hale?

6) What steps did your office take to maintain the independence of special investigator Michael Shaheen to investigate David Hale?

7) Did you or your office ever inform the attorney general, or the three-judge panel that appointed you, of the ties between you or your law firm and the Paula Jones legal team?

8) How and when did you learn of the existence of Linda Tripp’s tapes?

9) Why has your office refused to disclose the salaries and other compensation paid to you and your prosecutors?

10) What steps are you taking to accommodate the special master investigating potentially illegal leaks by your office to the media?

11) In a letter to Steven Brill, editor of Brill’s Content, you denied your prosecutors ever suggested Monica Lewinsky wear a wire and secretly record conversations with Vernon Jordan and the president. But Lewinsky testified to the grand jury that your office indeed made that demand. Who is telling the truth?

12) Having now served as independent counsel, would you favor reauthorization of the independent counsel statute? And would you like to see changes to the statute?

- – - – - – - – - -

Here is a fact sheet of what every American citizen should know about Kenneth Starr and his probe.

1) After successful lobbying by staunch conservatives such as North Carolina Sen. Lauch Faircloth, a three-judge panel dominated by Republicans replaced moderate Whitewater prosecutor Robert Fiske with Kenneth Starr in August 1994. Starr, former chief of staff to Reagan Attorney General William French Smith and a member of an ambitious circle of activist conservative attorneys, accepted the job despite the fact that he had opposed the independent counsel law when he was a Reagan official and helped prepare a brief arguing it was unconstitutional, vesting too much power in one unaccountable person.

2) At the time of his appointment as Whitewater independent counsel, Starr, a $1 million-a-year Washington attorney with the high-powered firm of Kirkland & Ellis, was advising the Paula Jones camp on her sexual harassment suit against Clinton and offered to write a friend-of-the-court brief on her behalf. He was also representing the tobacco industry, an ardent foe of the Clinton administration. Later, Iran-contra prosecutor Lawrence Walsh would comment that, considering Starr’s conflicts of interest, he should have felt obligated to turn down the job of investigating Clinton.

3) Starr proceeded to build his Whitewater case against Clinton largely around the testimony of confessed felon David Hale, a corrupt municipal judge and businessman who claimed then-Gov. Clinton had pressured him into making an illegal $300,000 loan to Jim and Susan McDougal, Clinton’s partners in the failed Whitewater real estate deal. Starr’s Whitewater investigators unearthed a formidable amount of evidence casting doubt on Hale’s testimony against Clinton, including the fact that Hale had falsely invoked Clinton’s name on a separate occasion to win a $50,000 kickback from an Alabama health company seeking an Arkansas state contract. But Starr chose to overlook this inconvenient episode in Hale’s past, as well as the fact that his star witness had turned his courthouse into a personal ATM when he served as a municipal judge, taking kickbacks from a private collection agency he had installed to gather fines. A Salon investigation has also revealed that David Hale attempted to get his respected brother Milas, a judge, to falsely corroborate his allegations about Clinton’s role in the Whitewater affair.

4) William Watt, another former municipal judge implicated in the Whitewater scheme, was used by Starr to corroborate Hale’s testimony during the trial of the McDougals and Gov. Jim Guy Tucker. But Watt would later tell Salon that Starr’s investigators ignored exculpatory information he provided them about Clinton and tried to pressure him into telling a more incriminating story about Clinton: “I was told they didn’t like the truth the way that I told it. I had my truth and they had their truth and I was told that they liked their truth better.” Watt also told Salon that he regarded Hale as someone who would “lie and manipulate people. He was a pathological liar.”

5) David Hale, while cooperating with Starr as his chief Whitewater witness from 1994 to 1996, would sometimes stay rent-free at a fishing resort in Hot Springs, Ark., owned by anti-Clinton activist Parker Dozhier, who passed on secret cash payments to Hale. This charge was made to Salon by Dozhier’s former live-in girlfriend, Caryn Mann, and her teenage son, both of whom have repeated their testimony before a federal grand jury. According to Mann, the money came from conservative attorney Stephen Boynton and David Henderson, vice president of the foundation that owns the conservative American Spectator magazine. Boynton and Henderson oversaw the Arkansas Project, an anti-Clinton muckraking campaign lavishly funded by right-wing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, who funneled his contributions through the Spectator.

6) “We’re convinced that none of our people had any knowledge of any such [Arkansas Project] payments [to Hale],” asserted Starr’s chief Arkansas deputy, W. Hickman Ewing Jr. But the first meeting of the Arkansas Project took place in the Washington law offices of Theodore Olson, a friend, political ally and former colleague of Starr’s, whose relationship dated back to their days as young activist conservatives in the Reagan Justice Department. Olson and Starr were also both beneficiaries of Richard Mellon Scaife’s politically inspired generosity. Starr was scheduled to take a Scaife-funded deanship at Pepperdine University until controversy about his connections to Scaife forced him to resign the post. Olson has served on the board and as the attorney of the Scaife-funded American Spectator as well as on the advisory boards of four other right-wing institutions funded by Scaife. Referring to Olson’s oversight role on the Arkansas Project, one source told Salon, “Olson is somebody who Scaife would trust to see that nothing went wrong and that his money would not be wasted.”

Like Starr, Olson worked on the Paula Jones case. Last year, when Jones challenged Clinton’s claim of immunity from civil suits while in office, Olson, together with Robert Bork, held a moot court to prepare Jones’ lawyers for their successful argument before the Supreme Court.

7) Olson — who, along with his wife, Barbara, is often called upon by the press to defend their friend Starr — also represented David Hale when he was called to testify before the Senate Whitewater Committee. Later, Hale lied under oath about how he came to retain Olson while testifying at the trial of Tucker and the McDougals. Two sources told Salon that by lying Hale was trying to conceal his connection to the Arkansas Project. It was the project’s Stephen Boynton and David Henderson who put Hale in touch with Olson. (Olson’s Arkansas Project connection is never mentioned when the New York Times and other media outlets call on him for comment about Starr’s investigation of the president.)

8) While Hale was cooperating with Starr’s Whitewater case, the independent counsel aggressively protected the man he called “a model witness,” despite all evidence that Hale was anything but. Starr and his deputies tried to stop an insurance fraud case brought against Hale by Arkansas prosecutors, who charged that Starr’s office tried to intimidate them into dropping the case. The trial, which Starr succeeded in delaying but not stopping, will now begin in March. It will certainly cast a further cloud on Starr’s “model witness,” for Hale is charged with bilking poor black clients in rural Arkansas out of their funeral payments.

9) Some of Starr’s deputies were alarmed by the independent counsel’s unquestioning embrace of Hale. They shook their heads in dismay when Starr argued in court for a reduced sentence for “Judge Hale,” as he called him, telling the court, “I have witnessed his contrition. I believe, your honor, that he is genuinely remorseful of his criminal past. I have been impressed with his humble spirit.” Taking issue with Starr, one Whitewater investigator told Salon, “With someone like Hale, you can never let down your guard. You should never get to a point where you begin to trust him.”

10) Starr deputy Hickman Ewing met quietly several times during the course of his Whitewater investigation with Rex Armistead, a private eye hired by the Arkansas Project to dig up dirt on Clinton. Armistead’s investigation focused on allegations that then-Gov. Clinton had protected a cocaine-smuggling ring operating out of the Mena airport in rural Arkansas. The drug charges were examined and rejected by three separate federal investigations.

One Whitewater investigator expressed concern about Ewing’s meetings with the private eye, because of the controversial connection between Starr and Scaife and because not all the meetings were recorded in official files: “This was either the worst case of judgment or something worse.”

11) At a critical juncture in Paula Jones’ long-running legal battle with the president, the Arkansas Project’s Stephen Boynton, David Henderson and Parker Dozhier intervened to find her experienced litigators, just before the statute of limitations on her lawsuit ran out. The suit was successfully revived — and it in turn would later revive Kenneth Starr’s flagging pursuit of the president.

Another connection between the Jones case and the Arkansas Project surfaced when Salon reported that William Lehrfeld, a conservative attorney who has worked for Scaife and who served as legal counsel for the project, contributed $50,000 to Jones’ legal fund from a little-known foundation he ran.

12) In early 1997, Starr’s Whitewater case against Clinton had reached such a dead end that he made an effort to flee his job for the sunny Pepperdine campus in Malibu, Calif. When his attempted escape provoked howls from his political and media supporters, Starr returned grimly to his Whitewater post. But his fortunes would dramatically reverse later in the year when the Jones lawsuit was green-lighted by the Supreme Court — with help from Starr’s friend Olson — and Jones’ lawyers subpoenaed Clinton and a then-obscure former White House intern named Monica Lewinsky.

13) Finally, in recent months, new attention has been given to the previously reported fact that Starr had close ties to the Paula Jones case even while he was seeking to replace Robert Fiske as Whitewater independent counsel in August 1994. Before his appointment, Starr had publicly spoken out against presidential immunity from Jones’ suit and had even prepared an amicus brief for Jones. Starr also consulted directly with Jones’ lawyers about the case, a fact he may not have told Attorney General Janet Reno when he sought approval to extend his probe into the fetid waters of Jones-Lewinsky-Tripp.

Perhaps most important, new documents have revealed that Starr knew much earlier than he told Reno about Linda Tripp’s Monica Lewinsky tapes; and that Tripp herself, not Lewinsky or Clinton, suggested to Lewinsky that she ask Vernon Jordan to help her find a job in exchange for her silence about her affair with the president.

By ensnaring Jordan in the Lewinsky matter, Tripp built the bridge that Starr walked across to move from the Reno-authorized Whitewater probe — where he was investigating whether Jordan helped Clinton pal Webster Hubbell get a job in exchange for his silence about the Whitewater deal — into the unrelated, but much more enticing matter of the Lewinsky affair. The shadowy ties between Starr, Tripp and Jones and their right-wing friends allowed the independent counsel’s office to create the perjury trap for Clinton in his Jones deposition that would result in the current impeachment crisis.

And so the Clinton-Starr drama came full circle. By returning to the Paula Jones civil case that he had counseled before his appointment as Whitewater prosecutor, Kenneth Starr was finally able to get his man. Like Roger Chillingworth, the vengeful moralist who relentlessly pursued the adulterous Hester Prynne and her lover, the Rev. Arthur Dimmesdale, in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter,” Starr branded Clinton with the scarlet “I” — for impeachment.

But this month’s election showed that most Americans have resisted the hysterical anti-Clinton sermonizing. They understand that Starr’s enterprise was a political inquisition from its very birth, and that his marriage of limitless prosecutorial force and political vengeance is a much more dangerous specter than President Clinton’s libido. It’s this sense of decency and balance that will, we hope, save the country from being torn apart over a matter that should never have been dragged into the public arena.

David Talbot

David Talbot is the founder and CEO of Salon.

Murray Waas is a frequent contributor to Salon.

Joan Walsh

Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large.

Jon Stewart wants release of bin Laden photos

"We can only make decisions about war if we see what war actually is"

  • more
    • All Share Services

Jon Stewart wants release of bin Laden photosJon Stewart on Wednesday night's "Daily Show"

In a segment on last night’s “Daily Show,” Jon Stewart argued for the release of graphic photos of Osama bin Laden’s body, which President Obama yesterday announced would remain classified.

“We’ve been fighting this war for nearly ten years … and we’ve seen nearly zero photographic evidence of it,” Stewart said. “We can only make decisions about war if we see what war actually is, and not as a video game where bodies quickly disappear, leaving behind a shiny gold coin.”

Although his argument was serious, Stewart did end on a humorous note: “The White House announced today it officially decided to not release the bin Laden photo. Instead, to keep it a secret, they’re going to airdrop it into an affluent Pakistani suburb, so it won’t be found for years.”

Salon’s Joan Walsh yesterday supported Obama’s decision not to release the death photos, arguing: “There’s absolutely no upside: The lunatic fringe will still doubt the evidence, and gruesome corpse photos run the risk of creating a backlash against bin Laden’s killing that doesn’t exist so far.” You can read her full piece here.

 

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Face/Off
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

 

Continue Reading Close

Emma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich.

From the pundits: The finest speech of Obama’s presidency

Healer-in-chief Barack Obama addressed the nation at the Tucson memorial. Here are a few key reactions

  • more
    • All Share Services

From the pundits: The finest speech of Obama's presidencyPresident Barack Obama speaks at a memorial service for the victims of Saturday's shootings at McKale Center on the University of Arizona campus Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2011, in Tucson, Ariz. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)(Credit: AP)

Speaking to a capacity crowd and reaching a grieving nation, Barack Obama sounded presidential last night at the Tucson memorial service at the University of Arizona. The speech — quickly and popularly identified as the best address Obama’s given since he was elected — ran long compared to those of past presidents like Bill Clinton or George W. Bush in times of national tragedy. But the pundits didn’t seem to mind one bit.

 Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post says Obama sounded like Obama again:

Obama was invested: Unlike some of the Oval office speeches he has delivered where he seemed to be reading the text, Obama was clearly invested in this address — intellectually and emotionally. And, it showed. Obama spoke in the poetry he used so well in his 2008 campaign, not the prose that has, too often for his supporters, defined his presidency. That was especially true when Obama spoke of the Christina Taylor Green, the youngest victim of the tragedy; “I want us to live up to her expectations,” Obama said. “I want our democracy to be as good as she imagined it.”

Cillizza’s colleague at the Post, E.J. Dionne, likens Obama to a preacher:

President Obama spoke Wednesday night as the pastor in chief, not as a politician. His address in Tucson was highly personal, rooted in the biographies of the victims and in scripture, more about the country as a family than about government. It was neither therapeutic nor political and dealt only in passing with the roiling controversies that have divided left from right.

Salon’s editor at large Joan Walsh touts the Americaness of the entire affair, citing a history of imperfection but a commitment to unity:

There it was, folks, Saturday morning and again Wednesday night: our country, as good as it gets. Remember how great it looked and felt and sounded, when things inevitably get ugly again…

Like it or not, that’s American history: we are imperfect, descended from people who took land from Indians and Mexicans and who held slaves, but also from people who fought for equal rights for everyone, and who, over time, managed to create laws and values and customs that (mostly) do that.

Calling the speech “hopeful and positive,” the Atlantic’s James Fallows explains why it succeeded:

The standard comparisons of the past four days have been to Ronald Reagan after the Challenger disaster and Bill Clinton after Oklahoma City. Tonight’s speech matched those as a demonstration of “head of state” presence, and far exceeded them as oratory — while being completely different in tone and nature. They, in retrospect, were mainly — and effectively — designed to note tragic loss. Obama turned this into a celebration — of the people who were killed, of the values they lived by, and of the way their example could bring out the better in all of us and in our country.

The New York Times’ Gail Collins acknowledges the Obama-we’ve-been-waiting-for and asks for more from the president:

Maybe President Obama was saving the magic for a time when we really needed it.

We’ve been complaining for two years about the lack of music and passion in his big speeches. But if he’d moved the country when he was talking about health care or bailing out the auto industry, perhaps his words wouldn’t have been as powerful as they were when he was trying to lift the country up after the tragedy in Tucson.

In case you missed it, here’s the full text of Obama’s speech. And here’s the video:

Correction: A previous verson of this story stated that the speech took place at Arizona State University. The speech in fact took place at the University of Arizona.

Continue Reading Close

Adam Clark Estes blogs the news for Salon. Email him at ace@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @adamclarkestes

Joan Walsh on “Ed Show”: Arizona’s racist law

Salon's editor debates the state's disturbing new immigration policy. Plus, Kelsey Grammer's right-wing network

  • more
    • All Share Services

Editor Joan Walsh made an appearance this afternoon on MSNBC’s “Ed Show,” where she vigorously debated the new Arizona immigration law with Republican strategist John Feehery. She went on to talk about Rahm Emanuel’s mayoral hopes and Kelsey Grammer’s right-wing TV channel, which launches this summer. Check out the clip below.

 

 

“Daily Show” on blame game — and O’Reilly’s meltdown

Stewart on Rush, Beck, Olber-Math-dow, and our favorite late-night crazy person

  • more
    • All Share Services

“The Daily Show” waded into to the media blame game over recent acts of political violence last night, focusing on Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Olber-Matth-dow. He also took a fond look at Bill O’Reilly’s recent antics during his interview with Joan Walsh. Check it out. Also, check out this fine submission to our Remix O’Reilly contest. And submit your own!

Continue Reading Close
Kerry Lauerman

Kerry Lauerman is Salon's Editor in Chief. Follow him on Twitter: @kerrylauerman.

Fox’s Wallace: Armey insult “pretty funny”

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and radio host Mike Gallagher laugh about Dick Armey's attack on Salon editor in chief Joan Walsh.

  • more
    • All Share Services

At least a couple of people think former House Majority Leader Dick Armey’s comments about Salon editor in chief were funny.

If you’re just tuning in, last week, while on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” Armey told Walsh, “I am so damn glad that you could never be my wife, ’cause I surely wouldn’t have to listen to that prattle from you every day.”

Later in the week, Think Progress notes, conservative radio host Mike Gallagher had Fox News’ Chris Wallace on his show, and the two discussed the remark. That conversation culminated with this exchange:

GALLAGHER: Now, now, feminists are very angry that he said, “I’m glad you couldn’t be my wife.” I mean …

WALLACE: It’s pretty funny actually.

GALLAGHER: It’s hysterical. Do you know how many times a week I say, “thank God I don’t have to wake up next to her.” I mean some of these callers, these shrews that call.

Audio of the discussion is below.

Update: The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz had a very different take on the incident. Sunday, on “Reliable Sources,” his CNN show, Kurtz said, “Well, you know, it was really one step above, ‘Joan, you ignorant slut.’ And it bothers me that nobody pays a penalty for this. I’m sure he’ll be back on all the shows within a week or two.”

Continue Reading Close

Alex Koppelman is a staff writer for Salon.

Page 1 of 6 in Joan Walsh