Cracks in the bipartisan fa
As House Republicans tried to depict their impeachment vendetta as a brave civil rights struggle, the important action was all taking place off-camera.
Topics: Bill Clinton, Arlen Specter, D-Pa., Susan M. Collins, Jeff Sessions, Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine, News
If you missed Day 1 of the impeachment trial proceedings, don’t worry. The House Republican managers’ presentation offered little new or unexpected for anyone who is remotely familiar with the case against President Clinton. Network coverage began to drop off early, which made sense, because the real action was all taking place off-camera.
There were a few notable exercises in hyperbole. Recognizing the profound unpopularity of the impeachment proceedings, especially among women and minorities, Republicans are now going to great lengths to remind Americans that the Monica Lewinsky mess grew out of the president’s alleged efforts to obstruct a federal civil rights case — and that’s Civil Rights, with a capital C and R. To hear Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R.-Wisc., defend the House case, you might have thought Clinton was on trial for bringing back Jim Crow, not lying about a sexual liaison with an office subordinate. After recounting the civil rights gains of this century, Sensenbrenner told senators “it’s not time to abandon” the country’s heroic struggle for civil rights. He challenged them to follow in the footsteps of those “who achieved equal rights for all Americans during the 1960s in Congress, in the courts and on the streets and in the buses and at the lunch counters.”
But besides Sensenbrenner’s amusing performance, there was almost no reason to watch the proceedings. They provided little clue to the only real question at issue: When will the acclaimed bipartisan agreement on trial proceedings last Friday break down? The truly significant event of recent days — and the one that points to the direction of the rest of the proceedings — was Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott’s decision earlier this week to sidestep the original agreement by coordinating with House Republicans on the issue of witnesses.
In a move that many Senate Democrats see as a violation of the bipartisan agreement, Lott appointed a three-man committee made up only of Republican senators to coordinate standards for deciding how and when witnesses should be called. The committee is made up of Jon Kyl of Arizona, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Jeff Sessions of Alabama — each of whom have publicly called for a trial with witnesses. Senate Democrats were later invited to join the committee — as was the White House — but both declined. Both sides may argue over who is to blame, but the important point is that both sides have parted ways.
Joshua Micah Marshall, a Salon contributing writer, writes Talking Points Memo. More Joshua Micah Marshall.




Comments
0 Comments