Henry Louis Gates, Jr.
Letters to the Editor
It's easier to dope kids up than to deal with their problems; blame the system, not Henry Louis Gates.
Johnny get your pills
BY ROB WATERS
(06/17/99)
A disturbing but interesting article. I am an attorney in a small town in
Ohio and a lot of my practice involves domestic custody cases and juvenile
court cases. In the juvenile court cases, at least a third of the kids I
deal with are medicated, and I don’t think I can remember even one kid who has
been medicated that isn’t taking a least two different medications. The
worst I’ve seen is a kid who at one point was on incredibly high doses of
eight meds. The kids usually see the prescribing doctor once every three or four
months; they are usually poor, and their parents are always overwhelmed by
the kids and their problems.
What is going on is a fear of these kids and, in most of the cases, a refusal to deal with their
real problems with more expensive talk theories. We give them some dope and stick them away.
It’s strange and quite scary: Kids who do the kinds of things I did when I was in
school (in the ’50s and ’60s) are considered “disturbed” and in need of
some very serious mind-altering medication; but if they drink beer or smoke
dope, they are criminals.
– Ronald C. Couch
Waters does readers a disservice by
continually intermingling the use of stimulant medications such as Ritalin
with antidepressants. Ritalin has been studied for more than 30 years, and has never shown any
significant long-term problems. A recent study found it was most likely
underprescribed rather than overprescribed. Attention deficit hyperactive
disorder, while sometimes found with depression, is a completely different
disorder and it makes little sense to try to focus on both at once.
– Patricia Saperstein
The only thing the recent school shooters have in common — aside from being male and
young — was the fact that they were all prescribed medication:
- Shawn Cooper, Ritalin, blasted shotgun inside school.
- Eric Harris, Luvox, Columbine H.S.
- T.J. Solomon, Ritalin, shot six of his schoolmates.
- Kip Kinkel, Ritalin and Prozac, blasted parents and killed two at his
school — and wounded 22.
Maybe psychiatrist Harold Koplewicz, director of New York
University’s Child Study Center (obviously an advocate for medicating
children) should get into counseling himself.
– Jeffrey Abelson
New York
I am 19, and I have been taking some sort of mood medication, on and off,
since I was 8. I believe that taking Ritalin at an early age has
partially caused my ongoing sleep disorders. Diagnosed with ADD (as it was
then called), I “grew out of it” at about 10 and stopped taking Ritalin. At 13, when I was besieged with depression, a psychiatrist put me on Prozac after
talking to me for 10 minutes. But without a mood stabilizer, I became
manic. In one horrifying instance, I was put on Halidol to control
delusions, and I shook so hard I frightened my schoolmates.
Managed care is the scourge of modern medicine. Neurology, especially children’s neurology, is little understood, as
are the ramifications of mind-altering drugs, but self-absorbed yuppie
parents would rather dope up their kids than address their family problems.
– Lillie Wade
The making of Henry Louis Gates, CEO
BY CRAIG OFFMAN
(06/16/99)
Having worked both as an academic and a manager at the Encyclopaedia
Britannica, I find that Craig Offman’s piece rings very true. Unfortunately, the situation he describes is
characteristic of the way multimedia encyclopedias are produced.
Encyclopedias have always been deeply commercial ventures disguised in
academic garb, and print encyclopedias were often as rushed and
badly managed as Encarta Africana. The digitization of encyclopedias has only
increased that trend; and in a period also characterized by a greater
reliance on outsourcing and temporary labor and greater attention to marketing,
the results have been predictably bad both for people who work on these
projects, and for the products. Usually the devotion of serious writers and
editors, who don’t want their names to be associated with shoddy work and are
willing to put in the overtime necessary to do the job right, is the only
thing that keeps this work on track. Good products can come out of these
efforts, but despite the system, not because of it.
It also comes as no surprise that this style of content production should
find its way into the university. Academia has long benefited from skilled,
underpaid labor in the form of graduate students; more recently, it has
subsidized faculty superstars with underpaid adjuncts. (It’s no coincidence
that the superstar system was built in the same decade that saw the explosion
of adjunct teaching.) Now corporate alliances with universities are giving
profit-making ventures access to that pool of talent, but what those on the
shop floor will gain from this brave new world is unclear. In simpler times,
their low pay was made up for (at least in principle) by career-advancing
training in new research techniques, mentorship or co-authorship on scholarly
papers. Whether they’ll be able to benefit from future efforts to commoditize
their intellectual labor — when universities and “dot coms” begin turning
leveraging Web sites into money-making ventures in distance learning, for
example — remains to be seen.
– Alex Pang
Project Manager, SiliconBase
Stanford University
Stanford, Calif.
Offman writes, “In today’s university, academics in the science and technology
departments can easily turn a profit from their intellectual work. With
the help of a technology licensing office on campus, an academic can
become an entrepreneur, often collaborating with a company to distribute
his or her invention/discovery in the form of a marketable product.”
Offman doesn’t cite any examples or other support for the facile argument he makes here — probably because he is entirely wrong. Employees of a university sign a contract with the university, giving the rights to all inventions and other intellectual property to the university. So academics, especially in the humanities, aren’t making any money. Why would they have to rely on corporations for support if they did?
Offman implicitly condemns academics for being remote with his
repeated use of the term “ivory tower,” yet he also condemns Gates’
very public dissemination of knowledge. I wonder if Offman has ever
read any of Gates’ work, which is highly accessible and interesting,
not at all the stuff of the “ivory tower.”
If this Web page is supposed to encourage people to think, why does it use
such superficial, ranting rhetoric? Why not offer facts and analytic tools
rather than cheap and obvious rhetorical strategies?
– Amy Vondrak
Syracuse, N.Y.
Nothing Personal: No pierced nostril for Barbie
BY AMY REITER
(06/16/99)
Exactly how is Sen. Inhofe responsible for the private, unauthorized
behavior of some of his staffers? How does their behavior make him a
hypocrite? If he hires a homosexual, does that make him a hypocrite also?
According to that view, he must avoid hiring homosexuals in order to be moral.
Actually, we all know why this is being publicized. This story is being
used as a club in order to beat Inhofe by those who disagree with him politically — nothing more.
– Paul Osborn
Nothing Personal: The nearly nekkid netrepreneur
BY AMY REITER
(06/17/99)
Regarding the “Look out! He’s got a fish!” item: One thing which I think we can all agree is really funny is a man assaulting his partner. It’s pretty funny when he just uses his fists, but when, in his rage, he gets all inventive — well, that’s for sure going the extra
mile. The thing that made this so incredibly hilarious was the way it was
accompanied by stories about the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Nancy
Richards-Akers at the hands of abusive partners. Genius!
Today’s Salon was a class act all the way.
– Melissa Curley
Drunk like me
BY STEVE BURGESS
(06/16/99)
In Burgess’ last paragraph, he goes badly astray. Jack Trimpey’s “venom” toward AA is by no means misplaced. Thanks to Alcoholics Anonymous, countless people have been led
down a destructive path whereby their chances for recovery are chained to an
arbitrary process that forces them to think about booze constantly.
For example: On the rare occasion I feel tempted to drink, I merely swat the idea
away like an annoying fly. A member of AA, on the other hand, must go
through an unnecessarily drawn-out process of running the steps through
their mind, gnashing their teeth as they wait to get to a private phone, get
to such a phone and call their sponsor, endure their sponsor’s so-called
wisdom and, finally, run off to a meeting. My method takes about 24 seconds;
AA’s consumes nearly 24 hours. While I’m
sure that Burgess’ experience was more pleasant, mine was more typical:
I faced sanctimonious, smug peer pressure and self-righteous demands that I get
a sponsor and “work the steps”. Thank God for Jack Trimpey (yes, I’m a
Christian, and I still dislike AA) and his egalitarian ideas for rational
recovery.
– Rob Anderson
The great Silicon Valley soap opera
BY JANELLE BROWN
(06/17/99)
Apple did not, in fact, steal the ideas for the Mac from Xerox PARC: They purchased the rights to use them, and they have never denied that PARC is where tools like bit-mapped displays,
mice and GUIs were invented.
– Steve Hull
White voters and Obama’s slide in the polls
What role does race play in who likes the president? A statistical look at when and why his white support slipped
Barack Obama made his name by telling us that there aren’t two separate Americas, black and white, but just one United States. Still, knowing the color of a voter’s skin offers a fair amount of information about how that voter feels about the president. Among white voters, it’s been dropping since this spring. Joan Walsh discusses some of the likely reasons, and some of the possible inflection points, in her blog; here, we’re simply going to look at the numbers, and then look at what was happening in the political world while those numbers were being collected. Using Gallup polling data, the following charts show how President Obama’s approval rating broke down among white, nonwhite, black and Hispanic poll respondents, and how those figures changed as specific key events occurred.
Continue Reading CloseGabriel Winant is a graduate student in American history at Yale. More Gabriel Winant.
The Gates-Crowley public sitcom
While Americans screamed insults at one another, Obama lost two weeks in the effort to pass healthcare reform
U.S. President Barack Obama (R) sits down for a beer with Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates (2nd L), Cambridge, Massachusetts, police Sergeant James Crowley (2nd R) and Vice President Joe Biden in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, July 30, 2009. Only in America: Now that the dust and feathers have settled from the nation’s latest interracial pecking party, professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.’s daughter reveals that she thinks the wicked racist cop Sgt. James Crowley is, like, really hot. Writing in the Daily Beast, Elizabeth Gates, her distinguished father’s confidante and amanuensis during the recent unpleasantries, confides that when they met at the White House “Beer Summit,” the Cambridge cop’s 13-year-old daughter said she’d found aspects of her father’s sudden celebrity unsettling.
Continue Reading CloseArkansas Times columnist Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of "The Hunting of the President" (St. Martin's Press, 2000). You can e-mail Lyons at eugenelyons2@yahoo.com. More Gene Lyons.
The White House and beer diplomacy
President Richard Nixon, left, meeting with Elvis Presley on Dec. 21, 1970, in Washington. Today, President Obama is scheduled to engage in a little beer diplomacy. Cambridge, Massachusetts police Sgt. James Crowley and Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. will join the President at the White House for a beer in order to extinguish the firestorm of controversy that has engulfed all three men since Crowley arrested Gates in front of his own home — and Obama commented that the police “acted stupidly.”
Continue Reading CloseVincent Rossmeier is an editorial assistant at Salon. More Vincent Rossmeier.
Black men, white cops and media mind readers
There's one person to blame for Henry Louis Gates Jr.'s arrest: Henry Louis Gates Jr.
So a Harvard professor who reportedly played the “you don’t know who you’re messing with” card to a cop got an unscheduled ride downtown. Boo hoo hoo. Maybe he learned something. Or would. If he’d get over himself, which appears unlikely. Anyway, when the police come to your door, always step outside. It puts everybody more at ease.
Also, be a regular Joe. They don’t know how many awards you’ve won, and, frankly, they don’t care. Silly misunderstandings are their favorite kind of domestic call. So just answer their questions and they’ll go away. Furthermore, people get arrested in their homes every day. It’s usually the easiest place to find them. If you’ve no experience of the law enforcement world, watch a few episodes of “COPS.” (Programming note: It’s not on PBS.)
Continue Reading CloseArkansas Times columnist Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of "The Hunting of the President" (St. Martin's Press, 2000). You can e-mail Lyons at eugenelyons2@yahoo.com. More Gene Lyons.
Right-wing racism on the rise
Even as a few GOP leaders try to dial back the crazy, Limbaugh and Beck spew hate, claiming Obama is a "racist"
First, credit where it’s due: A few lonely Republican leaders are belatedly trying to clean up the party’s mess of crazy, from the racially tinged character attacks on Sonia Sotomayor to the unhinged rhetoric of the Birthers to the overall vicious and fact-free spew of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. It’s not working yet — Beck’s claiming Obama “has a deep-seated hatred for white people” on Tuesday might be a new low — but at least someone’s trying.
Continue Reading CloseJoan Walsh is Salon's editor at large. More Joan Walsh.
Page 1 of 2 in Henry Louis Gates, Jr.