Kathy Dobie

The unbearable whiteness of being

This year's hate killers are weak, lonely Caucasian men who murder those who have what they don't: A sense of belonging.

  • more
    • All Share Services

I haven’t heard of anyone who spoke to Benjamin Smith during his three-day killing spree that ended in his suicide. As far as I know, he didn’t pick up the phone late at night between killings and say goodbye to Mom or Dad. He didn’t call his ex-girlfriend and say, “It’s all your fault” or “I’m sorry” or something cryptic, a line from a song, perhaps, that we could’ve milked for meaning later.

For three days, Smith cruised in his car alone, a young white man in a light blue Taurus, two handguns at his side. After that first time, he didn’t even get out of the car to shoot. He aimed out the window. He shot without saying a word. He sped away. He appeared an hour later, a day later, in another neighborhood, another city, finding new targets. No notes were left on the bodies, no racist pamphlets mailed to the police, no slogans shouted before pulling the trigger. He was a man with nothing left to say. A young white man. He killed all weekend, out there alone in his blue Taurus, and shot himself that Sunday night.

How many news reports have I read where “Man kills girlfriend and children, then self”? Hundreds, I suppose. I’ve always wondered if they turn the gun on themselves at the end to escape judgment. Or were they suicidal all along and just couldn’t bear to leave her and the kids behind? Couldn’t bear it because they knew that their families would survive fine without them; indeed, they would be happy to see them go.

Who did Benjamin Smith decide to take with him? Not his family, not his girlfriend — she left him over a year ago. A black man walking with his children. A Korean man coming out of church with a group of fellow worshippers. He shot at Orthodox Jews returning from temple and a group of Asian students talking outside their college dormitory. Like the high school killers in Littleton, Colo., Smith went after anyone who believed — in God, in family, in the rightness of their own existence. And anyone who belonged.

When I interviewed white-power skinheads a few years back, they were almost all the children of middle class, suburban families, like Benjamin Smith, like the Littleton boys, like the white supremacists in Sacramento, Calif. accused of murdering a gay couple. To the skinheads I met, being white meant being rootless, causeless, no flag to wave, no people to feel loyal to, no one feeling loyalty to them. “If the race war happened now, whites would lose,” they complained. “Blacks are so close together. They’d be real easy to set off and they’d all stick together but whites wouldn’t.”

They were educated kids, articulate. For all their talk of racial pride, they didn’t seem to like white people much. White meant weak. Greedy. Complacent. Most of all, lonely. They complained bitterly about how materialistic and bloodless white families had become.

Here’s how one skinhead described his parents’ middle-class life and their expectations for him: “It was go to high school, be on the football team, do all the things kids are supposed to do, then go to college, be a doctor, have a couple of kids when you’re 30.” His voice was filled with disgust.

He wanted to be working class. He wanted to be living in another era — the 1930s or ’40s, he thought, “when America was proud.” At 16, he defied his parents and his class and dropped out of school to get married. He had three kids, worked a couple of jobs and he was happy. “I slept in the bed I made. I took care of business,” is how he described it, proudly. Then his wife left him, and took the kids.

Every time I hear about another murderous young white man — Benjamin Smith or the Bible study killer or the Sacramento white supremacists or the Colorado boys who spent their Saturday nights closed inside the garage making bombs — I think of Kundera’s phrase, “the unbearable lightness of being.”

Who do they matter to? What value do they have, these awkward, bookish, lonely, none-too-pretty white boys? Where do they fit in? I doubt anyone feels more white today than these nerdy boys. It’s obviously not a good feeling; they seem afraid of being afraid, of being perceived as weak or nerdy or alone. And that is how they are seen now; they can no more help it than an Asian kid can help being seen as smart.

Beware the lonely white boy. Beware the nerdy ones, the ones without girls and stuck with each other on weekend nights, in the garage, breaking glass, trying to make a party, a tribe out of two. They live in their heads because it’s so unpleasant out here, and in there, they imagine themselves as warriors, wreckers of vengeance. Stephen King’s “Carrie” is now a boy, a white boy. He is in a rage because he’s a bookish, awkward boy and he has been made vulnerable.

When he was 20, Smith joined The World Church of the Creator. He couldn’t have made a worse move — a church without a God, a church that worshipped nothing but its own self, white men believing in … white men. And so, Smith went out and he killed people who went to real churches, real temples, people who believed in something bigger than themselves, people living as if they mattered.

This weekend I went looking through some of the white racist sites on the Internet. One of them was nightmarish. “Is anyone out there?” read the most recent message. “I keep coming here and it looks the same. I posted a message awhile ago but no one’s answered.” All alone in cyberspace, like Bowie’s astronaut, cut off from Ground Control, whirling endlessly. No one to hear you call, no voices coming through. This is the white man’s nightmare, a nightmare he can’t stop tweaking and calling up, shivering in dread all the while.

Last I heard, the skinhead I interviewed, the one who wanted only to raise his own family, had been arrested for murder. And Benjamin Nathaniel Smith died a white man’s death: alone in a car, driving fast, he put a bullet in his head. It was the night of July 4th and his ex-girlfriend told the New York Daily News, “This is his Independence Day from the government, from everything.”

) Pacific News Service

What’s race got to do with it?

Some men behaved badly in Central Park, but others tried to help the women under attack -- and they were black and Latino, too.

  • more
    • All Share Services

“Who knows what I would’ve done?” young men say, their faces clouding over.

By now, everyone knows the story: Right after the Puerto Rican Day parade in New York, dozens of men attacked dozens of women, corralling them one at a time and throwing water on them, pulling their shirts and sometimes their bras and pants off and pushing some onto the ground. Some of the men filmed the attacks, providing all the evidence needed for their own arrests.

The men had come from Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx and New Jersey. They were Latino and African-American. They had come with their video cameras to film some girl flesh. They had come to have a good time.

“I’m glad I wasn’t there,” says a Palestinian-American in my neighborhood, a twentysomething guy who works hard but likes to party, who could’ve been there if he hadn’t had to work.

He seemed anxious about how he would have behaved and even more afraid that he would’ve done nothing wrong but gotten swept up in the arrests anyway, melding fear of the police and fear of his own nature.

Some observers saw the Central Park attack as abuse directed against women. But for others it was also about being a young, nonwhite male in this city, always judged guilty in some profound way. Thus the question “Who knows what I would’ve done if I was there?” contains a deep anxiety: Am I a good man? Can I be?

In an editorial in the New York Daily News, Anne Roiphe wrote that the young men who attacked the women were not on “their own familiar turf but in the heart of a cold stranger, America the successful.”

She went on: “They roved across midtown Manhattan past exclusive clubs and fancy restaurants and co-op apartments that are not within their budget, and somewhere anger joined the mix of emotions that fueled the terrible hour.”

Roiphe is not alone in arguing that the men were moved by deprivation, men on the bottom trying to feel like they were on top of somebody. But that argument assumes we are one, very white world and these young, mostly Puerto Rican and black men from the boroughs are enraged by their inability to enter that world.

Well, it’s not one world, and the white monied class might bore many of these young men to death.

You can only be envious of what you desire. And 20-year-olds look up to glamour — hip-hop artists and basketball stars, record execs, actors, comedians and all those who have made big money and won adulation by seemingly having fun or doing something it seems we could all do if we only tried hard enough, like making music or throwing a ball. Above all else, the young want recognition and a chance for self-expression: Money without those things, quiet money, has no shine.

On the videos, it’s obvious these men felt perfectly at home. Being on “familiar turf” in this case wasn’t any more about your neighborhood than it is for middle-class white folks — it was about looking around and seeing people who look like you. These guys with their video cameras, football jerseys, young strong bodies, tats and piercings, brown faces, high spirits and roused appetites recognized each other, an insta-tribe, made up not from turf but from taste and consumption: Who do you love? What do you buy?

Sometimes when a man rips a shirt off a woman, he’s angry at women, not at class injustice. Sometimes when a man rips a shirt off a woman, grinning as she sobs, he’s having a good time.

Why should we decide that young men who aren’t white might think or feel differently than the rest of us or be any less involved in the daily battle between good and evil — sometimes evil wins out, sometimes good.

Sometimes the explanation for cruelty is hard to live with but is as simple and clear as rain:

Why do you kick the fat boy?

Because you can.

But if the Central Park assailants were mainly black and Latino, so were the men who attempted to help the terrified women. There was a moment of compassion caught on camera that’s as powerful as all the awful moments. When one woman stumbles from the crowd, weeping and trying to hide her bare breasts, three men come up to her, surrounding her but protectively. They make a wall of their backs. They bend low, concern on their faces, trying to talk to her. She’s crying so hard, I don’t think she hears them. One man tries to put something over her shoulders — a towel, a shirt? Another of the men pulls his mesh jersey over his head and hands it to her to wear.

In that way, with their bodies and their clothes, they cover her nakedness. And with their concern, they pull her back into the human family.

Those three men looked like every other young man there, like the attackers: young, male and nonwhite. They had also come for some excitement. They were also in a crowd on a hot summer day.

It’s just not true that, given the right conditions, every person will behave the same way. You can’t say the men in the park behaved the way they did because they’re left out of the American dream or overly influenced by MTV or the way girls behave on spring break or how President Clinton behaves year round or any number of reasons that have been bandied about.

Instead, imagine yourself there in the park that day and then ask what you would’ve done.

The girls were obviously afraid. They all were yelling or crying. There are men who look at a girl stripped and afraid and are exhilarated. And there are men who look at that same girl and more than anything else want to be able to rescue her.

There are people who have a strong sense of injustice and are inflamed by anything so obviously unfair, so simply cruel. And some of those people are men, young men, young black and Puerto Rican men who came to the parade that hot sunny Sunday to party.

) 2000 Pacific News Service

Continue Reading Close