Eleanor Stacy Parker

Bringing 'em back alive

How anesthesiologists keep you from drifting away forever.

  • more
    • All Share Services

My dad used to be a god.

Every day at 5 a.m. he drove downtown to his county Pantheon. There he scrubbed up with the other gods before he took patients for swims in the River Styx. When the surgeon gods finished, he’d carry the patients’ languid bodies back to the sunlight. Only able to see the sutures, they hugged the surgeons, never knowing that my dad was the one who’d been their keeper. If that ever bothered him, he never said so.

My dad used to be an anesthesiologist — the guy who puts you to sleep. Maybe he wasn’t a god, but he was the doctor who made sure you woke up. When a patient goes under general anesthesia, “slumber” is a nice way to put it. When you sleep, you can breathe without a respirator. You can detect when you need more oxygen, and react on your own. You can even wake up on your own.

Not when you go under.

When you go under general anesthesia, the anesthesiologist suspends you between life and death. This may seem a little dramatic, especially since you may only meet these doctors once before surgery, when they come to check your chart, and then again when you’re in the O.R. and the last words you hear are “take long deep breaths.” Perhaps if “ER” were called “OR,” they’d get more P.R. Dr. John Neeld, an Atlanta anesthesiologist and president of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, likened anesthesia to the work of commercial air pilots, where “99 percent of the work is routine — then every now and then it’s terror.”

When I asked my father if he ever felt terror, he said that profound apprehension was just part of the job: “With every patient, no matter how healthy or sick, you always think bad things can happen. It’s because of the unknown.”

Anesthesiologists are there to ensure optimum operating conditions no matter how many unknowns there are. And they must do so for both patient and surgeon. Sometimes a local or regional block will do the trick; only part of the body is anesthetized and the patient doesn’t need to be unconscious. But for more serious or complicated procedures, when there’s no other choice than general anesthesia. the anesthesiologist must do much to keep both you and the surgeons comfortable.

At first he’ll give you a sedative just to relax you. Once you’re in the O.R. and surgery is about to start, the anesthesiologist will give you drugs that facilitate both amnesia and pain-relief. He also administers muscle relaxants to induce paralysis, so the surgeons can do their intricate repairs without fear of limbs moving. To get the general anesthesia started you are given an anesthetic agent — like sodium pentothal — intravenously. (This is what used to be known as “truth serum” but has never been proven to have that special power.) Then the anesthesiologist add inhalation agents like nitrous oxide and Forane to keep you under. And to relieve your anxiety, you’re given sedatives like Versed or Valium.

But anesthesiologists get paid their big bucks for what they do once you’re under: They make sure you don’t die. They connect you to monitors that track your heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation of the blood and carbon dioxide output. (And they know how to fix those machines if one goes kaput mid-surgery.) And they control your airway; they make sure your tongue, once relaxed, doesn’t block your throat. A clear airway can be tricky to maintain during trauma cases when blood from mouth injuries or regurgitated stomach contents threaten to drip down the trachea. Then you’re usually intubated — yes, that scene they have on every episode of “ER” when they stick the plastic tube down the throat and there’s always some anxiety about being “in.” This is because if they accidentally stick it down your esophagus, oxygen pumped to your stomach isn’t going to reach your lungs. Once successfully intubated, you’re connected to a respirator.

Why do you need a machine to breathe for you, especially for a relatively simple procedure? The drugs used to keep you ignorant and numb are incredibly potent and tend to depress the respiratory system. If our body senses we aren’t getting enough oxygen, we take quicker breaths. But some drugs alter that system, and the body is unable to respond to insufficient oxygen levels. And sometimes the surgery itself calls for paralysis of the diaphragm. If the procedure takes place nearby, the muscle will never relax enough on its own not to be a threat to the procedure. The anesthesiologist will use a neuromuscular blocking agent to keep the diaphragm relaxed. So, once you’re under the general anesthetic, if for some reason the respirator malfunctions or the oxygen tank runs low and nobody notices, it’s a problem.

When it comes to oxygen intake, there’s little room for error — it only takes five minutes before your brain will die, though other organs can go a little longer without oxygen. So if you’re entering hour five of a seven-hour surgery, and the surgeon is engrossed in his cutting and sewing, and the nurses are busy sucking up blood, and the anesthesiologist is distracted, it’s easy to see how five minutes could slip away before someone notices that the oxygen tank has run low or the respirator has malfunctioned. Luckily, the monitoring technology is now so highly developed that these “oops” scenarios are exceedingly rare.

Dr. Keith Ruskin, a professor of anesthesiology at the Yale University School of Medicine, attributes the dramatic improvements of anesthesia safety over the last few years to the increasing sophistication of monitors. Two monitors found in every American operating room are the pulse oximeter, which measures oxygen levels in the blood, and the capnogram, which measures carbon dioxide output. During surgery, if either machine becomes incapacitated or measures a considerable drop in output, it emits piercing beeps that I’ve been assured are impossible to ignore. It’s getting harder and harder to die accidentally on the table.

Patients may fear death, but an equally strong anxiety is waking up mid-surgery. Current research shows that only two out of every 1,000 general anesthesia patients experience any consciousness during their operation. That could just mean they retained some memory of the doctors’ conversation — not that they necessarily felt or remembered pain. And the number of general anesthesia patients who develop any psychological problems because of their experience — such as insomnia, nightmares or anxiety — is about two out of every 100,000.
(According to Ruskin, those numbers can be misleading because they group the young and healthy. who generally have minimal complications, with the gravely ill, whose medical states preclude the anesthesiologist from using the amnesia-inducing drugs.)

For most patients, general anesthesia is just an in-and-out experience. “It was like being there, then not being there,” recalls Bob Jenkins, a 45-year-old engineer who had his appendix removed. “Really, it was just like being asleep.” Gloria Nixon-John, 53, a Detroit-area teacher, found her general anesthesia experiences to be smooth, except for the nausea she felt afterwards. For one surgery she even asked her anesthesiologist to go lightly on the anesthetics, because she didn’t want to be “out of control” completely. Now she remembers her doctors “talking and joking around.” But she found the levity to be comforting. Also comforting are her memories of the music they played in the O.R., including Simon and Garfunkel’s “Bridge Over Troubled Water.” She says she finds herself humming the song whenever she feels “threatened,” as if feeling a reassuring connection to her body’s previous trial and triumph. Not all recall or awareness has to be traumatic.

The problem with awareness reports is that they often have more to do with a patient’s misunderstanding than a doctor’s miscalculation. Sometimes patients think they’ve been fully knocked out when they’ve only been heavily sedated. Dr. Becky Welch, an Orlando, Fla., anesthesiologist, says heavy sedation by itself does not guarantee amnesia; a patient may still have recall. But if the patient’s doctor never explains the difference between heavy sedation and general anesthesia, the patient may have a memory he mistakenly thinks is from his time under general anesthesia.

With all of the potential emergencies anesthesiologists have to be prepared for, is theirs the most difficult job in the O.R.? No doctor I spoke with would go so far. But all agreed it’s stressful. “But a different kind of stressful,” says Ruskin. “The problem is that most of the time, everything goes fine, [but] when something goes wrong, it usually goes very wrong, very quickly.”

For Welch, that terror can come when patients don’t answer all their doctor’s questions. “The biggest problem will arise [when patients are not] thorough in revealing their medical history.” She says the use of illicit drugs can have a “devastating effect during anesthesia” and that doctors need to know beforehand so they can be prepared.

The unknown struck for Welch during a relatively routine case. Recently she cared for a woman in her 30s, perfectly healthy except for the back rods she needed to correct her scoliosis. About two-thirds of the way through the operation, “she began to bleed profusely quite suddenly to the point that it was extremely difficult to replace the blood loss.” Soon she was without blood pressure or pulse, and required CPR with cardiac shock. It took a team of several nurses and other anesthesiologists to finally stabilize her. When asked what she thought about during the crisis, Welch said: “I kept thinking about her young children that may never see their mother again.” They never did learn why the bleeding began. Afterwards, when she saw the patient leave the hospital, she marveled at how “someone who had been so close to death could leave … in such wonderful condition, as if nothing but a routine surgery had taken place.” Doctors try not to worry patients with worst-case scenarios, but shepherding them back from death’s door is often part of their job description.

For all those who worry about not waking up again, the good news is in the numbers. In 1970, the mortality rate was one in 10,000, but now it’s one in 250,000. However, for procedures done in an office (like most plastic surgery), and not a hospital operating room, the mortality rate is one in 5,000. Neeld, of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, attributes this number to increasingly invasive procedures, like liposuction, done without the benefit of an anesthesiologist present. In these cases it is usually the surgeon giving the sedation, and “no one is paying attention” enough to the patient’s breathing and vital signs, or the surgeon has administered inexpert combinations of anesthetics and painkillers. Except in California and New Jersey, office surgeries go virtually unregulated. (In August, a Boyton Beach, Fla., widow settled for more than $1 million over the death of her 51 year-old husband, who died after nine hours of cosmetic surgery; the medical examiner’s office determined the likely cause of his death to be a clumsy mix of anesthetics coupled with a critical shortage of oxygen.)

Often misunderstood, usually under-appreciated, the anesthesiologist doesn’t always get the “thank you” hugs reserved for the surgeon. I asked my father what he thought of my deity language. His frowning response: “No anesthesiologist I worked with ever thought of themselves as a god.” Then he said, “It’s a myth propagated by the laity.” So in my best devil’s advocate voice I responded, “What about surgeons?” His diplomatic skills gleamed as he paused, contemplated, then replied: “Well … everyone needs a certain level of confidence to do their job well.”

He loves me, he loves me not

Race was never an issue in my life -- until I fell in love.

  • more
    • All Share Services

I just don’t like flat noses.”

I dropped my knife with a clink. I had been smearing my scone with clotted cream, but now I wanted to take the porcelain tub of the stuff and chuck it at his chest. Here I was, across the table from the man I loved, and he’d just admitted he didn’t want our kids to have African noses. I was dumbfounded.

Our earlier discussions had always been about the big bad societal issues — discrimination, split loyalties, fitting in — and they usually seemed as surmountable as steeplechase shrubs. When the jumps looked too high Id say: “Look, your own half-black, half-German girlfriend has a scholarship at Oxford and a promising future in politics. Life can be good for a mixed kid!” He’d calm down and wed talk about something else.

But his nose declaration silenced me.

While James (not his real name) was always earnest and eager in his desire to have a family with me, he had unwittingly stated what I’d always feared: That in the end, race would count — against me. As I solemnly poured more tea, all I could think of was history’s Tragic Mulatta: The archetype of the mixed-race woman light enough to “pass,” but always rejected once her dark heritage was discovered.

The more we talked family, the more he sounded like a lost Faulkner character obsessed with poisoned bloodlines. It was as if he saw my genes as a ticking time bomb waiting to explode negroidness. He’d already told me stories of white couples giving birth to black babies (because of the sins of an errant ancestor) — stories that annoyed me because they smacked of cautionary tales. While this wasn’t Oxford, Miss., it was Oxford, England. Was he now speaking for his Empire past, giving voice to the collective fear that settler genes would be overrun by those of the natives?

Only the anthropologists know for sure, since James and I have long since broken up and no longer discuss such issues. As patently ridiculous as I found his concerns, I soon worried. Was there any legitimacy whatsoever to his fears? I wondered if “difference” ever undermined a parents ability to love, or be loved.

Im not the only one. My friends Bessie and Joel — she a 29-year-old Texas Cajun, he a 32-year-old black D.C. native — are a striking couple, one that would attract gazes even in a hate-free world. Day to day they survive the usual frictions, from the requisite stares in restaurants to the hurts of family disapproval.

One day I talked to Bessie, who expressed fears about one day having children with Joel. She told me about the time they were driving home and a group of black women pulled up and motioned for Joel to roll down the window. “They started yelling at him,” Bessie remembered, “asking him why he was turning his back on black women.” After that, Bessie became more hesitant about kids. “I didn’t know if I wanted to put them through this type of situation,” she said.

And she wondered if she would always fit into her children’s lives. As a white mom, she worried that one day her kids would “turn their backs” on her. She assumed that her kids would look more black than Cajun, and that a “black” identity would be automatically foisted upon them by society. She worried about the price of acceptance into the black community.

Would they be forced to forsake her as their mother, as if renouncing their matrilineal line could cleanse them of alien whiteness? This angst was only aggravated by what she saw as a black backlash against Tiger Woods. “I became scared,” she said, “when [he] said that he wasn’t black and there was a huge outcry from the black community.”

The more I listened to her worries, the more I wanted to answer her back. I wanted to say, “Hey, I was that kid! I had a white mother and a black father and it’s OK!” I wanted to tell her that I could never turn my back on my mom because she’s my rock, and that my mom can’t help but see herself in my face because her DNA blitzkrieged itself through my genes. While I know that my experience growing up was unique, I wanted to show her that it didn’t have to be unmitigated trauma.

I was different — no question about it. But it was a good thing. We were in Detroit, and, to be blunt, I was a golden girl in a chocolate city. To the adoring brown faces of family and strangers, my color and curls seemed precious.

Then, when I was 6, my father died. We soon headed north for the suburbs — where my currency was immediately devalued. My light skin was now seen as dark amid the children of the white working class. Unfortunately, my mom made my displacement worse by shearing my hair. When all the girls wanted Barbie manes, I looked like the beige Orphan Annie.

If I was ridiculed, I’m sure it was for looking like a chubby boy rather than a beige girl. I say beige, because nobody knew I was black. People would guess Indian, Hispanic or Middle Eastern first. My ability to be an ethnic chameleon allowed me to escape easy hits from racists — and allowed me to enjoy a bizarre sort of interloper status as kids shared racist jokes with me.

I remember in third grade watching my best friend pull my sleeve and say “Look, nigger lips!” as she pressed her bottom lip out and curled her pink tongue up against her top lip. Even though the episode was upsetting, I never felt threatened. Even then I knew I was lucky; it wasn’t like I ran gantlets of taunts on the playground, or felt I was in physical danger of any kind.

And unlike other mixed kids, I never felt torn between two cultures. Because in my suburbs, there was only one culture: the hegemonic white one. There were so few nonwhite kids I never felt like I had a choice in alliances. My family never made me choose either. The only black relative who I saw all the time was my grandmother, who was more concerned that I grew up to be a courteous young lady than a conscious black nationalist.

My family was just apolitical, so my new environment and the TV had pretty much free rein on shaping my sensibilities. At the age of 7 I liked AC/DC and slasher flicks; my beauty aesthetics were shaped by the cast of “Dallas.” Thinking Charlene Tilton, I asked the stylist to “feather” my hair. I still remember the bemused look when she told me no way.

Even in my conservative town, high school was good to me. People befriended me, listened to me, nurtured my talents. If kids made fun of me, it probably had more to do with my asymmetric hair and black trench coat than the melanin in my skin.

As opposed to being a hindrance, difference was something I embraced at every turn. Different music, different politics — I was always looking for the other side of the story. Even with my “alternative” persona (before alternative went mainstream), I was elected vice president of my class three years in a row; I went on to become senior class president and was even voted the girl most likely to succeed. From there, I went to Washington to study politics.

But race finally became an issue, in the one venue that mattered to me most: love and romance. I learned early on that all my accolades would never neutralize race when it came to dating white guys. I found it ironic that despite being seen as “most likely to succeed,” some parents still saw me as a drag on their (white) sons’ social and professional prospects.

I can never forget how my boyfriend David’s parents reacted to his relationship with me. (We were 16). “Think of your career,” they pleaded. “Think of your future.” Even though David was West Point bound, his parents assumed he’d someday return and settle in a big house off Main Street and build his life right next to theirs. But he was from Up North, and in Gaylord, wedding-cake brides didn’t come in beige. They worried he’d be shunned professionally, and in a small town, you could only alienate so many people before you were nonviable as a businessperson.

I don’t think he meant to hurt me with his parents’ opinions, but I could tell he was buying some of it and that was enough for me to break things off (and to make him persona non grata in my home). Once he entered school, where his worldview was no doubt radically broadened, he tried to resume correspondence. But by then, I’d moved on.

Obviously my experiences are unique, and in no way do I mean to discount the pains of the mixed-kid life. But I do think that mulattas don’t have to be tragic anymore. The only insurmountable problem for a mixed kid, I think, is the inability of her parents to love her because of her “difference.”

I asked my mom if she had ever worried about my “foreignness.” She scowled and said, “I was more worried about how I was going to feed you.” I wasn’t satisfied. “C’mon, not even a little worried?” She ironed some more and then blurted, “It wasn’t like I didn’t have choices!” Her allusion to abortion shut me right up, and then she added quickly: “You were my child, it didn’t matter. I would have loved you if you were green.”

To some, this epiphany will seem anti-climactic, like something I should have known in my bones. Others will still doubt. But now I finally know that a child doesnt have to be a clone of her parents to be an object of love. Just like I knew that a parent doesnt have to be a facsimile of the child to qualify for her love. Love may not conquer cruel streaks, self-absorption and/or long-distance telephone bills (apologies, James), but it can easily conquer cosmetic difference.

Continue Reading Close