Salon Home
Topic

Silicon Valley

Monday, Oct 25, 1999 4:00 PM UTC1999-10-25T16:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Welcome back, Lewis

"The New New Thing" author once said J-school ate his brain. Guess where he's teaching now.

Welcome back, Lewis

“C’mon,” said the other professor, “tell us your nut graph.” I gave up and dropped the pad. “What’s a nut graph?” I asked. “He doesn’t know what a nut graph is!” someone shouted. The adjunct professor took pity. He tried again, gently. “In the article you are writing about the school,” he said. “What’s your null hypothesis?” My null hypothesis? My null hypothesis! My angle. My bias. My take. My … point … of … view! “My null hypothesis,” I said, “is that the Columbia Journalism School is all bullshit.” They paused. “That’s a good null hypothesis,” said one.
– From “J-School Ate My Brain” by Michael Lewis, New Republic, April 19, 1993.

Oct. 25, 1999 | Six years ago I was holed up in Santa Barbara, Calif., recovering from a year-long Central American surf tour and slowly reentering life via journalism poverty. Hoping to vault into the upper echelons of the Fourth Estate, I pondered taking a masters degree in journalism. But my visions of J-school were dashed upon reading a New Republic article by a rising media star named Michael Lewis. (Yes, the same Michael Lewis who wrote “Liar’s Poker,” the bestselling exposi of 1980s Wall Street.) According to “J-School Ate My Brain,” CSJ was worse than useless and the concept of J-school in general was highly suspect.

Continue Reading

Alex Salkever is a surfer and writer living in Honolulu.  More Alex Salkever

Thursday, Jan 13, 2011 11:20 PM UTC2011-01-13T23:20:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

IBM’s Watson wins practice round of “Jeopardy!”

Computer, which tech giant calls "profound advance" in artificial intelligence, beats two former game show champs

Ken Jennings, Brad Rutter

"Jeopardy!" champions Ken Jennings, left, and Brad Rutter, right, look on as an IBM computer called "Watson" beats them to the buzzer to answer a question during a practice round of the "Jeopardy!" quiz show in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., Thursday, Jan. 13, 2011. It's the size of 10 refrigerators, and it swallows encyclopedias whole, but an IBM computer was lacking one thing it needed to battle the greatest champions from the "Jeopardy!" quiz TV show - it couldn't hit a buzzer. But that's been fixed, and on Thursday the hardware and software system named Watson played a competitive practice round against two champions. A "Jeopardy!" show featuring the computer will air in mid-February, 2011. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) (Credit: AP)

The clue: It’s the size of 10 refrigerators, has access to the equivalent of 200 million pages of information and knows how to answer in the form of a question.

The correct response: “What is the computer IBM developed to become a ‘Jeopardy!’ whiz?”

Watson, which IBM claims as a profound advance in artificial intelligence, edged out game-show champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter on Thursday in its first public test, a short practice round ahead of a million-dollar tournament that will be televised next month.

Continue Reading

  More Jim Fitzgerald

  More David R. Martin

Monday, Jan 3, 2011 10:55 PM UTC2011-01-03T22:55:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Goldman Sachs’ Facebook ploy

The investment bank buys, big, into the social network -- and expands a shadow stock market

The “great vampire squid” of finance, Goldman Sachs, has invested $450 million in the emerging great vampire squid of cyberspace, Facebook. As the New York Times’ DealBook reported, the deal is gives Goldman a leg up on the huge fees investment banks will get when the social-networking company eventually sells shares to the public. And as the Times and Wall Street Journal also report, Goldman will also haul in huge fees from those clients who want to invest themselves.

Continue Reading

A longtime participant in the tech and media worlds, Dan Gillmor is director of the Knight Center for Digital Media Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University's Walter Cronkite School of Journalism & Mass Communication. Follow Dan on Twitter: @dangillmor. More about Dan hereMore Dan Gillmor

Friday, Dec 17, 2010 2:18 PM UTC2010-12-17T14:18:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Another big Web company erodes user trust

Yahoo says it'll sell bookmarking service, a reminder that we exist online at other people's whims

Another big Web company erodes user trust

UPDATED

(Please see the note at the bottom of this piece.)

Yahoo says it will try to sell its Web bookmarking service, Delicious. This news, posted on the Delicious blog, comes a day after widespread reports — unchallenged until now by Yahoo — that the company was shuttering the service.

One result of the earlier reports was a frenzied search for a new social bookmarking service to replace what many people, including me, have used over the years to stockpile and organize links to online material we’ve found interesting. A second result was a further hit to Yahoo’s declining reputation.

Continue Reading

A longtime participant in the tech and media worlds, Dan Gillmor is director of the Knight Center for Digital Media Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University's Walter Cronkite School of Journalism & Mass Communication. Follow Dan on Twitter: @dangillmor. More about Dan hereMore Dan Gillmor

Tuesday, Nov 23, 2010 5:40 PM UTC2010-11-23T17:40:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Netflix’s streaming push: Charging more for less

The DVD-rental company moves hard onto the Net, and raises prices for early customers despite slimmer inventory

Netflix pushes streaming

I just downgraded my Netflix account, and will be sending the company $7 less each month than I’ve been sending for several years now. Why? Because Netflix is moving fast to live up to its name — to become an online video-streaming operation instead of the DVD-rental outfit it’s been — but in the process it’s raising prices while making its service worse, in key ways, for longtime customers.

Continue Reading

A longtime participant in the tech and media worlds, Dan Gillmor is director of the Knight Center for Digital Media Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University's Walter Cronkite School of Journalism & Mass Communication. Follow Dan on Twitter: @dangillmor. More about Dan hereMore Dan Gillmor

Wednesday, Sep 29, 2010 6:02 PM UTC2010-09-29T18:02:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Google gives Gmail users more control over inboxes

Now users can choose chronological stacking over threaded messages

Google Inc. is addressing one of the biggest complaints about its free e-mail service by giving people more control over how their inboxes are organized.

The new option announced Wednesday will allow Gmail users to choose whether they prefer their incoming messages stacked in chronological order, instead of having them threaded together as part of the same electronic conversation.

Gmail has been automatically grouping messages by topic or senders since Google rolled out the service six years ago.

But this so-called “conversation view” confused or frustrated many Gmail users who had grown accustomed to seeing all their newest messages at the top of the inbox followed by the older correspondence. After all, that’s how most other e-mail programs work.

Continue Reading

  More Michael Liedtke

Page 1 of 24 in Silicon Valley

Other News