Movies

“Three Kings,” one “Witch” and a “Princess”

Salon Arts & Entertainment's critics pick their favorite movies of 1999.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Michael Sragow

The best movie critic ever to compile year-end lists was James Agee. For his “Movies in 1945″ column in the Nation, he described himself as neither more “hopeful” nor “despondent” than usual — and then went on to cite two dozen good or better movies. The next year, with bracing honesty, he started his roundup with the statement that he was registering the movies he preferred “of the films of 1946 that I saw — I missed a number of likely candidates.”

Of the films of 1999 that I saw — I missed a number of likely candidates — here are the 22 I enjoyed the most. As I sorted them out, they fit together naturally in pairs. And as I assembled them like Noah’s flock, they seemed diverse enough to replenish hope for cinema even after a flood of bloated end-of-the-year releases.

David O. Russell’s “Three Kings” and Michael Mann’s “The Insider”

These films deliver steak and sizzle; their directors are gnarly, instinctive muckrakers working in opposite modes of exposi. Russell operates like a rock ‘n’ roll comedian riffing on the unreported underbelly and aftermath of the Gulf War. Mann is a symphonic narrative composer, turning the real-life plight of a Big Tobacco whistle-blower — and the Big Network news producer who fails to protect him — into a passionate threnody for white-collar man.

David Lynch’s “The Straight Story” and Ron Shelton’s “Play It to the Bone”
Both of these glorious road movies — the first fact-based and lyrical, the second flat-out funny — take roads less traveled. Lynch tracks a 73-year-old man as he rides a 1966 John Deere lawnmower from Iowa to Wisconsin to visit his ailing, estranged brother. Shelton travels from Los Angeles to Las Vegas in a lime-green ’69 Olds with two best-friend boxers (soon to be opponents) and the woman they both adore. Underneath the banter in these films about life’s meaning is the stirring quest of men to achieve redemption by doing one thing right.

Robert Altman’s “Cookie’s Fortune” and Lawrence Kasdan’s “Mumford”

The beauty and the warmth of small-town living — and the pettiness and claustrophobia, too — get fond, incisive treatment in these lovely curlicue comedies. In Altman’s film, Patricia Neal’s luminous performance as a big-hearted woman who tires of existence makes the first section as mysteriously moving as the final section of John Huston’s “The Dead.” In “Mumford,” Kasdan skillfully posits the radical notion that people want plain speaking and kindness from psychotherapy. (And while we’re on small towns, let’s not forget Michael Patrick Jann’s maligned beauty-pageant parody, “Drop Dead Gorgeous,” one of the few entries in this viriti-happy year to use a handheld style with knowing and explosive effect.)

Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut” and Wim Wenders’ “The Buena Vista Social Club”
Honest-to-God “funk” — as in (according to the American Heritage Dictionary) “an earthy quality appreciated in music such as jazz or soul” — returned triumphantly in these movie musicals. The first, a spin-off of the “South Park” TV show, is such a ferocious and apt parody of “story” musicals, from Rodgers and Hammerstein to “Les Miz,” that future generations may regard the title as a play on “South Pacific.” In Wenders’ self-described “musicumentary,” Ry Cooder rounds up extraordinary singers and instrumentalists who in their “son de Cuba” arrive at a jazz-pop-folk hybrid that (as Cooder writes in the liner notes to the original CD) is “very refined and deeply funky.”

“Toy Story 2″ and “Being John Malkovich”
Woody the cowboy doll discovers he once was a huge TV star; Buzz the spaceman action toy comes face to face with a souped-up new model. Most disorienting of all, Malkovich enters a world that is 100 percent Malkovich. The perils of celebrity — and the pull it exerts on our identities and desires — receive devilishly sly treatment both in John Lasseter’s virtuoso cartoon and Spike Jonze’s patchy feature, which heralds the emergence of Charlie Kaufman, a fearlessly inventive screenwriter.

Frangois Girard’s “The Red Violin” and Mike Leigh’s “Topsy-Turvy.”

Musical extravaganzas raised to the level of art. Girard follows a Cremona violin around the world over the course of centuries, while Leigh homes in on Gilbert and Sullivan, D’Oyly Carte and company as they cook up “The Mikado.” In the eyes (and ears) of these directors, the “pure” world of classical music and the “silly” world of humorous operettas are equally fraught with social, sexual and mystical meaning — and heroic achievement and sacrifice.

Hayao Miyazaki’s “Princess Mononoke” and Brad Bird’s “The Iron Giant”

In Miyazaki’s epic cartoon masterpiece, the incursion of ironworks into the spirit-laden wilderness of Japan’s medieval past provokes universal discord — and a torrential outpouring of primordial imagery. In Bird’s engaging animated feature, an iron giant from outer space appears in a small Maine coastal town in the paranoid ’50s. Only a derivative “E.T.” streak mars Bird’s distinctive melding of sentiment and satire, and the Giant himself is a funny-touching-

awesome creation, akin to King Kong.

Udayan Prasad’s “My Son the Fanatic” and Neil Jordan’s “The End of the Affair”

Islamic fundamentalism and Catholicism, respectively, wreak havoc on personal relations — and force anti-heroes to examine their failings — in these fervid expansions of a Hanif Kureishi short story (Kureishi himself wrote the script) and a Graham Greene novel.

Bernardo Bertolucci’s “Besieged” and Joan Chen’s “Xiu Xiu: The Sent Down Girl”

In these piercing, intimate tales, Bertolucci and his “The Last Emperor” star Chen use their cameras as psychic barometers charting the bonds between a displaced young woman and a loving older man. Bertolucci sets his film in contemporary Africa and Italy, taking off from a story by James Lasdun. Chen’s film, based on a story by Gei Lin (who co-wrote the script), grows out of the degradation of city girls “sent down” to the Tibetan steppes during the Cultural Revolution. Along with Prasad’s and Jordan’s work, these are the most exquisite literary adaptations of the year.

Steven Soderbergh’s “The Limey” and Kimberly Peirce’s “Boys Don’t Cry”

Both are terrific tributes to circa-1967 moviemaking. In Soderbergh’s inspired updating of John Boorman’s classic “Point Blank,” images of past and present mingle in a British ex-con’s brain as he stalks L.A. to avenge his daughter’s death. The fractured style evokes the exploratory excitement of the ’60s; the narrative captures the destructive nature of its druggy fallout. Peirce modeled her right-on rendering of the Brandon Teena murder case on real-crime films like Richard Brooks’ “In Cold Blood.” But in capturing the muddled yearnings of the male-impersonating Brandon and his buddies and girlfriends, Pierce goes way beyond Brooks’ movie in sympathetic imagination — and in rough-hewn poetry.

Tim Burton’s “Sleepy Hollow” and Neil Jordan’s “In Dreams”
The year’s best horror movies. Burton’s loose adaptation of Washington Irving has bravura to burn and joins the myth of the Headless Horseman to legends of rural American witchery. Jordan’s bold linkage of paranormal visions and a woman’s maternal feelings makes him the only filmmaker with two worthy 1999 entries (see “The End of the Affair,” above). Each of Jordan’s films soars en route to a rocky finale. Nonetheless, he’s given us more great acts than any other filmmaker on my list.

Stephanie Zacharek

(In no particular order.)

“Three Kings”

David O. Russell makes a small masterpiece about not-so-distant history. That it’s both morally complex and blazingly stylish only makes it that much more of an achievement.

“All About My Mother”
Pedro Almodsvar’s love letter to womanhood, and to motherhood, may be his most beautiful picture yet, and it’s definitely the one whose roots reach the deepest. Even with melodrama, Almodsvar has a light, fleeting touch, like a lover’s caress. And his actresses, including Cecilia Roth and Antonia San Juan, effortlessly unlock the mysterious roles of passion, sadness and intense beauty in everyday life.

“The Insider”
Michael Mann’s drama, based on the true story of Jeffrey Wigand, a tobacco company whistle-blower who got up the guts to appear on “60 Minutes” only to have the segment yanked by CBS, scans like an old-fashioned thriller. But its intensity, built layer upon layer by Mann’s storytelling prowess and by the actors’ terrific performances, sticks with you. Russell Crowe puts you into the skin of a man whose integrity almost destroyed him: That he isn’t completely likable only makes the character more resonant.

“American Pie”
Paul Weitz’s “teen” comedy got to the heart of male-female relationships in a way that few adult movies this year did (particularly Stanley Kubrick’s sodden “Eyes Wide Shut”). If it lives on in infamy for the bit with the pie, so be it: It’s also entertaining, heartfelt and subtly insightful.

“Besieged”
Bernardo Bertolucci’s gentle and lyrical love story about an eccentric concert pianist and his housekeeper probes all the quirks and tics and unexpected qualities of true love. Tender beyond belief.

“South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut” and “Dick”

It’s cheating, but I just couldn’t decide between these two comedies. Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s “South Park,” with its outlandishly conceived musical numbers (not to mention its fart jokes, its fake dicks and its effervescently foul language), is also a surprisingly cohesive piece of filmmaking. And Andrew Fleming’s delightful “Dick” — particularly Dan Hedaya’s portrayal of Richard Nixon — actually made me feel something for the bastard. I was more surprised than anyone.

“Romance”
Catherine Breillat’s controversial and fascinating film may have been largely misunderstood as a chronicle of the dark side of one woman’s sexuality. But the protagonist’s dark side has nothing to do with her adventurousness. It actually thrives on her inability, or unwillingness, to show her lovers who she is. In the end, Breillat shows how genuine honesty — as opposed to the honesty that’s expected — triumphs over game-playing every time. “Romance” really is about romance, but with all the hearts and flowers stripped brutally away.

“The Limey”
Less a revenge thriller than a piece of jagged poetry. Stephen Soderbergh chops up time until you don’t know where, who or what you are. By the last frame, he’s put the story back together so exquisitely that you feel more whole than before. Meanwhile, Terence Stamp runs off with the crown as the most beautiful man on the planet.

“Run Lola Run”

A shout of freedom, blasted directly into the ear of every film purist who scoffs at the use of music-video techniques in filmmaking. As an action picture, Tom Tykwer’s “Run Lola Run” is thrilling and beautifully constructed; but it’s also a love story, one in which confusion and bravery generate their own kind of heat.

“The Straight Story”

In 1994, 73-year-old Alvin Straight drove hundreds of miles on a lawnmower to see his ailing brother. David Lynch tells the story as if he were Bob Dylan: straight and weird at the same time. Simplicity is bliss.

Mary Elizabeth Williams

You know it’s a good year when by Labor Day you’ve already seen more memorable, inspiring and just plain entertaining films than you had by Dec. 31 the previous year. The relative abundance of things to praise, however, didn’t mean that everything enthusiastically embraced could live up to its kudos.
The loss of Stanley Kubrick didn’t make “Eyes Wide Shut” — or the degree of arty-farty fawning that accompanied it — one moment more bearable. “American Beauty” was the most lauded movie of the year, but for me it was just a compendium of shrill, “Look at me, Academy!” performances and embarrassingly predictable plot turns. And “Being John Malkovich” was witty and fresh, but I thought “Drop Dead Gorgeous” was funnier, even though no one else agreed.

Despite a few outbreaks of excessive enthusiasm, however, 1999 was still an exceptional year. Last year was notable for retro glory and big-ticket themes like Elizabethan romance and the horrors of World War II; 1999, in contrast, will be remembered for its audacious, original and defiantly unclassifiable pleasures. If the 10 films on my list have anything in common, it’s that they surprised, provoked and told their stories in startlingly unconventional ways. Taken together, they look like a fine way to end a century — but an even better way to begin a new one.

1) “Rushmore”
OK, so technically it came out in 1998. But you and I and everyone else who fell in love with it probably didn’t discover Wes Anderson’s wry, gentle comedy until it opened wide early this year. A coming-of-age fable that was also a meditation on midlife crisis, “Rushmore” managed to be warmly uncynical without being sappy. It also gave us Max Fisher, the most memorably brilliant, romantic, borderline psycho teenage protagonist since Bud Cort’s suicidal, smitten Harold Chasen.

2) “Election”
As gleefully nasty and blackhearted as “Rushmore” was unabashedly tender, “Election” was the satire that took high school politics and made them as vicious and dirty as any presidential campaign. Matthew Broderick gave a beaten-down schlub of an educator a profound capacity for sabotage, and Reese Witherspoon was the smug teen princess who unleashed his rage. Their brutal rivalry wasn’t pretty, but it was a hell of a lot funnier than anything we’ll get next year from Bush and Gore.

3) “All About My Mother”
Pedro Almodsvar’s best film in years was, according to his own description, an homage to women who act, men who act like women and women who want to become mothers. It was also a celebration of the families we’re born to and the ones we create for ourselves, a story of inexpressible grief and redemptive love. That it featured an assembly of pregnant nuns, drug-addicted actresses and transvestite hookers was both integral and inconsequential.

4) “The Straight Story”
The ominous thud from inside the house. The dreamy, otherworldly score. The almost too perfect landscape and the eccentric cast of characters. This was David Lynch territory all right, but with a major twist. This time there were no severed ears, no girls wrapped in plastic, just a plain-spoken, clean-living American farmer on a lawnmower-powered mission to see his estranged brother. The title character was named Straight, and that’s how Lynch played it, abandoning the gimmickry of his recent films for an earthier touch. And Richard Farnsworth, as Alvin Straight, turned in one of the year’s most nuanced performances as a common man who proved to be anything but.

5) “The Blair Witch Project”
Speaking of overhyped and overpraised … It’s true that “Blair Witch” went from neat little indie chiller to “Enough, already!” in less time than it takes to get lost in the woods. And if I never see another parody involving a girl in a hat and an extreme close-up again, it’ll be too soon. But if you were lucky enough to see the zero-budget, shaky-cam mockumentary before the lines around the block started forming and the backlash kicked in, you might still remember what a truly innovative, clever and seriously scary piece of work it was.

6) “Boys Don’t Cry”
An undeniably horrifying look at small-town violence and phobia, director Kimberly Peirce’s fact-based drama was something else, too: a tender love story and an ode to self-invention. Hillary Swank’s portrait of a woman who picked the wrong place to try to pass as a man was poignant for the character’s stubborn denial of biological circumstance, and Chlok Sevigny accomplished a sweetly complicated performance as a local girl in love enough to believe the illusion.

7) “Buena Vista Social Club”
Director Wim Wenders followed guitar player Ry Cooder and company as they scoured Cuba for the legends of a musical heyday long past. The result was a documentary of lushly beautiful contradictions. The crumbly but glorious splendor of Havana provided the perfect backdrop for musicians stooped by poverty and age but still radiant with a lust for life and a love of song. Gorgeously shot, and brimming with music so lovely and spirited, it didn’t matter if you couldn’t understand a word of it.

8) “Three Kings”
The first Desert Storm-era morality tale was loaded with black comedy, inventive special effects, easy comrades-in-arms chemistry and a skillful mix of high-stakes adventure and soulful humanity. And David O. Russell, best known for “Spanking the Monkey,” proved that it is possible to transition from hip indie guy to big-budget, big-studio director without falling flat.

9) “Run Lola Run”
A woman with flame-colored hair sprints through the streets of Berlin and three possible fates in a frantic quest to save her boyfriend’s neck and make her own story turn out right. “Run Lola Run” could have been just a slick, subtitled amalgam of MTV-style clichis, but this breathless adventure was too busy being busy to ever bog down or bore. Through music, photography, animation and, most of all, the ferocious energy of leading lady Franka Potente, writer/director Tom Tykwer proved that timing is everything.

10) “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut”
Who’d have though that the crudely drawn and just plain crude cutups from cable could deliver such an exuberantly intelligent celebration of free expression, or that they’d do it by stomping so cheerfully on the monolith of animation that is Disney? Any movie that can declare war on Canada, kill off the Baldwins, give Satan a power ballad worthy of Elton John and leave you humming a ditty about shutting your fucking mouth is a movie that will never win an Oscar, never win a Golden Globe and deserves nose-thumbing heaps of accolades.

Charles Taylor

1) “Three Kings”

Shot through with echoes of “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” and “The Wild Bunch,” embracing the humanist cynicism of “M*A*S*H” and boasting the strongest political content of any American film since “Blow Out,” David O. Russell’s Gulf War drama is nonetheless an original, a bloody military vaudeville with the rousing emotional satisfactions of a classic adventure film. Flawless performances from Ice Cube, Mark Wahlberg, Spike Jonze and George Clooney, who may be to the ’90s what William Holden was to the ’50s. From among countless priceless moments: Jonze’s goony-bird G.I. speeding toward the heroism he never wanted in the sedan of his dreams to the strains of Chicago’s “If You Leave Me Now.”

2) “Besieged”

Bernardo Bertolucci’s best film in years, and the one in which he finally cops to the way his thimble-deep Marxism has always been undermined and overwhelmed by his sensuality. There’s a sublime irony in the sight of David Thewlis’ classical pianist listening to John Coltrane’s “My Favorite Things” while taking inventory of the treasures he will sell to obtain the freedom of the African political prisoner married to the housekeeper (Thandie Newton) he has fallen in love with. A rich, beautifully acted parable about the undissolvable divisions between art and politics, East and West, male and female, black and white, Bertolucci’s film is also a lush chamber drama and an unlikely love story. The whole picture seems contained in Thewlis’ hands, which, when they aren’t at the keyboards, dart through the air as if they could pluck from it the poetry he can only express while playing.

3) “All About My Mother”

Pedro Almodsvar finally achieves the maturity his recent films were stumbling toward while rediscovering the flamboyance that made him so enjoyable in the first place. Inviting both laughter and sobs, often at the same time, this melodrama about the power of motherlove begins in territory akin to a Douglas Sirk weeper and winds up closer to a Maria Callas aria. Using color more emotionally than any filmmaker since Jacques Demy, Almodsvar puts candy-bright pop colors in a world where the happiness they denote can seem sadly out of reach.

4) “The Straight Story”

Being the true story of one Alvin Straight, a 73-year-old man who set out to visit the brother he hadn’t talked to in 10 years by driving 300-plus miles from Iowa to Wisconsin on his John Deere lawnmower. Predictably dismissed by some clueless reviewers as David Lynch making nice, “The Straight Story” is at once the most straightforward of the director’s films and as strange and wonderful as anything he has ever made. If the characters don’t fall in the personal infernos that consume the inhabitants of “Blue Velvet and “Twin Peaks,” the love Lynch showed small-town eccentricities in those works is very much present. As Alvin, Richard Farnsworth has a dignity no less immense for being so casual.

5) “The Dreamlife of Angels”

Erick Zonca’s debut film is a mystery story about the forces that draw people together and, bit by bit, pry them apart. Accepting the marginal economic state of his two heroines, and thus the French young, as a given, Zonca explores how people do or don’t hold onto their humanity in perilous circumstances. If Natacha Ringier’s Marie shows how people close themselves off, Ilodie Bouchez’s Isa shows the grace of those who remain heartbreakingly open in the toughest times.

6) “Late August, Early September”

Olivier Assayas’ ensemble drama follows a group of friends in their 30s reaching the age where their youthful idealism is no longer enough to keep them from acknowledging the privations and limitations their choices have entailed. Warm and direct in the way that his films that preceded “Irma Vep” were not, “Late August, Early September” finds Assayas reaching toward becoming a humanist filmmaker who remains true to the spirit of his generation of Parisians.

7) “Dick”

F. Scott Fitzgerald was wrong. There are second acts in American lives: You just have to wait until you’re dead. Reacting against the attempted posthumous rehabilitation of Tricky Dick, director Andrew Fleming’s film, the best American comedy of the year, views Watergate as not some blot on a record of remarkable foreign policy achievement (tell it to the Cambodians) but as the essence of Nixon’s craven, twisted soul. Retelling the story through the eyes of two teenage girls (Kirsten Dunst and Michelle Williams) who accidentally stumble upon the Watergate break-in and become privy to the White House coverup, Fleming has made a comedy about the dawning of contemporary American political cynicism. As Nixon, Dan Hedays turns in a caricature that never softens its subject and still calls up more sympathy than you may be ready to feel.

8) “The Insider”

Michael Mann’s style of filmmaking is glum, portentous and big, and he finally finds a use for it in this riveting, muckraking drama about betrayals of trust, both necessary and unforgivable. Mann wants to make us feel what it is to be up against the institutions that control American life — corporations, media, the courts — and to make us angry about their degree of control. Christopher Plummer’s sly-as-a-cat portrayal of Mike Wallace is delicious; but it doesn’t overshadow Al Pacino’s controlled passion as “60 Minutes” producer Lowell Bregman, or Russell Crowe’s phenomenal, fully lived-in performance as Jeffrey Wigand, the man who blew the whistle on Big Tobacco. No one has gone deeper into the character of the honorable American whose integrity keeps getting him in trouble.

9) “Buena Vista Social Club”

Starting out modestly, Wim Wenders’ documentary is perhaps the most purely joyous movie of the year. A piece of graffiti glimpsed near the end proclaims, “The Revolution Is Eternal!” But with the crumbling signs of Castro’s Cuba evident everywhere, what’s eternal is the shining faces of the film’s once-forgotten musicians playing with more sweetness than you have any right to expect from them.

10) “The Limey”

A meditation on how being out of time can be the hippest move of all. As Wilson, the English con who comes to L.A. to avenge his daughter’s death, Terence Stamp (seen alongside clips of himself 32 years younger in Ken Loach’s “Poor Cow”) is used as an icon of ’60s British cool, while Steven Soderbergh’s direction consciously evokes the fractured modernist style of John Boorman’s 1967 “Point Blank.” But there’s more than style here. Splintering the progression of scenes into shards, Soderbergh captures the way that, for Wilson, past and present are one. And Stamp, alone in his motel room brooding over the daughter lost to Wilson even before she died, shows the mournfulness his bravado hides elsewhere, presaging the tragedy of a man who pursues corruption only to see his hypocrisy staring him in the face.

Honorable Mention: “Romance,” “Run Lola Run,” “Cookie’s Fortune,” “My Son the Fanatic,” “The Matrix,” “Sleepy Hollow,” “American Pie,” “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut.”

Andrew O’Hehir

My primary gig at Salon is to cover major commercial films and, as advertised, this has been an exceptionally good year for Hollywood. So why are two of the first three movies on my list foreign? On the one hand, I could hold forth about the ways that American filmmakers are still not free from the pernicious influence of Alfred Hitchcock: They confuse action with emotion, see appearance as reality and understand storytelling mainly as a trick played on the audience. On the other hand, when I look at my list such protestations ring hollow. One of my highly rated foreign films is a cartoon and the other is a knockabout farce with considerably more action and slapstick humor than, say, “Being John Malkovich.” So let’s can the theories and get on with it.

Full disclosure: No critic sees everything, and there are several movies I haven’t gotten to that might have cracked this list, most notably “Dogma” and “All About My Mother.”

1) “Black Cat, White Cat”
The world shifted its attention away from the Balkans in 1999, but Bosnian filmmaker Emir Kusturica (“Underground,” “When Father Was Away on Business”) abandoned the serious tone of his earlier work for this defiantly ribald, allegorical farce that laughs in the face of death. Here, love is triumphant, the wicked are punished and death itself is revealed to be a temporary inconvenience. There’s more appreciation for life and the possibilities of cinema in “Black Cat, White Cat” than in any other 10 movies made this year.

2) “American Beauty”
I still have misgivings about this bittersweet suburban satire, but it has grown on me since its release, and I’ll take a flawed masterpiece over finely crafted crap any day of the week. Kevin Spacey is of course magnificent in the role of his career as Lester Burnham, facing the mother of all midlife crises, and if his final scene with would-be nymphet Mena Suvari doesn’t bring tears to your eyes, you may not have a heart. If the film’s pseudo-Buddhist spirituality is murky and its “issues” with homosexuality seem unresolved, it’s nonetheless a lovely, haunting and deeply serious exploration of ordinary American life.

3) “Princess Mononoke”
A sweeping, heart-rending epic about the conflict between nature and technology from legendary Japanese animator Hayao Miyazaki, this mythic yarn full of gods and demons, tyrants and rebels blows George Lucas off the map. But despite an exemplary English-language dub featuring the voices of Billy Crudup, Claire Danes, Minnie Driver and Billy Bob Thornton, box-office returns were modest. Maybe moviegoers couldn’t figure out if “Princess Mononoke” was for kids or adults. It’s really one of those rare and powerful animated films that works on different levels for different audiences.

4) “The Insider”
Yes, viewers stayed away in droves. Who wants to see a movie about “60 Minutes” and the tobacco industry? For me (and, I suspect, director Michael Mann), the heart of “The Insider” lies in Russell Crowe’s portrayal of whistle-blower Jeffrey Wigand as a conflicted and uncertain hero who never fully understands his own motivations. Wigand is a lonely man in a lonely country, a crumpled, middle-aged Hamlet who sees something rotten in the state of America. Always a first-rate visual stylist, Mann captures Crowe’s furrowed visage throughout the film in a series of striking, almost surreal tableaux that will stick with you long after Al Pacino’s method ranting has melted away.

5) “The Matrix”
Joseph Campbell, Philip K. Dick and John Woo are loaded for bear in this implausible pastiche that rips off every sci-fi actioner of the last two decades but manages enough wit and originality to be utterly distinctive. Sci-fi geeks spent months parsing the complex narrative, which for once respected the audience’s intelligence and halfway hung together. For the rest of us, it was about Keanu Reeves’ bod, Laurence Fishburne’s unflappable cool and the mind-bending action scenes cooked up by the writer-director team of Andy and Larry Wachowski. Furthermore, “The Matrix” was the first movie of ’99 to tap into the deepening unease surrounding the info-consumption economy. Its vision of the human race as isolated prisoners being force-fed an electronic false reality is, after all, pretty much true.

6) “Three Kings”
At heart, “Three Kings” is a Vietnam movie, right down to the psilocybin visuals and retro soundtrack (yes, letter-writers, I know when and where it’s set). In fact, as I wrote earlier this year, it’s probably the best Vietnam movie since “Apocalypse Now.” George Clooney, Ice Cube and (especially) Mark Wahlberg are outstanding as American soldiers adrift amid the chaos of post-war Iraq who must choose between greed and conscience. We never have much doubt where it’s going, but “Three Kings” is still a memorable adventure loaded with wit, a healthy sense of irony (that’s not the same as cynicism) and spectacular imagery.

7) “The Straight Story”
David Lynch’s minimalist Midwestern meditation on old age and mortality is elegant and bracing, even beautiful, but it didn’t rock me emotionally the way it did some viewers. Maybe that’s my problem: I can’t help feeling that Lynch remains cold to the fate of his characters, even in a movie where nobody winds up in a ditch with their eyes gouged out. On the other hand, he gets a wonderful performance from Richard Farnsworth as the ailing, quixotic Alvin Straight, who rides a lawnmower 300 miles to visit his estranged brother, along with a too-brief supporting role from Sissy Spacek. Veteran English cinematographer Freddie Francis supplies the lovely, leisurely images, and only Lynch could make a G-rated Disney film feel this sad and strange.

8) “Summer of Sam”
Spike Lee’s first non-black-centric film seemed to confuse audiences of all races and did poorly at the box office, but I’m not sure that’s Lee’s problem. Some conservative pundits actually claimed that its focus on a Bronx Italian-American neighborhood over the long, hot summer of 1977 was further proof of Lee’s anti-white racism. (How that’s supposed to work I have no idea.) In retrospect, this ambitious, explosive, frenetically alive film — which tries to bring together the Son of Sam killings, the Reggie Jackson-era Yankees and the birth of punk rock — may seem like Lee’s “Manhattan,” his effort to distill the essence of the city that fuels his art. OK, so his ambition exceeds his grasp, but this is still Lee’s only film of the ’90s good enough or big enough to rival “Do the Right Thing.”

9) “Office Space”
Right around here any Top 10 list becomes almost totally arbitrary, so let’s throw in a wild card. “Beavis and Butt-head” creator Mike Judge’s first live-action feature was doomed by an idiotic marketing campaign that bore no relationship to the movie, a sharp, true and very funny corporate satire set in nowheresville Texas suburbia. Ron Livingston turns in a subtle performance as the affectless software engineer who stages a coup against the long hours, anonymous drudgery and atmosphere of phony equality typical of the ’90s business world. Jennifer Aniston is the stir-crazy mall-restaurant waitress who catches his eye, partly for her refusal to wear “flair” on her uniform (see the movie and you’ll understand).

10) “Three Seasons”
Half neorealism and half romantic fantasy, this debut feature by Vietnamese-American director Tony Bui, almost overcrowded with memorably lovely images, is the first American film to be made in Vietnam. If it wasn’t for Harvey Keitel’s forced and awkward presence as a former G.I. back in Saigon to search for the child he abandoned many years earlier, “Three Seasons” would rate much higher. Its other interlocking Saigon stories — about a cyclo driver in love with a beautiful prostitute, a flower-seller from the countryside who gets to know a dying poet and a street urchin facing total destitution — are handled with impressive maturity and compassion.

Honorable mention: “American Movie,” “Being John Malkovich,” “The Green Mile,” “Jeanne and the Perfect Guy,” “West Beirut.”

Pick of the week: Haunting, gorgeous “Oslo, August 31st”

Pick of the week: "Oslo, August 31st" is a wrenching voyage of discovery in Norway's suddenly trendy capital

  • more
    • All Share Services

Pick of the week: Haunting, gorgeous

“Oslo, August 31st” is, as the title suggests, an evocation of one day in the Norwegian capital, as experienced by a troubled young man who’s facing the end of summer and the end of his youth. It’s a marvelously constructed personal journey, both wrenching and bittersweet, whose emotional ripple effects stay with you for days and weeks afterward. While much of international art cinema can seem overly talky or conceptually alien to American viewers, this second feature film from Norwegian director Joachim Trier is a dynamic, even breathtaking visual experience without much dialogue or any philosophical heavy lifting, following the bony, handsome, exceedingly vulnerable Anders (Anders Danielsen Lie) through coffee shops, nightclubs and bodies of water, en route to an ambiguous final destination.

I saw “Oslo, August 31st” last year at Cannes and found it powerfully affecting, but I never would have guessed that this small movie from a small country would have touched an international nerve the way it apparently has. In the wake of a breathless profile of doctor-turned-actor Lie and his supermodel wife, Iselin Steiro, in the New York Times’ style magazine — which made the film sound rather like a fashion accessory, or a handbook to Oslo architecture — I almost feel the need to dial back expectations a little. Yes, there are drugs and dance clubs and traveling shots but, honest to Pete, we’re not talking stylish, scenic, lovable hipster romp here, people. While “Oslo, August 31st” definitely has the dynamism and street-level energy of, say, an early Godard picture, and may indeed leave you eager to visit Norway, it’s first and foremost an intimate tragedy about a likable young man who has wandered off the path of life into some very dark woods, and isn’t necessarily finding his way back.

As in Trier’s equally wonderful first film, the 2006 “Reprise” — I’m pretty much the president of the cult on that one — the director is interested in exploring the existential dark side of Scandinavian social democracy, with its largely homogeneous character and devotion to equal opportunity. When I talked to Trier about that film, which featured Lie and Espen Klouman-Hoiner as a pair of arrogant, doomed aspiring novelists, he observed that in Norway “there are a lot of people with a lot of choices. It sounds wonderful but there’s a darker side to that. Lots of people are not dealing with those choices very well.” Anders in “Oslo, August 31st” is something like the worst-case outcome for Lie’s character in “Reprise”; he’s a guy from a loving, middle-class family who’s got looks, health, intelligence and education, but for unknowable reasons finds himself on the edge of middle age as a penniless, unemployable, supposedly recovering junkie.

Trier and co-writer Eskil Vogt adapted their central premise from “Le Feu Follet,” a 1930s novella about alcoholism by Pierre Drieu La Rochelle, but “Oslo, August 31st” could really be set anywhere at any time. It’s about the painful necessity of adapting to change, every single day that we’re alive, and if we identify with Anders even as we rage against his despair, it’s because every living human has at some point considered the possibility that it’s just too much and the struggle isn’t worth it. Anders is doing well in drug rehab, and has cautiously been granted a one-day leave to visit Oslo friends and apply for a job. But we can tell from the first moments of the film that his agenda is more complicated than that; Anders is in the position of a certain Danish prince, evaluating the reasons for being against the reasons for ceasing to be. (Trier, by the way, is cousin to another famous Dane, “Melancholia” director Lars von Trier, and one could argue their visions of the world are related as well.)

“Oslo, August 31st” runs a lean, mean 95 minutes, and not one second seems unimportant. Anders moves through the streets of Oslo looking for reasons to live and reasons to die, and even though we don’t know those streets as he does, we can tell that they’re haunted with memories and private agonies. The city is dotted with construction cranes and demolition sites, remorselessly regenerating itself while he appears to stand still. Indeed, Anders’ family home will soon be sold, and one of his personal missions is to pay a final visit. (The fluid, poetic cinematography is by Jakob Ihre.) He insults a prospective employer, refuses to make peace with his alienated sister, falls off the wagon — at first tentatively, and then enthusiastically — and leaves increasingly pathetic messages for his lost love, a woman who’s now in New York. (It’s the voice of Steiro, Lie’s real-life spouse.) On the other hand, he flirts with a younger girl who seems affectionate and charming, and who seems to open for him the promise of a new beginning. Their scene together at an Oslo swimming pool that has just closed for the season, so suggestive of both death and rebirth (and, literally, of baptism) is so gorgeous I wanted to cry. OK, I did cry, and that wasn’t the only time.

But none of that, not even the scenes where we feel that Anders is in imminent danger of taking his own life, are quite as painful as his visit with Thomas (Hans Olav Brenner), an old friend and veteran of long literary discussions and booze-and-drug sessions. Thomas has a wife and a kid now, and his vices involve an occasional bottle of beer. In the manner of one-time bohemians who’ve more or less grown up, he’s kind of an ostentatious jerk about it — but then admits to Anders, when they’re alone, that he’s desperately unhappy. Perhaps that’s the “ordinary unhappiness” Freud wrote about, the unhappiness we all have to accept to get from the last day of August into the first day of September, in Oslo or anywhere else. But is that enough? Is that ever enough, for anybody? And can we forgive those who decide that it isn’t?

“Oslo, August 31st” opens this week at the IFC Center in New York, and June 1 at Laemmle’s Playhouse 7 and Laemmle’s NoHo 7 in Los Angeles, with more cities and DVD release to follow.

Continue Reading Close

“Moonrise Kingdom”: Wes Anderson’s mid-’60s love story

Bruce Willis and Ed Norton are at their best in the rapturous summer fantasy "Moonrise Kingdom"

  • more
    • All Share Services

Tilda Swinton, Bruce Willis and Edward Norton in "Moonrise Kingdom"

All the details of Wes Anderson’s rapturous and hilarious mid-1960s New England summer romance “Moonrise Kingdom,” taken one at a time, are plausible. Indeed they are more than plausible; they’re perfect, from the fitted uniforms and yellow canvas tents of the troop of “Khaki Scouts” headed by cigarette-smoking Edward Norton to the achingly picturesque island home where the brood of children belonging to Bill Murray and Frances McDormand sit around listening to the Leonard Bernstein recording of “A Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra.” (I’m not going to bother questioning whether that record existed in 1965; some production intern probably spent half a day tracking down its history.)

Yet, as usual with an Anderson movie, this meticulous and convincing detail does not add up to realism but — depending on your perspective — to something either much less or much more than that. Something that could be described, and has been, in all kinds of ways: As fantasy or fairytale; as a whimsical miniature under glass; as a diorama created by a brilliant, obsessive-compulsive child. All reasonable descriptions, at least up to a point — and I’m on board for all of it. I’ve pretty much been on Anderson’s wavelength from Day One — or at least from “Rushmore,” which isn’t quite Day One. That’s not the same thing as saying that I think all his movies work equally well, or that he doesn’t occasionally lapse into laziness or self-indulgence. (I’ll have to give “The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou” another chance one of these days, but I feel pretty confident that was a misstep.)

I understand why Anderson’s films drive some viewers nuts, in fact, and I would simply respond that it should be clear by now that his vision of cinema and the world is idiosyncratic and not to everyone’s taste and that there’s no point sitting around hoping he’ll become more normal. But here’s what I reject completely: The idea that the artificiality or hyperrealism (a better word, I think) of Anderson’s worlds — which is admittedly cranked up pretty high here — is fundamentally pretentious and insincere, or that it reflects some kind of “kidult” refusal of grown-up emotion. Yes, Anderson’s principal subject, and arguably his only subject, is the collision between the emotional lives of adults and children and the paradoxical tragicomedy it can so often produce. But if Anderson’s adults yearn for the comparative simplicity of childhood while his children long for the big, important feelings they believe (wrongly) go with growing up, that in itself is a distinctly adult perspective.

“Moonrise Kingdom” takes place at the tail-end of summer — that season which is more charged with a rueful sense of passage than any other. Its preteen lovers, Sam and Suzy (played by newcomers Jared Gilman and Kara Hayward, respectively), most certainly aspire to the grand passions of Tristan and Isolde or Abelard and Heloise, and it’s entirely possible they’ve heard of them. They first met backstage during a performance of Britten’s “Noye’s Fludde” at the island of New Penzance’s only church, when Sam was in his Khaki Scout uniform and coonskin cap, and Suzy was wearing a bird costume. (The use of Britten, of all possible composers, as this film’s musical muse is wonderfully unlikely, and totally Andersonian.) After a hot and heavy epistolary romance, they conspire to run away together — as it happens (so we are told by on-screen narrator Bob Balaban), just three days before a major hurricane will hit New Penzance.

As irresistible as our young lovers are — Sam with his corncob pipe and camp-tested scouting skills, Suzy in her saddle shoes and with her dangerous pre-Lolita sexuality — this isn’t a movie about kids, and they are Potemkin protagonists. Against the certainty and clarity of the childhood world, we see the real heroes of New Penzance: Norton’s upright Scout Master Ward, who confesses his secret fears to a reel-to-reel tape recorder in the depths of the night; Bruce Willis’s Captain Sharp, the island’s only cop, who’s in love with Kara’s artsy, bespectacled mother, Laura (McDormand); Murray as the gentle, lawyerly Walt (Laura’s husband and Kara’s dad), who knows he is being cuckolded but can’t quite bring himself to do anything about it. All these lonely people are portrayed with wonderful delicacy and sensitivity, right in the middle of an artificial construction that contains plenty of shtick. I honestly don’t think I’ve ever seen Norton and Willis, in particular, be better than they are here.

Sam and Suzy’s tempestuous love affair, along with that looming act of God that’s boiling up out there in the Atlantic, will not merely bring all these people together but will give them an excuse to escape their everyday routine and their ingrained fears. In that sense, and in others too, “Moonrise Kingdom” is a deeply romantic film, perhaps the sweetest and most compassionate Anderson has ever made. What has evidently confused some viewers is the fact that it’s also an obsessively curated re-creation of an era that never quite existed, a meticulous storybook version of 1965 that’s more perfect than the original. In real life, Boy Scout tents of that era were made of canvas but were never yellow, and government social workers never wore Salvation Army-style uniforms, as Tilda Swinton’s officious character (whose only name appears to be “Social Services”) does here. And so on.

I suspect that people conflate the artificiality of Anderson’s movies with inauthenticity or insincerity (different things, to be sure) because his artificiality is obvious and worn on the surface, whereas the highly mannered films of, say, Martin Scorsese masquerade as realism. I’m not picking that example at random, by the way; Scorsese has identified Anderson as his favorite among younger American directors, I suspect because he sees a kindred spirit. The two men have very different aesthetics, but both are visionaries who see the world through a personal lens, and both are technical virtuosi concerned with managing every detail of their created universes. You’re free to prefer one director’s work to the other’s, of course, but “Raging Bull” and “Goodfellas” are every bit as obsessed with style and production design as any Anderson film. (The cinematography in “Moonrise Kingdom” is by Robert D. Yeoman, who has shot all of Anderson’s live-action films. The production designer is Adam Stockhausen, the art director is Gerald Sullivan and the spectacular costumes are by Kasia Walicka-Maimone.)

To the extent that “Moonrise Kingdom” can be described as nostalgia, it isn’t personal nostalgia, since Anderson himself was not born until 1969. Very likely it’s an attempt to create a fantasy version of the lost world of his own parents. I wonder whether Scout Master Ward, when the magical summer of ’65 fades into memory, will get married, move to Texas and have a son. The island cabin of Walt and Laura feels like a creation out of a classic children’s novel, but it is imbued with the sadness of a failing adult marriage. In the third act, it feels like Anderson and co-writer Roman Coppola get a little lost in plot shenanigans, and they introduce several extra characters (Jason Schwartzman, Harvey Keitel and Swinton all show up in small roles) to little effect. But all of “Moonrise Kingdom” — from Sam’s miniature stolen canoe to the Benjamin Britten excerpts to Captain Sharp’s heartbreaking bachelor trailer home — is a labor of love, as pure and sweet as the lovelorn letters of its young runaways. Wes Anderson can fool some people, maybe, but he’s not fooling me.

“Moonrise Kingdom” opens this week in New York and Los Angeles, with wider release to follow.

Continue Reading Close

Movie assailant punches a kid, becomes a folk hero

A 10-year-old gets punched in the face for being too noisy at "Titanic" -- and the Internet applauds the beating

  • more
    • All Share Services

Movie assailant punches a kid, becomes a folk hero (Credit: iStockphoto/IBushuev)

It’s a general rule of thumb that a grown man doesn’t get a lot of support for knocking out a 10-year-old child’s teeth. But Yong Hyun Kim has won himself a few fans lately for doing just that.

Back on April 11, the 21-year-old Washington state man settled in with his girlfriend to enjoy “Titanic” in 3D — right in front of a boy known only in police documents as KJJ. What ensued led to a night in jail and a charge of second-degree assault.

According to the Associated Press, the boy, who was at the theater with three friends and his mother, says “they were watching the movie and talking when Kim told them to be quiet.” KJJ maintains that they settled down, but when he later whispered something to a companion, Kim “jumped over the seat, threw an iced drink at them and punched KJJ in the face.” He says Kim told him something like, “You know what, I paid a lot of money to see this movie.”

Kim, however, insists that the boys “were hitting him and his girlfriend with popcorn, running back and forth in the aisle and bumping him with their arms.” He says that when he confronted the group, “they started laughing at him,” provoking him to take a swing at the boy. “I got so mad that it just happened,” he told police, adding that he didn’t realize his tormentors were children. He now faces the possibility of up to nine months in jail. When police arrived at 10:40 p.m., they found the boy in the lobby “bleeding from the nose and missing a tooth.”

What really transpired that night is still under investigation. I do know that, as a parent, I would never take a group of 10 year olds out late on a school night to see Kate Winslet’s boobies. Nor would I, under any circumstances, let them talk through a movie, as KJJ himself admits he and his friends were doing. I’ve suffered through too many other families and that precise brand of self-centered behavior. And that’s why Kim’s assertion that a bunch of kids wouldn’t stop wrecking his movie-going experience has struck a powerful chord of recognition among moviegoers.

Among the online commenters horrified that an adult would physically assault a child instead of just getting a manager, there have been plenty of folks who seem to know exactly where the guy was coming from. On USA Today, commenters have called Kim “a hero” and even offered “to pay for the man’s defense.” The more level-headed commenters suggest he should have hit the parents instead. And on the Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s site, comments have been flooded by those who admit they’ve “wanted to do that” themselves and “understand the guy’s feeling behind it.”

As ticket prices skyrocket, the movie-going experience continues to deteriorate. If you’ve gone to a film lately – or for that matter, any public entertainment — you’ve likely experienced the astonishingly rude behavior of individuals who seem unaware that they’re not in their own living rooms. Texting. Talking. Kicking seats. It’s exasperating and sometimes outright experience-ruining. And we rarely get the satisfying experience I once had when a row of rowdy teens were talking and texting during the film and a patron with roughly the dimensions of the screen barreled over, leaned down and whispered something to the group. I don’t know what he said, but the kids all got up and left. When they did, there was a palpable exhalation of admiring relief in the theater. And when an Austin, Texas, woman was kicked out the Alamo Drafthouse last year for texting, the theater’s cheeky pride in her outrage promptly went viral.

It’s inexcusable to assault someone for being annoying or disruptive or even for laughing at you. Furthermore, Kim’s assertion that he couldn’t see how young the kids were – when he saw well enough to land a face punch — seems a little shaky. Don’t knock out little boys’ teeth. In fact, don’t knock out anybody’s if you can help it. If you applaud hitting kids, you’re probably a bad person. But the lesson here – whether you’re a child or a grownup — is pretty simple. If you don’t know how to behave in public and you don’t like losing teeth or going to jail, for God’s sake, just stick to Netflix.

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

“The Intouchables”: Racial comedy, French style

"The Intouchables" is the biggest foreign-language film of all time. Some critics say it's also racist

  • more
    • All Share Services

A still from "The Intouchables"

Here’s a startling news item: “The Intouchables,” a lively if largely predictable Parisian comedy about a wealthy quadriplegic and his ne’er-do-well immigrant caretaker, has become the biggest international success in the history of French cinema. Indeed, according to some sources — and these things are notoriously difficult to measure on a global and historical scale — “The Intouchables” is now the biggest non-Anglophone film of all time, with a worldwide gross approaching $300 million.

But beyond the business headlines, what’s really fascinating about “The Intouchables” is the way it exposes the gulf in racial attitudes between France and the United States, along with another gulf that’s just as wide, the one that has film critics and cinephiles on one side and popular audiences on the other. Viewers in numerous countries have eagerly devoured this feel-good fable about two men of different races and classes who forge an improbable friendship (dubbed by some wags “Driving Monsieur Daisy”). While the audience for foreign-language film is inherently limited in America, there’s no reason to believe it won’t do well here also. At the same time, heated transatlantic debate has erupted over whether “The Intouchables” traffics in offensive racial stereotypes, with Variety critic Jay Weissberg writing an uncharacteristically angry review that accused the film of “Uncle Tom racism” and compared the Senegalese caretaker character to a “performing monkey.”

When Harvey Weinstein first acquired “The Intouchables” in the wake of its smash success in France, he clearly imagined another dark-horse Oscar contender, in the wake of “The Artist.” The film has racked up audience awards at film festival after film festival, and currently stands at No. 93 on IMDb’s user-generated “Top 250″ list. Omar Sy, the charismatic Afro-French actor who plays Driss, the caretaker, won this year’s César award (the French Oscar equivalent) for best actor, beating out actual Oscar winner Jean Dujardin. But with the looming possibility that “The Intouchables” could spark a divisive, soul-searching racial debate — which was precisely what squelched the Oscar hopes of “The Help” — those expectations have been downplayed. (That isn’t why “The Intouchables” is being released this week, with Weinstein and most of the film-biz aristocracy in Cannes, but the coincidence is oddly useful.)

Let me come clean right now and tell you that I enjoyed “The Intouchables” quite a bit. If you’re looking for a lightweight summer change of pace, with just a smidgen of Continental flair, here it is. Both Sy and co-star François Cluzet (of the hit thriller “Tell No One”) are marvelous, the former playing a guy who’s constantly in motion, both physically and psychologically, and the latter playing a depressed and repressed guy who literally can’t move, but whose real imprisonment has more to do with his spirit than his spinal cord. Don’t go expecting serious French art cinema, please; those who have described this movie as something like a mid-’80s Eddie Murphy comedy dressed up with classy Parisian settings are correct. But here’s the question, and I can’t answer it for you: Is that such a bad thing, in itself?

Once is not enough for a movie that’s made this much money, of course, and Weinstein already has an American remake in the works, possibly to star Colin Firth as stick-up-butt wheelchair dude. The real Eddie Murphy has gotten too old to play the loosey-goosey, pot-smoking sidekick, but there’s no shortage of guys who could do it: Jamie Foxx is the default setting these days, but I’d go for the suddenly hot Kevin Hart from “Think Like a Man.” I’m not claiming it’s aesthetically or sociologically valid to remake a French movie that already feels like a reheated Hollywood throwback, by the way. I’m saying it’s a cruel reality, like Dutch elm disease or Adam Sandler, and there’s no way to stop it.

To get back to the case at hand, I do understand what the haters find so offensive about “The Intouchables.” (The infelicitous English title, by the way, reflects the fact that they couldn’t really get away with calling it “The Untouchables,” could they?) I was pretty taken aback by Weissberg’s vituperative review, and I tend to believe that “Uncle Tom” is one of those expressions that white people should pretty much never use. On the other hand, I can only applaud him for abandoning the balanced, analytical mode of trade-magazine criticism and saying exactly what he damn well thinks. (As for comparing a black man to a monkey — well, I understand what Weissberg was getting at, but it’s an error of rhetoric, the sort of comment that makes nuance and context disappear.) And I know for sure, from hearing friends and acquaintances in and around the movie business complain about this film, that Weissberg is not alone.

I believe that Olivier Nakache and Eric Toledano, the writing-directing duo who made “The Intouchables,” are innocent of any bad intentions. In fact, “innocent” isn’t a bad word overall, for this movie and the worldview it represents. The French may pride themselves on being the most worldly and sophisticated of all people, but the debate in France about race and immigration and multiculturalism — which ramped up sharply after the suburban riots of 2005 — can sometimes sound strikingly naive to American ears. Until very recently, mainstream French opinion has resisted thinking about the nation in anything except homogeneous terms, despite growing Arab and black minorities (both immigrant and native-born) and evident social problems with segregation and discrimination. (The French census, for instance, is prohibited from collecting data on race or religion, so no one really knows how many French people are black or Islamic.)

There can be no question that the characters in “The Intouchables” are stereotypes, in the broad sense. Cluzet’s character, Philippe, is an aristocratic zillionaire who lives in an astonishingly luxurious flat in central Paris. Since being injured in a paragliding accident, he’s lived inside a cocoon of money and privilege, surrounded by antiques and modern art and a bevy of assistants. Sy’s character, Driss, is easygoing, good-hearted, lustful and uncultured, and his passions run toward pretty girls, getting high and vintage American R&B. Philippe hires Driss specifically because Driss doesn’t particularly want the job — he only shows up to get a signature for his benefits card — and feels no pity for Philippe.

Which is actually a pretty good reason. You get where this is going, most likely: Driss is a pretty inept caretaker, at least at first, but is the only person Philippe knows who will relate to him man to man. There’s a bit of borderline-homophobic humor about their enforced intimacy; there are interludes with hookers and fast cars and late-night conversations fueled by booze and marijuana. Driss learns to like Mozart and modern art; Philippe learns to get down with Earth Wind & Fire and gets some valuable tips about chicks. It’s probably fair to summarize this movie as being the story of a paralyzed white man who needs the help of a younger, stronger, more virile black man to reconnect with his own masculinity, and if you want to say that narrative reflects an underlying latticework of racist attitudes, I won’t argue with you. Then there’s the complicating factor that in the real-life story on which “The Intouchables” is based, the caretaker was of Algerian origin, and hence Arab rather than black. (The filmmakers have said they wanted to cast Sy, and built the story around him, but it’s certainly possible to render other interpretations.)

But one can concede all of that while still agreeing with French historian and multicultural activist François Durpaire, who has responded to Weissberg by arguing that the huge success of “The Intouchables” is likely to have positive effects in Europe’s emerging discussion of race and culture, even if the movie relies on crude generalizations. (Durpaire adds that if “The Intouchables” is offensive, so were the “Beverly Hills Cop” movies.) Movies are not meant to be seminars in sociology, after all, and most viewers will receive “The Intouchables” as an upbeat story about two guys from vastly different circumstances who turn out to have a lot in common and help each other, etc., rather than a lesson in racial semiotics.

Perhaps the strongest endorsement for “The Intouchables” has come from aging French ultra-nationalist Jean-Marie Le Pen, who has described it as an allegory about how the future of his nation depends on disenfranchised young immigrants from the suburbs. He thinks that’s a “dreadful” vision, mind you — but, seriously, who knew that guy was so smart?

“The Intouchables” opens this week in New York and Los Angeles, with wider national release to follow.

Continue Reading Close

Male grooming: The movie

From beard contests to ball cream, Morgan Spurlock's "Mansome" goofs through modern-day male narcissism

  • more
    • All Share Services

Male grooming: The movieJack Passion in "Mansome"

American men are bewildered about their place in the cosmos, or so we have been told repeatedly over the last 20 years. They don’t know whether to thread their eyebrows or wield a welding torch, and end up trying to do both at once (which is inadvisable). As comedian Adam Carolla laments in a scene from Morgan Spurlock’s documentary “Mansome,” the old-time certainties of gender identity have melted away: Women are flying fighter jets and men work at the hair salon; there are no longer “chick jobs and guy jobs.”

I get that Carolla is just cracking wise, from inside the bubble of his own lame version of post-rockabilly guy-shtick — he is interviewed inside a garage, with what looks like an orange Camaro behind him in the middle distance — and that if you brought up the fact that those old-time “chick jobs” paid 40 to 80 percent less than “guy jobs,” he’d get all irritated with you for being a drag. He’s still an idiot, though, even if he’s an idiot in quotation marks. That’s kind of the problem with “Mansome,” which tries to tackle the enormous subject of contemporary male vanity as an assemblage of whimsical anecdotes, which are often entertaining in themselves but studiously avoid any semblance of intelligent analysis or historical understanding.

It’s pointless to come down too hard on a film like “Mansome,” because like all Spurlock’s work (including “Super Size Me” and “Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden?”) it’s driven by a good-hearted frat-boy humor that seems fundamentally sincere. It’s more first-person journal and travelogue than it is cultural archaeology, and as such it’s basically OK. Spurlock gets to interview some of his celebrity pals about their attitudes toward masculinity and grooming: Paul Rudd is slightly ill at ease, Judd Apatow is charming, and Zach Galifianiakis steals the show, of course. (When asked to rate his looks on a scale of 1 to 10, Galifianakis responds confidently that some people find him “a strong 2.”)

Spurlock documents his own decision to shave off his trademark porn-star ‘stache, thereby reducing his 5-year-old son to torrents of tears. (It was definitely a mistake, Morgan.) He meets various kooky characters who have some tangential relationship to his theme, including a California suburbanite named Jack Passion who describes himself as a professional “beardsman,” meaning he travels the world exhibiting his Hagar-the-Horrible facial thatch in competitions. (Anthrax rhythm guitarist Scott Ian responds: “Beard and mustache competitions, for want of a better word, are kind of gay.” I laughed, and I know that’s wrong.) Then there’s the elegantly coiffed and tailored Manhattan clothing buyer who describes himself as the “dictionary definition of a metrosexual,” perhaps making up for his teen years as a Sikh immigrant outcast in middle America. And the entrepreneur who has introduced a lotion-y product called Fresh Balls: The Solution for Men. (Yes, it is what you think it is.)

In fairness, Spurlock is at least half aware that all the jokes and episodes of “Mansome” never add up to anything, except perhaps the conclusion that neither male narcissism nor male grooming is anything new, but that they have been coded in different ways at different times. Masculinity is no less a troubled construction than is femininity, and it’s just as easily whipped about by the tides of commerce and fashion. The aristocratic dandies of the 18th century make Spurlock’s New York Sikh metrosexual look like a shoeless Dust Bowl farmhand, and every Important Man of the 19th century, regardless of background or affiliation — King Leopold II! Karl Marx! The pioneering Ambrose Burnside! — had his own tonsorial signature that required extensive maintenance.

Now, I’m not denying that there’s something specific and contemporary about the version of male narcissism wrought by consumer capitalism, with its tendency to turn things once seen as immutable, such as gender or sexual identity, into fluid and exchangeable commodities with no fixed meaning. (Speaking of Karl Marx, it was he who wrote that, under capitalism, “all fixed, fast frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away … All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned.”) It was to address that question on a pop-sociological level that the term “metrosexual,” first introduced to America a decade ago in this Salon article by Mark Simpson, was originally invented. (Simpson’s coinage was instantly stolen by marketers, of course, and turned into a pretty-boy Frankenstein monster who was, in turn, burned by the resentful villagers.)

Some of that big-picture stuff comes up almost by accident in “Mansome,” but Spurlock doesn’t even pretend to pay attention. He’s just a guy! He’s confused like the rest of us! He makes his little boy cry and watches pro wrestler Shawn Daivari (a Minnesota native who plays the anti-American “heel” called Sheik Abdul Bashir) shave his back all the way down to his butt crack. He sticks for far too long with an embarrassing framing device in which Jason Bateman and Will Arnett go to a spa and engage in uneasy homoerotic banter. He chops up the movie into irrelevant chapters about beards, mustaches, hair and so on, as if those things were unrelated. When he goes to get his own hair cut, it’s at some pseudo-old-fashioned place in downtown Manhattan where the wood fixtures are way too polished and the barbers are conspicuously overdressed. It’s kind of endearing and kind of asinine.

“Mansome” is now playing in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York, Philadelphia, Portland, Ore., San Francisco, Seattle and Austin, Texas, with more cities to follow.

Continue Reading Close

Page 1 of 708 in Movies