Two! Four! Six! Eight!

Who do we love to hate? Alternative weekly journalists share their true feelings on SUVs, cell phones, minks, celebrities and others.

Topics: Chrysler,

I come across many an article seething with hatred during my weekly perusal of the alternative press. And why not? There are few reading pleasures more delightful than a well-aimed, passionately argued diatribe.

As the poet Ogden Nash once said, “Any kiddies in school can love like a fool,/But hating, my boy, is an art.” Indeed, to hate and hate well is a difficult task. The object of rancor must be chosen with a sharp eye for deep and complex flaws, to fuel your burning abhorrence. And one must be absolutely certain that the object of ire is indeed deserving; much scorn is misdirected, and hence wasted.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Salt Lake City Weekly, Jan. 6-12

“SUV Luv” by Andrew Haley

Andrew Haley rehashes all the usual arguments in this essay about why he hates SUVs. These monster trucks are environmentally destructive, pretentious and unnecessary. Worst of all, according to Haley, they’re inauthentic.” He writes: “While these vehicles are designed to look like off-roading vehicles … they are not the four-wheel-drive vehicles made to ply the outback. Instead, they are designed to create the image that you — the lawyer, the mom, the teacher, the banker — still have the youth, desire and time to go out into the rugged world and be a primitive man.” To which I say, so what? So middle-aged businessmen and soccer moms want to own something that fools them into thinking their lives are slightly less ordinary? That should make us sad, not angry.

The environmental argument is a good one to run with if you want to have any strength to your argument, but Haley barely touches on it. Indeed, the real object of his disaffection, I suspect, is not Joe SUV-owner per se, but his father. (That’s right, kids, I’m playing pop-psychologist.) Much of Haley’s rant addresses the fact that his father owned a Ford Explorer and once got angry with his son for taking it off-road. He concludes the piece with this Oedipal gem: “This craze is a lie. It is another token of status in this society of conspicuous consumption. These vehicles were marketed to make people like my father believe they would still look tough and young and outdoorsy if they drove one.” Hey Haley, there but by the grace of God go you.



- – - – - – - – - – - -

New York Press, Jan. 12-18

“My Life in Furs: Hate Me If It Makes You Feel Good” by Jessica Willis

With politically incorrect aplomb that you just have to sit back and admire, Jessica Willis visits a mink farm and discusses the feminist benefits of wearing fur. (“Fur makes a woman look fierce.”) “The sapphire male squirms in its small cage and shits some more,” Willis writes of one doomed creature. “Fuck you, you little creep, I think happily. You’re a little devil animal, useful to no one, save for your skin. Unfortunately, you’ve been born wearing the pubic thatch of the gods. He gets my drift and hurls himself against the wire peephole.” It only gets better from here. Willis can look forward to an abundance of hysterical hate mail in the weeks to come.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Detroit Metro Times

“Feeling the heat” by Curt Guyette

Here’s an organization deserving of hatred: The Global Climate Coalition, according to reporter Curt Guyette, has organized a “decade-long attempt to induce public skepticism and confusion over global warming.” Just who belongs to this coalition? Don’t let the warm ‘n’ fuzzy name fool you. Auto industry and fossil fuel bigwigs are running this public relations road show.

In this well-researched, balanced piece, Guyette avoids jumping to obvious conclusions. Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler have both withdrawn from the organization, he reports early on. But he also notes that while these companies have abandoned their green-washing P.R. ways, they are still responsible for producing a large percentage of the gas-guzzlers currently clogging freeways.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

The New York Observer, week of Jan. 17

“It Feels Good to Hate Gwyneth And Matt!” by George Gurley

They’re beautiful. They’re famous. They’re rich, and they have Oscars. Let’s hate them! In this brain-dead piece on hating Gwyneth Paltrow and Matt Damon, George Gurley just quotes a bunch of ne’er-do-wells bitching about the stars of “The Talented Mr. Ripley,” as well as Robin Williams, Winona Ryder (well, can’t blame them there) and Al Pacino. This isn’t hatred, it’s jealousy; and it’s petty and dull at that.

The Village Voice adds to this anti-celebrity mania with this revelatory (ha!) piece on how celebrity-bashing — get this — thrives on the Web. Another case of an old phenomenon getting the “gee whiz” treatment just because it happens to be occurring online.

New Times Palm Beach/Broward, Jan. 13-19

“Night of the Living Heads” by Bob Whitby

Bob Whitby’s deep dislike of Phish fans — an obvious, but amusing target if there ever was one — can be summed up as follows: “Phish offers its fans all the drugs and degeneracy of Woodstock without that tiresome stuff about civil rights, politics, and the war machine. In that sense what’s happening here is a fitting metaphor for a jaded age in which nothing is shocking and even the counterculture is a rerun.” Which I guess is more substantial than my excuse for hating them: bad outfits and patchouli.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

“Caught Unawares: Mobile Phones Linked to Violent Crime” by “South to the future”

In this unfunny satirical column, people using cell phones in public become the victims of robbery precisely because of their conspicuous consumption. In an e-mail alerting me to this piece, a Web master who will go unnamed asked: “Don’t you want something bad to happen to people who use mobile phones in public?” Um, no, actually I don’t. I use a cell phone in public. It’s convenient. It allows me to call taxis late at night, without risking my ass and losing quarters to some germ-infested, stanky-ass, graffiti-covered pay phone. I do my best to be considerate; I turn my phone off in movie theaters, and exit restaurants before placing or receiving calls. Call it self-defense, but wishing physical harm on someone for a behavior so benign seems far worse than the so-called infringement itself.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Philadelphia City Paper, Jan. 13-19

“Last call?” by Jen Darr

Jen Darr makes an even weaker case for hating cell phones. She’s upset because these high-tech gadgets may spell the end of pay phones. “The pay phone was democratic: It enabled those who couldn’t afford a phone of their own to take part in the luxury — if briefly — of technology,” Darr writes, and then pauses to muse over pay phone memories: “The college girl can’t forget the spot where she called her boyfriend after a visit to the doctor to say the test was negative.” Aww, how romantic. They’re dirty and expensive; they invite crime to otherwise fine neighborhoods, and force us to wait behind loud, obnoxious people. If you want to hate something, hate the pay phones. The cell phones are our deliverance from such crude means of communication. Long live Nokia!

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Weekly Planet (Tampa Bay), Jan. 6-12

“Brought to you by Big Brother” by Lynn Waddell

The word “synergy” may have a nice ring to it, but its consequences are far from pretty. In this smart, serious piece, Lynn Waddell tackles the costs of corporate monopolies in the media. She writes: “Critics warn that allowing unrestricted media ownership is the biggest threat to democracy since the Berlin Wall went up; Big Brother is no longer communist, but corporate, critics say.” Much to my disappointment, this article ends on a naive and predictable note: There’s a Noam Chomsky quote, but of course, and an exhortation to write your senator! Yeah, that’ll fix things.

Jenn Shreve writes about media, technology and culture for Salon, Wired, the Industry Standard, the San Francisco Examiner and elsewhere. She lives in Oakland, Calif.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>