Advertising

Camels and cowboys

I'll always be a smoker, even when I quit.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Camels and cowboys

When I write fiction, 90 percent of my characters smoke. I reserve the most descriptive words for passages of my creations alone with their cigarettes.

When I doodle, cigarettes hang from the lower lip of my stick figures. Sexy, smoky lines drift up to obscure their faces. I envy my characters incredibly. Oh, I’m still a smoker (I always will be), but I’m nonpracticing today. I’m back on the wagon. I know I’ll always want a cigarette on some level. I’ll always feel a tinge of envy when I pass a group of smokers in front of my favorite coffeehouse. But my family and friends, my instinct for survival, finally got the better of me.

I’d been saying I’d quit again since the moment I picked up a cigarette six months ago. My longtime friends knew I’d live up to my word — they’ve seen me quit before, several times. The longer somebody has known me, the more times they have seen me give up smoking. My friend Liz (a nonsmoker) can’t
fathom my ability to seemingly start and stop at will. And it’s true, I don’t have any trouble quitting the deadly addiction. I just can’t quit starting again.

I don’t really know why I started smoking again. I saw a full pack of Marlboro Lights lying on the ground outside my neighbor’s apartment, and I just helped myself to one. I suppose I was lonely at the time, and the thought of one last rendezvous with an old friend held some appeal. I didn’t smoke it immediately, but I kept it with me as I drove to the gym. I rolled it around in my fingers and put it in my mouth, pretending to smoke it. The thought of smoking a cigarette after so many months gave me a sexy,
bad-boy feeling — almost like spying on the next-door neighbor, but it remained in my car, carefully placed in the glove compartment. It wasn’t until a few days later that I came across it again and said, “What the hell?”

The euphoria was amazing. My body thanked me for the sensation it had so obviously missed. The world looked beautiful around me, and I thought about how much I loved my life and all my wonderful friends. Even my parents took on a sheen in my thoughts as the nicotine painted my glasses a pleasant shade of rose. That cigarette took me a long time to finish. That’s the
thing about smoking — the pleasant inhalation of the smoke, the almost spiritual quality of the early experience quickly gives way to a ravenous sucking to get as much nicotine in your body as possible. But that first cigarette was like a solemn prayer.

I waited anxiously for the addiction to kick in and, after a few days, I began to believe that perhaps it wasn’t going to happen this time. By golly, I had kicked it, I realized as I incessantly thought about the sensation of that one glorious cigarette during the course of the next two weeks. I would never need to fear the compulsion again. I even told my friends about my newfound strength. “I can smoke,” I exclaimed to their doubtful and disappointed faces, “and not be addicted.”

The next month at work, overjoyed and confident in my ability to resist addiction, I bummed a cigarette from my co-worker, Lisa. The day was stressful, and I couldn’t resist having just one — one more, that is. She had a concerned (or pleased?) look on her face when she realized another person had fallen from grace, but I assured her I was capable of having just one. Within the span of two days, my one and only cigarette had become two, then three and four.

Over the course of the next month, I began to join Lisa and Roger and the rest of the smokers regularly. Roger and I talked about his wife and kids, his former jobs, his career trajectory. We were close for the first time since we began to work together. Of course, my bumming was irritating and it made it difficult for the others in the club to take me very seriously, so I began to buy my own — only for work, only for the club. But like the pack left over from the college party, I began to smoke them, gradually incorporating them into my daily habits: two for the drive to work, one midmorning, one before and one after lunch, two in the afternoon and two
for the drive home. Those were only the official ones. Eventually, the club embraced me, and I became a smoker again. And that was that. I knew the cycle had begun again; I would smoke for as long as I needed to or until I couldn’t handle it anymore and then I’d quit.

Addiction for me is strange; in the middle of it, it’s like I’m in a tunnel. Quitting is unimaginable. The thought of it makes me feel lonely and jittery. But somewhere in the middle of the addiction, this dark tunnel (at a time when I strangely don’t feel lonely), my body tires of the constant subliminal messages that are bombarding it. I can no longer bear the thought of myself dying of lung cancer, of my sick father, frowning as he wonders why I’m throwing away the health that he’d give anything to have
again, of my friends shifting their position to avoid the noxious fumes that emanate from my direction. My body just gives me an escape clause, a ladder is lowered, and if I take it, then quitting is fairly easy. If I don’t quit then, I’m trapped again. Eventually, weeks — maybe months — later, another ladder is lowered. I wonder if everybody’s body gives them these little escape hatches, times when quitting is so much easier and more imaginable.

Perhaps the human spirit doesn’t like imprisonment — because
that’s what smoking is, a form of captivity. Perhaps humans are constantly struggling against the chains of addiction, and sometimes the human spirit prevails. I wish I could say our spirits always vanquish the darkness and lower ladders of freedom, but I know they don’t. I’ve seen too many people
slipping dangerously close to death who continually smoke and make excuses for their behavior. Perhaps their spirit gave up long ago; the tunnel just too dark and deep with not enough oxygen to support a flame.

I can see how that happens. Smoking has crept into my life in so many ways. It makes me feel like a writer — not because nicotine alters my brain chemistry, but because I feel like a beatnik when I smoke. I have never worn a beret, worn only black or joined a writer’s circle, but I did take up smoking. When I first moved to Chicago after college, it just seemed like the right thing to do. I would sit on the dirty old furniture at the neighborhood coffeehouse, and sip espresso and smoke cigarette after cigarette as I wrote in my journal. I like who I am when I smoke; I like the jittery sensation when I smoke too much; I love that I don’t need to eat.

And when I smoke, I don’t feel like doing anything else. Working out seems too arduous a task to even consider. Why spend hours pumping iron when I can sit on my deck and get the same stimulation while I read? Even sex begins to lose its appeal — not quite, but it begins to get lost in a haze.

In college, my best friend and I would sit in our dorm room watching movies, camp out at Denny’s for an all-nighter of studying or even just sit quietly on the white winter quad and smoke one cigarette after another. I don’t understand why cigarette companies spend their advertising dollars on giant billboards portraying cowboys and cartoon camels. Westerns aren’t cool anymore,
and the camels may be a clever idea to entice kids, but what person between the ages of 13 and 80 really cares about them?

Cigarette companies should spend their advertising dollars on the experience of smoking, reinforcing the idea that smoking is their friend, that it makes them into people they wouldn’t be if they didn’t smoke. Cigarettes helped my friends and me bond; they actually strengthened our friendship, or they seemed to. Rather than cowboys and camels, I’d respond to an arty, black-and-white billboard showing a group of friends sitting around a table, talking and laughing with their coffee and cigarettes. Or imagine an advertising campaign designed to stop people from breaking their habit; a group of laughing friends standing around while a man with a patch on his arm watches from a distance — alone.

When I thought about quitting this time, I felt like I was giving up a friend. The mere thought of abandoning my habit made me feel hollow and empty. And in truth, I did give up more than just the cigarettes; I also gave up all the people with whom I gossiped around the fountain during work hours. I was giving up all the discussions about how we — smokers — were the only group that it was still politically correct to discriminate against. We wore that discrimination like a badge of honor, but I couldn’t help feeling
ashamed as I walked into the office, the scent of stale smoke clinging to my clothes. And I noticed the others too, going into the restroom to wash their hands or spraying the mist into their mouths. We all knew it was disgusting, but that didn’t mean we could quit.

It took me nearly six months this time, but the ladder was lowered, and I chose to use it. Things have reverted back to the way they were in my pre-smoking days. Roger and I are back to saying quick hellos in the hall. Lisa and I haven’t had lunch since I quit. Sure, we can tell ourselves it’s the holidays or that we’re busy at work, but the truth is, I’m not in their club anymore. We don’t have anything in common. I suppose I could stand out by the fountain with them and enjoy my breaks from work, butI didn’t really need the breaks for rest; I needed them for smoking. It’s too dangerous to be near them. It feels false. Eventually, I’ll ask them for a cigarette. I’ll think I’ve kicked the addiction and the whole mess will start again.

But have I really kicked this addiction, or have I just replaced it,
splintered it up into a million subaddictions that can almost replace the thrill of nicotine? When I put down my last cigarette, the things that nicotine suppressed immediately came rushing back in to fill its cavernous wake. I eat much more food than I did as a smoker, or even before I became a smoker. Nothing seems to fill me up. My new favorite snacks are Triscuits with cream cheese. I can and do eat them one after the other until nearly the entire box is gone. I find that I focus not only on the hunger, but also on the texture of the crackers in my mouth, on the sensation of eating. My caffeine consumption has increased; I’ve
started drinking hammerheads (two shots of espresso in a cup of coffee) for that extra kick.

I also work out more. I’m more focused on my workouts, and I leave the gym sore — but drugged adequately. The endorphin rush that accompanies muscle breakdown is the closest approximation I can find to nicotine. In the past I’ve argued that I’m just more able to work out when I’m not smoking, that my lung capacity had increased. Now I see working out for what it is — a stimulant.

Incidentally (or not so), I think about sex constantly, can’t get enough. And if the real thing isn’t available? Well let’s just say that I’ve spent more on renting pornography in one week than I ever did on cigarettes in the same amount of time. Finally, worst of all, I’m drinking more than I did a month ago — two or three drinks per night. It’s a different buzz, but it’s a buzz. So if I don’t change my behavior yet again, I’ll be an overweight, nonsmoking, sex-crazed lush. Thank God I had the strength to
take that ladder.

Tate Gunnerson is a writer in San Diego. tate-gunnerson@home.com

America’s road sign legends

Burma-Shave's rhyming ads turned highway billboards into poetry, and changed advertising -- and America

  • more
    • All Share Services

America's road sign legends
This article originally appeared on Imprint.

ImprintIn a simpler time, when automobiles went slower and the pre-Eisenhower highway system in the United States was less developed, there was a popular advertising campaign that ran from 1927 until 1963. It consisted of rhymed messages sequentially staked on the right side of the road, all ending with the advertiser’s name, “Burma-Shave.”

Examples of vintage Burma-Shave road signs, including a blue South Dakota version. (Ray Crockett photo)

These red ads (one state, South Dakota, insisted that they be dark blue to keep them from conflicting with the red reserved for warning notices) usually consisted of five signs. For example: “DON’T PASS CARS/ON CURVE OR HILL/IF THE COPS DON’T GET YOU/ MORTICIANS WILL/BURMA-SHAVE.”

Some slogans touted Burma-Shave as a pre-aerosol “brushless” shaving cream—a cream you could scoop out of a jar and lather onto your face without relying on an old-fashioned brush and moistened soap in a mug.

 

("Thoroly"? I guess if the word doesn't fit the composition, change the spelling. . .)

In 1925, Clinton Odell, a Minneapolis lawyer, took the liniment his father created and transformed it into a brushless shaving cream. He named his company Burma-Vita—Burma, because most of the essential oils in the liniment were from the Burmese portion of the Malay Peninsula, and Vita from the Latin for “life”: “Life from Burma.”

Some of Burma-Shave’s primary “brushless shaving cream” competitors were Barbasol and Noxema.

The company was sold to Philip Morris in 1963, and all the signs were removed soon thereafter. As a testament to the campaign’s cultural significance, a set of signs was donated to the Smithsonian, where it still resides. But the brand eventually petered out. After being sold yet again (this time to the American Safety Razor Company) and then reintroduced in 1997, it never regained a hold in the market.

A history of the Burma-Vita Company, written by Frank Rowsome Jr. and illustrated by Carl Rose, was published by the Stephen Greene Press in 1963.

By the early 1960's, the rising costs of road-sign maintenance (as well as new and more effective ways of advertising) sounded the death knell for the Burma-Shave signs.

The following pages from Frank Rowsome Jr.’s book list all the road-sign Burma-Shave phrases produced from 1927 to 1963.

Continue Reading Close

7Up’s branding revolution

How "Bib-Label Lithiated Lemon-Lime Soda" became one of America's most popular soft drinks

  • more
    • All Share Services

7Up's branding revolution
This article originally appeared on Imprint.

ImprintI became interested in pop bottles (I grew up in the Chicago area where we all said “pop”) and related stuff when I was about 12 years old. I had gone inside an old garage that was attached to a neighborhood house that was being torn down and inside was a cache of un-returned pop bottles that must have dated from the 1940-’50s period. I took one of each type home (about 20 of ‘em) and yes, still have them to this day. I really got off on all the different labels and colors of glass and because I used to like to read old magazines I actually recognized most of the brands that were no longer around or had changed their design. I’ll go into this more in a future post, but wanted to lay some sort of a foundation for this piece, which is exclusively on 7Up, with a special focus on their branding efforts of the 1950s.

The soft drink that would be known as 7Up was created in 1929 by Charles Leiper Grigg in St.Louis as part of his “Howdy” line of sodas and was originally called “Bib-Label Lithiated (it contained the mood stabilizer lithium citrate until 1950) Lemon-Lime Soda.” It was almost immediately re-labeled “7 (7 natural flavors) Up Lithiated Lemon-Lime,” and then finally just “7Up”.

The first 7Up logo from 1929.

In terms of logos, an original winged trademark soon gave way to the red squared logo that lasted until the late 1960s that coincided with that period’s brilliant “Uncola” re-branding campaign. I always felt they had GOLD in that Uncola moniker. . .

A 1935 7Up label before the Howdy Company's name was changed to 7Up in 1936, followed by two Howdy beverage labels.

By the late 1940s 7Up was the third most popular soft drink in the United States. By the time the 1950s rolled around, the company had employed extensive branding techniques to keep the momentum going. The following three binders contain examples of what was offered to the bottlers and distributors to reinforce the product’s presence.

A catalog of 7Up sales/marketing items circa 1954.

This page includes tipped-in glossy paint chips.

These next three pages would NEVER fly with the HR Dept in 2012. . .

Before everyone had TV's in their home, it was common to go out to watch television.

7Up Sales & Promotion Merchandise Catalog circa 1954 - 59.

(would love to have those binders. . .)

Actual cloth swatches included.

More swatches.

1959 "Salesmakers" Catalogue

2 actual decals using the older logo with the woman reaching for bubbles- love the way the color is broken down into separate shapes and levels.

Actual booklet attached.

"Fresh Up Freddie" was the 7Up mascot created in 1957 by ad agency Leo Burnett and Walt Disney to help sponsor the Disney "Zorro" TV series.

Here’s a link to more info on “Freddie”: http://www.cartoonbrew.com/disney/fresh-up-freddy.html

Remember, it's from 1959. . .

Ditto. . .

2 mid-1930's 7Up bottles.

Left: 1940's bottle with 8 bubbles on label. Right: 1950's bottle 7 bubbles.

"Like" was introduced in 1963 as a diet version of 7Up. It contained Calcium Cyclamate which was determined to be a carcinogen in 1969. "Like" was discontinued in that same year and Diet 7Up was introduced in 1970 sans the Cyclamates. This bottle is dated 1964.

Late 1960's/early 1970's can.

"The Uncola".

As a final footnote, I was lucky enough to work on spots for 7Up International using the Susan Rose/Joanna Ferrone character “Fido Dido”! Here’s one of my favorites done while I was at the Ink Tank Studio in N.Y.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JpHjeGXyw8

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2012.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

Pepsi’s creepy Jackson revival

A ghoulish new campaign brings him back from the dead. Maybe it's time to stop looking backwards

  • more
    • All Share Services

Pepsi's creepy Jackson revivalMichael Jackson (Credit: Reuters/Kimimasa Mayama)

As if Michael Jackson wasn’t creepy enough when he was alive. The self-proclaimed King of Pop, who died nearly three years ago, is making a return via a new Pepsi campaign. The fabulously un-self-aware tagline? “Live for Now.”

The corporation is set to festoon one billion cans of Pepsi around the world – that’s one billion cans – with the singer’s unmistakable silhouette. It’s a bold move for a company whose most famous association with Jackson is that back in 1984, his hair caught fire filming a commercial for them. Jackson’s estate orchestrated his sponsorship resurrection, and a family spokesperson confirmed to the Wall Street Journal Thursday that “more such marketing agreements are planned.” Did anyone else just feel that collective shudder of revulsion?

Even dead, Jackson is a massive draw. He’s currently the subject of a global Cirque du Soleil tour with the horror movie title “Immortal.”  And Pepsi knows that overseas – especially in markets like Asia — his brand is as ubiquitous and American as well, cola.

Bringing back the dead is a peculiar – if increasingly common – gambit. Now that the earth has run out of living celebrities, they’ve had to revive Tupac to perform at Coachella  and Grace Kelly to make kissy face with Charlize Theron to sell perfume.  They even had to dig up Martin Luther King Jr., to pitch for Mercedes-Benz.

There comes a time when a celebrity passes into our iconography. Today, seeing the images of Elvis and Marilyn and James Dean in different pop culture contexts barely seems any stranger than fake Abraham Lincolns selling cars in February. And why wouldn’t Jackson’s people wring a few more opportunities out of his incredibly lucrative image? Somebody’s got to pay for all those $10 million mansions.

Senior PepsiCo marketing executive Frank Cooper told the WSJ that the new campaign will be both “respectful” and “forward looking.” It may be respectful. But there’s nothing “forward” about the dead. Jackson’s image survives as an easy symbol of pop music, but the man whose life ended from propofol intoxication three years ago, whose doctor is currently serving time for involuntary manslaughter, couldn’t seem less like the right spokesman for the notion of “living for now.”

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

Ashton Kutcher’s brownface fail

The actor's racist ad is pulled -- but what's left isn't much better

  • more
    • All Share Services

Ashton Kutcher's brownface failAshton Kutcher

Somewhere, Charlie Sheen is laughing and saying, “At least I never did that.” This week, we learned what’s even less funny than Ashton Kutcher: Ashton Kutcher in brownface.

In an ill-advised Popchips ad spoofing online dating that launched Wednesday, the “Two and a Half Men” star appeared as a variety of love-hungry “World Wide Lovers” vying for your affection. In a spectacular display of racial tone-deafness, one of them included “Raj.” Raj, all darkened skin and heavy accent, is “a Bollywood producer looking for the most delicious thing on the planet.” He’s looking for something “Kardashian hot … I would give that dog a bone.” He brags that he once won a milking contest, and he does a little dance that will haunt your nightmares.

Shockaroonie, some people found this offensive. The ad went the wrong kind of viral, with a social media explosion of negative feedback. It’s not that comedy with a racial element is always wrong wrong wrong. The Jewish Hank Azaria is currently in his third decade of playing the Indian Apu Nahasapeemapetilon on “The Simpsons,” and nobody seems to be outraged about this. Kutcher’s incredibly unnuanced performance isn’t that, though. On his blog, writer Anil Dash explains it perfectly –  “a fake-Indian outfit and voice” constitute “the entire punchline” of the clip. And, as he eloquently put it, “I can’t imagine I have to explain this to anyone in 2012, but if you find yourself putting brown makeup on a white person in 2012 so they can do a bad ‘funny’ accent in order to sell potato chips, you are on the wrong course. Make some different decisions.”

And so that’s what Popchips is trying to do. On Wednesday, in a “message from Keith” on the company’s website, its founder, CEO and foe of proper capitalization Keith Belling wrote, “we received a lot feedback about the dating campaign parody we launched today and appreciate everyone who took the time to share their point of view. our team worked hard to create a light-hearted parody featuring a variety of characters that was meant to provide a few laughs. we did not intend to offend anyone. i take full responsibility and apologize to anyone we offended.” That’s a constructive, self-aware response to a potential public relations disaster. (Kutcher, who in recent months has been tainted by his hasty Twitter support for Penn State coach Joe Paterno and a divorce that featured rumors of unprotected extramarital sex, has so far had no comment on the problematic ad campaign.)

It’s a positive thing that Popchips understood its mistake and made an immediate effort to rectify it by pulling the ad. That step forward is mitigated somewhat, though, by the a large number of “get over yourself” responses on Anil Dash’s blog. We’ve still got much work we need to do in this country around issues of stereotypes and sensitivity, folks.

You don’t have to look any further than the entire Popchips campaign to see what I mean. Its remaining “World Wide Lovers” include the stoner Brit “Nigel,” who’s “seeking higher planes of consciousness” (GET IT????), the effeminate German “Darl” — a swishy riff on openly gay designer Karl Lagerfeld — and the dumb redneck “Swordfish.” In the end, there’s also regular old, newly single Kutcher, who describes the other guys in the club as a “freak show.” Hey, geniuses at Popchips – you’re still perpetuating gross generalizations. Also: They’re not funny. It’s a great big snack-loving country. Being cool about brown people – and gay people, and people others would call “white trash” – shouldn’t be such a crunch.

 

 

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

FCC takes on super PACs

The commission voted to require stations to post political ad data online -- but it won't be searchable

  • more
    • All Share Services

FCC takes on super PACs (Credit: Screenshot from American Crossroads anti-Obama ad)
This originally appeared on ProPublica.

The Federal Communications Commission voted 2 to 1 this morning to require broadcasters to post political ad data on the Web, making it easier for the public to see how as much as $3.2 billion will be spent on TV advertising this election.

The files — which, among other information, detail the times ads aired, how much they cost, and whether stations rejected ad buy requests from campaigns — are currently available only on paper at stations.

The FCC rejected a push by the industry to water down the measure. But the rule as passed also has serious limits. For example, the data will not be searchable or uploaded in a common format.

The rule will first apply to affiliates of the four major networks (ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox) in the top 50 TV markets. All other stations will have until July 2014 to come into compliance.

“[L]arge areas of some swing states, like Virginia, Missouri, Wisconsin and Michigan, could see an influx of advertising in markets outside of the top 50,” the Sunlight Foundation noted in an analysis today. It was also not immediately clear exactly when the rule will go into effect for the top 50 markets.

Then there’s the crucial question of the format in which the files will be available. FCC spokeswoman Janice Wise told ProPublica that the commission is not creating a searchable database of the political ad files.

“We’ll accept whatever [file] format they provide,” she said in an email.

That will make it much more difficult to analyze the information.

Wise said there are no specific plans to make the database searchable.

By opting to allow stations to submit political data in any format, the commission departed from a recommendation made last year by in an FCC working group report.  The report called for the political file to be put online and that “as much data as possible [be] in a standardized, machine-readable format” that “could also enhance the usefulness and accessibility of the data.”

Also not clear is how the broadcast industry, which vigorously lobbied against the rule, will react.

“[W]e will be seeking guidance from our Board of Directors regarding our options,” the National Association of Broadcasters said in a statement decrying the vote.

In March, the industry group submitted a filing with the commission raising “serious questions about the FCC’s authority” to require stations to put political ad data online.

“That was written as a legal memorandum, which is code for, ‘We’ve lawyered up and we’re ready to sue over this,’” says Andrew Schwartzman, a longtime FCC watcher at the Media Access Project.

The broadcasters’ group declined to comment beyond its statement.

On a Thursday earnings call for Belo Corp., one of the companies that has been fighting the disclosure measure, CEO Dunia Shive suggested that broadcasters would continue to fight the new disclosure rule.

“I don’t think the conversation is over with respect to being able to continue talking about if we will ultimately have to include ad rates online,” she said, Broadcasting & Cable reported.

Belo spokesman R. Paul Fry told ProPublica that the company merely “want[s] to continue the dialogue on this subject.”

The FCC also said today it would review the new rule after a year to see if any changes need to be made before all stations will be required to come into compliance in July 2014.

Continue Reading Close
Justin Elliott

Justin Elliott is a reporter for ProPublica. You can follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin

Page 1 of 66 in Advertising