Native Americans

Sherman Alexie’s cultural imperialism

The Native American novelist thinks Ian Frazier had no business writing "On the Rez." He may have some trespasses of his own to answer for.

  • more
    • All Share Services

“When I first heard the title of Ian Frazier’s ‘On the Rez,’ his nonfiction study of the brief time he spent on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, I laughed out loud.” Thus begins Sherman Alexie, the 33-year-old novelist, poet and Spokane-Coeur d’Alene Indian, kicking off his blisteringly aggrieved dismissal of Frazier’s book in the Jan. 23 Los Angeles Times Book Review.

Alexie’s laughter, however, quickly subsides. “What denial! What romanticism!” he writes, before whacking the former New Yorker staff writer with a litany of further charges: morbidness, objectification, commodification and a “startling lack of self-consciousness,” to name just a few. The heart of Alexie’s antipathy, nonetheless, seems embedded in the following lines:

Many Indians, myself among them, believe that the concept of tribal sovereignty should logically extend to culture and religion, a concept which Frazier never addresses. Nowhere in the book does he examine his own motivations or question his observations. He writes about the Oglalas without stopping to wonder if the Oglalas want to be written about.

What Alexie is advocating here, more or less, is the “cultural enclosure of the intellectual commons” (to crib a phrase from scholar Rosemary Coombe), a sort of bulwark defense against cultural appropriation — or piracy, if you prefer. Such an approach would bind the typing fingers of even the most well-meaning outsiders, such as Frazier, leaving a culture’s stories firmly and exclusively in the hands of its own tellers. There are precedents here, of course: Alexie’s stance calls to mind the controversy William Styron brewed with his 1967 novel “The Confessions of Nat Turner,” in which the white Southern author wrote in the guise of the slave who led the famous 1831 revolt in Virginia. Several offended black critics suggested renaming the novel “The Confessions of William Styron.”

Here’s Alexie, 33 years later:

Frazier certainly displays plenty of self-confidence by beginning his book with this simple declarative sentence: “This book is about Indians, particularly the Oglala Sioux who live on the Pine Ridge Reservation in southwestern South Dakota, in the plains and badlands in the middle of the United States.” Notice that Frazier’s opening gambit doesn’t include possessives or qualifiers. He carefully avoids the more accurate description of his book: “This is Ian Frazier’s book containing his ideas and opinions of the Oglala culture ”

He returns to the idea a few paragraphs later:

Does [Frazier] ever admit that somebody from “the rez” has a different life experience than somebody who is just writing about the rez?

That I believe Frazier does indeed admit this — plainly, and throughout the book — is beside the point. The rub here is Alexie’s protectionist stance. Whatever emotional justifications it may have (and it’s impossible to deny that Indians have been victimized by bad art just as often as by other means), Alexie’s position is a reactionary one, inimical not only to art and journalism — to travel writing, most notably, which is what Frazier’s book amounts to — but also to science; even the slightest extrapolation sends it into ludicrous terrain. It’s easy to scoff at the bumbling hordes of men who felt affronted last year by “Stiffed,” Susan Faludi’s nonfiction inquiry into masculinity, on the grounds that a woman has no business commenting on men’s lives. But how different are their reactions, ultimately, from Alexie’s response to Frazier?

Moreover, Alexie could find himself tangled in the same web with which he’s trying to trap Frazier. In Alexie’s 1995 debut novel, “Reservation Blues,” the 1930s Mississippi Delta bluesman Robert Johnson appears, at the age of 82, in the tiny Spokane reservation town of Wellpinit. Legend has it that Johnson sold his soul to the devil in exchange for guitar prowess; he died at 27, leaving an apocalyptic mythology for blues fans worldwide, not to mention for blacks in Mississippi. But Alexie’s exhumation is a curious one. Johnson relinquishes to the Spokanes his talking guitar (which spouts such Blues Brothers-ish exclamations as “On the road, on the road. We startin’ up a band”), and eventually, via the help of an aged Indian rock ‘n’ roll therapist named Big Mom, he is released from his Faustian pact. The novel ends with him clad in a traditional ribbon shirt, cheerily eating fry bread — his myth turned entirely upside down.

No matter how artful Alexie’s use of Johnson as a symbol and how reverential his treatment, it’s a twisted appropriation — there’s no other word — of the life and legend of a man whose music represents a pinnacle of Southern black culture. But perhaps that’s due to Alexie’s source material: In his acknowledgments, he credits — “especially,” and solely, so far as Robert Johnson is concerned — the influence of the 1985 movie “Crossroads,” which starred Ralph Macchio (that’s right) as a young (white) guitarist who graciously frees a poor, old and oh-so-helpless (black) harmonica player from a Johnsonian pact with the devil. Talk about “romanticism” — and a “startling lack of self-consciousness.” At least Ian Frazier spent time on the reservation to research his book. Sherman Alexie just went to the video store.

Jonathan Miles, a contributing editor at Men's Journal, writes regularly for Salon Books.

No Plan B for Native American women

Despite being at exceptionally high risk for sexual assault, many have little access to emergency contraception

  • more
    • All Share Services

No Plan B for Native American women

Many women in America’s most vulnerable communities are already forced to live out Rick Santorum’s contraception-less nightmare. Heather Michon explains:

After weeks of debate over personhood, Planned Parenthood funding, transvaginal ultrasounds, fetal pain, Fluke-fest, aspirin-between-the-knees, and the little matter of 130,000 economically disadvantaged Texas women losing access to basic health care starting today, discussions about the accessibility of Plan B seem so… December 2011. Ancient history.

But for one group of women, access to emergency contraception is an urgent and tragically unmet need: the hundreds of thousands of Native American women who live on reservation lands. Their struggle for a better standard of care is the subject of a recent roundtable discussion by the Native American Women’s Health Education Resource Center (NAWHERC).

The statistics are stark. More than 1 in 3 Native American women will be sexually assaulted their lifetimes, a rate much higher than the general population. In one study, a stunning 92 percent of young women reported they had been forced to have sex against their will on a date.

Read more on her Open Salon blog.

Shocker: Obama to give America back to Indians

A secret U.N. plot revealed: First, they'll take Manhattan

  • more
    • All Share Services

Shocker: Obama to give America back to IndiansPresidential Medal of Freedom recipient Joseph Medicine Crow shows a drum to President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama during a reception for recipients and their families in the Blue Room of the White House, August 12, 2009. (Official White House photo by Pete Souza) This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.(Credit: The White House)

Congratulations, 2010, for fitting in one more completely insane made-up right-wing scandal: Barack Obama is going to give Manhattan back to the Indians! Also the U.N. will help, because grrrr, the U.N.!

Earlier this month, Obama said the U.S. would support the U.N.’s “Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People,” a non-legally binding promise to finally treat indigenous peoples with some small amount of decency after hundreds of years of the government murdering them and expelling them from their homes and forcibly relocating them to barren desert ghettos and now just letting them live in conditions of appalling, abject poverty. Bush refused to sign on to this, because, I dunno, it was from the U.N., and it might lead to frivolous lawsuits, or something? It’s a non-binding Declaration that basically says “we will be nice to indigenous people,” there’s no good reason not to support it.

But because hysterical right-wingers are hysterical right-wingers, they are seizing on this document as yet more proof that Obama wants to forcibly redistribute all the wealth, from productive hard-working Real Americans to swarthy welfare leeches. Take it away, World Net Daily!

President Obama is voicing support for a U.N. resolution that could accomplish something as radical as relinquishing some U.S. sovereignty and opening a path for the return of ancient tribal lands to American Indians, including even parts of Manhattan.

The issue is causing alarm among legal experts.

Oh, I bet it is. WND-founder Joseph Farah has a little column where he repeats this insane story, but then he quotes some egg-head professor who says that all the tribes want is some “open lands/spaces for repurchase,” which doesn’t really sound like “giving back” Manhattan to the Native Americans.

I say if you’re gonna do it, do it right and actually give New York back to the Delaware Indians! I’d rather be ruled by them than by Bloomberg and Albany.

(Also why don’t Scalia-style Constitutional originalists ever insist that America honor its various broken treaties with all the Indians whose lands we stole as we systematically removed and massacred them? I know that would entail giving them back the entirety of Oklahoma, among lots of other amusing things, but the supremacy of treaties is in the damn Constitution! Although I guess Article Six, with its federal supremacy clause and its no religious test talk, has always been the article that right-wingers are not particularly enthusiastic about.)

Correction: This article originally stated that WND founder Joseph Farah repeated the phrase “Carter era” in his incredibly silly column. That is incorrect. It was the incredibly silly “news story” on his incredibly silly website that repeated that phrase, even though the story has nothing at all to do with Jimmy Carter. I apologize for the error.

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Custer’s “Last Flag” sells for $2.2 million

A private collector takes home the only banner not captured or lost during the Battle of Little Big Horn

  • more
    • All Share Services

The only U.S. flag not captured or lost during George Armstrong Custer’s Last Stand at the Battle of Little Bighorn in southeastern Montana sold at auction Friday for $2.2 million.

The buyer was identified by the auction house Sotheby’s in New York as an American private collector. Frayed, torn, and with possible bloodstains, the flag had been valued before its sale at up to $5 million.

Since 1895, the 7th U.S. Cavalry flag — known as a “guidon” for its swallow-tailed shape — had been the property of the Detroit Institute of Arts, which paid just $54 for it.

Custer and more than 200 troopers were massacred by Lakota Sioux and Northern Cheyenne warriors in the infamous 1876 battle. Of the five guidons carried by Custer’s battalion only one was immediately recovered, from beneath the body of a fallen trooper.

And while Custer’s reputation has risen and fallen over the years — once considered a hero, he’s regarded by some contemporary scholars as an inept leader and savage American Indian killer — the guidon has emerged as the stuff of legend.

“It’s more than just a museum object or textile. It’s a piece of Americana,” said John Doerner, Chief Historian at the Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument in southeastern Montana.

The other flags were believed captured by the victorious Indians.

The recovered flag later became known as the Culbertson Guidon, after the member of the burial party who recovered it, Sgt. Ferdinand Culbertson. Made of silk, it measures 33 inches by 27 inches, and features 34 gold stars.

For most of the last century the flag was hidden from public view, kept in storage first at the museum and later, after a period on display in Montana, in a National Park Service facility in Harper’s Ferry, Md., according to Detroit Institute of Arts director Graham Beal.

Dating to an era when the museum took in a variety of natural history and historical items, the guidon was sold because it did not fit with the museum’s focus on art, Beal said.

“The irony is you get all these people phoning the museum upset we’re selling the flag, and no one knew we owned it,” he said.

A second 7th Cavalry guidon was recovered in September 1876, at the Battle of Slim Buttes near present-day Reva, S.D.

Now in possession of the Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument, that flag was poorly cared for and is now in horrible condition — “almost dust,” according to the monument’s chief of interpretation, Ken Woody.

As for Culbertson’s Guidon — or Custer’s Last Flag, as Sotheby’s has billed it — Woody pointed out that without the Custer mystique, it would be just another piece of old cloth.

“Some people like memorabilia and Americana, and they all want to own a little piece of it,” Woody said.

Sealed in a custom-made plexiglass case by the Detroit museum since its return from the Park Service in 1982, the flag has several holes and the red of some its stripes has run into the white stripes. Its once-sharp swallow tail tips are now tattered and torn.

Culbertson’s Guidon also is missing a star and a section of striping about 9 inches wide and 6 inches high — apparently cut away as a souvenir before its acquisition by the museum. Yet on the auction block, even what’s missing is worth a story.

“I’m sure Culbertson let other men take small snippets for themselves,” Sotheby’s vice chairman David Redden said.

Continue Reading Close

Obama set to hold second Native American conference

The president will host leaders from the nation's 565 federally recognized tribes at the White House Dec. 16

  • more
    • All Share Services

President Barack Obama will play host to Native American leaders at a White House conference on Dec. 16.

The president has invited the leaders of each of the 565 federally recognized tribes to the event, the White House announced Monday. It would be Obama’s second conference with American Indians. Obama first met with tribal leaders last November.

The president says he wants tribal leaders to be able to interact with him and with top administration officials.

Last year’s event drew leaders from 386 tribal nations and was the first meeting of its kind in 15 years.

U.S. offers $680 million to Indian farmers

After months of negotiation, the government settles with Native American ranchers who say they were denied loans

  • more
    • All Share Services

The government is offering American Indian farmers who say they were denied farm loans a $680 million settlement.

The two sides agreed on the deal after more than 10 months of negotiations. The government and the Indian plaintiffs met in federal court Tuesday to present the settlement to U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan.

The agreement also includes $80 million in farm debt forgiveness for the Indian plaintiffs and a series of initiatives to try and alleviate racism against American Indians and other minorities in rural farm loan offices. Individuals who can prove discrimination could receive up to $250,000.

A hearing on preliminary approval of the deal is set for Oct. 29. Sullivan indicated he was pleased with the agreement, calling it historic and coming down off his bench to shake hands with lawyers from both sides.

Assistant Attorney General Tony West and Joseph Sellers, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, both said they were encouraged by the judge’s positive reaction.

“Based on the court’s comments, we’re optimistic,” West said after the hearing adjourned.

The lawsuit filed in 1999 contends Indian farmers and ranchers lost hundreds of millions of dollars over several decades because they were denied USDA loans that instead went to their white neighbors. The government settled a similar lawsuit filed by black farmers more than a decade ago.

Unlike a second round of the black farmers suit that is now pending in Congress, the American Indian money would not need legislative action to be awarded.

The Obama administration has said settling the American Indian case is a priority. Hispanics and women farmers also have pending cases.

“Today’s settlement can never undo wrongs that Native Americans may have experienced in past decades, but combined with the actions we at USDA are taking to address such wrongs, the settlement will provide some measure of relief to those who have been discriminated against,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a statement.

Claryca Mandan of North Dakota’s Three Affiliated Tribes, a plaintiff in the case, stopped ranching after she and her husband were denied loans in the early 1980s. She said she was pleased with the settlement.

“This is a culmination of 30 years of struggle,” she said.

Continue Reading Close

Page 1 of 5 in Native Americans