Air raid on Washington

Boeing propositions Congress over China trade vote, and leaves nothing to the imagination.

Topics: China

When Boeing Co. chairman Phil Condit wound up his last visit to Washington, in February, with a pep talk to a business group, a little diplomacy seemed in order. Boeing’s Seattle engineers were still on strike, grousing about corporate callousness and worried the company would continue to subcontract more jobs to cheaper-labor countries — say, China, for instance.

Condit didn’t have a new money offer for the engineers. But he had one for Congress: If our top elected officials would approve permanent normal-trade status for Beijing, he said, the company would pay for those “aye” votes.

“We are an issues-oriented company,” the aerospace giant’s chairman announced to reporters, in reference to the upcoming China vote. “We try to support people who believe in the kind of issues that we think are important for the United States. So clearly, yes, we will be supporting people that believe in the direction we do.”

The offer didn’t need translation. A vote for Boeing’s China policy — as opposed to the cautionary approach urged by labor and human-rights groups — could be redeemed in campaign contributions. The record-setting bid — a mass payoff offer to 535 elected officials — had some observers doing double takes.

“This is a bribe,” says Joe Maciariello, a Claremont Graduate University business expert, of Condit’s statement. “Unfortunately,” adds Aaron Taylor of the Washington watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste, “this kind of quid pro quo is standard operating procedure in government. What is unusual is for a company official to speak to the media about it in such explicit terms.”

The accepted approach is a little backroom arm-twisting and a quiet promise of political contributions. But with the U.S. having agreed to seek permanent trade approval as a condition for China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, billions are at stake as the Clinton administration and American corporations face an intense vote in Congress — with Condit as the advance man.

He chairs a $6 million China trade campaign on behalf of the formidable U.S. Business Roundtable, representing chief executives from America’s biggest corporations lusting after Asian-trade nirvana. Boeing’s stake alone is immense. Already the No. 1 U.S. exporter to China, Boeing expects Beijing to order $120 billion in aircraft over the next two decades. To stabilize China’s trade status and avoid the now-yearly congressional battle and rights debate that ensues over policy renewal, Boeing and its roundtable members are pulling out all the stops and wallets.



But, with the House debate to begin May 22, the campaign ebbs and flows. Organized labor, so far, has the upper hand persuading a majority of legislators that permanent-trade status is bad news for the American worker. Many legislators are undecided, but can’t help notice that U.S. high-tech firms, flush with potential campaign funds, favor the vote. The White House figures it may need to convince only a dozen or so to swing the House vote (218 votes are needed for House passage; the Senate, where passage is likely, is set to begin debate in June).

President Clinton has offered some eleventh-hour inducements, such as a promise of a $22 million Commerce Department monitoring program that includes a “rapid response” team to assure China’s trade compliance. Some, such as Rep. Bill Archer, R-Texas, are predicting no less than the toppling of China’s government if the agreement is voted down.

Condit’s offer is seen as a desperate long shot — unless it swishes in. “Boeing’s professional government relations people would never make this kind of statement,” says waste-watchdog Taylor, and he’s apparently correct.

How, exactly, does the company plan to “support” those who back its China policy? “Boeing’s practice,” says Tim Neale, a Boeing spokesman in the capitol, “is to contribute money to elected officials and to people running for public office whose interests coincide with the company’s. All information about Boeing’s political contributions is on file with the Federal Election Commission and is public record.”

In other words, no comment. FEC records aren’t saying much yet, either. It’s early in the giving season, and Boeing’s China-related contributions won’t be surfacing until, perhaps, the next FEC disclosure-reporting period in June.

But the company has been typically generous to members from either party who tend to support Boeing legislative efforts and who also happen to be permanent-trade backers. They include Sen. Slade Gorton, R-Wash., ($7,500 in Boeing PAC donations this election cycle) and Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., ($5,500), along with Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Wash., ($4,000) and Majority Whip Dick Armey, R-Texas, ($3,000).

Not among Boeing’s $644,000 in soft- and hard-money congressional donations from this election cycle, has gone to Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., and Ruben Hinojosa, D-Texas, who have yet to make up their minds on the vote despite taking a recent White House-promoted trip to China. Rep. David Bonior, D-Mich., point man for the trade bill opposition, is also not on Boeing’s recipient list. Normally supportive of legislators from its home base in the Northwest, Boeing has not sent a donation to Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., either. DeFazio’s opinion of the China trade bill? “Our biggest export to China is family-wage American jobs,” DeFazio says.

Boeing regularly spreads its political capital around — it gave out $1.65 million to hundreds of federal candidates in the election off-year 1997-98, for example. Still, having written about Boeing for several decades, I was amused to see its top executive leading the China effort sporting an “easy money” sign. It was, compared to the company’s rich traditions of artful persuasion, literally politically incorrect. Boeing’s agents once regularly greased the company’s deals by slipping millions to Saudi royal families, Japanese government officials and assorted airline potentates — in a way, making the payoff as much a piece of aerospace history as the well-preserved Red Barn where Boeing was born.

But the dirty deed has always been performed under the cover of darkness, requiring offshore accounts and weighty bags of unmarked bills. It got so out of hand that Boeing factored bribe percentages into its sales estimates. In the post-Watergate 1970s, when the company was accused of violating newly dusted-off ethics laws, Boeing agreed to a U.S. consent decree following allegations it paid $52 million in bribes to foreign governments. Company officials admitted no wrongdoing, but privately argued they had to offer payoffs since their competitors were doling them out, too.

That was also Boeing’s excuse in a colorful civil lawsuit still proceeding today on appeals through a U.S. court in Florida. A Canadian airplane-maker has earned a $2.8 million judgment alleging, in part, that Boeing executives approved a $786,000 bribe on the 1989 sale of planes in the Bahamas. A 1993 Bahamian government investigation aided by Scotland Yard concluded that a Boeing sales “consultant” (a dapper, well-connected man about town whose expertise of big jets consisted of having ridden in some) had been paid $1.4 million by Boeing “for the corrupt purpose of passing on a bribe” as part of the deal.

Those influential events say a lot for style and smoke-filled rooms. The argot of the sly deal, the legendary finesse of Condit’s skilled forebears, requires he, at most, lean into the noise of a crowded bar and mutter an unrecordable “Something for your favorite charity, Senator?” But a press conference?

“Generally,” says watchdog Taylor, “this type of thing is done in a sort of doublespeak that is understood by the parties involved, but vague enough to provide plausible deniability.” Condit simply may have “unwittingly broken one of the unspoken rules of the Washington game” — a case of accidental honesty.

Rick Anderson

Rick Anderson has covered sex, crime and politics as a reporter and columnist for The Seattle Times and Seattle Weekly. He’s the author of “Seattle Vice.”

Featured Slide Shows

7 motorist-friendly camping sites

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 9

Sponsored Post

  • White River National Forest via Lower Crystal Lake, Colorado
    For those OK with the mainstream, White River Forest welcomes more than 10 million visitors a year, making it the most-visited recreation forest in the nation. But don’t hate it for being beautiful; it’s got substance, too. The forest boasts 8 wilderness areas, 2,500 miles of trail, 1,900 miles of winding service system roads, and 12 ski resorts (should your snow shredders fit the trunk space). If ice isn’t your thing: take the tire-friendly Flat Tops Trail Scenic Byway — 82 miles connecting the towns of Meeker and Yampa, half of which is unpaved for you road rebels.
    fs.usda.gov/whiteriveryou


    Image credit: Getty

  • Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest via Noontootla Creek, Georgia
    Boasting 10 wildernesses, 430 miles of trail and 1,367 miles of trout-filled stream, this Georgia forest is hailed as a camper’s paradise. Try driving the Ridge and Valley Scenic Byway, which saw Civil War battles fought. If the tall peaks make your engine tremble, opt for the relatively flat Oconee National Forest, which offers smaller hills and an easy trail to the ghost town of Scull Shoals. Scaredy-cats can opt for John’s Mountain Overlook, which leads to twin waterfalls for the sensitive sightseer in you.
    fs.usda.gov/conf


    Image credit: flickr/chattoconeenf

  • Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness Area via Green Road, Michigan
    The only national forest in Lower Michigan, the Huron-Mainstee spans nearly 1 million acres of public land. Outside the requisite lush habitat for fish and wildlife on display, the Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness Area is among the biggest hooks for visitors: offering beach camping with shores pounded by big, cerulean surf. Splash in some rum and you just might think you were in the Caribbean.
    fs.usda.gov/hmnf


    Image credit: umich.edu

  • Canaan Mountain via Backcountry Canaan Loop Road, West Virginia
    A favorite hailed by outdoorsman and author Johnny Molloy as some of the best high-country car camping sites anywhere in the country, you don’t have to go far to get away. Travel 20 miles west of Dolly Sods (among the busiest in the East) to find the Canaan Backcountry (for more quiet and peace). Those willing to leave the car for a bit and foot it would be remiss to neglect day-hiking the White Rim Rocks, Table Rock Overlook, or the rim at Blackwater River Gorge.
    fs.usda.gov/mnf


    Image credit: Getty

  • Mt. Rogers NRA via Hurricane Creek Road, North Carolina
    Most know it as the highest country they’ll see from North Carolina to New Hampshire. What they may not know? Car campers can get the same grand experience for less hassle. Drop the 50-pound backpacks and take the highway to the high country by stopping anywhere on the twisting (hence the name) Hurricane Road for access to a 15-mile loop that boasts the best of the grassy balds. It’s the road less travelled, and the high one, at that.
    fs.usda.gov/gwj


    Image credit: wikipedia.org

  • Long Key State Park via the Overseas Highway, Florida
    Hiking can get old; sometimes you’d rather paddle. For a weekend getaway of the coastal variety and quieter version of the Florida Keys that’s no less luxe, stick your head in the sand (and ocean, if snorkeling’s your thing) at any of Long Key’s 60 sites. Canoes and kayaks are aplenty, as are the hot showers and electric power source amenities. Think of it as the getaway from the typical getaway.
    floridastateparks.org/longkey/default.cfm


    Image credit: floridastateparks.org

  • Grand Canyon National Park via Crazy Jug Point, Arizona
    You didn’t think we’d neglect one of the world’s most famous national parks, did you? Nor would we dare lead you astray with one of the busiest parts of the park. With the Colorado River still within view of this cliff-edge site, Crazy Jug is a carside camper’s refuge from the troops of tourists. Find easy access to the Bill Hall Trail less than a mile from camp, and descend to get a peek at the volcanic Mt. Trumbull. (Fear not: It’s about as active as your typical lazy Sunday in front of the tube, if not more peaceful.)
    fs.usda.gov/kaibab


    Image credit: flickr/Irish Typepad

  • As the go-to (weekend) getaway car for fiscally conscious field trips with friends, the 2013 MINI Convertible is your campground racer of choice, allowing you and up to three of your co-pilots to take in all the beauty of nature high and low. And with a fuel efficiency that won’t leave you in the latter, you won’t have to worry about being left stranded (or awkwardly asking to go halfsies on gas expenses).


    Image credit: miniusa.com

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 9

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>