Mysteries

The case of the confusing bookstore

It takes the skills of a great detective to find the best mysteries among the new releases. Our critic offers his list of some recent gems.

  • more
    • All Share Services

The case of the confusing bookstore

You know how it is. You stop by your favorite mystery bookstore to find out what’s new and you’re confronted with dozens of choices, all of them bearing blurbs (some perhaps from your favorite mystery writers) assuring you that this is just the thing you’ve been looking for. But how do you separate the good hard-boiled writing from the Chandler manqués? Or, if you prefer comic mysteries, how can you tell the writers who are truly funny from the ones who are merely cute?

This column, which will appear in Salon occasionally, makes no claim to be comprehensive; my tastes may not be yours. What I would like it to be is the equivalent of one of those conversations that never seem to happen in the huge superstores, the chance encounters that are increasingly the province of niche bookstores. You run into a stranger and start talking about what you’ve been reading, trading recommendations or warnings. Think of this column as a periodic report from a fellow mystery reader (who can feel as overwhelmed by what’s available as you do) on what he’s liked in the last few months.

And I’d also like it if readers took the opportunity to share their discoveries with me. Conversations with strangers have provided me with some great leads on things I would have otherwise missed. I can’t cover everything. But part of the pleasure of reading is being able to share your current enthusiasms with others. I’ll be your informant if you’ll be mine.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Dark End of the Street
By Ace Atkins
336 pages
William Morrow
[Order from Powells.com]

The critic Peter Guralnick called James Carr the greatest of all soul singers. To anyone who’s ever heard him, he is certainly the most terrifying. What you encounter in Carr’s voice is an emotional outpouring so total, so naked that the madness he slipped into at the height of his career sounds only too plausible. Listen to Carr’s cover of the Bee Gees’ “To Love Somebody” or his version of “The Dark End of the Street” by Chips Moman and Dan Penn, Carr’s biggest hit and the source for the title of Ace Atkins’ new mystery, and you find yourself wondering how this man will get out of the song alive.

In “Dark End of the Street” Carr’s music is such a powerful vortex that anyone who ever heard it, anyone who knew him, anyone who crossed paths with him at one time or another finds their lives in danger. In its way, Atkins’ novel, the third and (so far) finest in the Nick Travers series, is a rebuke to the notion that art is or should be enriching, comforting, therapeutic. In this book, art can kill you, and that is part of its greatness.

The Carr figure here is Clyde James, a soul singer who disappeared after recording a few hit sides in the ’60s and who may or may not still be alive. Whether he’s dead or still breathing, his absence hasn’t kept him from haunting the lives of the people who knew him, including his sister, Loretta Jackson, who hires Nick to find him.

Nick is a great conceit of a hero: a former pro football star, a current professor of blues at Tulane and a part-time P.I. Loretta and her husband, JoJo, are Nick’s spiritual parents and their bar is his truest home. Nick is hard-boiled without being a macho fool about it, and you can say the same of his creator. Atkins writes good, solid hard-boiled prose, with just enough of the smartass in it to steer clear of mannerist pastiche and enough sharp description to give his passages a lyrical punch. (One caveat: It’s not a good idea to read Atkins on an empty stomach since his frequent descriptions of Southern cuisine can start your gastric juices rumbling like a Gene Krupa solo.)

What every character in “Dark End of the Street” shares, from the heroes to the villains, is that they’ve all been marked, for better and worse, by music. There’s a hit woman named Perfect Leigh who got her name from her mother mishearing a Rolling Stones’ line. Creepiest of all is “Jon Burrows,” an Elvis-worshipping hit man who believes himself to be Elvis’ dead twin, Jesse Garon. Atkins doesn’t use this character for some sneering swipe at poor white Southern culture. For one thing, as a son of the South himself, he’s all too aware of how that culture has been dismissed as trash. But he does dig right into what’s creepy about the Elvis-as-Jesus mind-set. A lot of people have played with the idea of Elvis risen from the dead in some unholy incarnation, none of them with the black humor or the menace Atkins captures.

But it’s the spirit of James Carr who hovers over every page of this book, as if that great tortured voice, or even the memory of it, were scanning the territory like spotlights after a jailbreak. It’s Atkins’ tribute to Carr that none of the characters escape its reach.

- – - – - – - – - – -

Chasing the Dime
By Michael Connelly
400 pages
Little, Brown
[Order from Powells.com]

A mystery writer looking to do something innovative in the field might attempt to write a novel where the sex industry is not automatically the modern-day equivalent of the white slave trade. It’s not that the sex industry doesn’t have its sleazy, abusive side; it’s that the idea of it as nothing but a chamber of horrors is a clichi. And with the popularity of porn, that appears to be a vision that few consider to be the whole story.

Michael Connelly is one of the best of the current crop of American hard-boiled writers, but halfway through “Chasing the Dime” I began feeling that Nancy Bartholomew’s series of feather-light comic mysteries featuring the Florida stripper Sierra Lavotini had him beat for sophisticated outlook. Connelly can only think of the sex trade in terms of victims and users, and the worst part of the book is when he slides into the moralism that is the wheezing bane of hard-boiled writing.

Connelly’s new book is about a computer whiz named Henry Pierce whose company is awaiting the financial backing to manufacture an invention that will revolutionize not just the computer industry but plenty of others as well. Moving into his new apartment, Henry finds that his phone number used to belong to a woman working for an escort service, and he is still receiving calls from her clients. Bored, anxious to take his mind off work and more than a little naive, Henry tries to contact her, realizes she’s gone missing and is soon under suspicion from both the cops and his co-workers.

“Chasing the Dime” is Connelly’s second novel this year, following “City of Bones,” which looked as if it was the beginning of the end of his books about L.A. detective Harry Bosch. Maybe that caesura in the Bosch saga is what makes “Chasing the Dime” feel as if Connelly is marking time. It doesn’t have the urgency of his best work, but it also avoids his tendency to work in one plot twist too many until the plausibility of his story falls to bits. (That was most notably a problem in “The Poet,” otherwise his creepiest book.) Still, “Chasing the Dime” is well-plotted and it holds your interest, and it’s easy to picture the book’s high-tech shenanigans translating well to the screen. And nobody is going to argue with the revelation of who’s behind the book’s evildoing: It’s a villain so many of us hate already.

Sleepyhead
By Mark Billingham
310 pages
William Morrow
[Order from Powells.com]

As the modus operandi in serial killer procedurals grow more and more grotesquely baroque, the genre’s tendency to fetishize those killers becomes more and more obvious. What’s refreshing about the British comedy writer Mark Billingham’s “Sleepyhead” is that this debut novelist comes up with a genuinely creepy premise without being unpleasant. More important, he doesn’t lose sight of the victims.

The psycho in “Sleepyhead” is drugging young women as a prelude to inducing stroke, leaving them in a state of permanent coma. The most remarkable passages in the book are the inner monologues of Allison Willets, the killer’s sole “success” (i.e., the only one of his victims who doesn’t die — she’s conscious, but she can’t speak and can barely move). It’s here that Billingham shows his knack for comedy. Allison’s voice has a “what next?” exasperation that manages to be darkly funny without slighting the horror of her situation.

Allison’s doctor, Anne Coburn (one of those smart, ultracompetent, no-nonsense women that some mystery writers are so adept at and whom readers love), devises a way of communicating with Allison involving the young woman blinking her eyelids. Allison remarks: “Just call me the Amazing Performing Eyelid Woman! Only I can’t sodding well perform, can I? … I was screaming at my eyelids inside my head. It felt like the signal went out from my brain. But slowly. It was some dodgy old Lada beetling along the circuits, or whatever they’re called … It was on the right road and then it just got stuck at roadworks somewhere. Like it lost interest. I know I can do it but I haven’t got any control over it. When I’m not trying I’m blinking away like some nutter, but when I want to I’m as good as dead.” At their best, Allison’s monologues have some of the otherworldly strangeness of the heaven sections of Alice Sebold’s “The Lovely Bones.”

The revelation of the killer’s identity and motive are, frankly, a prosaic letdown after the extremity of the crime. And Billingham takes risks in making his cop hero, Detective Inspector Tom Thorne, so pigheaded and off track for most of the investigation, though it’s easy to imagine Thorne becoming a companionable protagonist (the next of the Thorne books, “Scaredy Cat” is already out in the U.K.) and Billingham’s control of character and plot becoming more sure. He’s off to a remarkable start.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Tart Noir
By Stella Duffy and Lauren Henderson, eds.
309 pages
Berkley Prime Crime
[Order from Powells.com]

An outgrowth of the Web site tartcity.com, this collection of short stories by a lineup of some of the most prominent female mystery writers vindicates the site’s exasperation with women characters as tokens or frail damsels in distress. The collection was edited by Stella Duffy, author of the Saz Martin mysteries, and Lauren Henderson, author of the Sam Jones mysteries, and they’ve managed to corral an impressive array of their colleagues to contribute.

Henderson’s “Tragic Heroines Tell All” imagines Phaedra, Medea and Lady Macbeth spilling all on a talk show. The author’s trademark cheekiness is in evidence but also a fine satirical idea: how the Oprah-ization of feelings and experience reduces grand passions to nothing more than piddling neuroses. Duffy’s “Martha Grace” is a cruel and rather obvious object lesson redeemed by the sinister fairy tale mood. Among the other highlights are Jen Banbury’s “Take, for Example, Meatpie,” in which a mysterious and larcenous young woman moves from junior high to junior high, finding the most picked-on boy and providing him with a sexual education. It’s not the follow-up to Banbury’s debut, “Like a Hole in the Head,” that some of us have been waiting for, but it’s a sexy — and pleasingly perverse — entry.

Even sexier and much, much darker is Val McDermid’s “Metamorphosis.” In her introduction to the story McDermid says she has stayed away from writing about sex because it’s so tough to do. Well, the only sweat that shows in “Metamorphosis” is the sweat covering the lovers’ bodies. And the eroticism of McDermid’s writing here is matched by the twisted ending, which has the muffled deadliness of a brick wrapped in a towel.

Charles Taylor is a columnist for the Newark Star-Ledger.

A sex traffic mystery

A new horror novel delves into the dark corners of the Internet as it investigates a girl's murder

  • more
    • All Share Services

A sex traffic mystery

Nobody concludes a novel quite the way Mo Hayder does: with a revelation that leaves the reader staring at the page, poleaxed, willing more words to appear or flicking back to see just how she did it. Hayder’s astonishing 2007 horror novel “Pig Island,” for example, ended with the stunned narrator, framed for murder, watching his nemesis depart and “something coiled and dark, like smoke or a spirit, lifting itself out of the car and hovering near the roof…” Now, on the final page of “Hanging Hill,” a mother lovingly watches her young daughter and a friend drive off to the Glastonbury Festival. “The van turned left. Not right, the way she would have gone…. Leave them alone, she thought…. You just can’t go on worrying about your children for ever.” Worrying: a quaint, domestic impulse; utterly redundant in the terrifying world that Hayder creates.

Barnes & Noble ReviewHere, as always, a Hayder plot that seems straightforward is masterfully skewed. In Bath, England, Lorne Wood, a privileged teenage beauty, is found horribly murdered beside a canal. Detective Inspector Zoe Benedict is led, by instinct as much as evidence, to suspect a connection to the sex trade and Internet pornography, a realm that Hayder evokes in all its dankness. “[M]ost of the time they’re doing it because it’s easier than standing behind a till at Top Shop for eight hours a day,” one avuncular pornographer tells Zoe of his “models.” Less benign are fetishistic practices “all about humiliating the woman.” As one jaded dame explains, this is what sells “by the shedload … Makes you wonder about human nature, don’t it?”

Zoe doesn’t wonder anymore. She has seen too much. And she has secrets of her own. But that is another story, one of a handful that Hayder expertly steers on parallel tracks as she shunts the murder investigation forward, then makes it stall or veer, all the while heightening our sense of dread. While Zoe courts danger by revisiting her past and pursuing Lorne’s likely killer, Zoe’s estranged sister, Sally, becomes the housekeeper for a nouveau-squire who exudes criminality and violence. Divorced, somewhat clueless, and mother to teenage Millie, Sally has little choice. She does, however, have a shady lover who reveals that Sally’s employer is involved with the Ministry of Defense, the UN mission in Kosovo, and sex trafficking.

These are filaments that flicker at the periphery of our anxious vision while Zoe and Sally demand our attention. Especially Zoe, who, like many female Hayder protagonists, is both wounded and feral. Slumped in a toilet cubicle, for example, her own blood dripping onto the floor, she resolves to “…take some time off work…. Sleep rough and drink Guinness out of the can.” Fueled by desperation more than courage, Zoe is as startling as the cinematic action scenes that Hayder so expertly stages. Shocks intensify — a nail gun comes into play, a body is dismembered, foul sex committed — while the tidal pull of Hayder’s intersecting narratives churns up tangled evidence that could incriminate Sally’s vile employer, a local drug dealer or a lovesick teenager. Toward the end, the sisters traverse moonlit farmland — “Two lonely figures casting long blue shadows…feet shushing the dead corn” — to confront Lorne’s killer and the final horror. Which is not, of course, the end at all.

Continue Reading Close

National Review asks why Obama reads critically acclaimed fiction instead of Jonah Goldberg

Conservative "intellectuals" examine the president's vacation book list -- and become concerned

  • more
    • All Share Services

National Review asks why Obama reads critically acclaimed fiction instead of Jonah Goldberg

Barack Obama is reading gritty rural neo-noir by an acknowledged master of the crime fiction genre, and the National Review is not happy with him. The president bought Daniel Woodrell’s “Bayou Trilogy,” along with a number of other novels, at a Martha’s Vineyard bookstore, and Tevi Troy, a “senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former senior White House aide” (“senior fellow at the Hudson Institute” means “minor Republican apparatchik in need of a paycheck while his party’s out of power”) is analyzing the president’s reading list for you.

The reports are in about the books President Obama is looking at on his annual trip to Martha’s Vineyard. According to reports from the Los Angeles Times and the AP, Obama purchased five books on his trip to the Vineyard bookseller Bunch of Grapes: Marianna Baer’s Frost, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, Daniel Woodrell’s Bayou Trilogy, Emma Donoghue’s Room, and Ward Just’s Rodin’s Debutante.

The second wave came when, according to Alexis Simendinger, White House aides listed for reporters the three books Obama brought with him to the Vineyard: two more novels — Abraham Verghese’s Cutting for Stone and David Grossman’s To the End of the Land — and one nonfiction work — Isabel Wilkerson’s The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America’s Great Migration.

This “may constitute the oddest assortment of presidential reading material ever disclosed,” according to Troy. Because Woodrell’s books may be almost universally praised, but they are genre fiction, and genre fiction is too trashy for presidents to read. “Bill Clinton, for example, used to love mysteries, but he did not advertise the titles of what he once called ‘my little cheap thrills outlet.’” Even Bill Clinton knew better than to tell people he read books with crimes in them! (Can you imagine if Barack Obama was found to be hiding the fact that he read crime fiction? IMPEACHMENT.)

Also one of the novels is by an Israeli author, but it is by an Israeli author who criticizes Israeli policy, proving once again that Obama is no friend of Israel. “[R]eading this novel will likely not assuage those concerned about Obama’s views on the Middle East,” says Troy, and he should know, because he is the one using it to attempt to score an insane political point.

The best part (noted by Matt Yglesias) is when Troy asks why this bookstore’s online store doesn’t list horrible books written by National Review contributors as “in stock.”

Obama, like other Democratic presidents, has tended to read mainly liberal books, although he could stand to gain some insight from conservative ones. There could be many reasons for his selection bias, but buying his books at the “legendary” Bunch of Grapes probably is not helping matters. While I have never had the pleasure of shopping there, the store’s website highlights a variety of its offerings, with nary a conservative work. There may be some on the shelves there somewhere, but they are probably not staring Obama in the face when he visits the store.

According to the results of my completely unscientific survey of Bunch of Grapes’s website, Laura Ingraham’s Of Thee I Zing, Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism, and Mark Steyn’s After America were listed as available for online ordering. Thomas Friedman’s Hot, Flat, and Crowded, which appeared as an Obama book selection twice, in 2008 and 2009, was listed as “In Stock.” This is not meant as a criticism of the bookseller; Bunch of Grapes is running a business, and they need to cater to the liberal crowd at Martha’s Vineyard in order to bring in customers. At the same time, if Obama wants to diversify his reading selections, Bunch of Grapes may not be the place to go.

Why would Bunch of Grapes stock Emma Donoghue’s “Room,” a novel Aimee Bender called “truly memorable” and “remarkable,” when they could stock Jonah Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism,” a book that the American Conservative says “reads less like an extended argument than as a catalogue of conservative intellectual clichés, often irrelevant to the supposed point of the book”? Liberal bias, that’s why. Liberal fascist bias.

Anyway, the president is “out of touch” and “in a bubble” because he can read, according to a conservative intellectual, at a “think tank.”

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

The latest “Game of Thrones” casting news

Gwendoline Christie, Natalie Dormer join with houses of Tarth and Tyrell

  • more
    • All Share Services

The latest British actress Gwendoline Christie, a new "GoT" cast member.

George R.R. Martin’s blog, “Not a Blog” (it’s a LiveJournal), posted a cryptic message yesterday, about bunnies and Aussies and barbicans.

Since the tag was “Game of Thrones” and “HBO,” the collective Internet began salivating as it tried to unravel the mystery. Surprisingly, some people got it.

Turns out all these references were clues about the casting of Brienne, Maid of Tarth, a character that appears in the second “A Song of Fire and Ice” book. British actress Gwendoline Christie snagged the coveted role of a woman described as “piggish” and “awkward” in the books, who is mocked with the nickname “Brienne the Beauty” because she is well … not.

Christie however, is quite a looker, though I see where Martin saw the female knight in her: The actress is 6’3.

Martin revealed the meaning of his riddle later that night:

As for my clues … Christie played in a music video called DAMARIS, which includes a song about Isabelle, the She-Wolf of France (wife of King Edward II, for the history nerds out there), and played in Shakespeare’s CYMBELINE at the Barbican theatre. She also posed for Australian photographed Polly Borland for a show called “Bunny.”

She also appears in the recent Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassas, though I did not use that one in my clues.

Here’s Gwendoline in action, in a (very) short NOMAD film called “Ourhouse.”

Oh yeah, she’s going to be great.

An earlier announcement has pegged “The Tudors” actress Natalie Dormer to play 16-year-old Margaery Tyrell.

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Pick of the week: A natural-born Romanian killer

Pick of the week: From the Romanian New Wave's greatest director comes the inside-out murder mystery "Aurora"

  • more
    • All Share Services

Pick of the week: A natural-born Romanian killerCristi Puiu in "Aurora"

It’s tough to say where Romanian director Cristi Puiu’s dark and mesmerizing new film “Aurora” ranks on the “cultural vegetables” scale. On one hand, it’s a bone-dry existential comedy, or perhaps a reverse-engineered murder mystery, that runs almost three hours and is far more concerned with capturing the rhythms and rituals of everyday life than with delivering a plot. On the other hand, “Aurora” tells an inherently dramatic story about the moment when an ordinary guy snaps the tether, goes out and buys a gun, and proceeds to wreak bloody vengeance on the world. This is something like “Falling Down,” that Joel Schumacher movie with Michael Douglas, as remade by Andrei Tarkovsky or Chantal Akerman.

In the first sentence above, I’m referring to a recent kerfuffle among film critics that began with a New York Times Magazine article by Dan Kois and continued with responses by Times critics Manohla Dargis and A.O. Scott and numerous others (including yours truly). This included various allegations of crimes against art and totalitarian groupthink, along with unhelpful discussion of the meaning of the word “boring.” Thankfully, the schism that was conjured up between intolerable art-house snobs and lightweight slaves of Hollywood is mostly imaginary. Hardly anyone who cares about cinema only likes one kind of movie, or judges every movie by the same standard. Right now, I’m suggesting that you should catch “Aurora” (with the parenthesis that it’s not going to be everybody’s cup of bitter Romanian coffee), and I’d say almost the same thing, with slightly more apologetic eye-rolling, about “Transformers: Dark of the Moon.”

Still, that debate provided an interesting background for “Aurora,” which I found to be a gritty, atmospheric and nerve-wracking work that powerfully evokes the disordered mental condition and depressed surroundings of its middle-aged protagonist (played by Puiu himself). I totally get that the idea of watching a three-hour film in Romanian is daunting, but once I adjusted to Puiu’s rhythms I was fully engaged. That said, if you go in expecting a conventional mode of narrative and explication, where every scene advances us further into the plot in some specific way, and you understand who all the people are and how they relate to each other, then this movie will frustrate you and drive you completely freakin’ nuts.

As in the film that made Puiu’s international reputation, “The Death of Mr. Lazarescu,” the narrative of “Aurora” is turned upside-down, or maybe inside out. The earlier movie tells us what’s going to happen in the title, and then we don’t, in fact, witness the death of Dante Lazarescu, only the entirely ordinary day full of quarreling neighbors and distracted nurses and mechanical malfunctions that’s going to be the last one of his life. Instead of the intense subjectivity of most movies, where the hero’s trials and tribulations become the focus of heightened and artificial drama, Puiu pulls back to a more objective view, reminding us that momentous events in the real world don’t come with a pulsing soundtrack or a temporary suspension of the universal tendency toward entropy.

Puiu’s character in “Aurora,” who we eventually learn is named Viorel, may be having a worse day than Mr. Lazarescu, if that’s possible. A taciturn and nearly affectless fellow of 40 or so, he skulks through the streets of Bucharest, by car and by bus and on foot, with a haunted look in his eyes. Viorel appears to be a family man, at least in the deceptively calm opening scene, but things have evidently gone wrong somehow (and trust me, it’s not worth trying to figure it out). He appears to be following a blond woman (not his wife) with small children, although we don’t know who they are; he has fragmentary conversations we can’t hear or can’t understand; he acquires a shotgun and some ammunition and spends some time considering suicide before deciding on, shall we say, a more extroverted path. But the startling eruptions of violence in “Aurora” are momentary, and occur either outside the frame or deep in the middle distance. They emerge from a life full of other things: Even as Viorel is noticeably sliding into insanity, he haggles with movers, stands in line at the deli, collects some ironed shirts from his mother, has a testy exchange with his stepfather and a cordial one with a neighbor over water damage accidentally caused by an enthusiastic kid in the bathtub.

Puiu’s films belong to a recognizable tradition of Eastern European social comedy, and depict post-Communist Romania as a place where everybody feels aggrieved at everybody else and where nothing can ever happen without a great deal of pointless argument and defensive grumpery. In a way, that’s the joke of the film, that even a guy going on a killing spree has to navigate the tremendous hassle of Romanian society, and that nobody much cares. I don’t think Puiu is blaming Romania’s depressed and contentious national mood for Viorel’s crimes, exactly; Americans are all too aware that this sort of thing can happen anywhere. Mordant, anti-psychological and masterfully shot (by Viorel Sergovici), “Aurora” is both a mystery and a mysterious accomplishment. It may demand multiple viewings, both to understand a bit more about what’s going on and also, if you get me, to figure out what the hell is going on.

“Aurora” is now playing at the IFC Center in New York, and will open Aug. 27 at the Harvard Film Archive in Cambridge, Mass., with other cities and dates (and home-video release) to follow.

Continue Reading Close

Heiress’ long-hidden art will go on display

Huguette Clark hoarded works by Monet, Renoir, and John Singer Sargent -- and in her will, has started a museum

  • more
    • All Share Services

Heiress' long-hidden art will go on displayFILE - This Aug. 11, 1930 file photo shows Mrs. Huguette Clark Gower, daughter of the late Sen. William A. Clark of Montana, a copper magnate, in Reno, Nev. Clark, the 104-year-old heiress to a Montana copper fortune who once lived in the largest apartment on Fifth Avenue, died Tuesday, May 24, 2011, at a Manhattan hospital even as an investigation continues into how her millions were handled. (AP Photo, File)(Credit: AP)

Mysterious multimillionaire Huguette Clark was born into privilege and died, more than a hundred years later, in almost total solitude. While there was plenty of interest in her death last month, very little information could actually be reported: She hadn’t been seen in public for decades, and few could guess what might happen to her $400 million fortune and uninhabited luxury properties in California, New York and Connecticut.

In her May obituary, the Los Angeles Times described Clark as “a copper tycoon’s daughter with a taste for exquisite French dolls, baronial homes and solitude;” the New York Times labelled her “the last link to New York’s Gilded Age” — a relic from “the city’s glory days of Astors, Guggenheims and Vanderbilts.” Clark had been raised in a different world, and (or so the papers implied) she seemed to have stayed there, isolating herself from the twenty-first century and its inhabitants.

Indeed, Clark might have died in relative obscurity (as much obscurity as someone worth $400 million can achieve, at least) had it not been for several MSNBC features published last year, including one that questioned the motives of those who cared for the heiress, asking provocatively: “Who protects an old lady who secluded herself from the world, limiting her life to a single room, playing dress-up with her dolls and watching cartoons?” The piece ignited interest in Huguette, ensuring that plenty of eyes would be trained on her estate in the instance of her demise.

Now that Clark has died, questions about her estate and vast personal holdings are finally being answered. The heiress’ will was released this week — you can read the entire document here (pdf), courtesy of the New York Post — and it has some interesting bequests.

Part of Clark’s immense estate will be used to start a new fund, the Bellosguardo Foundation, “for the primary purpose of fostering and promoting the Arts.” The showpiece of the foundation will be Bellosguardo itself: Clark’s grand California home, set on 23 acres and reportedly worth $100 million. The property will be made into a museum — filled with art (including paintings by Renoir and John Singer Sargent), musical instruments (including a Stradivarius), and rare books, all moved west from Clark’s kingly 42-room Fifth Avenue apartments. Clark herself had apparently not visited Bellosguardo “for at least 50 years” before her death; now, the house will likely attract large crowds.

Not all of Clark’s art will go to the California estate, however; a $25 million Monet — one of the “Water Lilies” paintings — has been left to Washington, D.C.’s Corcoran Gallery, which already has a wing named after Clark’s senator father (and owns his 775-piece art collection).

As to the people who will personally profit from Clark’s will — including, prominently, the heiress’ longtime nurse — The Atlantic Wire has assembled a handy cheat sheet. Clark left nothing to her relatives, whom her attorney, Wallace Bock, says she “knowingly and assiduously avoided” over the years.

One million dollars will be split between Bock himself and Clark’s accountant, Irving Kamsler, both of whom fell under suspicion for mismanagement of Clark’s wealth when last year’s MSNBC report was released. “The Manhattan district attorney’s office is investigating how Mr. Bock and Mr. Kamsler have handled Mrs. Clark’s money, according to a person briefed on the case who spoke on the condition of anonymity,” The New York Times reported Wednesday.

Continue Reading Close

Emma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich.

Page 1 of 17 in Mysteries