Idiocy of the week

The shameless spinning of a former national security advisor.

Topics:

It was a remarkable Op-Ed. Tuesday, in the Washington Post, Brent Scowcroft, the former national security advis0r, hailed the Bush administration’s handling of the Iraq question. Fair enough. It’s been a pretty impressive fall. It pains those who believe in appeasing Saddam, but we now have for the first time in many years unanimous U.N. support for a real inspections regime, a clear opening for war if we need it and Saddam in an ever-tightening noose. Who can complain about that, apart from the pro-Saddam apologists in the antiwar brigade?

Scowcroft tries to spin this as a victory for his argument, famously made last August, that threatening unilateral war against Iraq was a foolish idea, given America’s international isolation and the need to “focus” on the war against terrorists. (Scowcroft saw the prevention of weapons of mass destruction from getting into the hands of terrorists as completely independent of a war on terror. Well, I guess we’re all entitled to our opinion.)

But here’s Scowcroft’s argument:

“By credibly threatening unilateral military action to resolve an Iraqi problem that has festered for years, the administration achieved two objectives. First, it induced the United Nations Security Council to face up to its responsibilities. Second, by declaring that the only sure solution to the Iraqi problem was regime change by military force, the administration maximized the odds that Saddam Hussein would take the United States seriously, accept U.N. authority and avoid a conflict that could well involve incalculable consequences for the region. The result: unanimous agreement in the Security Council that an international outlaw regime must return forthwith to lawful behavior, and unmistakable determination to use military force if it does not.”

Excuse me, but isn’t this exactly what Scowcroft was advising us not to do last August? He wrote that “there is a virtual consensus in the world against an attack on Iraq at this time. So long as that sentiment persists, it would require the U.S. to pursue a virtual go-it-alone strategy against Iraq, making any military operations correspondingly more difficult and expensive.”



Now no one was suggesting last August that we were going to attack Iraq immediately. So the words “at this time” must surely have meant this fall or winter. So Scowcroft was advocating a diplomacy-first policy and an exclusively U.N. route to disarm or depose Saddam. But now he admits that “credibly threatening unilateral military action” was the key element in the administration’s success in these very objectives. So he was dead wrong, wasn’t he? In fact, his entire argument that you can separate diplomacy from the credible threat of force has been proved baseless. Does he admit this? Nuh-uh. He just keeps on spinning.

Some have argued, most notably Steve Feldberg at MSNBC.com, that, in fact, there is no discrepancy between August Scowcroft and November Scowcroft. Feldberg says that Scowcroft never ruled out military action against Iraq. He just wanted it under U.N. auspices. That’s true as far as it goes. But it misses the point that multilateral diplomacy alone, which Scowcroft urged, could never have achieved this. Paradoxically, it was the threat of unilateralism that made multilateralism possible and effective. We needed a real threat from the “cowboy” for the world cops to take notice.

Score yet another one for the moron Bush. And leave Scowcroft to the historical oblivion he so richly deserves.

Salon columnist Andrew Sullivan's commentary appears daily on his own andrewsullivan.com Web site.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.

    Domino's

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.

    Arby's/Facebook

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.

    KFC

    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    Pizzagamechangers.com

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.

    7-Eleven

    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>