Tina Fey

“Mean Girls”

What do you get when "SNL's" Tina Fey writes a screenplay about social hierarchies in high school? A teen comedy ... for grown-ups.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Studios are so busy grabbing at the bunched-up dollars of teenage moviegoers that they’ve failed to realize that the most promising market for teen comedies may be grown-ups. No one ever forgets what it’s like to be a teenager; it’s a subject that’s much more satisfying to revisit than to live through. I doubt many adults are flocking to see Lizzie McGuire vehicles of their own accord. But if they were suddenly faced with the modern equivalent of “Fast Times at Ridgemont High” — or even something as subversively intelligent as “American Pie” — I suspect they’d fork over their weekly movie allowance in a heartbeat.

Mark Waters’ “Mean Girls” doesn’t have as much depth or resonance as “Fast Times” or “American Pie.” But there’s a sly intelligence at work here — in the writing, the filmmaking and the acting — that makes it deeply pleasurable to watch. “Saturday Night Live’s” Tina Fey, the screenwriter, may have been inspired to write “Mean Girls” after reading Rosalind Wiseman’s “Queen Bees and Wannabes: Helping Your Daughter Survive Cliques, Gossip, Boyfriends and Other Realities of Adolescence,” but the movie doesn’t scan like a grad student’s sociology project. (If that’s what you’re after, check out last year’s parentsploitation fest “Thirteen,” which suggested, “Reefer Madness”-style, that it’s a short road from belly-button piercing to prostitution.)

And yet “Mean Girls,” even as it keeps us laughing, treads into some painfully realistic territory, perhaps because the teenage turf it’s treading hasn’t changed all that much in the past 50 years. There have always been, and probably always will be, social hierarchies in high school. “Mean Girls” reminds us, mischievously, how little those anthill social divisions mean in the grand scheme of adult life, even as it brings back how much “fitting in” matters when you’re a teenager.

Lindsay Lohan is Cady, who has been home-schooled for years not because her parents are religious freaks but because they’re zoologists (they’re played, with generous dollops of good-liberal-parent earnestness, by Anna Gasteyer and Neil Flynn). For the first 15 years of her life, Cady has lived with her parents in Africa, which means that in her case, the notion of high school as intimidating foreign territory isn’t just a metaphor — it’s piercingly literal. Friendly, open and trusting, Cady is lost in a place where neither the administrative rules nor the unwritten social ones make any sense. She doesn’t realize, for example, that she needs a hall pass to use the bathroom; she has no idea where to sit in the cafeteria at mealtime, which means she eats her lunch crouched in a lavatory stall, alone.

But two fellow misfits, the gentle, lumbering, almost-openly-gay Damien (Daniel Franzese) and tough-but-sensitive Janis Ian (played by Lizzy Caplan — her character’s name is the picture’s most obvious acknowledgment that grown-ups are actually the ideal audience for teen movies), quickly take Cady under their wing. Their first act of kindness is to present her with a map of the lunchroom, so she’ll know which tables have been staked out by which cliques, among them the Preps, the JV Jocks, the Asian Nerds, the Cool Asians and the Sexually Active Band Geeks (the last of whom are shown pawing, groping and sucking at one another with oblivious abandon).

But the most elite table is the one presided over by the school’s royalty, also known as the Plastics: Gretchen (Lacey Chabert) is the one who gleans the juiciest gossip about her classmates and wields it like a pink-fur-covered club; Karen (Amanda Seyfried) is the ditzy one who looks adorable and follows the group’s rules unquestioningly; and Regina (Rachel McAdams) is the group’s (and the school’s) Queen Bee, the blond bitch-goddess whom everyone looks up to, emulates and fears.

The Plastics express curiosity about Cady early on, only because she seems like a good target for their cruel scrutiny. (Regina gushingly “admires,” with unvarnished disgust, the handmade leather-and-shell bracelet Cady wears.) But Cady amuses and intrigues them, and they decide to initiate her into the fold, but only after they’ve laid out some very specific rules: On Wednesdays all the Plastics wear pink, and no one must wear a tank top two days in a row. Cady doesn’t really want to be a Plastic, but Janis and Damien urge her to infiltrate the group’s inner sanctum and report her findings back to them; they hope to sabotage the Plastics by finding out what makes them tick.

That should be simple enough, but then, in high school, nothing is ever simple: Cady falls for the boyfriend Regina has dumped earlier (Jonathan Bennett), not realizing that he’s off limits because Regina still considers him her property. Worse yet, Cady drifts all too easily into the rhythm of being a Plastic: The group’s power is intoxicating. Worst of all, even though Cady is a good student who’s brilliant in math, she dumbs herself down — refusing, for instance, to join “the Mathletes,” an elite group of numbers geeks — all the better to fit in.

As canny as “Mean Girls” is about the hidden minefields of high-school hierarchies, it’s only glancingly homiletic: Cady and her classmates ultimately learn how damaging it is to spread rumors and talk about people behind their backs, but Waters (who directed last year’s smart, sprightly “Freaky Friday”) and Fey don’t deny us the biting pleasure of watching the girls engage in all this nastiness in the first place. “Mean Girls” doesn’t turn a blind eye toward the suffering that gossipy girls (or boys) can inflict. But the cruelties inflicted by the Plastics are intelligently stylized: These girls are immediately recognizable as archetypes, which frees us to enjoy the Tilt-a-Whirl of their bad behavior. “Mean Girls” is at its heart a moral movie, even though, for the most part, it keeps a lid on the uppity moralizing. Waters and Fey trust us to grasp the movie’s subtexts on our own; they realize that the best way to get the movie’s meaning across is to concentrate on keeping the action fleet and funny.

It doesn’t hurt that all the actors seem to be having a great time. Lohan pulls off the tricky job of playing the straightforward nice girl without ever seeming stiff or bland. Fey appears as a likably no-nonsense math teacher — it’s a good example of how a performer can shape a small comic role into a character rather than a mere caricature. She’s joined by some of her “Saturday Night Live” colleagues, including a few who haven’t gotten the exposure they deserve: In addition to Gasteyer, Amy Poehler shows off her trademark comic dementia as Regina’s silicone-inflated, valium-addled mom. And Tim Meadows plays a dry-as-dust school principal who’s funny precisely because you can’t imagine anything ever shocking him.

But the most marvelous performer of all may be Seyfried, as the loopy, innocent Karen. Seyfried (in her movie debut) carries on the proud and unfairly maligned comic tradition of the dumb blond. She acknowledges to Cady that, yes, she may not be all that bright, but she does have her special gifts: She taps her forehead, opens her blinking-doll’s eyes wide, and asserts in her wispy voice, “I have a fifth sense!” In case she hasn’t made her point, she elaborates: “It’s like I have ESPN or something.” Seyfried makes playing dumb seem easy, even though it requires an especially meticulous sense of timing: The space between lines is wavier, and it’s measured not in beats, or even half-beats, but eighths and sixteenths. Hit the wrong one, and you can make a joke thuddingly obvious. Seyfried gets every note right, riding the dippy waves of her role like an expert surfer.

“Mean Girls” isn’t a particularly deep picture, but it does have some weight and ballast: Unlike many contemporary comedies, it doesn’t just glide by like a forgettable, overdecorated parade float. It has an appealing prickliness, a quality that intensifies, subtly, both its good humor and its innate sense of right and wrong.

“Mean Girls” may do well with teenagers, but I think grown-ups are its truest audience. Getting through high school is rough for most of us. By the time we’ve made it through the battle zone, we deserve a lifetime’s worth of good movies on the subject. We’ve earned the right to look back on it all and laugh — even if that laughter comes with a sting.

Stephanie Zacharek is a senior writer for Salon Arts & Entertainment.

Five pop culture items we missed

Today's catch: End of "Breaking Bad," "Real Housewives" hit the road, and Tina Fey welcomes normal-named baby

  • more
    • All Share Services

Five pop culture items we missedBreaking Bad - Bryan Cranston as Walter White, Anna Gunn as Skyler, RJ Mitte as Walt Jr. - Doug Hyun/AMC

1. Unnecessary tour of the day: “The Real Housewives” Live Tour will feature women from all of the different manifestations of Bravo’s reality show as they perform … what exactly? Do any of them have actual talents? I had hoped this was to be a musical production of some sort, with costumes by Shereé Whitfield and wigs by Kim Zolciak, but apparently it’s just going to involve the women taking their reunion episodes on the road.

2. Cancellation of the day: Sorry, Kate Gosselin, your money train is at an end, as TLC has just canceled ” Kate Plus 8.”  Don’t worry, I’m sure you will find other ways to exploit your children for cash … maybe have the younger ones try out for “Toddlers & Tiaras”?

3. Preemptive grieving of the day: We knew this moment would come, but we still don’t feel prepared to hear that next season will be the finale of “Breaking Bad.” I’m thinking there’s a spinoff in the works with Kate Gosselin as Bryan Cranston’s quirky new love interest.

4. Birth of the day: Tina Fey’s second daughter, Penelope Athena. Oh come on, Tina! You aren’t even going to try to make things interesting by naming your kid after a piece of machinery or your favorite food?

5. Hot androgyny of the day: To get everyone pumped up for Fashion Week, New York magazine profiled the beatific Andrej Pejic, who models both male and female lines on the runway, and who claims to have “left (his) gender open to artistic interpretation.”

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Is this the end of “30 Rock”?

Alec Baldwin claims the beloved, brilliant show only has one season left -- and we all despair

  • more
    • All Share Services

Is this the end of Tina Fey and Alec Baldwin in "30 Rock"

What can you say about the revelation that “30 Rock” will be shutting down shop in 2012? Besides, of course, “blerg”?

At a gala for the National Dance Institute Tuesday night, Alec Baldwin told Vulture, “I will tell you one thing. And that is our show next year is our last year of the show.” Baldwin has repeatedly maintained his intention to jump ship when his contract expires next year, but this was the first public mention of the entire works going belly up. “Our contracts are expired [in 2012], and Tina is gonna have a big career directing films and writing. She’s going to be the next Elaine May. She’ll be great,” Baldwin said.

Fey, who’s got enough Emmys, Golden Globes and Mark Twain awards to suggest that she doesn’t need to aspire to anybody else’s career, certainly has plenty she can do outside of the Liz Lemon domain. The New York Times this week called her new book, “Bossypants,” “dagger-sharp” and “extremely funny.” She was in two movies last year, as a beleaguered bridge-and-tunnel type in “Date Night” and as the voice of Roxanne Ritchie in “Megamind.” She’s an accomplished screenwriter and producer. Baldwin’s right, even if absolutely nothing else she’s ever done — and I’m including “Mean Girls” here — touches the genius of “30 Rock,” she’ll still be great.

The rest of the show’s team has similarly bright prospects. Alec Baldwin was a movie and stage star — and one of “SNL’s” most beloved recurring hosts — long before he became Jack Donaghy. Tracy Morgan hosts and produces SyFy’s “Scare Tactics,”  and has a robust stand-up career. Jack McBrayer is in every third movie that comes out. And television and Broadway veteran Jane Krakowski is due any moment to have her first child.

But what about us? Even the prospect of one more full season cannot mitigate the pain of the prospective loss of “30 Rock,” a show that still, in its fifth season, remains one of the sharpest, boldest comedies on the air. What other series would attempt a live episode — with Julia Louis-Dreyfus occasionally standing in for Tina Fey? Or do a whole show as a fake episode of a reality train wreck called “Queen of Jordan”? What other series would have a character offhandedly remark, “Where are my manners — would you like some meth?” And who but “30 Rock” would not just toss in a devastating parody called “Gay Sports Center,” but do it on the same episode that “Sports Night” creator Aaron Sorkin was guesting? These are dark times, especially for those of us still carrying around all that “Arrested Development” grief.

Despite its accolades and loyal following, “30 Rock” has never been a ratings blockbuster. Tina Fey has more than once joked that she’d always assumed she’d have been long since canceled by now. But what makes the show so vital and refreshing is that it’s unlike anything else on the air. The frequently pitch-perfect domestic tribulations of “Modern Family,” the romantic entanglements of “How I Met Your Mother,” and the workplace indignities of “Parks and Recreation” and “The Office” have their satisfactions, but for pure, absurd delight, you’ve got to go to FX to even come close. That’s why to imagine a world with no Funcookers, no Sandwich Days, no gaybies, no Wesley Snipes, is to hear the sound of laughter dying.

Yet all things in life are transitory — even “Lost” and “24″ had to wrap it up eventually. Fey, who turns 41 next month and has written eloquently  of her conflicted desire for a second child, may have a non-career-related incentive to take a break from the rigors of a weekly series. She’s as much as said that she can’t run “30 Rock” and take time to have a second child; perhaps she’s decided that it’s now or never time.

Whatever the motivations — and there are likely many — it’s probably better to go out while the show is still at the top of its game rather than limp along like some New York-centric sitcom version of “Battlestar Galactica.” If “30 Rock” really does bow out in 2012, it will have given us six memorably hilarious seasons and introduced the word “whuck” into the lexicon. It will have changed forever our understanding of “diabetes repair” and the intricacies of the NBC page program. If Fey and company are wise, they won’t try to go out with some horribly overambitious finale, like “Cheers” and “Seinfeld” did. They’ll just be funny, right up to the last moment, on a spring night a year from now. And while nothing can ever replace the Rock, is it too early to start wishing that Fey won’t stay away too long, and that some genius out there right now is developing “Queen of Jordan” just in time for, say, June of 2012?

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

10 year time capsule: When Tina Fey became a hot commodity

A decade ago, the first female head writer of "SNL" still needed to play second fiddle to Fallon to become a star

  • more
    • All Share Services

10 year time capsule: When Tina Fey became a hot commodityFighting against sexy.

“If you want to make an audience laugh, you dress a man up like an old lady and push her down the stairs. If you want to make comedy writers laugh, you push an actual old lady down the stairs.”

That was Tina Fey in 2004, talking to Virginia Heffernan in the New Yorker about how mean the writers of “Saturday Night Live” could be. At the time, how could readers have known what we know now — thanks to the multiple glowing reviews of her new book “Bossypants” (excerpts of which appeared in the New Yorker) — that the joke isn’t about the mean-spirited humor of pushing the elderly, but the compunction of women to push each other down flights of stairs (or, even worse, to fall down on purpose) to prove that they can make it in the boys’ club of comedy.

But let’s back up to 2001: Tina was already head writer at “Saturday Night Live,” the first woman Lorne Michaels had ever hired for that position. So, you know, score one for the ladies. This was also the year that Tina’s crew won a Writer’s Guild Award for their 25th Anniversary Special. Behind the scenes, Tina was killing it.

And then Lorne gave her the role of co-hosting “Weekend Update” with Jimmy Fallon, which traditionally only kept female anchors on to play the straight man (or woman) to their raunchy male counterparts. TV Guide called the pairing the best since “Dan Aykroyd called Jane Curtin an ignorant slut.

Tina and Jimmy’s relationship was much less tempestuous than the point/counterpoint segments that Jane and Dan used to do (where, it should be noted, the joke of the sketch involved Jane and Dan calling each other terrible names while making their cases). Fallon was the goofball younger brother to Tina’s staid, “smart girl in glasses” prude. While Jimmy ended “Update” by throwing pencils at the ceiling, Fey would make her own callback to her predecessor Curtin by using her and Chevy Chase’s original closing line, “Goodnight, and have a pleasant tomorrow.” But it was still hard for Tina, a comedian trained at Chicago’s Second City, to only play one part on the show. Even Lorne noted that he was placing his head writer in a box:

The audience isn’t seeing Fey’s whole range, Michaels said, noting that she’s somewhat restricted by the “more contained presence” required by “Weekend Update.” But there’s more there than just humor, said her boss, who admires her tenacity.

Of course, later that year, when it became obvious that Tina was becoming “the hot one” (of the women on the show), Lorne totally changed his idea of why he put Tina with Fallon. In an article for the Observer in March 2001 called “Meet Four-Eyed New Sex Symbol, ‘Weekend Update’ Anchor Tina Fey,” Lorne commented on the duo’s dynamic:

“The old Hollywood thing was that she gave him sex and he gave her class … the rhythm and timing of that is just a chemistry thing: either it works or it doesn’t …. We saw the beginnings of that working.”

Fey’s admitted rocky relationship with her own sexual presence (and that of all female comedians, basically) didn’t start in the writer’s room where she may have been outnumbered, but was still boss. It began when the comedian was put on air and immediately stopped being the head writer and started being part of the “Astaire-Rogers combination.” (Another Lorne-ism.) Though no one ever stopped calling Tina brilliant, smart and funny — in short, her credentials and intelligence were never in question — that added ingredient of the camera immediately commodified Tina in a way that it commodifies any actor or actress. Maybe that’s why her early “Weekend Update” pieces were more about giving Fallon the room to ham it up than it was to prove her own comedic chops:

Post-Fallon, Tina and Amy Poehler had their all-girls club on “Update,” another first for the show, and it was easier to see Tina’s success on-screen as part of a feminist comedy movement. But back in 2001, despite all her achievements and success running the show, Fey was still wrestling away from the image of being just another pretty face. Even if that face was wearing glasses that were only being used for TV appearances.

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Tina Fey: Working mom of the year

The "30 Rock" star writes a witty -- and surprisingly candid -- New Yorker essay on parenting

  • more
    • All Share Services

Tina Fey: Working mom of the yearTina Fey

Tina Fey’s great appeal has always been her ability to wrap all that razor-sharp wit, intelligence and beauty in the guise of a regular gal you could easily imagine eating nachos with in your sweat pants. Fey isn’t like the rest of us mere mortals, of course. She’s a Mark Twain prize- and multiple Emmy and Golden Globe winner, a woman who’s appeared on the cover of Vanity Fair and Rolling Stone, and, as her brutally funny, uncharacteristically candid essay in this week’s New Yorker reveals, a woman who can unpack the travails of a working mother with more heart, soul and righteous indignation than a  a boatload of Caitlin Flanagans and Lisa Belkins.

Despite the intensity of her work — from her scathing Sarah Palin to the biting jibes about race and gender that make “30 Rock” indispensable — Fey has rarely mined the rich, often terrible fodder that the day-to-day grind of parenting provides. Her television alter ego Liz Lemon has a pathetic romantic life and a baby fever that’s going nowhere. The only occasional voice of parental frustration on the show comes from Liz’s married-with-five-kids colleague Pete, who fantasizes about stealing his dead neighbor’s identity, “because sometimes it feels like too much and maybe Daddy just needs to get in the car and drive.” (If you desire a realistic, non-”Two and a Half Men” version of what raising kids is like, you really need to be watching “Louie.”)

Perhaps it’s because Fey’s costar Jane Krakowski is pregnant, or her “SNL” and “Baby Mama” costar Amy Poehler welcomed a second child last year, that she felt the need to write with such frankness about her relationship with her 5-year-old daughter, Alice, and the will-she-or-won’t-she? mystery of whether to have a second child. It’s a move she acknowledges would mean “derailing the TV show where two hundred people depend on me for their income, and I take that seriously.” And she understands intimately that that’s a business decision no male prospective parent ever has to make.

Though few of us working mothers have to worry about how our fertility will affect a beloved television network franchise, Fey’s internal anguish and external pressures to “have another one” are familiar to many of us. She opens her essay with her daughter bringing home a copy of the storybook “My Working Mother,” a whimsical tale of a witch’s child who admits, “It isn’t easy having a working mom. Especially when she enjoys her work.” Yes, kids, it’s true: The only thing harder than a mom who has to work is one who actually likes to work. A few years ago, when I wrote what would be the last story I’d write for a parenting magazine, an editor changed a source’s quote from “I love my job and I love my kids” to “I like my job, but I love my kids.” God forbid you have more than one passion in life. How do you, as Fey writes, answer the skeptics who accusingly ask how you “juggle it all”? (Hint: They don’t believe you can. They’ll urge you to keep reproducing and judge you for still having a vocation.)

As it happens, I know “My Working Mother” well; my own young daughter pointedly selected it the last time we went to Books of Wonder. I know what it’s like to have a kid who says, as witch’s sprog does, “I don’t always like having a working mom.” It sucks, even though, as Fey says, “I’m sure the two men who wrote this book had the absolute best intentions.”

Like that broomstick-flying heroine of the children’s story, Fey also likes her work. And she’s blazing at it, which is where the rub comes in, because she says she always assumed her show would have been canceled by now. Instead, she now finds herself in what she self-deprecatingly refers to as her “last five minutes.” As in last five minutes of fame. Last five minutes of fertility. The cruelest joke of all is the one made by biology. And for many women, the apex of their careers coincides neatly with the waning of their fecundity. What’s a mother to do, when no matter how equitable and awesome the family may be, no one will ever write a book about how difficult it is to have a dad who holds down a job?

So it’s terrific to read another mother admitting her anguish over “this second baby nonsense.” “Am I just chasing it because it’s the hardest thing for me to get and I want to prove that I can do it?” she writes. “Do I want another baby? Or do I just want to turn back time and have my daughter be a baby again?” And she’s open about the very real career danger of a woman in show business suddenly going AWOL and finding herself the subject instead of the source of the punch line. As she brutally puts it, “The definition of ‘crazy’ in show business is a woman who keeps talking even after no one wants to fuck her any more.”

Yet as the sands of time slip through the hourglass and those incredibly nosy helpy helpertons advise, as they do Fey, “You should have another one,” somehow the world turns on, often quite well anyway. We can be paralyzed by choice, but life will make choices for us regardless. In the end, Fey admits that “Either way, everything will be fine,” which is possibly the most hopeful and encouraging thing any working mother could say to another. And there’s something pretty wonderful about having America’s best girlfriend admit she’s got her eggs in the same basket as the rest of us.

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

What was Tina Fey’s humor prize really about?

Last night on PBS, America's best comedians celebrated her -- but her edgiest, best work was nowhere to be seen

  • more
    • All Share Services

What was Tina Fey's humor prize really about?Tina Fey waves to fans as she arrives at the Kennedy Center where she was awarded the Mark Twain Prize for humor in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2010. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)(Credit: AP)

Of course Tina Fey is brilliant. Of course she’s one of the most insightful and hilarious figures in American comedy today. Of course she deserves every Emmy (seven, if you’re counting), Golden Globe, Writers Guild of America and Teen Choice Award  on her overstuffed shelf. She was the head writer for “Saturday Night Live.” She gave us “Mean Girls” and “30 Rock.” She’s an icon to legions of urban career women — a Carrie Bradshaw with more wit and fewer plantar warts. She’s even in the No. 1 movie in the country, as reporter Roxanne Ritchie in “Megamind.” And so when she was feted last week with the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor, in a comedy legend-packed evening at the Kennedy Center that aired Sunday on PBS (right opposite her Fey look-alike Sarah Palin’s reality debut), it was in many ways cause for cheering.

But there also was something about the evening — its mix of gentle Fey roasting and lavish praise, its abundance of Palin jokes combined with a delicately apolitical tone — that took a considerable amount of that gloriously sharp, Samuel Clemens-ish philosophy of “the assault of laughter” out of the whole works.

Despite its impressive, 19th-century-evoking name, the Twain Prize doesn’t have much of a history. It’s only been around since 1998, when the Kennedy Center established it to “recognize those who create humor from their uniquely American experiences” and chose as its first honoree Richard Pryor. It’s only been given posthumously once, to George Carlin, who died mere days after his award was announced in 2008. It’s only been given to two other women: Whoopi Goldberg in 2001 and Lily Tomlin in 2003. And considering that last year’s recipient was Bill Cosby, it’s hard not to consider that Fey’s acceptance speech words “Only in comedy is an obedient white girl from the suburbs a diversity candidate” were not entirely in jest.

If this prize is, after all, modeled on the American who best emulates Twain as a “fearless observer of society,” wouldn’t this have been the year of all years to give a nod to Jon Stewart whose fearlessness level has been off the charts?  But maybe there’s such a thing as too fearless, too political, too of the moment. And it has been seven years since anybody gave one of these things to a woman. So Fey, this year, it is.

It’s undeniable that Fey has, in the short dozen years since she joined the writing staff of “Saturday Night Live,” blossomed into an indispensable force in the American comedic landscape and the world’s greatest retort to the charge that women can’t be funny. Sunday night, she was funny indeed, thanking Sarah Palin for so much inspiration and lamenting that the Kennedy Center will soon be known as “the Tea Party Bowling Alley and Rifle Range.”

But it’s worth noting that her deadpan praise for conservative women in politics — they’re great “unless you don’t want to pay for your own rape kit … unless you’re a lesbian who wants to get married to your partner of 20 years … [or] unless you believe in evolution” — did not make it to the broadcast. Nor, in fact, was there much evidence in all of the clips shown Sunday night of the wicked, often scathing social commentary that burns through Fey’s work. This is not just the woman who wrote the “Mom Jeans” fake ad; she’s the one who penned an entire episode of “30 Rock” revolving around an insulting word for the female genitalia, one who declared in 2008 that if McCain and Palin won the election “I’m leaving Earth.”

For all her disarmingly bespectacled, girl-next-door appeal, the lady is an eviscerating wit whose humor touches on race, death, gender and all kinds of difficult, often terrible-to-talk-about stuff. She even slipped a highly contentious rape joke into “30 Rock’s” season premiere this year.

Fey doesn’t write that way because she is, according to her own self-description, a “stone cold bitch.” She does it because she intuitively understands Twain’s directive that “the hard and sordid things of life are too hard and too sordid and too cruel for us to know and touch them year after year without some mitigating influence.” But if she is presented simply as that kooky neurotic gal from that sitcom, the accolades hardly seem worth giving. And sitting regally at the Kennedy Center, looking, as Amy Poehler observed, like Evita, Tina Fey seemed a little lost, like security had taken all the hard and cruel and sordid out of her purse, and left her with too little to bounce her genius against. 

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

Page 1 of 6 in Tina Fey