Ann Coulter

Conservative calendar girls

We've got the perfect holiday gift idea for all the Condi-worshiping, feminist-hating, gun-toting females on your list!

  • more
    • All Share Services

Conservative calendar girls

Still looking for last-minute gift ideas? Consider the inaugural printing of the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute‘s Great American Conservative Women 2005 wall calendar.

Perhaps inspired by last year’s Babes Against Bush calendar, the Luce Institute decided to print the calendar, according to spokeswoman Audrey Mullen, “because they have a lot of really terrific women in their speakers’ bureau and who support the Policy Institute. They want to get the message out there that there are some terrific conservative women who are also great role models for young women [and who] are not what you see promoted in the media generally.”

The Luce Institute draws a pretty hard line on the kind of women it thinks are “promoted in the media generally.” The institute’s Web site features archived articles that refer to Hillary Rodham Clinton as a “Senate diva”; celebrate “Spin Sisters,” Myrna Blyth’s attack on the liberal women’s media; and argue that Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day is a “stealth feminist holiday” that “victimizes sons and daughters.” There’s also a piece about the National Organization for Women called “They Should Call it THEN” and a report on Gloria Steinem’s 2000 wedding to the since deceased David Bale, charitably headlined: “A Fish Gets a Bicycle.”

So you cannot accuse these people of being humorless. Which could explain the calendar, which features 12 conservative chicks in full Talbots finery. The calendar, which can be purchased through the institute’s Web site for a $25 donation, is being given away free at institute events, to servicemen and women and on college campuses. Don’t hurt yourself while picturing a photo of Jeanne Kirkpatrick hanging on a dorm room wall next to a glossy poster of “O.C.” heartthrob Benjamin McKenzie.

The 2005 calendar year kicks off with an image of Luce herself. The journalist, editor, congresswoman from Connecticut and ambassador to Italy is quoted as saying, “Do one thing well. You can have it all, but you will be very tired.” Star Parker, a former welfare mother who, according to the calendar, “reformed her life, received a degree in marketing, and launched an urban Christian magazine,” graces February. March belongs to a smiling Christina Hoff Sommers, author of “Who Stole Feminism?” and “The War Against Boys.” The calendar quotes her embrace of the phallus: “It is unfashionable to say so but I will say it anyway: The energy, adventurousness, stoicism, and competitiveness of normal, decent males is responsible for much of what is right in the world.”

Ronald Reagan’s treasurer Bay Buchanan comes next and says, “I go to college campuses. I talk to these young women, as brave a people I’ve ever met, who have spoken out on their college campuses … They’re chastised, they’re ostracized, they are literally jeered. They go up before their student bodies and the feminists show up and are screaming at them. This is on these wonderful campuses that are supposed to be for freedom of speech.”

This is Buchanan’s entire calendar quotation, taken from a 2001 speech at the institute’s Conservative Leadership Seminar. This may be just the sound of another chastising feminist, but who is she talking about here? Who are “these young women” who are getting “literally jeered”?

One calendar denizen who has surely been jeered by feminists is May dreamboat, radio shrink and famed gay-hater Dr. Laura (Schlesinger). She appears, all dimples, with a helmet of straw-colored hair that seems to glow seraphically. “I deeply disdain the feminists for what they have done to generations of women and to children who pay the price of lost, intact, loving stable homes with married committed moms and dads,” Dr. Laura is quoted as saying. She is surely gratified that feminists disdain her right back.

June brings us lawyer, columnist, Eagle Forum founder, ERA buzz-kill and all-around good-time girl Phyllis Schlafly, who is followed in July by thin political pundit Ann Coulter. August’s Michelle Malkin, a conservative columnist, says, “When liberals won’t clam up about their sordid sex lives and we object, they call us rude. When liberal women raise their voices, they are praised as ‘passionate.’ When conservative women raise their voices, we are condemned as ‘shrill.’” Well, if it walks like a whistle and talks like a whistle …

Back-to-school September features the country’s most powerful black woman, Oprah! Kidding. It’s Condi. Unfortunately, the calendar must have been printed too late to catch her promotion to secretary of state, since she is listed as national security advisor. The best part of Condoleezza Rice’s page is the smaller secondary photo, supplied by the White House, showing her with Dick Cheney in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center on 9/11, conferring by phone with President Bush, presumably from the presidential emergency “Get me the fuck out of here” plane.

Likable pundit Monica Crowley is next, but she’s totally overpowered by November’s Jeanne Kirkpatrick. A Leavey professor of government at Georgetown and senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Kirkpatrick was the first woman appointed to serve as a permanent representative of the U.S. to the United Nations. She is quoted as saying, “People have often said to me, what did I do that was the most interesting thing in my life. The answer is having a baby … Having and raising babies is more interesting than making speeches at the United Nations. Believe me.” Especially the spitting up.

Clare Boothe Luce was a journalist, and so it’s only fitting that the calendar that bears her name have a great kicker. And by God, it does, in December, when it features gun rights advocate Shemane Nugent, wife of Ted, and coauthor with her husband of a book called “Kill It & Grill It.” She is quoted as defending the Second Amendment, and the smaller picture shows “Ted and Shemane Nugent with their teen son, Rocco, at their ranch in Texas.” In camos. All holding machine guns.

Happy holidays!

Rebecca Traister

Rebecca Traister writes for Salon. She is the author of "Big Girls Don't Cry: The Election that Changed Everything for American Women" (Free Press). Follow @rtraister on Twitter.

Ann Coulter’s phony budget math

Dog bites man, the sun rises, and Coulter and AEI flack dissemble about Obama vs. Bush and Reagan budgets

  • more
    • All Share Services

Ann Coulter's phony budget mathPolitical commentator and author Ann Coulter addresses the American Conservative Union's annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, February 10, 2012. (Credit: Reuters/Jim Bourg)

I was late to the excellent MarketWatch story debunking the notion that President Obama’s been on a spending binge; I spent most of Tuesday traveling. But after my “Hardball” segment on it Wednesday, Ann Coulter tweeted: “Joan Walsh says that Marketwatch chart is ‘unbelievable’! Why yes it is, in the sense of being untrue.” That’s when I saw that there was shrill but lame GOP pushback on Rex Nutting’s excellent story, from both Coulter and the American Enterprise Institute’s James Pethokoukis. I don’t normally reply to Coulter’s right-wing delusions — I haven’t written a column about her in five years – but since I think Nutting’s findings are a crucial corrective to GOP lying, I wasted my Wednesday night trying to understand the GOP attempt to discredit him. You’re welcome.

Coulter admits she relies on Pethokoukis, so let’s go directly to the source. To recap, Nutting crunched Office of Management and Budget and Congressional Budget Office numbers to find that under Obama, spending has risen at an annualized rate of 1.4 percent, less than any president since Dwight Eisenhower. It jumped 8.1 percent in the last three years of the George W. Bush presidency, and in fiscal year 2009, for which Bush approved the budget, it jumped 17.9 percent. But Bush isn’t the most profligate Republican: Ronald Reagan increased spending an average of 8.7 percent in his first term.

Pethokoukis quarrels with Nutting’s assigning Bush’s budget to Bush, because “Obama chose not to reverse that elevated level of spending; thus he, along with congressional Democrats, are responsible for it.” Exactly how one president undoes the spending approved by another president under a different Congress goes unexplained. The AEI pundit also argues that we should look at federal spending as a percent of GDP, and he notes that’s gone up under Obama, attempting to prove that Nutting is mistaken – but that’s a useless metric during a recession, which by definition shrinks GDP.

Coulter goes even further (of course). “It turns out Rex Nutting, author of the phony Marketwatch chart, attributes all spending during Obama’s entire first year, up to Oct. 1, to President Bush.” (The italics are in the original; they’re where the good writing is supposed to be.) She continues: “That means, for example, the $825 billion stimulus bill, proposed, lobbied for, signed and spent by Obama, goes in … Bush’s column.”

Shockingly, Coulter is … wrong. First of all, only about $120 billion of the stimulus was spent in fiscal year 2009 – and Nutting counted it in Obama’s column. He also included new funds appropriated under Obama and the Democratic congressional majority for the child health insurance program and other projects. And it says so quite clearly on the nifty chart Coulter finds fault with: $140 billion spent in the 2009 budget year is plainly attributed to Obama. It also says so in the text of the story, for people who don’t read charts.

“I attributed all the new spending I could find to Obama,” Nutting told me in an email. “I looked at the CBO’s budget outlook from Jan. 2009, and spending for ’09 was actually lower than CBO projected. And spending has been flat since then.”

Coulter also claims that Nutting’s piece has been ignored by the New York Times, but in fact David Firestone weighed in today, and made a point I should have made: It’s actually sad that a Democratic president is kvelling about cutting the rate of federal spending growth to its lowest level since Dwight Eisenhower (actually, I made that point last August). Firestone notes that various budget deals aim to cut discretionary spending by $800 billion over a decade, by trimming education, food, housing, transportation and job training programs. “This category of spending, which used to be 5 percent of the gross domestic product in Nixon’s days, is heading down to less than 2 percent,” Firestone notes. Pethokoukis and Coulter ought to be applauding.

I’ve hailed Nutting’s piece not because I’m happy that Obama has presided over such stingy budgets (largely forced to by congressional Republicans), but because I’m glad to see a reporter telling the truth. If Pethokoukis and Coulter are the best the GOP can do to tear his work down, maybe more reporters will join him.

Continue Reading Close
Joan Walsh

Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large.

“The Daily Show” takes on Ann Coulter’s race-baiting logic

Jon Stewart and co. extend one of the pundit's controversial statements to its logical extreme VIDEO

  • more
    • All Share Services

(Credit: Comedy Central)

Most by now are probably familiar with Ann Coulter’s declaration, when discussing the Herman Cain sexual harassment debacle earlier this week, that “our blacks are so much better than their blacks.” Most probably weren’t all that shocked to hear this sort of race-baiting from Coulter, who’s made a lucrative career dispensing right-wing vitriol. Most probably just ignored her uncouth remarks and moved on.

Still, just in case you were looking for a more complete exegesis of the logic behind Coulter’s statement, Jon Stewart, along with his “Daily Show” correspondents, extended the argument to its logical extreme last night.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Conservative Minorities vs. Liberal Minorities
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-2-2011/conservative-minorities-vs–liberal-minorities?xrs=share_copy

Continue Reading Close

“The Daily Show” commemorates 9/13/01

"Remembering the day we forgot the lessons of the day we swore we had sworn we would always remember"

  • more
    • All Share Services

Ten years ago, a tragedy brought us all closer together. Last night, Jon Stewart recalled another moment, just two days after, when all the solidarity engendered through a national trauma began to dissipate into the political ether. Opportunists — first Jerry Falwell, then Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, all the “Ground Zero Mosque” people (not to say anything of the folks in power) — began using the memory of that historical moment for their own personal advantage. “The Daily Show” paid tribute:

09/13/01: Remembering the Day We Forgot the Lessons of the Day We Had Sworn We Would Always Remember

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Coming Soon – The Daily Show Remembers 9/13/2001
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook
Continue Reading Close

Ed Schultz thinks Ann Coulter is “toxic”

The MSNBC host reacts to a controversial blog post by Coulter who claims that radiation is good for you

  • more
    • All Share Services

Ed Schultz thinks Ann Coulter is

Ed Schultz targeted Ann Coulter and her recent comments on radiation’s positive health benefits in his “Take Down” segment on Friday night. Last week, Ann Coulter wrote a blog post about the positive health benefits of radiation and made national headlines when Bill O’Reilly scolded her on his show for the shoddy research and inappropriate timing of her incendiary claims. Schultz agreed and took the scolding to the next level saying:

A lot of people say Ann Coulter is toxic. But we had no idea that she would take that literally. You would laugh at her if she wasn’t making light of a terrible tragedy.

Watch Schultz’s segment in full. Note Ann Coulter’s glowing green head.

Continue Reading Close

Adam Clark Estes blogs the news for Salon. Email him at ace@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @adamclarkestes

Ann Coulter tells Bill O’Reilly: Radiation is good for you

The conservative author defends her blog post, "A glowing report on radiation." Bill O'Reilly doesn't buy it

  • more
    • All Share Services

Ann Coulter tells Bill O'Reilly: Radiation is good for you

What’s the opposite of fear-mongering? False-sense-of-security-mongering, probably. Or whatever you’d call Ann Coulter’s latest blog post claiming that radiation does a body good:

With the terrible earthquake and resulting tsunami that have devastated Japan, the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer.

Coulter cites a 10-year-old newspaper article and some studies by fringe scientists as proof to her theory. She goes on to compare radition — which she says is “a sort of cancer vaccine” — to “poisons” like zinc and magnesium found in multi-vitamins.

Bill O’Reilly invited Coulter onto his show last night and scolded her for misleading the audience into misunderstanding the well established dangers of radiation:

Continue Reading Close

Adam Clark Estes blogs the news for Salon. Email him at ace@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @adamclarkestes

Page 1 of 18 in Ann Coulter