King Kaufman’s Sports Daily

Colts hammer Pats to go 8-0, which is not halfway to 16-0. Plus: Clock snafus a go-go.

Topics:

Let’s stop any talk about the Indianapolis Colts going undefeated right here.

They pounded the New England Patriots 40-21 Monday night in Foxboro, Mass. — their own private graveyard in recent years — in front of Al Michaels and everybody. Now they’re 8-0, halfway to a perfect record, and they’ve finally beaten a live opponent, so that 1972 Miami Dolphins talk is starting.

The Colts looked tremendous Monday, unstoppable on offense against a team that has rendered them impotent in the recent past, and stifling at times on defense, especially when Indy was building its big lead in the second quarter. The Pats had the ball twice in the second period, going three and out and gaining 23 yards on five plays before Corey Dillon fumbled.

Indianapolis was the Super Bowl pick of many a Super Bowl picker, including yours truly. They are clearly the best team in the league at the moment and appear likely to stay that way barring a catastrophic injury to Peyton Manning, or a series of them to his teammates.

But as big as it was for the Colts to get the Patriot monkey off their backs, there’s still a long way to go.

The Colts are not halfway to a 16-0 record because they’re 8-0. Think of all the 8-0 teams you’ve ever seen. How many of them have gone undefeated? (Teacher’s edition: 1.) If the Colts get to 14-0, they’ll be about halfway to 16-0.

And the Patriots are a live opponent, but they’re not THE PATRIOTS of the last two years. They’re still a pretty good team. They’ve beaten the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Atlanta Falcons on the road. But they’ve also been thrashed twice now, by the Colts and the San Diego Chargers, both times on their home field.

The injuries have finally taken their toll, not just on defense but also on the offensive line. The loss of the two coordinators, Romeo Crennel and Charlie Weis, may have had an impact as well.

Whatever it is, and however much good beating them does for the Colts’ psyche, the Patriots are just another team now, one of several scrambling for a playoff spot.

They’re likely to make it, since they’re aided by playing in a weak division where 4-4 puts you in first place. And they’re going to keep getting help from a soft schedule. They could go 6-2 in the second half without playing any better than they have so far.



The Colts still have to play dangerous games in Cincinnati, Jacksonville and Seattle, and they have to play the Steelers and Chargers at home. And that’s not to mention those trip-up games that sometimes happen to NFL teams that are cruising along, home games against the Houston Texans, Tennessee Titans and Arizona Cardinals.

Indy could go 5-3 in the second half without playing any worse than it has so far. Overall, that is. If the Colts keep playing like they did Monday night, the ’72 Dolphins are going to have to take an interest.

In about six weeks.

- – - – - – - – - – - -

Clock management [PERMALINK]

A couple of funny things happened with clocks in games I saw Sunday.

Reader DavidWilliam, in a letter posted to Monday’s column, pointed out that Washington was able to run a minute off the clock between its third-down play and a punt near the end of its win over the Philadelphia Eagles Sunday night.

On the third-down play, Clinton Portis was tackled short of a first down with 3:55 remaining. It generally takes two or three seconds from the ball carrier hitting the ground for the 40-second play clock to start, and that’s what happened.

The play clock clicked down to :10 with 3:20 left in the game. Washington, leading 17-10, was letting as much time go by as it could before calling timeout, then punting. But at that point, the play clock switched to :25. Washington called timeout with one second left on the timer, 2:55 to go in the game. That should have happened at 3:11. Washington gained 16 seconds.

“The referee made the wrong decision in pumping up the clock,” said Terrel Canton, a statistical analyst in the NFL’s officiating department. “It definitely was a mistake.”

Canton said there was some miscommunication between the officials who manage the clock, head linesman Ed Camp and line judge Jerome Boger, and referee Tom White.

Canton said that when there’s a problem or delay spotting the ball, so that there’s less time than usual between the spot and the expiration of the play clock, the referee has to advise the offense that the play clock is winding down and that they have to hurry to the line of scrimmage.

There was no delay following the Portis run, but White was evidently fooled by the Washington punt team standing around and making no move toward the line of scrimmage.

“He didn’t know that Washington was going to wait down to one second to call a timeout,” Canton said. “He just figured it was some problems with us.”

Since he hadn’t warned Washington, White reset the play clock.

I pointed out to Canton that it ended up not mattering, since Donovan McNabb threw the game-deciding interception with a minute and a half to play.

“It ended up not mattering,” he harrumphed, “but they still let the offense have about 15 more seconds.”

The other clock issue I mentioned Monday. At the end of the Oakland-Kansas City game, Larry Johnson plunged into the end zone for the winning touchdown as time expired. But the play had begun with five seconds showing on CBS’s scoreboard-graphic clock, and the last three seconds ticked off with Johnson lying on the ground in the end zone.

The Raiders didn’t argue with the officials about the clock, and Canton said his office hadn’t heard any complaints by Tuesday morning. He said there may be a question about it from the team in the regular Wednesday session reviewing the officiating, but acknowledged that if Oakland was hopping mad, he’d have probably heard something Monday.

A late call to the Raiders hadn’t been returned at posting time, but since the game ended they’ve complained a lot about an atrocious tripping penalty against pass rusher Ed Jasper three plays before Johnson’s touchdown without mentioning the clock at the end of the game.

Canton speculated that maybe CBS’s clock graphic was inaccurate. That got me wondering whether the clock graphic is electronically tied to the scoreboard clock. If it says :03 on your TV, does that necessarily mean it says :03 in the stadium?

“The answer is yes and no,” said CBS spokeswoman Leslie Anne Wade. “Most often we are synced with the score clock. Occasionally we are not. Obviously, officially, the time is kept on the field, and probably where you’re asking about, we weren’t in sync with the score clock.”

Maybe, but the clock looked OK to me.

The play began with the clock stopped at :05 following a timeout by each team. Once the ball was snapped, the clock seemed to start properly. Johnson leaped into the end zone and landed with :03 showing. I timed the play myself, and it took no longer than two seconds from snap to Johnson lying on the ground.

Keep in mind that Johnson scored around the top of his jump. By the time he hit the earth, the play had been over for half a second or so, and because he jumped over the pile, neither he nor the ball was hidden from the officials’ view, so there shouldn’t have been a delay calling it a touchdown.

Sure enough, the head linesman, Ron Marinucci, could be seen entering the TV frame with :02 showing on the clock, running in from the sideline with his arms already raised, signaling TD. The clock stops when the whistle blows, and officials blow their whistles when they signal touchdown.

All things considered, even with a fairly slow reaction to stop the clock, I don’t see how there couldn’t have been time left following Johnson’s scores. The Chiefs should have had to kick off.

But if the Raiders don’t mind, I don’t. I’ll let you know if they complain.

Previous column: Run, Dick Vermeil, run!

- – - – - – - – - – - -

  • Bookmark http://www.salon.com/sports to get the new Kaufman column every day.
  • To receive the Sports Daily Newsletter, send an e-mail to kingnewsletter@salon.com.

  • More Related Stories

    Featured Slide Shows

    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Facebook
    • 1 of 14
    • Close
    • Fullscreen
    • Thumbnails

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

      One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

      In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

      Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

      We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

      On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

      Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

      The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

      Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

      While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

      As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

      Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

      Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

      13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

      Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

      There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

    • Recent Slide Shows

    Comments

    0 Comments

    Comment Preview

    Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>