How long did the Times hold its news?
The paper says it waited "a year" before publishing a story on the president's secret spying plan. Did it know the truth before the 2004 election?
By Tim GrieveTopics: George W. Bush, War Room, The New York Times, Politics News
As we noted earlier today, the New York Times is out with a story in which it says the Bush administration has been monitoring — without warrants — telephone calls and e-mail messages originated in the United States. What we didn’t mention, and should have, is this snippet from the piece: “The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. After meeting with senior administration officials to hear their concerns, the newspaper delayed publication for a year to conduct additional reporting.”
Our question: When did the White House make its request, and what does “a year” mean? The Times is awfully light on details here, leaving itself open for speculation from the left as to whether the Times sat on the story through last year’s presidential election. At the same time, the right is free to speculate about the Times’ decision to run the story now, just as the Senate was about to take up and — as it turns out — vote down the reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act.
We put the question of timing to Times reporters Eric Lichtblau and James Risen, whose names appear at the top of the story. Lichtblau’s response: “I’m afraid we’re referring all calls to Catherine Mathis in corporate PR.” So we put the question to Mathis’ office, which faxed us a long statement from Times editor Bill Keller in response. It doesn’t answer the question of timing — Mathis said she’d look into that and get back to us — but here’s what it does say about the delay in publishing more generally:
“We start with the premise that a newspaper’s job is to publish information that is a matter of public interest. Clearly a secret policy reversal that gives an American intelligence agency discretion to monitor communications within the country is a matter of public interest. From the outset, the question was not why we would publish it, but why we would not.
“A year ago, when this information first became known to Times reporters, the administration argued strongly that writing about this eavesdropping program would give terrorists clues about the vulnerability of their communications and would deprive the government of an effective tool for the protection of the country’s security. Officials also assured senior editors of the Times that a variety of legal checks had been imposed that satisfied everyone involved that the program raised no legal questions. As we have done before in rare instances when faced with a convincing national security argument, we agreed not to publish at that time.
“We also continued reporting, and in the ensuing months two things happened that changed our thinking.
“First, we developed a fuller picture of the concerns and misgivings that had been expressed during the life of the program. It is not our place to pass judgment on the legal or civil liberties questions involved in such a program, but it became clear those questions loomed larger within the government than we had previously understood.
“Second, in the course of subsequent reporting we satisfied ourselves that we could write about this program — withholding a number of technical details — in a way that would not expose any intelligence-gathering methods or capabilities that are not already on the public record. The fact that the government eavesdrops on those suspected of terrorist connections is well-known. The fact that the NSA can legally monitor communications within the United States with a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is also public information. What is new is that the N.S.A. has for the past three years had the authority to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States without a warrant. It is that expansion of authority — not the need for a robust anti-terror intelligence operation — that prompted debate within the government, and that is the subject of the article.”
We’ll post more when we hear more from the Times.
Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog. More Tim Grieve.
Related Stories
More Related Stories
-
If Alex Pareene was a cable news executive...
-
Portland's senseless war on fluoride
-
Graphic video reportedly shows possible London machete attack suspect
-
What economists get wrong about the jobs crisis
-
Ted Cruz: "I don't trust the Republicans"
-
Pa. governor "can't find" any Latinos to work in his administration
-
Glenn Beck: "The American people have just been raped"
-
"Original Coca-Cola had a very small amount of cocaine"
-
Corporations accused of wrongdoing win battle to keep identities secret
-
Weak, incompetent Democrats blow another one
-
Lois Lerner, IRS disaster
-
Cyber attacks could cause the next world war
-
Donald Rumsfeld worried that marriage equality will lead to polygamy
-
Experts: Fox News spying scandal a game-changer
-
Biden cracks Obama teleprompter joke
-
IRS official takes the Fifth: "I have not done anything wrong"
-
Lessons from Lincoln leave gay immigrants behind
-
Los Angeles elects first Jewish mayor
-
Peter King: There's "hypocrisy" over aid by Oklahoma senators
-
Anthony Weiner announces run for NYC mayor
-
How policy nihilists in the Senate doomed LGBT immigrants
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 pics
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
Credit: AP/LM Otero -
Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
Credit: AP/Matt Rourke -
A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher -
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
Credit: AP/Molly Riley -
Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite -
Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster -
O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid -
Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield -
When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin -
A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin -
Recent Slide Shows
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
Related Videos
Most Read
-
Oklahoma senator: Tornado aid "totally different" from Sandy aid
Jillian Rayfield
-
Tornado survivor to Wolf Blitzer: Sorry, I'm an atheist. I don't have to thank the Lord
Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
Inhofe and Coburn: Red state hypocrites
Joan Walsh
-
Horrifying new trend: Posting rapes to Facebook
Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
Facebook's hate speech problem
Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
Andrew Leonard
-
Brad Pitt keeps breaking his silence on how boring marriage to Jennifer Aniston was
Daniel D'Addario
-
GOP attorney general candidate tried to force women to report miscarriages to police
Katie Mcdonough
-
Did a Salon excerpt ruin Penn Jillette's chance to win "Celebrity Apprentice"?
Daniel D'Addario
-
9-year-old slams Rahm over Chicago schools
Natasha Lennard
Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

25 points26 points27 points | comment

3 points4 points5 points | comment

2 points3 points4 points | 8 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
-
Is This The Face Of A New Global Human Rights Movement? -
Anthony Weiner's First Campaign Began With An Apology For "Race-Baiting" -
The Time Lois Lerner Failed To Investigate A Major Al Gore Fundraiser At The FEC - Arrested Congressional Development
- Jay Carney To Press: "You're Good At Your Jobs And You're Smart"


Comments
9 Comments