Stop junk mail for good

The Internet hasn't slowed down the tree killers. But you can use it to keep their catalogs and credit card applications at bay.

Topics: Environment, Global Warming, The Good Life, Science,

Stop junk mail for good

You’d think that with all the spam floating around the Internet these days, good old-fashioned junk mail, the kind that clogs your home’s mailbox and the nation’s landfills, might be a thing of the past.

Alas, that is not to be. The amount of direct mail that catalog companies, Internet purveyors, and coupon captains send out each year continues to climb, up from 90.5 billion pieces in 2003 to a whopping 103.5 billion pieces in 2007, according to the U.S. Postal Service. “It’s a colossal waste,” says Kristi Chester Vance, communications director of ForestEthics, a group that has worked to reduce the environmental impact of the catalog industry.

In fact, the annual greenhouse-gas emissions from the production of junk mail are equal to those of 3.5 million cars. (That figure doesn’t include emissions from transporting and disposing of the stuff.) Beyond that, each year junk mail production in the U.S. consumes more than 96.7 billion gallons of water and more than 100 million trees, ForestEthics estimates. Most of those, says Chester Vance, come from carbon-dioxide-sequestering, biologically diverse old-growth forests, rather than from sustainably managed tree farms. And according to the Environmental Protection Agency, only about a third of all junk mail is recycled. “All that for a response rate of less than 3 percent,” Chester Vance notes, referring to the fact that fewer than 3 percent of people — often even fewer — respond to the solicitations.

Junk mail has nonenvironmental problems too. It exposes you to identity theft and is just a drag to sort through. If you spend five minutes a day dealing with junk mail — shredding credit card offers, for instance — you blow a full 30 hours a year. Time you could use to write the great American novel, hang out with your kids, or gaze up at the stars.

Usually your name and address end up on junk mail lists because you’ve purchased something with a credit card, subscribed to a magazine, or listed your name and address on the application for a store’s discount card. Merchants sell your information to others. You may have tried stopping your junk mail in the past, perhaps by contacting the Direct Marketing Association, the largest industry trade group, to little or no avail.



But fighting the junk mail hydra requires a multipronged approach, one that environmental groups and Internet-based service providers are taking up in equal measures. Now, several paid and some free services can effectively stop between 80 and 95 percent of all that mailbox clutter.

One such service is the Palo Alto, Calif.-based GreenDimes.com. For a $15 one-time fee, GreenDimes will “contact a dozen or so direct-mail groups on your behalf,” says general manager Dan Estabrook. GreenDimes instructs these groups, which compile and sell names to countless companies and banks, to remove your name and address — including past residents and the omnipresent “current resident” — from their databases. GreenDimes also monitors the DMA’s distribution list on a monthly basis to make sure your name is not included. “On the catalog side, we communicate directly with thousands of catalog companies, indicating that you’ve authorized us to remove your name,” Estabrook says.

GreenDimes’ coverage should last for three to five years, he estimates. If you move, you need to re-up. Like other services, GreenDimes allows consumers to choose, for the life of the membership, which catalogs they’d like to receive and which they’d like to stop. And with each new membership, the group plants 10 trees through tree-planting groups American Forests, Sustainable Harvest International, and Trees for the Future.

Ferndale, Mich.-based nonprofit 41pounds.org — its name is based on the average amount of junk mail a person receives each year — offers a similar service. For $41, it guarantees to stop junk mail for five years. It erases your name from direct mailers like Valpak, ShopWise, Reader’s Digest, Publishers Clearinghouse and Bed Bath & Beyond. It also donates $15 of your fee to nonprofits such as Stopglobalwarming.org.

Stopthejunkmail.com will put the brakes on junk mail to small businesses as well as consumers, for $20 a year.

None of these junk-mail-stopping services has been rated by consumer organizations such as Consumer Reports. But ever since signing up for GreenDimes this summer, I can happily report that my junk mail has stopped; the only pieces I now receive are from the environmental groups to which I belong.

If you don’t want to pay anything to stop junk mail, check out Catalog Choice, organized jointly by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the National Wildlife Federation, and the Berkeley, Calif.-based Ecology Center. The Web site allows individuals and businesses to remove their names from the mailing lists of catalogs they don’t want. Simply register, find the names of the catalogs you no longer wish to receive, enter the requested information into the Web form and click “Decline.” Catalog Choice will then contact merchants on your behalf.

Why focus on catalogs? Although they constitute only about 15 percent of the direct-mail pieces sent out in 2006 — that’s about 15.5 billion catalogs — “they have a disproportionate effect because of their weight,” explains the NRDC’s Kate Sinding. Sinding believes consumers aren’t the only ones who will benefit from the service. “We think this will help merchants, who can mail to people who want to get their catalogs and not waste money mailing to people who don’t,” she says.

Of course, the junk mail industry is hip to the fact that most people loathe much of what they produce. So the Direct Marketing Association is getting in on the act, sort of. Its new Commitment to Consumer Choice requires its 3,600-plus member companies to “notify consumers of the opportunity to modify or eliminate future mail solicitations.” As of October 2008, you should see a line on every piece of junk mail that explains how to get your name removed from the companies’ mailing list. If not, says DMA senior vice president for corporate responsibility Patricia Kachura, you should rat them out to the DMA. “Failure to comply means they can be brought to the DMA board of directors and could be expelled from the association,” Kachura says.

The DMA has also made nonbinding environmental recommendations, such as increasing recycled-paper content. And, for $1, the group offers its own consumer Mail Preference Service. The service claims to remove individuals from DMA-member lists; it doesn’t remove them from the lists of nonmember companies or from credit card or other financial solicitation lists, which are handled by other concerns. You can opt out of financial solicitations for free, though, by visiting OptOutPrescreen.com, a site jointly run by the four largest credit information agencies.

Finally, in dealing with junk mail, you might want to participate in new efforts by ForestEthics, the Center for a New American Dream and other groups to launch state “Do Not Mail” registries. The registries would prohibit direct marketers from sending unsolicited mail to those who sign up, much in the way the federal “Do Not Call” registry prohibits phone solicitations. “State ‘Do Not Call’ registries led to the creation of the federal ‘Do Not Call’ registry,” says ForestEthics’ Chester Vance, explaining why the groups are focusing their efforts on state legislation first.

The environmental benefits of such a registry could be pretty wide-ranging. And then, hey, think of all the time it could free up to deal with spam.

Liz Galst is a regular contributor to Plenty. Her writing has appeared in the New York Times, Newsweek, and Better Homes & Gardens.

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>