Join Salon staff as we discuss Episode 5 of "The Wire"
Salon contributors will include: Heather Havrilesky, TV critic; Sarah Hepola, Life deputy editor; Alex Koppelman, staff writer; Kerry Lauerman, New York editorial director; Farhad Manjoo, senior writer; Laura Miller, senior writer; Joan Walsh, editor in chief.
BEWARE: Spoilers ahead!
Koppelman: Once again, I felt somewhat let down by this episode, especially since last week’s was so good. And the sad thing for me is that just about everything about this episode was “The Wire” at its best — Omar’s long wait, Bubbles’ desire for punishment, Clay Davis’ thrasing about — but the continued McNulty/Freamon make up a serial killer plot just kills everything for me. I could deal with it last week, when it was muted behind Marlo’s continuing machinations, but this time it was just way too up front for me.
But this episode did have some great moments. Maybe I’m just a nerd (maybe?), but I liked the two sneaky references to David Simon’s “The Corner” that got slipped in. Waylon, Bubbles’ sponsor, works at the same crab house depicted in “The Corner” miniseries, and if I’m not mistaken, that was the real Fran Boyd drawing blood for Bubbles’ HIV test. (Her son DeAndre played Brother Mouzone’s assistant/bodyguard Lamar.) And I’m glad we’re seeing more of Michael and Dukie — the interplay between them has been one of the best parts of the season. I just wish we could get a glimpse at Randy and Naimond.
Finally, I will give the fake serial killer plot one thing: At least this time everyone above McNulty and Freamon is acting in good faith. Earlier in the show, the problem with the bosses was that they were just incompetent. Now, their hands are genuinely tied, and the wall thrown up against the investigation is not of their own making. It’s another side of the causes for paralysis in city governments, and good for Simon et al. for exploring that.
Hepola: Alex, you mentioned a real-life cameo, which has always been one of those easter eggs of “The Wire,” a show that rewards careful viewing. But I want to talk about a cameo that’s become trouble for the show — musician and ex-junkie Steve Earle as Bubble’s AA sponsor. The man has the acting abilities of a muppet. He acts with his hands, with his head, with his toes. I realize recovering addicts are twitchy, but Earle looks like he’s jonesing for the bathroom. And his limited ability makes it all the more difficult to pull off 12-step speak about how we need to let go of our shame and take an honest inventory. David Simon must think it’s cool that a seasoned sonofabitch like Earle wanted to be on his show, but what’s wrong with trained actors? (For those keeping score at home, by the way, I bagged on Steve Earle’s theme song this season AND his acting ability. I am so not invited to the Earles’ annual Christmas guitar jam.)
A few other scenes stood out this episode: a fleeting glimpse of Chris, the assassin’s assassin, playing sweetly with his daughter; McNulty not paying for the paper but sneaking in to steal his copy (and we wonder why the industry is dying); and the hilarious response of the young reporter when told to do a story on the homeless. “Where am I gonna find homeless people?” It’s Baltimore, dipshit.
Manjoo: Yup, this one was definitely a disappointment over last week’s. A few episodes ago Alex, I think, hit on the main problem with the McNulty serial killer storyline, its dramatized-for-TV unrealism; it feels more like a yarn Dick Wolf, the “Law & Order” creator, clumsily “ripped from the headlines” than like a tale David Simon and his fact-obsessed co-writers dug up on the real city streets. It’s TV, not HBO.
That sense was especially powerful this week. I did enjoy the newsroom scene in which McNulty and Scott the fabulist reporter discuss the implications of the serial killer phone call that each of them knows is fake. But this kind of dramatic irony — is that what you call the device? — felt like a departure from four seasons’ of “Wire” storytelling, more pyrotechnics than gritty street drama. Worse was the part where Freamon and McNulty go over how they’ll switch the serial killer wiretap with one for Marlo. Even Herc wouldn’t have tried something so stupid.
But of course I’m burying the lead here. Omar! What happened to Omar!? Guesses, anyone?
Sarah, you really think Steve Earle’s that bad? His acting didn’t stand out to me either way, actually. And I have to say — I’m warming to his version of the song. Not that I like any version very much; in the endless war between “The Sopranos” and “The Wire” for Best TV Show Ever, one of the few categories I give to “The Sopranos” is Theme Song. Alabama 3′s “Woke Up This Morning” is unbeatable. Speaking of music, though, the one good thing about McNulty going back to the bottle is more bar scenes, which means more great jukebox music. Picking “Everybody Wants to Rule The World” for the background to McNulty’s first encounter with Scott Templeton felt very right.
Even a bad episode of “The Wire” has got some unforgettable scenes. For me, this time, it was Cutty telling Dukie that in the rest of the world, “not everything comes down to how you carry it in the street.” Dukie’s response just breaks your heart, doesn’t it? “Like, how do you get from here to the rest of the world?”
Havrilesky: Sweet Jesus, this is a tough crowd. Given what we know about the backgrounds of McNulty and Freamon, how isn’t it plausible that they’d go to great lengths to nail Marlo? And how does that one storyline make it impossible for you to enjoy the other threads of Simon’s story? You people need to log a few hours watching shitty TV with me so you’ll remember the difference between a story that “seems a little farfetched” and the sorts of deeply, absurdly stupid plots found in most procedural dramas.
That said, I think McNulty and Freamon could march into Carcetti’s office with bombs strapped to their bodies and I’d still enjoy this show from start to finish. It’s just been too good for too long not to suspend whatever disbelief you have and give Simon the benefit of the doubt.
I also loved Dukie’s line about the rest of the world, Farhad. What a direct sock in the jaw to those who expect inner city kids to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and become captains of industry through sheer determination alone. Dukie’s total befuddlement about how to get out of his situation is just heartbreaking.
MILLER: I”m with Farhad and Alex on the serial killer story line. This episode offered more of an explanation of how McNulty expects his cockamamie scheme to work — Lester will pass off the information gleaned from the wiretap switcheroo as coming from an anonymous informer — but they both know that in that case it can’t be used as evidence. And, as should have been obvious from the start, the scam McNulty’s running is far more likely to pull real detectives off of real murders. Besides, won’t he eventually have to produce a killer?
I didn’t weigh in last week, but I’ve been thinking since that if this were a David Milch show, I’d have no doubt that Marlo’s name had pointed, literary significance. Marlo doesn’t resemble Christopher Marlowe, but he has a lot in common with the main character in Marlowe’s first great dramatic success, “Tamburlaine the Great (Pts. 1 & 2)” Based on the 14th-century Mongol conqueror, Timur, Marlowe’s Tamburlaine is a creature of pure ambition who arrives seemingly out of nowhere and subjugates most of the known world, grinding assorted potentates under his feet (literally — he forces one defeated emperor to act as his footstool). Like Tamburlaine, Marlo really only wants one thing — to exercise his will without impediment of any kind. However clever and ruthless the other drug lords in “The Wire,” they all have other desires, whether it’s the basic gangster hedonism of Avon, Stringer Bell’s hunger for legitimacy or Prop Joe’s hankering to play Woodrow Wilson. Marlo simply wants to rule, for its own sake. We’ve yet to see him with a (real) girlfriend, or at home, or even spending the money he’s acquiring hand over fist. Last night we saw him suggest a celebration, but it’s hard imagine him actually relaxing with Chris in Atlantic City.
What’s terrifying about Marlo is what was terrifying about Tamburlaine (both Marlowe’s fictional character and the actual historical figure, Timur the Lame): he is willing to do absolutely anything to win — “His resolution far exceedeth all,” says one of the characters in Marlowe’s play. For Tamburlaine, this includes persuading a man to usurp his own brother to seize the throne of Persia, then double-crossing him to become emperor himself. He arrogantly starves and torments his captives, harnessing a couple of vanquished kings to his chariot and indiscriminately slaying women and children. He fills up a lake with the drowned burghers of Babylon and punishes the mayor of Damascus by having all the city’s “holy virgins” skewered on spears. These atrocities are no exaggeration, by the way; the real Timur like to build huge pyramids out of the skulls of his beheaded victims. The fearsome reputation of the Mongol chieftains — who mercilessly slaughtered entire populations if anyone among them offered the slightest resistance — was one of their most effective weapons. Marlo’s many killings are investments in the same sort of reputation.
Of course, this kind of power — the power of comprehensive terror — is hard to maintain indefinitely. When Marlowe’s Tamburlaine boasts “I hold the Fates bound fast in iron chains,/ And with my hand turn Fortune’s wheel about;/ And sooner shall the sun fall from his sphere/ Than Tamburlaine be slain or overcome” — you know he’s setting himself up for a fall (even if it took Marlowe two plays to get him there). What finally brings him down is, apparently, the wrath of providence. Besotted with his own power and boasting that it exceeds even that of God,” Tamburlaine defiantly burns a pile of sacred books, including a copy of the Q’uran. By the next scene, he’s stricken with a “distemper” and soon drops dead.
I doubt Marlo will die of a bad cold, but I expect he will fall by the end of the season, and the cause will be the repercussions of some seemingly minor act of hubris, creeping up on him unawares. Could it be something as insignificant as a pilfered camera?
The unemployed meet MacArthur’s tanks
Episode 4 of our video series remembers when “unemployed armies” roamed America -- and the real Army attacked
VIDEO
When Occupy Wall Street burst on the scene last September, the movement seemed unique and unprecedented. The latest installment of “F**ked: The United States of Unemployment,” however, traces the long history of occupation as a strategy of the unemployed. The impact these earlier movements had is rarely acknowledged, but those uprisings inspired everything from films like “The Wizard of Oz” to transformative government programs such as Social Security.
Another similarity between the “unemployed armies” of yesteryear and the Occupy movement is the brutal response by law enforcement. Witnesses expressed shock when the Oakland police sprayed tear gas at protesters and complained about the liberal use of billy clubs by cops in New York, but imagine Gen. Douglas MacArthur unleashing a deadly offensive of tanks, bayonets and torches on military veterans camping out in Washington, D.C. It’s all captured in the chilling video below.
Love’s fumbles
How did three celebrity fights go down? Belle Boggs, Ben Greenman, Caitlin Horrocks & Alix Ohlin imagine the scenes
(Credit: AP/Salon)
It’s Valentine’s Day, perhaps the sappiest day of the year for couples. But it’s also a good day to remember that being part of a couple is hard — and that no one other than those two people truly understands what goes on or why it works.
So Salon asked four top novelists to look at celebrity couples in the news recently either for a split or a disagreement and imagine the back story. What went wrong? What was really said?
Just click on the links below to read the stories:
Whip-It by Belle Boggs and Richard D. Allen
The author of “Mattaponi Queen” imagines the final phone call of Demi and Ashton’s marriage — and wonders if anyone was actually listening in.
Pitch and Catch by Ben Greenman
When Gisele Bundchen defended Tom Brady by criticizing his receivers after the Super Bowl, it created some awkwardness. An author and New Yorker editor re-creates the conversation.
One Day You’re In by Caitlin Horrocks
It was an awkward day on “Project Runway” when Heidi Klum and Seal split, guesses the author of “This Is Not Your City” — especially for those who speak in Seal song titles.
Demi’s Last Night Out by Alix Ohlin
The evening before Demi’s friends called 911 with a medical emergency, she was at another party, and despaired of ever finding anyone who truly understood her again, imagines the author of “The Missing Person.”
Whitney Houston dies at 48
A look back at the glorious career and biggest hits of the troubled pop diva
VIDEO
Singer Whitney Houston is shown during the Whitney Houston "I Look To You" CD Listening Party held at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Thursday July 23, 2009 in Beverly Hills, California.
Before the tragic tabloid headlines, the “crack is wack” denials and the tumultuous marriage to Bobby Brown, pop/soul diva Whitney Houston towered over the music world in the mid-1980s and early ’90s.
Houston died Saturday in Beverly Hills, on the eve of the Grammy Awards. She was 48.
She sold 200 million records worldwide, won six Grammys, two Emmys and nearly two dozen American Music Awards. Hits like “How Will I Know,” “Saving All My Love For You” and “I Wanna Dance With Somebody” ruled the pop charts — and made her one of the few singers who could be identified by one name.
With royal music roots — the daughter of gospel sensation Cissy Houston, the cousin of Dionne Warwick and the god-daughter of Aretha Franklin — she seemed destined to become a pop queen. But drugs and erratic behavior helped tear her career down.
“The biggest devil is me. I’m either my best friend or my worst enemy,” Houston told Diane Sawyer in a 2002 interview, with Brown by her side.
Let’s remember her at her peak, with some of her biggest hits:
“Saving All My Love For You”
“I Wanna Dance With Somebody”
“Star-Spangled Banner” at the Super Bowl
“I Will Always Love You,” Grammy performance
“I’m Your Baby Tonight”
“How Will I Know”
Is work worth it?
Unemployment brings soul-searching. In a new episode of our video series, the jobless share surprising priorities
VIDEO
Certain experiences will always force a reevaluation of life’s priorities. The birth of a child, a near-death experience — or getting fired. The latest episode of Salon’s video series on unemployment in America begins with Theresa Iacovo, a laid-off truck dispatcher, reminiscing on all of the Christmases she missed during her 20-year career. “Why did I give up that time with my family that I can never give back?” she asks.
Several recent submissions to Open Salon on the topic of unemployment also question the relationship between personal fulfillment and work. Homeless Scribe aptly sums up the source of much frustration: “Fresh out of college, I expected job security in exchange for hard work. I expected fairness in exchange for loyalty. And I expected respect in exchange for respect. I lived up to my side of the bargain. It’s the other side that failed.”
While challenging the myth that unemployment equals a meaningless existence, Livia Gershon explains how the freedom of not having a job can come with more benefits than the meager compensation of, for example, a part-time shift at Wal-Mart. She writes, “An unemployed father might create a more stable home for a little while, so his wife doesn’t have to take a day off if a kid gets sick. He might also be able to watch a neighbor’s child after school, or help his parents fix their roof.”
The trick, of course, is finding balance. We would all love to chase our passions, but we can’t just ignore those pesky bills. The former employee of a Chicago law firm captures this conflict in his cathartic piece “My Unintended Vacation.” He writes, “Between temp jobs, I started spending a lot more time volunteering for a few nonprofits and found it much more rewarding than the old job — except for the money, of course.”
Salon readers: Tell us your love woes
Next week, our Valentine's Day experts will prescribe classic literature for your problems. Here's how to submit
Authors Jack Murnighan and Maura Kelly.
Love woes are timeless — so why not look to literature’s most lasting works for advice on how to deal with them?
In their new book, “Much Ado About Loving,” authors Maura Kelly and Jack Murnighan do just that. Next week, in honor of Valentine’s Day, we’re bringing their expertise — and the innumerable literary examples at their fingertips — to you.
Tell us about your romantic problems, and we’ll send Jack and Maura to the stacks. Heartbroken after a nasty breakup? Languishing in a long-term relationship that’s lost its spark? They’ll tackle anything — from good old-fashioned forbidden love to ultra-modern online dating disasters — and let you know which Great Works offer words of wisdom suitable to your situation.
Email your entries to bythebook@salon.com, and check back on Valentine’s Day to see which classics they prescribe. Submissions will be accepted until 5 p.m. EST on Friday, Feb. 10.
Page 1 of 88 in Salon Staff
The things I carry
When I lost the ability to type
Pop art, the beaded edition
The beautiful banality of high school
The unemployed meet MacArthur’s tanks
Demi’s last night out
One day you’re in
Pitch and catch
Whip-it 

