Why is Obama supporting “limited” offshore drilling?
Maybe it's because he understands the big picture -- compromises may be necessary along the way to a sustainable energy future.
Topics: 2008 Elections, Energy, Globalization, How the World Works, Politics News
Did Barack Obama flip-flop by endorsing a “limited amount of new offshore drilling” in a speech detailing his new energy plan delivered in Lansing, Mich., on Monday?
To even ask the question in such a manner is to drastically oversimplify a complex problem. The best answer, then, is just to recommend reading the full text of the speech. Like nearly all of Obama’s major speeches, it is nuanced and comprehensive. Yes, he does endorse expanding domestic production of oil and gas, advocates selling 70 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and even makes a seriously questionable call to “speed up the process of recovering oil and gas resources in shale formations in Montana and North Dakota.” But he does so while making absolutely clear that none of these measures will solve the American “addiction” to foreign oil or make any significant long-term impact on gas prices. Not when a country that has only 3 percent of the world’s reserves of oil consumes 25 percent of the fuel. No amount of drilling offshore will change that equation, and Obama knows it, and he says so.
All of his new concessions to increased production come in the context of a hugely ambitious plan to steer the entire nation toward renewable and sustainable energy — a plan that he rightly identifies as critical to both the health of the planet and the health of the U.S. economy.
And on that point he makes it absolutely clear how he differs from his opponent. After noting that he agrees with McCain that today’s energy crisis was 30 years in the making, Obama said:
What Senator McCain neglected to mention was that during those thirty years, he was in Washington for twenty-six of them. And in all that time, he did little to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. He voted against increased fuel efficiency standards and opposed legislation that included tax credits for more efficient cars. He voted against renewable sources of energy. Against clean biofuels. Against solar power. Against wind power. Against an energy bill that — while far from perfect — represented the largest investment in renewable sources of energy in the history of this country. So when Senator McCain talks about the failure of politicians in Washington to do anything about our energy crisis, it’s important to remember that he’s been a part of that failure. Now, after years of inaction, and in the face of public frustration over rising gas prices, the only energy proposal he’s really promoting is more offshore drilling — a position he recently adopted that has become the centerpiece of his plan, and one that will not make a real dent in current gas prices or meet the long-term challenge of energy independence.
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




For Gay Couples Seeking Immigration Reform, All Eyes On Sen. Patrick Leahy
Religious Leaders Urge Obama To Reject Pipeline On "Moral Grounds"
Connecticut Senator Suffers Through Food Stamp Challenge
Comments
65 Comments