Football
Broncos-Chargers: The readers write
What about that blown call? Were the Broncos "playing with house money"?
A lot of readers have responded to Mike Shanahan: American hero wanting to talk about the call that referee Ed Hochuli admitted he screwed up right before the Denver Broncos’ game-winning touchdown and conversion.
Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler had fumbled while scrambling. He’d tried to throw a pass, but the ball had popped out when he’d brought his hand back. His arm came forward, but without the ball. Hochuli, seeing this in real time, blew his whistle: incomplete pass. The Chargers recovered the ball and the replay review showed that Cutler had indeed fumbled, but the whistle had blown the play dead. The weird, Frankenstein-like ruling: Broncos ball, at the spot of the fumble.
ChillyDogg How could you write this and not mention the only reason Denver even had a chance to try for two was because the ref made a horrible call on the fumble. The announcers even said they thought Shanahan went for two because he knew they should have lost the fumble and was giving the Chargers a chance to win the game.
Seriously, do you believe that’s why Shanahan went for two? Have the voices in your head call the voices in mine and they’ll meet up for some Bubble Up and rainbow stew. And I’m pretty sure that’s not what the announcers said.
I didn’t record the end of that game but I was watching it in real time and I’m pretty sure Dick Enberg mentioned that Shanahan was “playing with house money” after the blown call, though I think it was more of a comment than an attempt to get inside Shanahan’s mind. Rich Eisen said the same thing on the NFL Network later in the day.
All I can say is: What time can these people come over to my house for poker? Or, as ChefColeman put it, talking about “house money” is a horrible was to look at gambling … Best way to never leave with some winnings. Is it in your pocket? If so, it is your money.
Shanahan wasn’t playing with house money after that blown call. No competent coach would say, “Oh, well, a blown call went our way. We shouldn’t win this game, so let’s go crazy!” Shanahan’s paid to win games and go to the Super Bowl. He hadn’t won anything before that two-point conversion. He’ll be playing with house money in any games the Broncos play after they’ve sewn up their playoff berth and seeding. Then he can fool around.
More on the blown call — and let’s not forget about the earlier blown call in Denver’s favor, a fumble ruling that would have been overturned on review, only the replay gear wasn’t working. Gotta love instant replay.
paperboyz777 Yes, but … Shanahan wouldn’t have had the opportunity if the officiating had been competent.
Lunatic Fringe Like the previous posters, I agree it is disingenuous to not mention the gift Denver was given by the officials.
I don’t see the connection between the blown calls and the decision to go for two. There were dozens of things that led to the score being 38-37 San Diego, and I didn’t mention any of them because I was talking about the decision to go for two, not how the Broncos got there.
Besides, if I were going to write about every blown call and replay foible, this column would turn into a tiresome recitation of the same complaints over and … uh … and we can’t have … er … hey! Look over there! [Runs away.]
jpbreeze I do give Shanahan respect for going for the two points, why wouldn’t he, he got that second chance, and when that happens, you go for the win to get right with the “Karma Police”.
lonewolfy Shanahan knew the Gods were especially smiling upon him when Ed Hochuli blew the obvious call on Cutler’s fumble … To have played it safe and kicked the extra point would have been to spit on the Gods in response to their generous gift — and considering that in NFL overtimes, a coin flip determines possession and your offense may never even get a chance to take the field, why mess with the generous football deities?
I try to stay away from theological debates. I think you guys meant to write to Tuesday Morning Quarterback.
Or, as Mantonat put it: Salon readers are the only community I know who are mostly atheist except when it comes to football. There’s no karma or divine force at work here.
mkelly9772 This is not the fourth and one for a touchdown vs. a sure thing field goal situation in which you’ve been harping on in the past, where the fourth and one success is much greater than the coin flip success (yet coaches choose the coin flip). He basically chose a coin flip over a coin flip. Exciting football, to be sure, but hardly a great coaching decision.
Agreed. But here’s the thing. If there are two options, even if those options aren’t even close to being equally optimal, NFL coaches will always choose the one that will get them criticized less should it fail. I praised Shanahan not for making a great football decision, but for making the move that would have gotten him criticized had it failed. That just never happens in the NFL, and for Shanahan to do it when it’s basically, as you said, choosing one coin flip over another, well … I’m misting up!
gayle Oh for cryin’ out loud who cares about football this morning? Nobody in Chicago, I can assure you.
Thanks for the update. Do keep us posted.
Jason G. KK writes: “If the average offense facing the average defense has a 50 percent chance of success, what are your chances with a good offense against a bad defense? And what if it’s the end of a long afternoon, and that defense has just been on the field getting scored on?”
The relative quality of the teams obviously affects the odds, but the other two factors will not affect the odds. Because the baseline success rate, whatever it is, already factors those things in. If you are going for a 2-pt conversion, then the defense will have just been scored upon in the vast majority of cases. (Relatively few touchdowns are scored off of interceptions, kickoffs, etc.) And I would venture to guess that the majority of conversion attempts come late in the game. Nobody goes for two in the first half.
All good points. It’s true that the defense has almost always just been scored on and it’s usually near the end of the game, but not all scoring drives are created equal, and not all ends of games are created equal. The Chargers defense had just been scored on via a 12-play, 80-yard march.
There had also been a 14-play, 76-yard march by Denver in the fourth quarter that had ended in an interception. The Chargers defense had been on the field for 12:37 of the previous 13:44. On the afternoon they had been on the field for 75 plays, compared to 49 for the Chargers defense. All of that is not accounted for in the overall stats.
But speaking generally, not about this specific situation, yes. I overstated the case.
King Kaufman is a senior writer for Salon. You can e-mail him at king at salon dot com. Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr More King Kaufman.
Can Tebow find salvation?
Updated: After losing his job in Denver, evangelicals' favorite jock faces an uncertain future in New York.
Tim Tebow (Credit: Reuters/Rick WIlking) [UPDATED BELOW]
You don’t need to be an evangelical Christian to care about the future of Tim Tebow. I’m a lapsed atheist myself. But with the resurrection of quarterback Peyton Manning in Denver, I wonder most about the future of the spiritual scrambler, who led the Broncos to the playoffs last year.
The Broncos signing Manning to replace Tebow is a no-brainer. He may be diminished by age and injury, but he is also the best quarterback of our time, not because he is a brilliant coach’s puppet (Tom Brady) or an on-field, off-field brute (Ben Roethlisberger) but by virtue of a fierce work ethic and a concentrated intelligence that is contagious and inspirational. Whatever is left at age 35 of him will make the Broncos better.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
The Super Bowl is not a job creator
Despite what civic boosters say, hosting the big game provides few long-term benefits
(Credit: AP/Michael Conroy) Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League, argued on “60 Minutes” last Sunday that the NFL is one professional organization designed to appeal to the economic interests of the little guy: Its revenue-sharing model, he said, gives a fighting chance to squads from Green Bay and Buffalo as well as to those from large media markets like New York, Los Angeles and Boston.
On the eve of the Super Bowl, Goodell was touting the familiar idea that the sport’s biggest game is a boon to economic development. But with the cost of a ticket now averaging $3,982 and 30-second television spots selling for $3.5 million, the Super Bowl can appear to be more an occasion for ostentatious excess than an engine of development.
Continue Reading CloseAlexander Heffner is a freelance journalist whose writing has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe. More Alexander Heffner.
Political lessons from this year’s Super Bowl
From jobs to health care, football's big game illustrates the factors that will dominate the 2012 election
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (Credit: AP Photo/Elise Amendola) Most Americans won’t need a justification to watch Sunday’s game, but if you’re a Salon reader you might think, even in passing, that celebrating the holiest day of violence, consumerism and class warfare on your couch is a betrayal of your values or a waste of your time. You might even imagine that it would be better to take a hike, read a book or meditate.
Not this Sunday, buster. It’s an election season. You need to watch this game to fully understand how jobs, religion, leadership and healthcare dominate every American contest.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
Enjoy the game? For the true fan, it’s all about agony
The New York Giants are in the Super Bowl. But for one obsessive, the question is what time to take the Ativan
Ohio State football fans (Credit: AP) “The truth is,” Nick Hornby wrote in “Fever Pitch,” his book about his obsession with Arsenal and British football, “for alarmingly large chunks of an average day, I am a moron.”
That’s a wonderful sentence by one of my favorite writers, but if Hornby is only a moron for only large chunks of the average day, he is doing a lot better than I am. I can honestly report that for the last few months I have been an absolute idiot for all but very small portions of the day.
Continue Reading CloseTed Heller's latest novel, "Pocket Kings," will be published in March. He is also the author of the novels "Slab Rat" and "Funnymen." More Ted Heller.
Small blunders kill Super Bowl dreams
For fans of the 49ers and Ravens, the road to the big game is paved with pain
Kyle Williams loses it Just when it looked like the NFC and AFC championship games were going to last until the Super Bowl, two fatal blunders brought them to an abrupt close. The stunning conclusions to two of the most tense, evenly matched conference championship games in recent memory were a painful reminder that although football is a team game, one miscue by a single player can wipe out thousands of hours of collective blood, sweat and tears.
It will be a sad and lonely night for Baltimore Ravens’ kicker Billy Cundiff, whose shanked chip-shot 32-yarder gave the AFC championship to the New England Patriots. Kickers must have strong mental constitutions: in a sport where bonds between teammates are cemented in blood and pain, they are not always regarded as full-fledged comrades to begin with, and so when they screw up, it’s even harder for them to deal with. The mantra “short memory,” which defensive backs are constantly shouting at each other, applies in spades to kickers. Cundiff could use a tall glass of Milk of Amnesia.
Continue Reading CloseGary Kamiya is a Salon contributing writer. More Gary Kamiya.
Page 1 of 52 in Football