Football
Colts, wasted TO’s do in Pats
Bill Belichick might be a genius, but he can squander timeouts with the best of 'em.
Even geniuses waste timeouts.
New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick burned through all three of his second-half timeouts by the fourth minute of the fourth quarter at Indianapolis Sunday night. That forced his hand in the endgame, giving him no choice but to go for it on fourth-and-15 at the Colts 45, down by three with just over four minutes to go.
That low-percentage Matt Cassell pass was picked off, and the Colts were able to nail down the 18-15 win.
It’s impossible to say that the wasted timeouts beat the Patriots, but none of them seemed all that necessary, and if some or all of them had been saved New England could have pinned the Colts deep in their territory with four minutes left and the Pats able to kill the clock up to three times. You’d have to like their chances a lot better in that situation than having Cassell heave the ball downfield on fourth-and-15.
The first timeout was lost on a dumb challenge. It looked like one of those Belichick ego moves. The Patriots had tried to catch the Colts with 12 men on the field with a quick snap. The play gained nothing, leaving New England with a second-and-10 at the Colts 45. But Belichick challenged the officials’ ruling that the 12th man had just barely made the sideline before the snap.
The payoff would have been a five-yard penalty, first-and-five at the 40. Not nearly enough gain to risk losing a timeout in the second half of a close game. At the time, early in the third quarter, the Colts led 7-6. If you’re going to challenge there, you’d better be as sure as sure can be that you’re right. Belichick was wrong. The Patriots drove downfield and scored a touchdown anyway, as if to prove how little they needed that 12 men on the field penalty.
The second timeout came later in the same drive, with 8:33 to go in the third quarter, when Cassell didn’t like what he saw in the defense and called time before the snap on second-and-8 from the Indianapolis 17. A somewhat defensible move, but I’m a fan of taking the delay of game penalty in that situation.
There’s a big difference between second-and-8 and second-and-13, but I think the difference between having one and two timeouts remaining in a tight game is bigger. The yardage wouldn’t have moved the Patriots out of field-goal range.
Kevin Faulk ran for a first down on a draw play coming out of the timeout, and the Patriots, as noted, eventually scored the touchdown. That second timeout might have made both possible, and without it the Patriots might not have been in the game at the end. But I say hang on to those timeouts unless there’s an overwhelming reason not to, and there wasn’t.
The third timeout was as weird as the first. The Patriots, now trailing 15-12, had a fourth-and-1 at the Colts 7 with just under 12 minutes to go in the game. The Pats lined up to go for it, but Belichick, racing down the sideline, called timeout just before the snap. The play, which didn’t count, did gain the first down. Belichick wanted the field-goal team.
Stephen Gostkowski hit the chip shot, but that timeout would have been saved by making the right decision in the first place. Or by making the wrong decision and sticking with it.
“We didn’t get a very good look at the spot,” Belichick said after the game. “At first we thought it was fourth and inches and then all along it was fourth and about a yard. So once we saw the distance, it just seemed better to go for the points.”
Again, the difference between fourth-and-inches and fourth-and-1 isn’t as great as the difference between having one timeout and having no timeouts — and no challenges — in a close game. Easy to say in hindsight, of course, but I think I’ve established my bona fides as a fanatic protector of timeouts.
Maybe the Colts would have beaten the Patriots anyway. Maybe Peyton Manning would have taken over after that punt with four minutes to go and driven his team 90 yards for the game-clinching score with a few seconds left. We didn’t get to find out. There wasn’t time.
King Kaufman is a senior writer for Salon. You can e-mail him at king at salon dot com. Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr More King Kaufman.
Can Tebow find salvation?
Updated: After losing his job in Denver, evangelicals' favorite jock faces an uncertain future in New York.
Tim Tebow (Credit: Reuters/Rick WIlking) [UPDATED BELOW]
You don’t need to be an evangelical Christian to care about the future of Tim Tebow. I’m a lapsed atheist myself. But with the resurrection of quarterback Peyton Manning in Denver, I wonder most about the future of the spiritual scrambler, who led the Broncos to the playoffs last year.
The Broncos signing Manning to replace Tebow is a no-brainer. He may be diminished by age and injury, but he is also the best quarterback of our time, not because he is a brilliant coach’s puppet (Tom Brady) or an on-field, off-field brute (Ben Roethlisberger) but by virtue of a fierce work ethic and a concentrated intelligence that is contagious and inspirational. Whatever is left at age 35 of him will make the Broncos better.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
The Super Bowl is not a job creator
Despite what civic boosters say, hosting the big game provides few long-term benefits
(Credit: AP/Michael Conroy) Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League, argued on “60 Minutes” last Sunday that the NFL is one professional organization designed to appeal to the economic interests of the little guy: Its revenue-sharing model, he said, gives a fighting chance to squads from Green Bay and Buffalo as well as to those from large media markets like New York, Los Angeles and Boston.
On the eve of the Super Bowl, Goodell was touting the familiar idea that the sport’s biggest game is a boon to economic development. But with the cost of a ticket now averaging $3,982 and 30-second television spots selling for $3.5 million, the Super Bowl can appear to be more an occasion for ostentatious excess than an engine of development.
Continue Reading CloseAlexander Heffner is a freelance journalist whose writing has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe. More Alexander Heffner.
Political lessons from this year’s Super Bowl
From jobs to health care, football's big game illustrates the factors that will dominate the 2012 election
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (Credit: AP Photo/Elise Amendola) Most Americans won’t need a justification to watch Sunday’s game, but if you’re a Salon reader you might think, even in passing, that celebrating the holiest day of violence, consumerism and class warfare on your couch is a betrayal of your values or a waste of your time. You might even imagine that it would be better to take a hike, read a book or meditate.
Not this Sunday, buster. It’s an election season. You need to watch this game to fully understand how jobs, religion, leadership and healthcare dominate every American contest.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
Enjoy the game? For the true fan, it’s all about agony
The New York Giants are in the Super Bowl. But for one obsessive, the question is what time to take the Ativan
Ohio State football fans (Credit: AP) “The truth is,” Nick Hornby wrote in “Fever Pitch,” his book about his obsession with Arsenal and British football, “for alarmingly large chunks of an average day, I am a moron.”
That’s a wonderful sentence by one of my favorite writers, but if Hornby is only a moron for only large chunks of the average day, he is doing a lot better than I am. I can honestly report that for the last few months I have been an absolute idiot for all but very small portions of the day.
Continue Reading CloseTed Heller's latest novel, "Pocket Kings," will be published in March. He is also the author of the novels "Slab Rat" and "Funnymen." More Ted Heller.
Small blunders kill Super Bowl dreams
For fans of the 49ers and Ravens, the road to the big game is paved with pain
Kyle Williams loses it Just when it looked like the NFC and AFC championship games were going to last until the Super Bowl, two fatal blunders brought them to an abrupt close. The stunning conclusions to two of the most tense, evenly matched conference championship games in recent memory were a painful reminder that although football is a team game, one miscue by a single player can wipe out thousands of hours of collective blood, sweat and tears.
It will be a sad and lonely night for Baltimore Ravens’ kicker Billy Cundiff, whose shanked chip-shot 32-yarder gave the AFC championship to the New England Patriots. Kickers must have strong mental constitutions: in a sport where bonds between teammates are cemented in blood and pain, they are not always regarded as full-fledged comrades to begin with, and so when they screw up, it’s even harder for them to deal with. The mantra “short memory,” which defensive backs are constantly shouting at each other, applies in spades to kickers. Cundiff could use a tall glass of Milk of Amnesia.
Continue Reading CloseGary Kamiya is a Salon contributing writer. More Gary Kamiya.
Page 1 of 52 in Football