Football
NFL should make the easy fixes to replay
Sunday's mess in Baltimore showed that the league needs to remind its officials what "indisputable" means and put cameras on the goal line.
Don Banks of Sports Illustrated — a past Panel o’ Experts champion — has a handy rundown of the most egregious mistakes from what he calls “the annus horribilis that 2008 has turned into for NFL game officials.”
Banks writes that Ed Hochuli’s Week 2 blunder that handed the Denver Broncos a victory over the San Diego Chargers is one bookend for the refereeing nightmare season and Sunday’s controversial replay overturn that gave the Pittsburgh Steelers the game-winning touchdown over the Baltimore Ravens is the other.
I admire his confidence that there won’t be an even better bookend in the last two weeks, though he does acknowledge the possibility. But those two calls would still be significant because they went a long way toward deciding two of the league’s eight divisions.
The Broncos, thanks to their win over the Chargers, lead San Diego by two games in the AFC West with two to play. A Chargers win — assuming everything since that date would have happened the same way, which of course one can’t assume but everyone does in sentences like this, and that’s really not the catastrophe some people like to pretend it is — would have resulted in a first-place tie today. The Steelers’ win over the Ravens Sunday clinched the AFC North title.
We shouldn’t hold our breath for the competition committee to provide any meaningful fixes, Banks writes, citing NFL sources who tell him nothing big is in the works. That’s a shame, but I can think of two ways that aren’t that big that would be immediate improvements to the replay system.
First, and easiest, and free, the NFL should crack down on the concept of “indisputable.” That’s what the video evidence is supposed to be before a call is overturned, and there’s been creep over the years away from indisputability.
That was the real problem with Sunday’s call by referee Walt Coleman, which happened in the final minute with the Ravens leading the Steelers 9-6. Santonio Holmes of the Steelers caught a pass with both feet in the end zone, but his body leaning forward, out of the end zone, toward the line of scrimmage. It wasn’t clear that the ball broke the plane of the goal line, required for a touchdown, before Holmes was pushed out of the end zone by tacklers. The ruling on the field was no touchdown, the ball spotted inside the 1, fourth and goal.
The replay official reviewed the play and ruled that the ball had broken the plane for a touchdown. Coleman, in announcing the decision, created confusion by mentioning Holmes’ two feet in the end zone without saying anything about the ball breaking the plane. He clarified after the game that he had said the bit about the feet to indicate that Holmes had made a legal catch. The replay ruling was that the ball had broken the plane.
I thought the ball broke the plane. I also thought it was possible the ball didn’t break the plane. None of the replay angles provided a view straight down the goal line. The long lenses used by TV cameras can make for tricky angles. You often are not seeing quite what you think you’re seeing because the shot is compressing the distance between the camera and what it’s looking at. There’s physics going on there. Or optics or something.
I thought if I were a Steelers fan I’d think the replays showed an indisputable touchdown. I thought if I were a Ravens fan I’d think the play was indisputably not a touchdown. As a Raiders and Rams fan who was watching a 9-6 game in its 60th minute, I wasn’t sure I’d recognize a touchdown if I saw one.
But since I’m not a Steelers fan, the replays did not look like indisputable evidence of a touchdown to me. The continuing controversy over the call means that, by definition, I had it right. Reasonable people can and have disagreed about whether Holmes scored. That’s the very definition of disputable. The call, right or wrong, should have stood. No touchdown.
The rule says the evidence has to be indisputable. Enforce the rule.
As for the tricky angles: Why can’t the NFL just solve that problem once and for all? If the original ruling on the Holmes catch had stood, the Steelers would have had a fourth and goal inside the 1. Had they gone for it — is Steelers coach Mike Tomlin American hero material? — there would have been a network camera at the goal line on both sides of the field. A plunge or quarterback sneak could have been scrutinized on replay from the perfect angle.
So why doesn’t the NFL, rather than relying on network cameras, just set up a permanent camera at the goal line on both sides of the field? It’s ridiculous that this prime angle is only available on plays that start at or near the 1-yard line. The Holmes touchdown play started at the 4, and the NFL replay industrial complex was caught off-guard.
It would cost some money. Four fixed cameras on each of the NFL’s 31 fields would be ideal, but the league could probably get away with 32, two mobile cameras at each game, in position on whichever side of the field the teams are playing on. It’s not often that there’s a break-the-plane question on a play of more than 50 yards.
I know times are hard and everything. The NFL just laid off some people. But that was prudence, not poverty. I don’t think we’re talking about a whole lot of money, in the NFL scheme of things.
It would have to be worth something to cut down even a little bit on people talking about how bad NFL officiating has become. Usually, it’s not that the refs are bad. It’s that they’re operating in a bad system. A lot needs to be done to fix that system. But some fixes are easier than others. The NFL should start here.
King Kaufman is a senior writer for Salon. You can e-mail him at king at salon dot com. Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr More King Kaufman.
Can Tebow find salvation?
Updated: After losing his job in Denver, evangelicals' favorite jock faces an uncertain future in New York.
Tim Tebow (Credit: Reuters/Rick WIlking) [UPDATED BELOW]
You don’t need to be an evangelical Christian to care about the future of Tim Tebow. I’m a lapsed atheist myself. But with the resurrection of quarterback Peyton Manning in Denver, I wonder most about the future of the spiritual scrambler, who led the Broncos to the playoffs last year.
The Broncos signing Manning to replace Tebow is a no-brainer. He may be diminished by age and injury, but he is also the best quarterback of our time, not because he is a brilliant coach’s puppet (Tom Brady) or an on-field, off-field brute (Ben Roethlisberger) but by virtue of a fierce work ethic and a concentrated intelligence that is contagious and inspirational. Whatever is left at age 35 of him will make the Broncos better.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
The Super Bowl is not a job creator
Despite what civic boosters say, hosting the big game provides few long-term benefits
(Credit: AP/Michael Conroy) Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League, argued on “60 Minutes” last Sunday that the NFL is one professional organization designed to appeal to the economic interests of the little guy: Its revenue-sharing model, he said, gives a fighting chance to squads from Green Bay and Buffalo as well as to those from large media markets like New York, Los Angeles and Boston.
On the eve of the Super Bowl, Goodell was touting the familiar idea that the sport’s biggest game is a boon to economic development. But with the cost of a ticket now averaging $3,982 and 30-second television spots selling for $3.5 million, the Super Bowl can appear to be more an occasion for ostentatious excess than an engine of development.
Continue Reading CloseAlexander Heffner is a freelance journalist whose writing has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe. More Alexander Heffner.
Political lessons from this year’s Super Bowl
From jobs to health care, football's big game illustrates the factors that will dominate the 2012 election
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (Credit: AP Photo/Elise Amendola) Most Americans won’t need a justification to watch Sunday’s game, but if you’re a Salon reader you might think, even in passing, that celebrating the holiest day of violence, consumerism and class warfare on your couch is a betrayal of your values or a waste of your time. You might even imagine that it would be better to take a hike, read a book or meditate.
Not this Sunday, buster. It’s an election season. You need to watch this game to fully understand how jobs, religion, leadership and healthcare dominate every American contest.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
Enjoy the game? For the true fan, it’s all about agony
The New York Giants are in the Super Bowl. But for one obsessive, the question is what time to take the Ativan
Ohio State football fans (Credit: AP) “The truth is,” Nick Hornby wrote in “Fever Pitch,” his book about his obsession with Arsenal and British football, “for alarmingly large chunks of an average day, I am a moron.”
That’s a wonderful sentence by one of my favorite writers, but if Hornby is only a moron for only large chunks of the average day, he is doing a lot better than I am. I can honestly report that for the last few months I have been an absolute idiot for all but very small portions of the day.
Continue Reading CloseTed Heller's latest novel, "Pocket Kings," will be published in March. He is also the author of the novels "Slab Rat" and "Funnymen." More Ted Heller.
Small blunders kill Super Bowl dreams
For fans of the 49ers and Ravens, the road to the big game is paved with pain
Kyle Williams loses it Just when it looked like the NFC and AFC championship games were going to last until the Super Bowl, two fatal blunders brought them to an abrupt close. The stunning conclusions to two of the most tense, evenly matched conference championship games in recent memory were a painful reminder that although football is a team game, one miscue by a single player can wipe out thousands of hours of collective blood, sweat and tears.
It will be a sad and lonely night for Baltimore Ravens’ kicker Billy Cundiff, whose shanked chip-shot 32-yarder gave the AFC championship to the New England Patriots. Kickers must have strong mental constitutions: in a sport where bonds between teammates are cemented in blood and pain, they are not always regarded as full-fledged comrades to begin with, and so when they screw up, it’s even harder for them to deal with. The mantra “short memory,” which defensive backs are constantly shouting at each other, applies in spades to kickers. Cundiff could use a tall glass of Milk of Amnesia.
Continue Reading CloseGary Kamiya is a Salon contributing writer. More Gary Kamiya.
Page 1 of 52 in Football