The silliest Republican economic proposal yet

South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford wants to spend stimulus money paying down debt. Where have you gone, Herbert Hoover?

Topics: Mark Sanford, U.S. Economy, Globalization, How the World Works, Economics,

South Carolina Republican politicians appear determined to help a woebegone nation get through these troubled economic times by providing us with an unending gusher of comic relief. If it isn’t Senator Jim DeMint declaring that the stimulus bill is anti-Christian, then it’s Senator Lindsey Graham attacking earmarks in general while defending his own earmarks as justifiable spending appropriations.

But that’s old news. Now we’ve got South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford announcing that he will ask President Obama for a stimulus “waiver” that will allow him to apply $700 million worth of stimulus funds to paying down South Carolina’s “very sizable state debt and contingent liabilities.”

Aside from not appearing to understand what the word “stimulus” means, Sanford is displaying a distressing level of ignorance as to the nature of our current economic problems. In a letter to state legislators, Sanford wrote that “[W]hen one is in a hole, the first order of business is to stop digging.”

You Might Also Like

That kind of thinking might apply to, oh, I don’t know, enacting tax cuts without matching spending cuts, or waging a war without coming up with a source of revenue to offset its cost. But it does not apply to the problem of confronting a collapse in demand. To put it in Sanford’s own terms: to stop digging now runs the risk of making the hole much bigger. Each month in which 600,000 jobs are lost is a month in which 600,000 more people become significantly constrained in their ability to consume goods and services, which means that the companies that produce those goods and services go out of business, leading to more layoffs, and so on. The cycle is self-perpetuating and, so far, steadily accelerating. Paying down government debt at this particular juncture is probably the stupidest use of government funds possible.

The moderate conservative opinion columnist David Brooks had a choice word for this kind of economic strategy, when commenting on House Minority Leader John Boehner’s call last Friday for a spending freeze.

He said it was “insane.”

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R.,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>