Does corporate hog farming breed swine flu?
Critics of multinational agribusiness farming practices suggest that Mexico's problems could be a result of overcrowded pigs in unsanitary conditions.
Topics: China, Globalization, How the World Works, Latin America, Mexico, Swine Flu, Politics News
Is there a link between corporate hog farming and the outbreak of swine flu? Grist’s Tom Philpot, relying on loose translations of Mexican newspaper reports, is speculating that there might be. The key piece of evidence: Smithfield, the world’s largest producer of pork, “operates massive hog-raising operations in Perote, Mexico, in the state of Vera Cruz, where the outbreak originated.”
The World Health Organization’s swine flu FAQ states that “there is no clear indication that the current human cases with swine influenza infection are related to recent or ongoing influenza-like disease events in pigs,” but there’s no getting around the basic fact: As the WHO also says, “people usually get swine flu from infected pigs,” and there are a whole lot of pigs in Perote, Mexico — at least 950,000, according to Philpot.
Philpot regularly writes critically about corporate agribusinesses, and his implication is obvious: There’s something unnatural about cramming hundreds of thousands of pigs together in unsanitary conditions, and so maybe we shouldn’t be surprised to find a massive hog farm at ground zero of a potential pandemic. Mexican news reports, writes Philpot, also paint a fairly dire picture of the environmental conditions afflicting Smithfield’s Mexican operations.
I’m sure that this is just the beginning of this story. But if Philpot is right, then we have potentially much worse things to worry about in the future. In his post about Mexico and Smithfield, Philpot didn’t even mention the post that he had written the day before, referencing rumors reported by the Associated Press suggesting that China’s largest agribusiness company, COFCO, might be interesting in buying Smithfield.
Comments
0 Comments