Republican Sen. Bunning won’t run again in 2010

The senator says his party's leaders pushed him out

Topics: War Room, Jim Bunning,

Normally, the Republican leadership would be upset to hear that an incumbent senator from their party has decided to retire. That’s not the case with Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., who announced Monday afternoon that he will not run for re-election in 2010.

Senate Republicans, including Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who heads the party’s Senate campaign committee, have been actively looking for someone else to run in Bunning’s place for some time now. At one point, when the candidate recruiting became public, Bunning even threatened to sue the National Republican Senatorial Committee if they supported a primary challenger. But at the time, Cornyn said he’d support Bunning if he ran.

That’s not the way the veteran Kentucky senator sees it. In a statement, he put his decision not to run again squarely on the shoulder of his party’s leaders, saying:

You Might Also Like

Unfortunately, running for office is not just about the issues. To win a general election, a candidate has to be able to raise millions of dollars to get the message out to voters. Over the past year, some of the leaders of the Republican Party in the Senate have done everything in their power to dry up my fundraising. The simple fact is that I have not raised the funds necessary to run an effective campaign for the U.S. Senate.

Actually, if either party’s disappointed about this announcement, it’s the Democrats — they had a good chance of knocking off Bunning and taking his seat, or at least forcing the GOP to play defense, and that seems much less likely now.


Alex Koppelman is a staff writer for Salon.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R.,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>