Advertising

Will the swinging ’60s crush our “Mad Men”?

A huge culture shock awaits Sterling Cooper. Here's a look at the "creative revolution" that hit the ad world

  • more
    • All Share Services

Will the swinging '60s crush our

“Mad Men” followers debate how each season will begin as obsessively as they discuss how it will end. That’s because we know, as the characters do not, that their world, whose customs and values seem so settled and inevitable, is on the verge of a series of profound shocks. We’ve watched them through the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, and we know what national trauma awaits them the following fall; we want to see how they’ll handle that, too. But the series’ creator, Matthew Weiner, has already stated that he has no intention of depicting the Kennedy assassination dramatically. The aftereffects, yes, but not the part that these people will talk about for the rest of their lives whenever someone asks them where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news.

No doubt more upheaval awaits the characters of “Mad Men” closer to home: Which of the women will be the first to read “The Feminine Mystique”? Whose relative will die in Vietnam? Who buys the first Beatles album? Chances are, though, that Weiner will find all these familiar milestones a bit too on-the-nose for his understated, Cheeveresque drama. More intriguing is how he’ll portray something that people in advertising have called the “creative revolution,” a shakeup of industry philosophy and standards that peaked in the late 1960s. The profession at the heart of “Mad Men” is in for some big changes, and chances are the gang at the Sterling Cooper agency won’t weather them very well.

For a glimpse of the craziness about to descend on Weiner’s creations, hunt down a used copy of Jerry Della Femina’s “From Those Wonderful Folks Who Gave You Pearl Harbor: Front Line Dispatches From the Advertising Wars,” a memoir of sorts. “Of sorts” because it reads more like the transcript of a tape made at a bar or cocktail party with the recorder propped up next to the raconteur at the center of the crowd. Della Femina launches directly into a cheeky rant (about how advertising is not “all very Tony Randall” — presumably a reference to early-’60s sex comedies starring that “suave” actor as an ad man) and then segues into one indiscreet anecdote and riff right after another, such as the time TWA encouraged several agencies to spring for substantial presentations when they weren’t seriously considering any of them. (A variation of this behavior scuppered the career of Duck on “Mad Men.”) If you’d like to find out who exactly Della Femina is, where he comes from and why he’s telling you all this — the basic meat and potatoes of autobiography — I suggest you visit Wikipedia, though god only knows how the digitally deprived readers who made Della Femina’s book a bestseller when it was first published in 1969 managed to orient themselves.

Della Femina and his ilk — brash, young and irreverent — were the winners in the “advertising wars” of the 1960s. Most of the folks at Sterling Cooper won’t be. When interviewed about the show, Madison Avenue veterans like George Lois and Mary Wells Lawrence have complained that the industry wasn’t as buttoned-down, as sexist or as boozy as the series depicts it. And maybe it wasn’t, at least not from their perspective, but Lois and Lawrence were also among the victors of the creative revolution, young Turks who kicked the likes of Roger Sterling and even Don Draper to the curb. “Sterling Cooper is not cutting-edge,” Weiner explained when the New York Times Magazine asked him about their objections. “It’s mired in the past.”

Signs of Sterling Cooper’s old-school propensities include more than just leering at and condescending to secretaries or midday tête-à-têtes with Johnny Walker. There’s the casual anti-Semitism (seen in the firm’s discomfort when taking on a Jewish retailer as a client in Season 1) and the fact that the agency’s TV department was created solely to humor copywriter Harry Crane after he marched into Roger Sterling’s office to protest being taken for granted and underpaid. Oh, how behind the curve Sterling Cooper is in that! According to Juliann Sivulka, author of “Ad Women,” a history of women in the business, the agency Batten, Barton, Durstine and Osborn (BBDO) had a TV-division staff of 150 a full decade before the action in “Mad Men” begins.

Much like the comic book industry in the 1940s, the cutting-edge advertising agencies of the 1960s benefited from the fastidious WASPiness of Madison Avenue’s mainstream. They hired frustrated, talented Jews and Italians who’d been shut out of tony operations like Sterling Cooper. “I interviewed at J. Walter Thompson for the Ford account,” Della Femina told the Times Magazine, “and was told, ‘We don’t want your kind.’ It took me two years to figure out that he meant I wasn’t a WASP.” If “From Those Wonderful Folks” is any indication, Della Femina is the opposite of Don Draper: voluble, madcap and confiding to the point of indiscretion.

No adman played a greater role in the creative revolution than William Bernbach, who co-founded Doyle Dane Bernbach (DDB) in 1949. In 1959, DDB produced the “Think Small” campaign for Volkswagen, the cause of much bafflement among the young copywriters of Sterling Cooper but voted the No. 1 campaign of all time by Advertising Age in 1999. Bernbach’s opposite number was David Ogilvy, once the most famous advertising executive in the world and author of “Confessions of an Advertising Man” and the revered manual “Ogilvy on Advertising.” Where Ogilvy emphasized exhaustive research and a rational appeal to the consumer — one of his mottoes was “the more you tell, the more you sell” — Bernbach aimed for the emotions, insisting, “you can say the right thing about a product and nobody will listen … you’ve got to say it in such a way that people will feel it in their gut.” No ad did this more effectively than DDB’s harrowing “Daisy” commercial for Lyndon Baynes Johnson’s 1964 presidential campaign.

In a new biography of Ogilvy, “The King of Madison Avenue,” former Ogilvy & Mather CEO Kenneth Roman (who worked with Ogilvy for 26 years) acknowledged that his former boss had his best and biggest ideas in the 1950s and took forever to “appreciate television and the power of music in evoking emotion.” Although Ogilvy’s most famous campaigns — the eye-patched Hathaway Shirt man and “Schweppervescence,” a soft-drink quality bestowed on a grateful America by a dapper British colonel — employed a certain whimsy, he was most influential in direct mail advertising, where bombarding the customer with information remains an effective tool. Tellingly, Ogilvy himself considered his best work to be a full-page, all-text ad explaining the tax benefits to be had by locating a factory in Puerto Rico.

Like Ogilvy — “the product of a print generation,” according to Roman — the crew at Sterling Cooper still thinks of advertising campaigns in terms of magazine and radio ads, in words rather than images. (What disgusts them most about the “Think Small” ad is how much white space it “wastes.”) Yet Don, with his often enigmatic and lyrical pitches, has more than a little Bernbach in him. In his presentation to Kodak for its new slide projector, he rhapsodizes over a parade of photographs of his own family, “This device isn’t a spaceship. It’s a time machine. It goes backwards. Forwards. It takes us to a place where we ache to go again. It’s not called ‘the wheel.’ It’s called ‘the carousel.’ It lets us travel the way a child travels, around and around, and back home again, to a place where we know we are loved.” Similarly, he tells a roomful of cigarette makers that “Happiness is the smell of a new car. It’s freedom from fear. It’s a billboard on the side of the road that screams with reassurance: Whatever you’re doing, it’s OK. You … are … OK.”

The difference between Don and the new breed of advertising professionals about to descend on the world of “Mad Men” is that the emotions Don plays on are anxious and nostalgic (“freedom from fear” being one of the “four freedoms” that FDR championed in a speech rallying the nation to the cause during World War II). “Think Small” and the ads produced by Bernbach’s protégés in the late 1960s wooed customers with the dream of a new way of life that was cooler, wittier, freer, more fun. An exemplary campaign is the one Mary Wells Lawrence designed for staid Braniff Airlines after she left DDB to work for a wacky advertising “think tank” with its headquarters situated in a hotel.

In her diverting 2002 autobiography, “A Big Life in Advertising,” Lawrence explains that she was in an airport waiting for a flight and found the scene unbearably drab, all the planes white and the terminals a dispiriting “greige.” So she had Braniff’s “hostesses” outfitted in wild uniforms designed by Emilio Pucci and the planes themselves each painted in one of seven brilliant solid colors. The catchphrase, which was more an addendum to the visual pizazz of the makeover than the guiding principle of the campaign, pronounced “The End of the Plain Plane.” The result was exhilarating, if light-years away from the rational approach of Ogilvy. Apple Computer got a similarly giddy boost by using the same trick when it introduced its candy-colored iMacs in 1998.

Lawrence was incontestably a star, but when, in 1966, her boss offered her the authority and salary of an agency president but not the title, he told her “the world’s not ready for women presidents.” She promptly quit and founded her own agency with two young male co-workers. Wells, Rich and Greene proceeded to colonize big chunks of America’s pop culture vocabulary; they were responsible for “Plop plop, fizz fizz,” “I can’t believe I ate the whole thing,” “I [heart] New York” and “Friends don’t let friends drive drunk,” among other catchphrases. By 1969, Lawrence was the highest-paid woman in the world and reputed to be the highest-paid executive in advertising.

As Sivulka writes in “Ad Women,” one of the biggest changes in the advertising industry over the period between 1960 and 1968 was the increase in women employees by one-third. By 1983, more than half of the people in the business were women. Peggy Olsen of “Mad Men,” so recently graduated from the secretarial pool to copywriter (and now with her own office!), serves as the exemplar of this revolution at Sterling Cooper, yet she’s no trailblazer. Agencies as traditional as McCann Erickson had women vice-presidents (not just copywriters) by the early ’60s, and Jane Trahey had opened her own agency (they did the “What Becomes a Legend Most?” campaign for Blackglama furs) as early as 1958. Advertising firms were more open to promoting women than other companies because appeals to women — the primary purchasers in most households — lay at the center of their business.

Sterling Cooper demonstrates its tardiness in gender relations as in everything else with its proposed Jackie/Marilyn campaign for Maidenform in Season 2. After first breaking down the office’s entire female population into Jackies and Marilyns (with Peggy the odd woman out, of course), the boys devise a campaign promising that Maidenform’s lingerie can cater to both the diurnal good girl and the nocturnal vamp in every woman. It’s a retread of Revlon’s famous ads for Fire & Ice lipstick from the early ’50s, summarized by one Revlon executive as “a woman is hot and cold, good or bad, a lady and a tramp.” Copy for another lipstick shade, Cherries in the Snow, from around the same period cooed, “Who knows the black-lace thoughts you think while shopping in a gingham frock?” (It’s probably an indicator of the perversity of our age that a gingham frock with a white bra under it now seems kinkier than black satin over black lace.)

Most of the male characters in “Mad Men” wrestle with whopping madonna-whore issues, which is why Peggy (who falls into neither camp) barely registers as female to them. Any drift in the categories freaks them out. When Betty Draper surprises her husband on Valentine’s Day by prancing around in a black corset, he can’t even get it up (no doubt he was preoccupied with his adulterous S/M affair with Bobbie Barrett). He also scolds Betty for buying a bikini, claiming it makes her look “desperate.”

Weiner has cited both Helen Gurley Brown’s “Sex and the Single Girl” and Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique” as significant sources for “Mad Men.” In an interview with Variety, he recalled rereading these two influential books and recognizing that they represent “more than 50 percent of the show.” Brown preached obsessive careerism wrapped in a candy-coated sex-kitten shell, while Freidan debunked housewifery as sufficiently engaging life’s work for educated, middle-class women. Yet it’s difficult to imagine Peggy (definitely “mouseburger,” to use Brown’s famous coinage) attempting anything quite so daring as Brown’s collection of bedpost notches, or Betty suddenly deciding she needs a job that amounts to anything more than sitting still and looking pretty.

Personally, I’m hoping for the day that Peggy gets fed up at Sterling Cooper, walks and takes with her not a couple of schmucks from the copy department but the magnificent, smart, tough-as-nails Joan Holloway, who could beat both Brown and Friedan at their own games if she only put her mind to it. Together, they’d be unstoppable. (Sadly, Lawrence did no such thing, and later in her career she was criticized for rarely hiring women.) They could even bring in Pete Campbell to handle the smaller accounts. Given Weiner’s distaste for the obvious, “Mad Men” is unlikely to end in such blatant wish fulfillment, but a girl can dream.

Laura Miller

Laura Miller is a senior writer for Salon. She is the author of "The Magician's Book: A Skeptic's Adventures in Narnia" and has a Web site, magiciansbook.com.

America’s road sign legends

Burma-Shave's rhyming ads turned highway billboards into poetry, and changed advertising -- and America

  • more
    • All Share Services

America's road sign legends
This article originally appeared on Imprint.

ImprintIn a simpler time, when automobiles went slower and the pre-Eisenhower highway system in the United States was less developed, there was a popular advertising campaign that ran from 1927 until 1963. It consisted of rhymed messages sequentially staked on the right side of the road, all ending with the advertiser’s name, “Burma-Shave.”

Examples of vintage Burma-Shave road signs, including a blue South Dakota version. (Ray Crockett photo)

These red ads (one state, South Dakota, insisted that they be dark blue to keep them from conflicting with the red reserved for warning notices) usually consisted of five signs. For example: “DON’T PASS CARS/ON CURVE OR HILL/IF THE COPS DON’T GET YOU/ MORTICIANS WILL/BURMA-SHAVE.”

Some slogans touted Burma-Shave as a pre-aerosol “brushless” shaving cream—a cream you could scoop out of a jar and lather onto your face without relying on an old-fashioned brush and moistened soap in a mug.

 

("Thoroly"? I guess if the word doesn't fit the composition, change the spelling. . .)

In 1925, Clinton Odell, a Minneapolis lawyer, took the liniment his father created and transformed it into a brushless shaving cream. He named his company Burma-Vita—Burma, because most of the essential oils in the liniment were from the Burmese portion of the Malay Peninsula, and Vita from the Latin for “life”: “Life from Burma.”

Some of Burma-Shave’s primary “brushless shaving cream” competitors were Barbasol and Noxema.

The company was sold to Philip Morris in 1963, and all the signs were removed soon thereafter. As a testament to the campaign’s cultural significance, a set of signs was donated to the Smithsonian, where it still resides. But the brand eventually petered out. After being sold yet again (this time to the American Safety Razor Company) and then reintroduced in 1997, it never regained a hold in the market.

A history of the Burma-Vita Company, written by Frank Rowsome Jr. and illustrated by Carl Rose, was published by the Stephen Greene Press in 1963.

By the early 1960's, the rising costs of road-sign maintenance (as well as new and more effective ways of advertising) sounded the death knell for the Burma-Shave signs.

The following pages from Frank Rowsome Jr.’s book list all the road-sign Burma-Shave phrases produced from 1927 to 1963.

Continue Reading Close

7Up’s branding revolution

How "Bib-Label Lithiated Lemon-Lime Soda" became one of America's most popular soft drinks

  • more
    • All Share Services

7Up's branding revolution
This article originally appeared on Imprint.

ImprintI became interested in pop bottles (I grew up in the Chicago area where we all said “pop”) and related stuff when I was about 12 years old. I had gone inside an old garage that was attached to a neighborhood house that was being torn down and inside was a cache of un-returned pop bottles that must have dated from the 1940-’50s period. I took one of each type home (about 20 of ‘em) and yes, still have them to this day. I really got off on all the different labels and colors of glass and because I used to like to read old magazines I actually recognized most of the brands that were no longer around or had changed their design. I’ll go into this more in a future post, but wanted to lay some sort of a foundation for this piece, which is exclusively on 7Up, with a special focus on their branding efforts of the 1950s.

The soft drink that would be known as 7Up was created in 1929 by Charles Leiper Grigg in St.Louis as part of his “Howdy” line of sodas and was originally called “Bib-Label Lithiated (it contained the mood stabilizer lithium citrate until 1950) Lemon-Lime Soda.” It was almost immediately re-labeled “7 (7 natural flavors) Up Lithiated Lemon-Lime,” and then finally just “7Up”.

The first 7Up logo from 1929.

In terms of logos, an original winged trademark soon gave way to the red squared logo that lasted until the late 1960s that coincided with that period’s brilliant “Uncola” re-branding campaign. I always felt they had GOLD in that Uncola moniker. . .

A 1935 7Up label before the Howdy Company's name was changed to 7Up in 1936, followed by two Howdy beverage labels.

By the late 1940s 7Up was the third most popular soft drink in the United States. By the time the 1950s rolled around, the company had employed extensive branding techniques to keep the momentum going. The following three binders contain examples of what was offered to the bottlers and distributors to reinforce the product’s presence.

A catalog of 7Up sales/marketing items circa 1954.

This page includes tipped-in glossy paint chips.

These next three pages would NEVER fly with the HR Dept in 2012. . .

Before everyone had TV's in their home, it was common to go out to watch television.

7Up Sales & Promotion Merchandise Catalog circa 1954 - 59.

(would love to have those binders. . .)

Actual cloth swatches included.

More swatches.

1959 "Salesmakers" Catalogue

2 actual decals using the older logo with the woman reaching for bubbles- love the way the color is broken down into separate shapes and levels.

Actual booklet attached.

"Fresh Up Freddie" was the 7Up mascot created in 1957 by ad agency Leo Burnett and Walt Disney to help sponsor the Disney "Zorro" TV series.

Here’s a link to more info on “Freddie”: http://www.cartoonbrew.com/disney/fresh-up-freddy.html

Remember, it's from 1959. . .

Ditto. . .

2 mid-1930's 7Up bottles.

Left: 1940's bottle with 8 bubbles on label. Right: 1950's bottle 7 bubbles.

"Like" was introduced in 1963 as a diet version of 7Up. It contained Calcium Cyclamate which was determined to be a carcinogen in 1969. "Like" was discontinued in that same year and Diet 7Up was introduced in 1970 sans the Cyclamates. This bottle is dated 1964.

Late 1960's/early 1970's can.

"The Uncola".

As a final footnote, I was lucky enough to work on spots for 7Up International using the Susan Rose/Joanna Ferrone character “Fido Dido”! Here’s one of my favorites done while I was at the Ink Tank Studio in N.Y.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JpHjeGXyw8

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2012.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

Pepsi’s creepy Jackson revival

A ghoulish new campaign brings him back from the dead. Maybe it's time to stop looking backwards

  • more
    • All Share Services

Pepsi's creepy Jackson revivalMichael Jackson (Credit: Reuters/Kimimasa Mayama)

As if Michael Jackson wasn’t creepy enough when he was alive. The self-proclaimed King of Pop, who died nearly three years ago, is making a return via a new Pepsi campaign. The fabulously un-self-aware tagline? “Live for Now.”

The corporation is set to festoon one billion cans of Pepsi around the world – that’s one billion cans – with the singer’s unmistakable silhouette. It’s a bold move for a company whose most famous association with Jackson is that back in 1984, his hair caught fire filming a commercial for them. Jackson’s estate orchestrated his sponsorship resurrection, and a family spokesperson confirmed to the Wall Street Journal Thursday that “more such marketing agreements are planned.” Did anyone else just feel that collective shudder of revulsion?

Even dead, Jackson is a massive draw. He’s currently the subject of a global Cirque du Soleil tour with the horror movie title “Immortal.”  And Pepsi knows that overseas – especially in markets like Asia — his brand is as ubiquitous and American as well, cola.

Bringing back the dead is a peculiar – if increasingly common – gambit. Now that the earth has run out of living celebrities, they’ve had to revive Tupac to perform at Coachella  and Grace Kelly to make kissy face with Charlize Theron to sell perfume.  They even had to dig up Martin Luther King Jr., to pitch for Mercedes-Benz.

There comes a time when a celebrity passes into our iconography. Today, seeing the images of Elvis and Marilyn and James Dean in different pop culture contexts barely seems any stranger than fake Abraham Lincolns selling cars in February. And why wouldn’t Jackson’s people wring a few more opportunities out of his incredibly lucrative image? Somebody’s got to pay for all those $10 million mansions.

Senior PepsiCo marketing executive Frank Cooper told the WSJ that the new campaign will be both “respectful” and “forward looking.” It may be respectful. But there’s nothing “forward” about the dead. Jackson’s image survives as an easy symbol of pop music, but the man whose life ended from propofol intoxication three years ago, whose doctor is currently serving time for involuntary manslaughter, couldn’t seem less like the right spokesman for the notion of “living for now.”

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

Ashton Kutcher’s brownface fail

The actor's racist ad is pulled -- but what's left isn't much better

  • more
    • All Share Services

Ashton Kutcher's brownface failAshton Kutcher

Somewhere, Charlie Sheen is laughing and saying, “At least I never did that.” This week, we learned what’s even less funny than Ashton Kutcher: Ashton Kutcher in brownface.

In an ill-advised Popchips ad spoofing online dating that launched Wednesday, the “Two and a Half Men” star appeared as a variety of love-hungry “World Wide Lovers” vying for your affection. In a spectacular display of racial tone-deafness, one of them included “Raj.” Raj, all darkened skin and heavy accent, is “a Bollywood producer looking for the most delicious thing on the planet.” He’s looking for something “Kardashian hot … I would give that dog a bone.” He brags that he once won a milking contest, and he does a little dance that will haunt your nightmares.

Shockaroonie, some people found this offensive. The ad went the wrong kind of viral, with a social media explosion of negative feedback. It’s not that comedy with a racial element is always wrong wrong wrong. The Jewish Hank Azaria is currently in his third decade of playing the Indian Apu Nahasapeemapetilon on “The Simpsons,” and nobody seems to be outraged about this. Kutcher’s incredibly unnuanced performance isn’t that, though. On his blog, writer Anil Dash explains it perfectly –  “a fake-Indian outfit and voice” constitute “the entire punchline” of the clip. And, as he eloquently put it, “I can’t imagine I have to explain this to anyone in 2012, but if you find yourself putting brown makeup on a white person in 2012 so they can do a bad ‘funny’ accent in order to sell potato chips, you are on the wrong course. Make some different decisions.”

And so that’s what Popchips is trying to do. On Wednesday, in a “message from Keith” on the company’s website, its founder, CEO and foe of proper capitalization Keith Belling wrote, “we received a lot feedback about the dating campaign parody we launched today and appreciate everyone who took the time to share their point of view. our team worked hard to create a light-hearted parody featuring a variety of characters that was meant to provide a few laughs. we did not intend to offend anyone. i take full responsibility and apologize to anyone we offended.” That’s a constructive, self-aware response to a potential public relations disaster. (Kutcher, who in recent months has been tainted by his hasty Twitter support for Penn State coach Joe Paterno and a divorce that featured rumors of unprotected extramarital sex, has so far had no comment on the problematic ad campaign.)

It’s a positive thing that Popchips understood its mistake and made an immediate effort to rectify it by pulling the ad. That step forward is mitigated somewhat, though, by the a large number of “get over yourself” responses on Anil Dash’s blog. We’ve still got much work we need to do in this country around issues of stereotypes and sensitivity, folks.

You don’t have to look any further than the entire Popchips campaign to see what I mean. Its remaining “World Wide Lovers” include the stoner Brit “Nigel,” who’s “seeking higher planes of consciousness” (GET IT????), the effeminate German “Darl” — a swishy riff on openly gay designer Karl Lagerfeld — and the dumb redneck “Swordfish.” In the end, there’s also regular old, newly single Kutcher, who describes the other guys in the club as a “freak show.” Hey, geniuses at Popchips – you’re still perpetuating gross generalizations. Also: They’re not funny. It’s a great big snack-loving country. Being cool about brown people – and gay people, and people others would call “white trash” – shouldn’t be such a crunch.

 

 

Continue Reading Close
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedub.

FCC takes on super PACs

The commission voted to require stations to post political ad data online -- but it won't be searchable

  • more
    • All Share Services

FCC takes on super PACs (Credit: Screenshot from American Crossroads anti-Obama ad)
This originally appeared on ProPublica.

The Federal Communications Commission voted 2 to 1 this morning to require broadcasters to post political ad data on the Web, making it easier for the public to see how as much as $3.2 billion will be spent on TV advertising this election.

The files — which, among other information, detail the times ads aired, how much they cost, and whether stations rejected ad buy requests from campaigns — are currently available only on paper at stations.

The FCC rejected a push by the industry to water down the measure. But the rule as passed also has serious limits. For example, the data will not be searchable or uploaded in a common format.

The rule will first apply to affiliates of the four major networks (ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox) in the top 50 TV markets. All other stations will have until July 2014 to come into compliance.

“[L]arge areas of some swing states, like Virginia, Missouri, Wisconsin and Michigan, could see an influx of advertising in markets outside of the top 50,” the Sunlight Foundation noted in an analysis today. It was also not immediately clear exactly when the rule will go into effect for the top 50 markets.

Then there’s the crucial question of the format in which the files will be available. FCC spokeswoman Janice Wise told ProPublica that the commission is not creating a searchable database of the political ad files.

“We’ll accept whatever [file] format they provide,” she said in an email.

That will make it much more difficult to analyze the information.

Wise said there are no specific plans to make the database searchable.

By opting to allow stations to submit political data in any format, the commission departed from a recommendation made last year by in an FCC working group report.  The report called for the political file to be put online and that “as much data as possible [be] in a standardized, machine-readable format” that “could also enhance the usefulness and accessibility of the data.”

Also not clear is how the broadcast industry, which vigorously lobbied against the rule, will react.

“[W]e will be seeking guidance from our Board of Directors regarding our options,” the National Association of Broadcasters said in a statement decrying the vote.

In March, the industry group submitted a filing with the commission raising “serious questions about the FCC’s authority” to require stations to put political ad data online.

“That was written as a legal memorandum, which is code for, ‘We’ve lawyered up and we’re ready to sue over this,’” says Andrew Schwartzman, a longtime FCC watcher at the Media Access Project.

The broadcasters’ group declined to comment beyond its statement.

On a Thursday earnings call for Belo Corp., one of the companies that has been fighting the disclosure measure, CEO Dunia Shive suggested that broadcasters would continue to fight the new disclosure rule.

“I don’t think the conversation is over with respect to being able to continue talking about if we will ultimately have to include ad rates online,” she said, Broadcasting & Cable reported.

Belo spokesman R. Paul Fry told ProPublica that the company merely “want[s] to continue the dialogue on this subject.”

The FCC also said today it would review the new rule after a year to see if any changes need to be made before all stations will be required to come into compliance in July 2014.

Continue Reading Close
Justin Elliott

Justin Elliott is a reporter for ProPublica. You can follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin

Page 1 of 66 in Advertising