The latest insult from the credit card industry

If you're not using your plastic enough, watch out. You may have to pay for that privilege, too

Topics: U.S. Economy, How the World Works, Credit Cards,

So let’s say you are a typical American facing a tough recession. You are having trouble making your mortgage payment. You’ve been carrying a lot of debt on your credit cards. Maybe your partner loses his or her job or you get a pay cut. You read the newspapers and figure times will be hard for a while.

So you make some smart decisions. You cut back on expenses. No more expensive dinners out on the town. No more pricey vacations. Most important — you focus on paying down your credit card debt. You become a saver, instead of a conspicuous consumer.

And one day, you look with satisfaction at a zeroed out balance on your plastic. Nice work!

But don’t keep it up too long, because what’s good for you is bad for the credit card companies. And they simply won’t stand still while your plastic stays in your wallet. According to Bloomberg News, the credit card companies have come up with yet another way to gouge some flesh from the newly thrifty — “inactivity” charges: fees for not using your cards.

Credit card issuers, facing the highest level of delinquencies since April, according to Moody’s Investors Service, are reviving inactivity charges and reworking other fees in an effort to stem declining revenue.

Fifth Third, based in Cincinnati, added the fee for the majority of its cards in June, in part to offset increasing servicing costs, said spokeswoman Stephanie Honan. “We want to encourage active use and management of the accounts,” Honan said.

You Might Also Like

There are ways to fight back. Bloomberg quotes Linda Sherry, the director of national priorities with Consumer Action, with a workaround: “If you’re keeping the card in a drawer because of the safety it provides, use it a few times in a year.” Presumably, if you’re disciplined enough to pay down your debt, or not use your card at all, you will also be disciplined enough to pay for groceries a couple of times a year with your credit card and then pay off the bill immediately.

But it’s the principle here that counts. The credit card companies are better off if you behave against your own interests. It’s a new twist on the paradox of thrift — the idea that our individual decisions to pull back work against our collective interest in a thriving economy. It’s bad enough that rational behavior can suck the life out of an economy — but to be actively penalized for saving your pennies with an inactivity charge? That’s just insulting.

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R.,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho,

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France


    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>