The Budget: Obama reality vs. Pawlenty fantasy
A $1.6 trillion deficit underlines the brutal state of the economy. But a rising GOP star has a plan!
Topics: U.S. Economy, How the World Works, Budget Showdown, Politics News
Copies of President Barack Obama's budget are seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Feb. 1, 2010, as it was delivered to the Senate Budget Committee. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)(Credit: AP)Within nanoseconds of the release of President Obama’s new $1.6 trillion budget, Republicans started screaming about the White House’s’ “lip service” to concern about the deficit — proof, once again, of the fantasy-land currently occupied by the GOP.
The numbers are big, for sure, and should alarm anyone already worried about the long-term sustainability of U.S. finances. But the fact is that this budget underlines the unpleasant reality we currently face. Looking forward, Obama’s new budget includes significant tax increases, the end of two wars, a fully recovered economy, and that still won’t bring the annual deficit down below $700 billion-$800 billion.
…the budget plan calls for nearly $1 trillion in tax increases on upper-income families — largely through allowing Bush tax cuts to expire. Banks, bankers and multinational corporations would face new fees and levies. And oil companies would lose $39 billion in tax breaks…
The two top income-tax brackets would rise to 36% and 39.6% from 33% and 35%. For families earning at least $250,000, capital-gains and dividend tax rates would rise to 20% from 15%. All totaled, upper-income families would face $969 billion in higher taxes between 2011 and 2020. Oil and gas companies would face $37 billion more in taxes over that stretch.
Hedge-fund and private-equity traders who now see their fees taxed as capital gains would have their income taxed at income-tax rates, at a cost of $24 billion over the decade. And multi-national companies would pay an additional $122 billion on earnings overseas, a proposal Mr. Obama made last year that went nowhere amid furious business opposition.
With those plans in mind, let’s turn to a balanced budget proposal from Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a potential GOP presidential candidate in 2012. Pawlenty says the debate over the deficit “is no longer between competing political philosophies — it is a matter of basic mathematics.”
Pawlenty then calls for a balanced budget to the amendment to the Constitution and simultaneously recommends that “the Bush tax cuts should be made permanent and tax burdens on individuals and businesses should be further reduced.”
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




No Evidence FBI Is Targeting Chechen Separatists In Boston Bombing Case, Advocates Say
Bill De Blasio Won't Be Distracted By Anthony Weiner
State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
Comments
27 Comments