Eric Massa

Glenn Beck, Eric Massa waste America’s time

Unprepared Fox host fails to get ex-congressman to provide evidence for the wild charges he's been throwing around

  • more
    • All Share Services

Glenn Beck, Eric Massa waste America's timeT.V. host Glenn Beck addresses the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington on Saturday Feb. 20,2010.(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)(Credit: Jose Luis Magana)

6:08 p.m.: One final thought about the trainwreck that was this interview. The whole thing may best be summed up by a quote that Tom Tomorrow tipped me to. Here’s Beck, talking about Massa during his radio show on Monday:

Who is this guy? Stop! Stop. I want to change the show. This needs to be our lead tonight at 5:00 and get this guy on. I don’t have, I don’t have guests on. We just don’t and we certainly don’t lead with a guest. This guy is the guy we’ve been looking for!

Beck had very little idea who Massa was or what he wanted to talk about. He simply wasn’t prepared for the interview — he just knew that the former congressman had said some things that tended to support his worldview.

This is where we really see the limits of an approach like Beck’s. His schtick — former wacky morning DJ turns guy who’s singlehandedly saving America by exposing what they don’t want you to know — works fine when it doesn’t involve actual knowledge or reporting. Once he needs that, though, things can fall apart very quickly.

As Salon’s Mike Madden put it on Twitter, “Beck’s lesson: conspiracy theories much easier to spin without bothering to ‘interview’ people who would ‘know something’ about the ‘facts.’”

6:00 p.m.: Beck, back at his chalkboard and without Massa, circles one of the questions he asked the audience to consider earlier — Do you believe what he says about corruption? And if so, does it affect you?

“This is why I said I’m sorry I’ve wasted your time,” Beck says. “We learned a lot — I think — but what we learned I don’t think affects you at all. From New York, goodnight America.”

And with that,he turns and starts walking off the set.

5:55 p.m. “I have wasted your time,” Beck says to the audience, and apologizes, then goes on to castigate Massa.

This has been embarrassing for Beck, and he knows it. He came in unprepared and far too ready to believe that the former congressman would have some actual evidence for or substance to the charges he’s made.

5:53 p.m.: Beck asks if there’s another shoe that’s going to drop. Massa basically says there is — talks about people in Washington being willing to say anything. Then he talks about text messages: “We bantered back and forth all the time,” he says.

Little piece of advice for Massa — and, well, pretty much everyone: Do not ever admit something like that on national television.

5;47 p.m.: Back from commercial, Beck tries again to press him for specifics on “corruption.” He might as well be screaming, “Tell me bad things about Democrats!” But Massa either doesn’t get it or he’s ignoring it, talking instead about how both parties whip votes in the House. As Massa is saying this, it looks like Beck’s eyes are going to pop out of his skull.

And then Massa goes on to admonish people in general to stop calling fellow Americans names. Like “Communist.” If everyone started following this rule, Beck’s show would become a guy standing silently in front of a blank chalkboard for an hour. So yeah, this doesn’t go over so well.

5:42 p.m.: Beck’s now sounding pretty pissed. Massa simply doesn’t seem to get what the host wants from him — maybe he’s not a regular viewer? So Beck goes to commercial break again, making it fairly clear that he tried to explain what he wanted out of Massa during the last break. He lays it out before going to commercial, telling the former congressman, “I haven’t heard anything. I’ve heard generalities. Let’s take a break — let’s take a break. Let’s go back to: We’ve had the Rahm Emanuel, maybe let’s go back there. What specifically did he do? There’s actionable stuff there, so why wouldn’t we start with that?”

5:40 p.m.: Beck’s trying to get the dirt that Massa basically promised him when he went off on the radio this past weekend. Massa starts talking about campaign finance reform, which is exactly not what Beck wants to hear. The host holds his hand over his mouth, looks pained, maybe a little angry.

“Tell me something about the unions and how the unions are working,” Beck says. He’s basically begging for some dirt on one of his targets — the White House would be great too, he says — right now. And it’s not working.

5:31 p.m.: Suddenly things are about Beck, as he goes off on a little rant: “Do you realize my family is at stake? You’ve got a little scandal with your children in college. I’ve got one for all time now, because I’m not going to resign, I’m not going to back down. I’ve come to a place where I believe the system will destroy me. That’s OK, because I’m doing what I can to pass on a better system for tomorrow.”

He does bring this around to Massa, though, saying he’s puzzled by the former congressman putting up a “white flag” and resigning.

Then we’re off to commercial, but before that, Beck tells Massa to “make a difference” in the half hour still to come. “Name names,” the host says. “What do you know that we need to know?”

5:29 p.m.: Beck’s now moving the interview to ground he’s much happier on — talk of broken systems and corrupt Democrats. (Though the two men do disagree on Massa’s criticism of lobbyists’ money, which the former congressman says is basically legalized bribery. Beck doesn’t like that.)

Also, they talk about something Massa alleged this past weekend, a confrontation between him and a naked Rahm Emanuel in a shower. Massa’s standing by it, says he’ll never forget it.

5:18 p.m. Massa has brought an x-ray of a tumor in his lungs (he had cancer in the 1990′s that was supposed to be fatal, and a new cancer scare in December). Even by Beck’s standards, this is getting over the top, and the host himself seems to be backing away from it.

5:17 p.m.: An instant classic in this exchange –

BECK: You don’t want to fight, you don’t want to stand and fight.

MASSA: Nope.

BECK: So why are you here? Out of all the shows you could pick …

MASSA: I want the toughest, most unforgiving interviewer possible.

BECK: That would be Bill O’Reilly.

5:12 p.m.: Already we’ve got two different pictures of what Massa’s going to do here. On the one hand, as soon as he came on, it seemed like he wouldn’t give Beck what he wants — he said he wasn’t forced out, but that he “forced myself out.” He added, “I own this.” And he said that though he took “full and complete responsibility” for what he’s done, he won’t talk about it.

And then he talked about it, specifically discussing the new allegations in a Washington Post report from Tuesday afternoon. He suggested the timing of the story was odd — which conspiracy-minded Beck loved, of course. And then he went on to make things much worse for himself:

“Now they’re saying I groped a male staffer. Yeah, I did,” Massa said. “Not only did I grope him, I tickled him until he couldn’t breathe and then four guys jumped on top of me. It was my 50th birthday. It was kill the old guy. You can take anything out of context.”

Massa also said he “never should have allowed myself to be as familiar with my staff as I was.” in response to a direct question from Beck, however, he said he did not ever touch anybody sexually.

5:06 p.m.: And we’re at the chalkboard! Beck has three things he wants us to think about: Is there anything new to his charges of corruption? Do you believe what he says about corruption — and if so, does it affect you? (If it doesn’t affect you, Beck says, turn the channel, go some place else.) Finally, do you believe what he says about himself?

I’m going to be asking pointed questions,” Beck says, and then goes on to make some very odd point about men in the U.S. having the right to face their accusers, rather than be subject to whisper campaigns.

5:01 p.m.: And away we go. Beck tells us he has no idea what’s going to happen — “it’s going to be a wild and interesting hour,” he says. Says people on the left and on the right don’t want this interview to happen, that it could blow up after five minutes and that he’s got guests scheduled as backup just in case.

“He is not on my side,” Beck said. “He is a gigantic progressive.”

Beck and I agree on this: This will be interesting.

Stay with us right here at War Room — starting at 5 p.m. EST, we’ll be blogging Glenn Beck’s interview with former Rep. Eric Massa, D-N.Y.

Beck announced Monday that Massa would be on for the full hour of his Fox News show, and he’s been promoting the former congressman’s claim that Democrats pushed him out of the House because he was a no vote on healthcare reform. Now, though, the two will have to deal with a new report indicating that harassment allegations against Massa are much more serious than he’s been letting on.

Alex Koppelman is a staff writer for Salon.

The year in trumped-up pseudo-scandals

2010 was full of crescents in logos, candidate bribery and dastardly reverse-racism

  • more
    • All Share Services

The year in trumped-up pseudo-scandals

Every day, right-wing blogs and Fox News are abuzz with hysterical reports of partly or wholly invented scandals that, in their fevered imaginations, threaten to once-and-for-all destroy the Obama administration. While most of the bloggers are true believers, convinced that they’re one smoking gun away from opening everyone’s eyes to the criminality of the administration, on Fox they just run with whatever sounds good until they get bored with it or something more entertaining comes along. Once a pseudo-scandal ceases to be useful, it doesn’t really go away forever — Free Republic commenters will reference it until the end of time — but most people just sort of forget about it shortly after Megyn Kelly stops mentioning it.

So I went through the archives to help remind everyone just how many silly things the conservative press got all worked up about in the year 2010. (With a couple big items left out. Everyone stopped talking about the “Ground Zero Mosque” once summer ended, but it’s hardly been completely forgotten.)

Harry Reid said “Negro”

“Game Change,” a lengthy catalog of unimportant gossip masquerading as an account of the 2008 elections, was released to much media attention in January. While some people gravitated to the chapters about Sarah Palin or the ambitious power-crazed and insane Elizabeth Edwards, the right-wing media latched onto one silly line spoken by Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

In a private conversation, Reid said Barack Obama was “light-skinned” and had no “Negro dialect.” As I said, at the time, a 70-year-old white man saying “Negro” is embarrassing but not particularly shocking or outrageous. Any restatement of Reid’s point in more sensitive language — that Barack Obama could be president because he seems less “black”/threatening to old white people than major black politicians of the past — would’ve been mostly uncontroversial.

But Republicans have some major issues and hangups with regard to racial issues — they’ve convinced themselves that they’re a persecuted minority, basically — and so they all thought that because Trent Lott got in trouble for saying something awful a few years ago, it was only fair that Harry Reid get in trouble for saying something that they convinced themselves was just as bad, or worse. But Reid used inartful language to express a non-offensive point. Lott used perfectly polite language to express an awful argument: That America would’ve been better off with a segregationist president.

John Kyl and Michael Steele and John Cornyn — three Republicans who stood by Lott in 2002 — called on Reid to resign. He didn’t, and everyone more or less forgot about it.

Barack Obama’s uppity expression

Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds just innocently posted a picture from the White House Flickr feed, and asked his readers to “analyze the body language.” The point was clear: Obama looked smug and uppity. In case you didn’t get it, Glenn zoomed in on Obama’s face and cropped the photo to show his elitist eyes more clearly, and then quoted some reader mail: “If I really wanted to set my dad off, all I’d have to do is send him this photo.”

When Andrew Sullivan pointed out that Glenn was reading something bizarre into a random photo, Glenn proudly bragged that he goaded the liberals into playing the race card, which was, I assume, his goal all along.

Barack Obama yelled at the Supreme Court!

Once Bill O’Reilly’s done flirting with Megyn Kelly in the clip above, they both take turns purposefully misinterpreting Barack Obama’s criticism of the Citizens United decision at the State of the Union, then Megyn calls the act of criticizing the Supreme Court in the State of the Union “unprecedented.” Can you believe the nerve of this president, saying something critical of the Supreme Court while they’re sitting right there? Unprecedented! In fact, according to Megyn’s research, this had only already happened nine other times. But those other times weren’t that serious, while this was “a full-frontal assault on the justices who were sitting a stone’s throw away from him,” apparently.

Captain America hates the Tea Parties

In February, a panel in a Captain America comic book featured a bunch of protesters with Tea Party-inspired signs, and this really pissed off a bunch of tea partiers. They even investigated the comic’s author’s Twitter, where they discovered damning evidence that he was a a liberal. My favorite response: “This seemingly innocuous Captain America comic is, in reality, a grossly effective weapon of the leftists, for it captures the hearts and minds of children.

The Missile Defense Agency logo looks Islamic!

The Defense Department’s missile-developing agency got a new logo in February, and critics (Drudge) were quick to point out that it had a crescent-ish shape in it, and crescents are also present on Islamic flags, and therefore Barack Obama loves Iran.

The Nuclear Security Summit logo also looks Islamic

Two short months later, Pamela Geller and the New York Post and Fox News all noticed that the president’s Nuclear Security Summit logo also had a mysterious circular crescent-ish shape, just like the shapes on the flags of Muslim countries. (This logo was actually based on the Bohr model of the atom, but Niels Bohr was Danish and therefore probably a socialist.)

NASA is abandoning space to coddle Muslims instead!

In an interview with al-Jazeera, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said that Barack Obama charged him with inspiring children to get into math and science, expanding international relationships and reaching out to the Muslim world.

This is all fairly uncontroversial stuff, but conservatives exploded with outrage. It’s NASA’s job to send Americans into space to conquer the moon-men, not to encourage Islamofascists!

Barack Obama told Republicans to sit in the back of the car, which is reverse-racist

Everyone got sick of the president’s car-in-the-ditch routine before the midterms, but apparently telling Republicans to sit in the backseat of a car was an endorsement of racial segregation, according to Fox & Friends and Glenn Beck and Michele Bachmann.

Barack Obama doesn’t say the word “terror” often enough

As we all know, the best way to combat terrorism is to constantly talk about terrorism, all the time. But Barack Obama is scared to say the word terrorism, because he is a Kenyan socialist. Monica Crowley did some fine work popularizing this bizarre talking point, which of course became a Fox News recurring theme for a good month or so. Even Jim DeMint said Obama was unwilling to use the word “terrorism.”

Obama, for the record, says the word “terrorism” pretty often.

Barack Obama said the word “ass”

After some prompting from Matt Lauer, Barack Obama said he was talking to people dealing with the Gulf oil spill so that he could learn “whose ass to kick.” Apparently, this sullied the office of the presidency. (Among other things.)

Michelle Obama went to Spain!

In August, First Lady Michelle Obama took a vacation to Spain, with a couple friends and her daughter Sasha. Matt Drudge claimed that this trip would cost the taxpayers millions of dollars and Mickey Kaus said this proved that the first family was fighting and Maureen Dowd just said something that made no sense about Michelle bringing Barack martinis after work. (The friends paid for their own airfare and lodging, for the record.)

The White House bribed Joe Sestak!

According to Democratic Senate candidate Joe Sestak, the White House offered him a job in exchange for not running against Arlen Specter. (Actually, Bill Clinton mentioned some sort of unpaid role doing something terribly uninteresting. But the truth doesn’t matter.) While the White House said this never happened, the right-wing press decided that this was a terrible bribe and a violation of various laws. Rep. Darrell Issa got particularly excited, asking for a special prosecutor to be appointed. Then Sestak lost and no one cared anymore.

The White House also bribed Andrew Romanoff!

Someone at the White House apparently offered Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff some sort of job in exchange for dropping out of the Senate primary. Dick Morris got all excited. But then Romanoff lost and no one cared anymore.

The White House forced Eric Massa to resign because of healthcare

Former Representative Eric Massa is, plainly, a weird, troubled guy. He was forced to resign in March because of complaints that he inappropriately touched staffers and generally created an uncomfortable work environment. But according to Massa, he was forced out because of White House dirty tricks and union thuggery. Rahm Emanuel confronted him naked in the shower and unions tried to bribe him into supporting the administration’s agenda! In Massa’s telling, his ouster was punishment for voting against cap and trade and healthcare reform.

Glenn Beck believed every word of this nonsense for like a day, until he had Massa on for what was perhaps the most entertaining hour of the Glenn Beck show ever.

Barack Obama’s trip to India will cost $200 million a day!

This one’s only a little more than a month old, but it had a short shelf-life because the sourcing was even dumber than usual for these sorts of things. One Indian news agency quoted an anonymous “top official” of an Indian state claiming that Obama, accompanied by 3,000 people, would spend $200 million a day during his trip to Mumbai. Rush Limbaugh, Drudge, the National Review, the Washington Times, the Daily Mail and every conservative blog under the sun ran with this incredibly dubious “report.” Then everyone shut up about it minutes after it was debunked and stopped being a useful attack.

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Eric Massa’s imaginary military coup

The sad, disgraced former congressman imagines Dick Cheney's treasonous attempt to make David Petraeus president

  • more
    • All Share Services

Eric Massa's imaginary military coup

Esquire has a long profile of former Congressman Eric Massa, the New York Democrat who is accused of being a serial tickler of men and boys. The story humanizes a cartoonish figure. Some of it is heartbreaking. But it also basically confirms that Massa is a crazy person.

Before the tickling thing ever came to light, Massa had a bombshell story for the Esquire editors: Dick Cheney and General David Petraeus were planning a military coup! Sort of.

According to Massa’s grand conspiracy, retired generals were telling him that Petraeus secretly met with Dick Cheney twice about running for president in 2012. Massa thought this was full-blown treason:

Massa shot him a look. “I know something about the Uniform Code of Military Justice,” he said. “And I want you to tell me how this is not a coup. You’ve got a commander with armies in the field, and he’s plotting with Dick Cheney to bring down his commander in chief. How is that not a coup? It’s Seven Days in May!”

Many people have speculated, for years now, that Petraeus might run for president in 2012. He has always denied political ambitions, but it would be no big deal if he did run, as long as he retired first. Petraeus has officially denied Massa’s allegations (which really didn’t need to be denied, because they are ridiculous).

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Massa says $40,000 check to aide wasn’t authorized

Eric Massa claims no connection to a sum of money his campaign sent to its former chief of staff

  • more
    • All Share Services

Former congressman Eric Massa says he didn’t authorize a $40,000 check his campaign wrote to his chief of staff shortly before the New York lawmaker resigned last month.

In a statement released Saturday by his attorney on the campaign’s behalf, the New York Democrat said the check to Joe Racalto was “based solely on misrepresentations” by Racalto to campaign officials.

Racalto is among those pursuing sexual harassment complaints against Massa.

Racalto’s lawyer, Camilla McKinney, said Friday the check was a “deferred payment” for Racalto’s work this year and last on the congressman’s 2010 re-election campaign and for work on Massa’s 2008 transition.

The payment to Racalto came as allegations about his boss sexually harassing young male staffers in his office were becoming public.

Las Vegas Sun: Justice Department mulling Ensign indictment

So far Nevada Sen. John Ensign has evaded punishment for his misconduct. But his immunity may soon end

  • more
    • All Share Services

Las Vegas Sun: Justice Department mulling Ensign indictment Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) in 2009.

The distasteful saga of Sen. John Ensign, Republican from Nevada, adulterer and financial finagler, has been stuck in a strange state of irresolution since he confessed to an illicit romance with an aide’s wife last summer. Constrained by Senate rules and customs, his colleagues say nothing, while the ridiculous Senate Ethics Committee does nothing.

Although he was forced to step down from the chairmanship of the Republican Policy Committee, few in the party leadership have criticized him or called for him to resign, even as the emerging story of Ensign’s alleged financial and professional payoffs to his former lover and her family have raised questions of criminal misconduct.

The Justice Department began to probe those payoffs not long after initial reports that Ensign’s parents — wealthy owners of a casino resort in Nevada — had given at least $96,000 to the former aide, Doug Hampton, and his wife. What the Ensigns called a “gift” might be viewed as something else by federal authorities.

But now the Las Vegas Sun reports that Justice Department officials are investigating whether Ensign and his family committed a financial crime known as “structuring.” Structuring is essentially a form of money laundering — consciously attempting to evade federal regulation and oversight by trickling out a series of smaller sums, for example, rather than one large payment.

Sun political reporter Jon Ralston says that is what he was told by “a reliable source familiar with the deliberations occurring inside the Justice Department as federal authorities in Washington try to do with Ensign what they could not do with former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens: Get their man.”

The national and Washington press corps have mostly allowed Ensign to skate while skewering Charlie Rangel, Eric Massa and other Democrats, but Ralston has led the way on this wild scandal from the beginning. His assessment of the prospects for the Nevada senator and his party is blunt:

That the feds are looking at structuring as a possible crime will not surprise many old hands who have watched the sordid Ensign saga play out, morphing from a fairly grotesque he-slept-with-his-best-friend’s-wife-who-was-also-his-wife’s-best-friend story to a fantastically creepy tale of a senator trying to keep the cuckolded husband quiet by any means necessary, including, perhaps, structuring transactions with businesses in exchange for campaign contributions.

Maybe Ensign won’t be indicted. Maybe he will resign in exchange for not being indicted. Maybe he will serve out his term or even be re-elected. Would that be any more incredible than anything else we have seen? …

The question is how Justice might, ahem, structure a deal with Ensign. It is clear from observers — and from those who know the thinking inside the Justice Department — that the Stevens debacle has cast a shadow over the Ensign case.

The department is being very deliberate in assembling a case against Ensign. But Justice has a mountain of documents and e-mails that, combined with the senator’s own admissions or statements in e-mails, would seem to amount to a formidable case. And last week’s New York Times story, showing how Ensign’s contacts with a local company (similar to several other interactions), show how far the senator was willing to go to get Hampton work, mostly while he was employed by ex-Ensign aides who had formed a lobbying/consulting firm. The structure, so to speak, is becoming more transparent all the time.

This drip-drip-drip of revelation seems to have left Ensign unfazed, like a man who is slowly drowning but believes he can rise above it — or, perhaps, deludes himself into thinking he can walk on water. But as Republicans here and in Washington play the pathetic see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, speak-no-evil game vis-a-vis Ensign, it is becoming more obvious that their craven behavior could be self-defeating.

Ralston even suggests that the Ensign affair, if and when an indictment results, might improve the poor reelection prospects of Senate Majority Harry Reid, D-Nev., who has long cultivated a friendly working relationship with his state’s junior senator. The Republican candidates seeking to oust Reid both have “foolishly” said they would welcome Ensign’s support. Among those who will privately laugh when Ensign is indicted or resigns is Bill Clinton. Ensign voted to impeach Clinton, called on him to resign, and was still insisting on his moral superiority to the former president on the day that he “apologized” for the “distraction” of his extramarital affair.

Continue Reading Close

Joe Conason blogs in Salon several times a week and writes a weekly column for the New York Observer. His latest book is "It Can Happen Here: Authoritarian Peril in the Age of Bush."

This week in crazy: Eric Massa

The Democrat's scandal roped together dark conspiracy theories, Glenn Beck and a naked Rahm Emanuel

  • more
    • All Share Services

This week in crazy: Eric Massa

In a business that’s been around as long as politics, and one that’s seen more than its fair share of spectacular career-ending flameouts, it’s not easy to come up with something original these days. So give Eric Massa credit for something.

“Now, they’re saying I groped a male staffer,” the former Democratic representative from upstate New York told Glenn Beck on Tuesday. “Yes, I did. Not only did I grope him, I tickled him until he couldn’t breathe, and four guys jumped on top of me. It was my 50th birthday.” Ah, that explains it all! It was, in the annals of weird political confessions, a new one.

Massa’s interview with Beck was a hideous mix of self-flagellation, combativeness, dark conspiracy theories and awkward segues. On both sides. Once he heard Massa’s rant on a local radio station over the weekend, blaming White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel for all that is evil in the world, Beck simply had to put the guy on TV. Why bother doing any research ahead of time? The hour that followed proved that the two of them deserved each other; Beck tried to bait Massa into saying something — anything — inflammatory, and Massa tried to get Beck to look at photos of a tickle-heavy Navy ritual that Beck described as “like an orgy in Caligula.”

The whole tale that Massa was promising, which won him not just the Beck interview but also a good chunk of prime-time CNN “Larry King Live” exposure later that night, was too preposterous to be true but too salacious for cable news to pass up. Emanuel had gotten in Massa’s face — naked — in the House gym locker room, haranguing him to support healthcare reform. The groping charges and the sexual harassment investigation were just part of a Democratic leadership conspiracy to get him out of the House, so they’d only need 216 votes to pass the bill. But Massa was obliging them and resigning, because, as he told Beck, “I own this. I take full and complete responsibility for my own behavior.” And what about the cancer, which only a few days earlier had been the reason Massa said he wasn’t going to seek reelection? That didn’t come up until 10 minutes into the interview.

But Massa did pull a bit of a fast one on Beck, refusing to play along with his deranged suspicions. He blasted the constant fundraising the job requires (though he may have exaggerated the time he spent dialing for dollars), called for campaign-finance reform, backed away from his most over-the-top claims about Emanuel. The whole thing left Beck so disgusted that he apologized to his audience for wasting their time.

What still qualifies Massa for “Week in Crazy” honors, though, is that he went on TV in the first place. Why bother going through with these interviews once you’ve already resigned, especially if you’re not going to play along with the host’s crackpot theories? The tickling explanations didn’t exactly clear Massa’s name; on the contrary, the House ethics committee may still investigate what, exactly, was going on. And reports that came out later in the week made it sound like tickling wasn’t anywhere near where the story ended. “I’m going to show you more than tickle fights,” he told Beck.

The whole thing was so obviously a ploy for attention that it’s almost hard to believe the media went along with it. Almost. (Just ask Rep. Patrick Kennedy, who shouted at the press for doing just that.) Massa, though, did show one more glimpse of sanity toward the end of his moment in the spotlight. “In 72 hours I’m gone, and who cares?” he told King. And with that, he faded away, destined to become a Trivial Pursuit answer someday.

Continue Reading Close

Mike Madden is Salon's Washington correspondent. A complete listing of his articles is here. Follow him on Twitter here.

Page 1 of 3 in Eric Massa