Salon Home
  • RSSfeed
  • Follow Clash of the Titans
Media Property

Clash of the Titans

Tuesday, Mar 30, 2010 5:11 PM UTC2010-03-30T17:11:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Sweet Zeus! Where are the good Greek films?

Classic mythology offers the most dramatic stories ever. Why are Hollywood's attempts to re-create them so lousy?

Laurence Olivier as Zeus in the 1981 version of "Clash of the Titans."

Laurence Olivier as Zeus in the 1981 version of "Clash of the Titans."

Watching the trailer for “Clash of the Titans,” I know as surely as the Oracle of Delphi that this movie will be foul. A remake of the 1981 film — fantasy classic to some, pure hokum to others — it will swoop upon us April 2.

Here’s what I wonder: Why has no halfway decent director made a film about the Greek gods and their attendant nymphs and heroes? I don’t mean contemporary retellings like “Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief.” I mean a movie that re-creates the Greek gods on their own terms.

Think about what James Cameron or Peter Jackson could do with this material — the original stuff from Hesiod and Ovid and Apollodorus, which is so much better than toga-clad extras and grunts fighting giant scorpions.

TV spots for the 2010 “Clash of the Titans” played endlessly during the Vancouver Olympics. In one, Liam Neeson as Zeus cries “Embrace your birthright, Perseus!” in tones stinking of Stilton. The following clip is like a low-rent “Gladiator” jammed with rock ‘n’ roll:

Continue Reading

Martha Nichols is the Editor-in-Chief of the online literary magazine Talking WritingMore Martha Nichols

Monday, Apr 12, 2010 12:24 PM UTC2010-04-12T12:24:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

“Titans” clashes with “Date Night” at box office

The weekend's No. 1 movie is too close to call

Steve Carell and Tina Fey are in a box-office clash with the gods of Mount Olympus.

No. 1 bragging rights for the weekend were too close to call Sunday, with 20th Century Fox estimating a $27.1 million debut for Carell and Fey’s comedy “Date Night” and Warner Bros. reporting the action tale “Clash of the Titans” at $26.9 million.

Rankings will be sorted out Monday when studios release final numbers, which can vary by $1 million or more for some films compared with Sunday estimates.

Continue Reading

  More David Germain

Wednesday, Apr 7, 2010 7:35 PM UTC2010-04-07T19:35:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

The Kraken is this year’s Susan Boyle

How did a tentacled sea beast from "Clash of the Titans" become the breakout star of the spring?

The Kraken is this year's Susan Boyle

Hippogriffs are so last decade. Toruks? Whatever. And dragons? Well, they’re all right. But from the moment Liam Neeson commanded, with all the authority of the most badass god on Olympus, a certain tentacled behemoth to go forth, the Kraken became the hottest mythic beast to descend upon our culture since Harry met the Hendersons.

Continue Reading
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedubMore Mary Elizabeth Williams

Monday, Apr 5, 2010 1:05 PM UTC2010-04-05T13:05:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

“Titans” battles to No. 1 spot with $61.4 million

The Warner Brothers action remake beat "Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married Too?" in its weekend debut

The gods of Mount Olympus are the new rulers of the weekend box office.

The ancient Greek action remake “Clash of the Titans” debuted at No. 1 with $61.4 million, according to studio estimates Sunday. Adding Thursday night preview screenings, the movie totaled $64.1 million.

Released by Warner Bros., “Clash of the Titans” features “Avatar” star Sam Worthington as demigod hero Perseus and Liam Neeson as his dad, Zeus, king of the Olympian deities.

Opening at No. 2 with $30.2 million was Lionsgate’s sequel “Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married Too?”, reuniting filmmaker Perry with Janet Jackson and other co-stars for another comic drama about eight friends and their relationships.

Continue Reading

  More David Germain

Friday, Apr 2, 2010 1:01 PM UTC2010-04-02T13:01:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

I hate 3-D!

Headaches and high ticket prices: Welcome to the future of movies

I hate 3-D!

I knew it was all over a few nights ago, when I saw the Sears ad for 3-D television. After all, the current top two movies in the country are the 3-D fantasies “Alice in Wonderland” and “How to Train Your Dragon.” Resistance is futile, non-immersive fogies. The future of entertainment is here, reaching out from the screen to grab you by the short and curlies, whether you like it or not.

Continue Reading
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Mary Elizabeth Williams is a staff writer for Salon and the author of "Gimme Shelter: My Three Years Searching for the American Dream." Follow her on Twitter: @embeedubMore Mary Elizabeth Williams

Friday, Apr 2, 2010 11:01 AM UTC2010-04-02T11:01:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

“Clash of the Titans” could make the gods weep

It's a mythological extravaganza with a messy story, a lame monster and no magic. Release me, Kraken!

CLASH OF THE TITANS

Sam Worthington in "Clash of the Titans." (Credit: Jay Maidment)

Many of us who fancied ourselves sophisticated in 1981 freely mocked “Clash of the Titans” at the time of its theatrical release: A hokey-looking fantasy that plays fast and loose with Greek mythology, starring a well-oiled Harry Hamlin as brave warrior Perseus and Laurence Olivier as his top-god father, Zeus? No thanks. We were too busy oohing and ahhing over the prim aesthetics of “Chariots of Fire” to fall for anything so obviously fake as a flying white horse.

Since then, many of us have seen the error of our ways, and we now know what little kids who were dazzled by watching “Clash of the Titans” on TV (it was a staple of HBO in the early days) have always known. Directed by Desmond Davis and with stop-motion special effects by the great Ray Harryhausen, the first “Clash of the Titans” is an unself-conscious treasure of fantasy filmmaking. Harryhausen’s creatures — from his feathery-winged Pegasus to his fearsome yet sympathetic sea beast the Kraken — are low-tech by today’s standards. Yet within their specially created universe, they’re wholly alive, not disposable. Their fantastically unreal qualities demand a measure of engagement from the viewer, and it’s that engagement — not the amount of money or time spent on their creation — that gives them life.

Continue Reading

Stephanie Zacharek is a senior writer for Salon Arts & Entertainment.  More Stephanie Zacharek

Other News