SALON

Friday, Apr 9, 2010 12:32 PM UTC

Tea partiers don’t really hate government spending — they just want in

Sooner or later, everybody wants something from the government. Just ask the conservatives getting farm subsidies

By

Topics: Tea Parties, Republican Party, U.S. Economy, War Room,

Tea partiers don't really hate government spending -- they just want inRepublican congressional candidate Stephen Fincher, left, a farmer and gospel singer from Frog Jump, Tenn., speaks with prospective voters following a fish fry and campaign stop at the National Guard Armory in Ripley, Tenn., Wednesday, Feb. 17, 2010. Ask national Republicans to name a model 2010 congressional candidate, and they're likely to mention Stephen Fincher. (AP Photo/Lance Murphey)(Credit: AP)

It’s remarkable how often you hear tea partiers making exemptions for their favorite kinds of government spending. For a movement that’s supposed to be reinvigorating conservative purism, these folks sure are willing to compromise on first principles.

The classic example of this is how conservatives rushed to the defense of Medicare during the healthcare fight. Although the rhetoric from the right mainly focused on the threat of government meddling in healthcare, what it appeared to actually mean was that the government is doing a good kind of meddling now, and that we shouldn’t change that to a bad kind of meddling in the future.

In that same vein, we’ve now got the spectacle of an aspiring tea party leader, Tennessee congressional candidate Stephen Fincher, who’s actually been collecting $200,000 a year in farm subsidies from the federal government. He’s not the only one, either. Indiana Republican state Sen. Marlin Stutzman, who’s running for U.S. Senate and is another conservative purist favorite, hauled in $156,907.54 from 1997 to 2006.

Stutzman at least makes a half-gesture toward honesty, and says he thinks the agricultural subsidy program should gradually be phased out. But Fincher seems willing to stick up for the cash transfers he’s gotten. “People are quick to say with their mouth full, ‘Well, the American farmer is on the dole.’ But a loaf of bread is two bucks when it could be 10 bucks. I know what it is with the government in my business. We would be all for not having government in our business, but we need a fair system.”

We don’t actually need agricultural subsidies to keep bread under $10 per loaf, but let’s give Fincher the benefit of the doubt for a second, and say that he’s right. This would be a damn near perfect argument from the left for the government’s right to determine economic value and redistribute wealth. Bread is important, poor people can’t afford it, so let’s tax folks and use the money to subsidize bread. A true small-government, free-market conservative would say that a loaf of bread has a correct price that supply and demand dictate, and if it’s $10, so be it.

Of course, agricultural subsidies don’t exist to subsidize bread for the poor. That program is called “food stamps.” Farm subsidies exist to subsidize, well, farmers, most of whom are actually giant corporations. Fincher probably didn’t pocket the $200,000 because he thought that it was his solemn duty, in order to keep the price of bread down. He did because someone offered him $200,000. And this is the problem.

The tea partiers have been talking about smaller government as the main principle of their movement. But what they’re arguing against isn’t actually the government having a place in the economy. They hardly could. The fact is that we need the government for lots of stuff, and there’s just no getting around it no matter how much you huff and puff. Just ask the Republican state legislators who forced their governors to accept stimulus money last year.

Sure, it’s fun to say that the bailout and the stimulus were just big government muscling in on the private sector. But people like Fincher and Stutzman are only free to make this criticism because other politicians grasped the need to not let the economy go into meltdown. For a conservative politician, there’s plenty of hay to make about healthcare reform as a totalitarian move against free enterprise. But you’d better avoid trying to roll back any universal benefits, because everyone actually really likes government-run healthcare once they’ve experienced it. How do you think Medicare got to be politically untouchable?

This is why conservatives always end up disillusioned with their leaders. It’s not really politically possible to cut the government. Majorities may not like government spending in the abstract, but they sure like it in practice. There’s broad public support for the idea of cutting the budget, and no support at all for any concrete ways of doing so. In fact, a recent poll found that only tiny minorities of the public support cutting any specific program except for foreign aid. And even there, people vastly overestimate how much aid we give out, and if confronted with the specifics of where it goes — the Israeli military, HIV prevention — probably wouldn’t want to cut it so much anymore.

So on the off-chance that we do end up with, say, Sarah Palin as president in the near future, there are — obviously — lots of good reasons to worry. But she probably wouldn’t be able to roll back any major programs. It’s not welfare that the tea partiers are against. It’s welfare that they can’t get a piece of. Palin probably wouldn’t even dare try to touch Medicare or Social Security. After all, Alaska is one gigantic ward of the state.

Gabriel Winant is a graduate student in American history at Yale. More Gabriel Winant.

Next Article

Related Stories

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

The week in 10 pics

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 11
  • Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
    Credit: AP/LM Otero

  • Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
    Credit: AP/Matt Rourke

  • A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
    Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher

  • Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
    Credit: AP/Molly Riley

  • Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
    Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite

  • Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
    Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster

  • O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
    Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid

  • Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
    Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield

  • When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
    Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin

  • A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
    Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 11

Related Videos

Comments

 79 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>

follow salon

Most Read

Popular on Reddit

links from salon.com

vote
Paul Krugman’s right: Austerity kills. "In an economy where we’re all in the same boat, one person’s spending is another person’s income. So when the government cuts spending, it reduces people’s income, leading to less business, more unemployment, and a vicious spiral of slowing down the economy."
383 points384 points | 398 comments
vote
Paul Krugman’s right: Austerity kills -- radical cuts destroy economies and lives, and the honest numbers and economics keep proving it
167 points168 points | 27 comments
vote
Virginia state Sen. Mark Obenshain wants to send women to jail who don't report their miscarriages to the police
95 points96 points | 18 comments
vote
Corporate greed is poisoning America — literally
71 points72 points | 11 comments
vote
Facebook “like” on trial in Virginia
27 points28 points | 6 comments

From Around the Web

Presented by Scribol
listener_new_rect The Listener: So long, Sookie Stackhouse

Recommendations