Have you thanked a Supreme Court justice lately?
My letter to the justice who authored the Roe v. Wade decision taught me an important lesson about gratitude
Topics: Supreme Court, News
Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens poses for photos during a group portrait session with the members of the U.S. Supreme Court, at the Supreme Court Building in Washington, Friday, Dec. 05, 2003. President Ford nominated Stevens to the Supreme Court, taking his seat Dec. 19, 1975. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)(Credit: J. Scott Applewhite)Retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will leave a legacy proving that even a Republican can advocate for the rights of people over major institutions — private and public — threatening to swallow them up.
Brought to the federal circuit bench by Richard Nixon, Stevens was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Gerald Ford and confirmed in 1975. Now 89 and having evolved into what many on the right see as the most liberal member of the high court, Stevens — a one-time Republican who no longer declares a party preference — is stepping down. This gives President Obama a chance to hold back the conservative Roberts-Scalia-Thomas-Alito phalanx.
Americans stand in awe of Supreme Court justices. Until relatively recently, justices kept an appropriately circumspect distance from public interaction, lest they compromise their judicial integrity. The downside of this distance is that justices accustomed to getting hate mail seldom get words of encouragement and gratitude from citizens who appreciate their wisdom.
In 1983, a decade after he authored the Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legally available nationally, Justice Harry Blackmun agreed to be interviewed for a cover story in the New York Times Magazine. In that historic departure from judicial silence, Blackmun spoke poignantly of the Roe backlash. He described letters calling him the “Butcher of Dachau” and worse. He pondered retirement.
As the executive director of Planned Parenthood in Rhode Island at that time, I replied to Justice Blackmun with a handwritten note on my office letterhead apologizing that those of us who saw him as a hero had apparently neglected to tell him so. I urged him “not to even think about retirement until the current [Reagan] administration has faded into political oblivion.”
He responded within a day, saying how much it had meant to him to hear from someone on the front lines of the abortion issue. He concluded by writing, “I am in your debt.” That framed letter still hangs on my bedroom wall, a reminder of how important it is for even isolated justices to hear from the people on whose behalf they interpret the law.
John Paul Stevens has been described as a justice whose opinions could be “idiosyncratic.” Once supportive of the death penalty, in later years he wrote eloquently against it. About the concept of trying children under age 16 for capital crimes Stevens wrote:
Mary Ann Sorrentino was the executive director of Planned Parenthood Rhode Island from 1977 and was an AP award-winning radio talk show host for 13 years. She now writes a column that appears in the Keene (NH) Sentinel, Providence Phoenix and other publications. More Mary Ann Sorrentino.




Comments
14 Comments