Goldman Sachs: “We didn’t do anything wrong”
Hostile senators square off with unrepentant "market makers." As financial crisis soap operas go, that's good TV
Topics: Mortgage Crisis, How the World Works, Bank Reform, Goldman Sachs, Politics News
Senate Investigations subcommittee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., lifts a binder of exhibit documents on the role of investment banks on the Wall Street financial crisis, as he briefs reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, April 26, 2010, ahead of the Goldman Sachs hearings. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)(Credit: AP)After more than five hours of relentlessly hostile grilling from both Democratic and Republican senators, the four former and present Goldman executives appearing on the first panel before the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Tuesday were visibly shell-shocked. Fabrice Tourre seemed trapped in a nightmare that wouldn’t end. Michael Swensen, a managing director in the structured finance division, looked like he had been sucker-punched. Swensen’s former structured finance colleague, Joshua Birnbaum, was still giving as good as he got — of all the Goldman representatives he was consistently the most nimble in his responses, and even seemed to be enjoy parrying some of the more prosecutorial questioning. But there was flop sweat on his brow, too.
Maybe they’d all been expecting something different, and maybe they could be excused for that, if their expectations were formed by watching other congressional hearings over the last couple of years. Sit and smile through a couple of hours of grandstanding rhetoric from mugging-for-the-cameras senators, say “I don’t recall” a few times, and call it a day when the committee moved on to bigger game, like the much anticipated appearance by Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein.
But Sen. Carl Levin is running a different kind of show, something that became obvious when he destroyed Washington Mutual a few weeks ago in the first installment of this sequence of hearings. He came prepared, and so did most of his colleagues, especially Republican Tom Coburn and Democrat Claire McCaskill. Citing e-mail after e-mail in which Goldman employees referred disparagingly to financial products that they were pushing on their clients, the senators kept hammering on a single major point: Even as Goldman started betting against mortgage-backed securities, it was shoveling “junk” at its clients.
The Goldman executives saw no problem with this apparent conflict of interest. Daniel Sparks, Goldman’s former head of mortgage finance, was quite explicit: Goldman had no responsibility to tell its clients what kind of position — long or short — it might have on the portfolio of investments it was trying to sell to clients. In this respect, he expressed an entirely conventional view on Wall Street.
Sen. Coburn acknowledged that there is a place for a so-called market maker who puts together speculators on both sides of a deal. But Coburn made a crucial distinction. “I want to know,” he said, “where’s the ethical standard on when you expose your position as the market maker?”
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




French President Hollande Signs Marriage Equality Bill
Obama Group Braces For Progressive Backlash Over Keystone
Republican Lawmakers Took IRS Union Campaign Cash
Comments
25 Comments