What would happen if an American politician called someone a bigot?
Gordon Brown, the "bigot," and the dysfunctional relationship of elites and the working class
Topics: Immigration, British Election, War Room, Gordon Brown, Race, Politics News
Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown, wearing a Sky News microphone, speaks to local resident Gillian Duffy, 65, while campaigning for Britain's May 6 General Election in Rochdale, England, Wednesday April 28, 2010. Brown was caught on microphone describing a voter he had just spoken to - apparently Duffy - as a "bigoted woman". The comments were made as he got into his car, not realising that he had the microphone pinned to his jacket. He told an aide: "That was a disaster - they should never have put me with that woman. Whose idea was that? It's just ridiculous..." Asked what she had said, he replied: "Everything, she was just a bigoted woman."(AP Photo< Lewis Whyld-pa) **UNITED KINGDOM OUT: NO SALES: NO ARCHIVE:**(Credit: AP)So a pensioner named Gillian Duffy asked British Prime Minister Gordon Brown about welfare cheats and “all these eastern Europeans that are coming in.” He accidentally called her “bigoted” on a live microphone, and now his campaign to keep his job as British prime minister is imploding. Watching this meltdown happen, I keep wanting to feel bad for the guy, and then as soon as I let myself, I get mad at him all over again.
What’s going on here?
Immigration politics are a little different, country to country, but not that different. Here’s how it breaks down in the U.K.: The Conservatives are fairly akin to America’s Republican Party, as the least bashful representatives of British nationalism on the scene. Meanwhile, Britain’s two left-of-center parties align with the two faces of our Democrats.
Brown’s Labour Party, the traditional representative of the working class and its interests, has felt some obligation to respect anxieties about immigrants taking jobs and changing neighborhoods. But Labour has long since shed its old crusading socialist identity, and is basically a technocratic party of government. These guys run for reelection by talking about 2 percent increases on various indices, and the old connection with working-class struggles has gotten a little tenuous. In Brown’s contempt for Duffy, you can hear some of New Labour’s pencil-pushing hauteur.
The surging Liberal Democrats, on the other hand, are sort of the British equivalent of the cosmopolitan, less class-conscious wing of our Democratic Party, based in college towns and the cores of big cities. (I shudder to use the term, but think “wine-track.”) As such, they don’t really see immigration as a problem at all.
To judge Brown, it’s helpful to ask how this would play out in the U.S. Imagine if, say, Al Gore in 2000 — a figure in some ways similar to Brown — had been caught calling a retiree in Youngstown, Ohio, a bigot, after she complained to him about the Mexicans filling up the neighborhood. Would this imaginary Gore have been right?
Gabriel Winant is a graduate student in American history at Yale. More Gabriel Winant.




Tensions Brew Inside White House Over Counsel's Role
House May Launch Hearings Over Justice Department Media Spying Scandal
Is This The Face Of A New Global Human Rights Movement?
Anthony Weiner's First Campaign Began With An Apology For "Race-Baiting"
The Time Lois Lerner Failed To Investigate A Major Al Gore Fundraiser At The FEC
Comments
66 Comments