President flies to oil disaster, rebuts criticism
Obama travels to the Gulf while his administration defends their response to the calamitous slick
Topics: Gulf Oil Spill, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Environment, Janet Napolitano, Republican Party, News
President Barack Obama awaited a firsthand update on the Gulf Coast oil spill as two members of his Cabinet on Sunday outlined the “very grave” environmental impact and sought to counter criticism the government had reacted slowly.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said the administration had treated the explosion at the BP rig April 20 as a potential disaster from the beginning.
“The physical response on the ground has been from day one as if this could be a catastrophic failure,” she said. “Every possible resource was being lined up on shore.”
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said it was uncertain when the oil, spewing from a pipe nearly a mile beneath the water, would be plugged.
“The scenario is a very grave scenario. You’re looking at potentially 90 days before you ultimately get to what is the ultimate solution,” said Salazar. But then “a lot of oil could spread.”
Obama flew to Louisiana for briefings on the underwater spill, which remained unstopped and impossible to measure, raising fears it could be pouring more oil into the Gulf than earlier believed. Traveling with him were White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, homeland security and counterterrorism adviser John Brennan and energy adviser Carol Browner.
The Coast Guard estimated that at least 1.6 million gallons of oil have spilled since the April 20 explosion that killed 11 workers on an offshore rig. In the Exxon Valdez disaster, an oil tanker spilled 11 million gallons off Alaska’s shores in 1989.
Obama has relied on reports from agency chiefs and Coast Guard officials since the magnitude of the spill became clear late Wednesday. Aides report he’s been getting regular updates.
Salazar, Napolitano and the administration’s point man on the disaster, the commandant of the Coast Guard, Adm. Thad Allen, made the rounds of the Sunday talk shows to defend the federal response.
Allen said it is impossible to know the eventual size of the spill because that will depend on when BP can stop the flow, a technically challenging effort hampered by the well’s depth where everything must be done by remote control.
“On the level of complexity, I’d certainly give it nine,” said Allen on “State of the Union” on CNN. “We have to stop this oil where it’s emanating on the sea floor.”




Comments
53 Comments