The imaginary inflationary boogeyman

Guess what? It's hard for people to be scared of a threat that doesn't exist

Topics: Inflation, How the World Works, U.S. Economy,

The imaginary inflationary boogeymanIn this photo taken Tuesday, May 11, 2010, shoppers browse near a display of 365 Organic brand mustard at a Whole Foods Market, Inc., store in Little Rock, Ark. Whole Foods reports quarterly earnings, Wednesday, May 12, 2010, after the market close. 365 Organic is a Whole Foods brand. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston) (Credit: AP)

By the time I read my third attack today on Rob Cox’s Wednesday New York Times column warning that the Federal Reserve was being insufficiently appreciative of the dangers of inflation, I was forced to go read it myself, just to make sure some kind of mass hallucination had not captured the best minds of the Internet. Inflation is at a 44-year-low. How could anybody possibly think that raising interest rates — and thus stifling what meager economic growth we currently are enjoying — should be the Fed’s first priority?

But you don’t have to read far into Cox’s column before realizing that it is even worse than its fast-spreading reputation. The first line of the second paragraph:

The corridors of wealth and finance are alive with new optimism.

The pleasures of hindsight notwithstanding, the carnage on the U.S. stock market on Thursday, and the general sentiment of fear and panic raging through Europe, do not map well to this assertion, even if we grant that the rich are always better insulated from economic downturns than the rest of us. Cox’s chief evidence — same store sales at Whole Foods stores are up 7 percent over last year, is a fragile reed when tossed into the maelstrom of everything we’ve learned about what’s going on in the global economy in the last couple of weeks.

For an incisive takedown of Mr. Cox, Annie Lowrey is very good in the Washington Independent. Matthew Yglesias, meanwhile, is just funny:

If there has ever in your life been a time when you didn’t worry about inflation, you should think about that time. Then you should ponder the fact that today we have more excess capacity than we did at that time. We have higher unemployment than we did at that time. And we have less inflation than we did at that time. So why are you worried now?



But the best explanation of why the Fed or anybody else, shouldn’t be freaking out about the potential for inflation, comes from the depths of the beast itself, mighty Wall Street.

From the Wall Street Journal: (Italics mine.)

“People don’t seem to be worried about any potential fallout from inflation, probably because there isn’t any,” said Kevin Giddis, head of fixed-income sales an trading at Morgan Keegan.

Probably?

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 26
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>