In favor of brashness
Mike Huckabee
In response to NPR firing Juan Williams for expressing prejudice toward Muslims, Mike Huckabee today slammed NPR for discrediting “itself as a forum for free speech” and solidifying “itself itself as the purveyor of politically correct pabulum.”
In a statement published on his PAC’s website, Huckabee called for the de-funding of NPR and said he will “no longer accept interview requests” from the network:
NPR has discredited itself as a forum for free speech and a protection of the First Amendment rights of all and has solidified itself as the purveyor of politically correct pabulum and protector of views that lean left.
While I have often enjoyed appearing on NPR programs and have been treated fairly and objectively, I will no longer accept interview requests from NPR as long as they are going to practice a form of censorship, and since NPR is funded with public funds, it IS a form of censorship. It is time for the taxpayers to start making cuts to federal spending, and I encourage the new Congress to start with NPR.
Huckabee, who hosts his own show on Fox, has himself been criticized for extreme rhetoric. He has reportedly advocated the idea of a population transfer of Palestinians out of the West Bank.
But more to the point, Huckabee’s rhetoric about free speech rings hypocritcal in light of his reaction to White House reporter Helen Thomas’ comments about Jews and Israel in June. After those comments, in which she said Jews should “get the hell out of Palestine,” a huge media outcry — with Huckabee one of the loudest voices — prompted Thomas to resign.
On his Fox show, Huckabee fumed that Thomas’s words were “outrageous, anti-Semitic, racist,” and “indefensible.” His conclusion: “Helen, I’ve got a suggestion: maybe it’s time for you to go home.”
Fox News host Glenn Beck speaks during the National Rifle Association's 139th annual meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina on May 15, 2010. REUTERS/Chris Keane (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS) (Credit: Reuters)
Has Glenn Beck been touting anti-Semitic propaganda again? If so, should he suffer the same fate as Helen Thomas, the legendary Hearst columnist forced to resign last month after an idiotic tirade urging Israelis to “go home” to Poland and Germany?
Those unpleasant questions were provoked by Beck’s latest bizarre outburst concerning religion when, in the throes of yet another lecture July 13 on why Christians should abhor social justice, he alluded to his belief that “the Jews” had killed Jesus Christ.
Discussing liberation theology and its portrayal of Jesus, Beck said: “If he was a victim and this theology was true, then Jesus would have come back from the dead and made the Jews pay for what they did.”
Beck’s recitation of the old Christ-killer canard — a foundation of anti-Semitic ideology from the Passion Plays of the Middle Ages through the rise of Nazism to Mel Gibson’s contemporary spewing — may or may not represent personal prejudice. As the Fox News star might say, some of his best friends (including his publicist Matthew Hiltzik) happen to be Jewish.
But this fresh gaffe is hardly the first time that Beck has given wide circulation to ideas and ideologues hateful to Jews. Whether he is a bigot in his heart is unknowable, but he is a repeat offender.
As noted in a Salon series last year by Alexander Zaitchik, author of “Common Nonsense,” a gripping and thoroughly researched Beck biography, he has frequently and enthusiastically endorsed the late W. Cleon Skousen, a far-right favorite of the ’50s and ’60s with roots in Beck’s own Church of Latter-Day Saints. Skousen’s conspiracy theories echo old anti-Semitic themes about world domination by major banking families that can be found in the works of Henry Ford and Adolf Hitler.
According to Zaitchik, Skousen relied on “research” by Arsene de Goulevitch, a former czarist officer whose own sources included Boris Brasol, the pro-Nazi Russian émigré who popularized the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a forged text alleging a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.
So embarrassed was the Mormon leadership by Skousen’s extremism that they eventually disowned him and his books. In 1971 the editors of the Mormon journal Dialogue invited Georgetown historian Carroll Quigley to write a critical review of Skousen, who had extolled his work. Quigley condemned his whacked-out admirer in the harshest possible terms: “Skousen’s personal position seems to me perilously close to the ‘exclusive uniformity’ which I see in Nazism and in the Radical Right in this country. In fact, his position has echoes of the original Nazi 25-point plan.”
Dubious and deluded though Skousen surely was, he is not the most disreputable figure admired by Beck. That distinction still belongs to Elizabeth Dilling, Nazi propagandist and Axis agent, whose 1935 tract “The Red Network” he endorsed just last month.
On June 4, Beck told his radio audience that he had been reading Dilling’s book, sent to him by a fan, “last night,” and that it was a “handbook … for patriots.” If he actually read the book, he must have perused the sections in which Dilling blamed the anti-Semitic outrages of the Nazi regime on the Jews themselves because of “the large number of revolutionary Russian Jews in Germany,” who “doubtless contributed toward making Fascist Germany anti-Semitic.” A few years later she revealed her unabashed admiration of Hitler, attending Nazi party rallies in Germany and conspiring with Axis and Nazi elements in the United States.
How does Beck compare with Thomas, whose scandalous babble reverberated so powerfully through the American media? Although her statement was undoubtedly offensive and clearly subject to interpretation as anti-Semitic, she said nothing about Jews per se. She repeated none of the classic slurs of anti-Semitism and endorsed no Nazi authors.
In fact, she apologized humbly before resigning from Hearst and surrendering her seat in the front row of the White House press room. Beck has yet to apologize for his promotion of the Nazi Dilling, let alone his rancid remark about making the Christ-killing Jews “pay for what they did.”
So what is the appropriate sanction for him? Former Clinton aide Lanny Davis, whose demand for Thomas to be suspended was widely publicized in the Murdoch press, today told me that Fox News should “suspend his privileges of an on air platform for a reasonable period of time at least as a statement of the unacceptability of Mr. Beck’s comments.”
Perhaps it is most appropriate to turn to Beck’s own judgment, however, at the time of the Thomas blowup. On June 7, when he aired the Thomas sound bite that quickly became so notorious, Beck was unsparing. “The old hatreds are reappearing,” he said. “Now, how Helen Thomas has a job today is beyond me … You know, may I tell you, this Jewish-run media, really, they’re bad at running the media, if they are indeed Jewish. You know what I mean? The Zionist masters really suck at being Zionist masters … if you still have Helen Thomas sitting in the front row after saying go back to Germany, go back to Poland. Play it again, please.”
Fox News should replay Beck’s rancid blather so he can hear it again — and then, if he has any self-respect, he should resign.
“Why don’t you come up on my veranda and set a spell? Sounds like someone could use to hear some casual racism… South Carolina style.”
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Thank You, South Carolina – The Race to Replace Disgrace | ||||
|
||||
FILE - In this May 27, 2010 file photo, Helen Thomas listens to President Barack Obama during a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington. Controversial remarks about Israel by veteran White House reporter Helen Thomas drew sharp criticism from the Obama administration on Monday, as well as the cancellation of a high school graduation speech she was to deliver. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was asked at his daily briefing with reporters about President Barack Obama's reaction to Thomas' remarks. Gibbs called them "offensive and reprehensible." (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) (Credit: AP)
Under any other circumstances, it wouldn’t be a surprise to hear that Helen Thomas — the titan of the White House press corps — is retiring. For god’s sake, the woman who has reported on the U.S. presidents for five decades is turning 90 this summer. Who would begrudge the trailblazer for hanging up her press card so that she can sleep in once in a while?
But the news that Thomas is retiring from Hearst Newspapers comes in the wake of controversy shrouding her comments about Israel and Palestine. The news, then, is not so simple.
If you’ve been under a rock this past week, here’s what happened: Thomas was videotaped saying that Jewish people “should get the hell out of Palestine” and go back to Germany or Poland. As the public recoiled from her comments, Thomas issued an apology and said that her remarks “do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance.” Nonetheless, she was dropped by a national speaker’s bureau and canceled a high school commencement address she was expected to give. And now comes news of her retirement after 67 years in the journalism business.
Had Thomas retired a month ago, the news would have cued a celebration of her contributions to journalism. And let’s be frank: These contributions are truly astonishing. In 1943, a year after she graduated from Wayne State University, she was hired by United Press International. So began a long trajectory of barrier breaking in the places where media and politics meet, places that are hardly welcoming to professional women. Thomas became the first female officer of the National Press Club — which had been exclusively male for nearly a century — and the first female officer of the White House Correspondents Association. She served as the WHCA’s first female president in the mid-1970s. Thomas also helped persuade President Kennedy to sit out the press correspondent’s dinner because women were not allowed to come. As well, Thomas plowed her way into the Gridiron Club, the oldest and most prestigious Washington journalism club, becoming its first female member and, later, its first female president.
But today, Thomas’ career abruptly ends in what we are safe in assuming is a retirement not of her choosing. While I don’t mean to be an apologist for her remarks about Jewish people, I must note one thing: Thomas has been working as a columnist, not reporter, for the last decade. So it isn’t the fact that she’s publicly editorializing on current news that is the problem here; her job is to have opinions. The uproar was inspired because people don’t like her opinions.
I don’t like how Thomas voiced her opinions in this video; it was sloppy and hurtful. But her views aren’t exactly news; the gist of them are evident from her past columns. Meanwhile, Thomas joins a long line of opinion-makers who have uttered controversial, even despicable comments. Rush Limbaugh, anyone? Glenn Beck? Howard Stern? Sean Hannity? None of these voices seem to fear a forced retirement. What’s different about Thomas? For one, she’s old. For two, she’s a woman. And while I won’t pretend this is a simple scenario where ageism and sexism are wholly to blame, it’s hard to imagine that they aren’t factors at all.
Now, I’m afraid that this is the legacy Thomas will be left with: Because she wasn’t perfect, she was terrible. In fact, of course, Thomas is neither perfect nor terrible. What she represents is that uncomfortable reminder that our heroes are not infallible. They are not everything we want them to be, no matter how much we pretend otherwise. Our heroes will disappoint, sometimes egregiously.
I hope Helen Thomas’ accomplishments aren’t diminished in light of her faults. I also hope her accomplishments don’t keep us from holding her accountable when she errs. Perhaps the greatest takeaway from this debacle might be the realization that, yes, people with significant failings can accomplish great things. Knowing this, we close the distance between ourselves and those we admire. Our heroes are not other; they are us. Rather than being a disappointment, this can open the door to what we might expect from ourselves. This can be a push toward our own great trailblazing, our own groundbreaking, our own achievements.
Hearst columnist Helen Thomas is retiring after she gave a controversial response to a question about Israel to RabbiLIVE.com. Thomas, 89, has worked from the White House since she covered the Kennedy administration for UPI.
After she moved from UPI in 2000 (following the wire’s purchase by the Unification Church) to Hearst, Thomas became known for her much more opinionated questioning of White House press secretaries. As she was regularly abusing the Bush administration’s flacks (from her longtime position in the very first row), she earned the ire of conservatives and right-wing bloggers (most of whom masked their hatred in faux-sadness that a trailblazing legend had become a liberal crank).
RabbiLIVE got the damning video on the 27th, when they asked Thomas for comments “on Israel.”
“Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine,” Thomas answered. That, as Gabriel Winant wrote this morning, is a justifiable sentiment. But, asked to elaborate, Thomas seemed to recommend what amounts to an ethnic cleansing, saying Israeli Jews should “go home” to “Germany, Poland, and America, and everywhere.”
I imagine Thomas didn’t understand that an off-the-cuff remark to a stranger with a tiny camera would be taken as a serious expression of the dark anti-Semitism that lurks deep in her heart, and then endlessly argued over and replayed. I also think it’s fairly likely that she was very inartfully attempting to make a more defensible statement about colonialism, occupation, and the still-growing wave of settlers on Palestinian lands. But I can’t speak to what she really meant any more than the critics who accuse her of anti-Semitism. (She did apologize, unconditionally, on her website.)
Thomas could be occasionally embarrassing even to her liberal fans, but she was the only member of the press corps to ask President Obama about Afghanistan at what turned out to be her last presidential press conference.
It’s sad that a figure of this stature will have to end her career on such a sour note, but that’s the way the news cycle works now. Thankfully, the half-life of collective memory is at an all-time low, so soon the angry villagers will have moved on to their next target, and Thomas can hopefully retire in peace.
Page 1 of 3 in Helen Thomas
A passport to utopia
“The Fault in Our Stars” and “There Is No Dog”: Not kids’ stuff
Ricky Gervais: My conscience never takes a day off
Lessons of a very sexy pirate costume
America’s failed promise of equal opportunity
Is gay literature over?
A voice that touched us all
Whitney Houston dies at 48
Didn’t she almost have it all?
Porn’s taboo transsexual stars