
GOP on Kagan: Will she fight for civil rights of rich, powerful?
Republicans worry that Justice Kagan might not always rule on the side of corporations and the military
By Alex PareeneTopics: Elena Kagan, Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter, Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark., Jeff Sessions, Obama's Supreme Court nomination, Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Supreme Court, U.S. Senate, War Room, Politics News
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, foreground. listens to questions from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, on video screen, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 29, 2010, during the committee's confirmation hearing for Kagan. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)(Credit: Susan Walsh)Yesterday, the Republican members of the Senate Judicial Committee opened the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings by, perhaps unwisely, putting Thurgood Marshall on trial. Today, they’re laying off Marshall, but they’re making it clear that they believe the court’s job is to always defend the rights of the powerful.
Republicans brought Marshall up 35 times yesterday, with unrepentant racist scumbag Jeff Sessions and Arizona’s Jon Kyl leading the charge against that terrible activist liberal judge who hated the Constitution. (Later, asked to name any single Marshall decision or opinion they disagreed with, Sessions and Orrin Hatch and Tom Coburn could not, really. Because that would’ve given away the game.)
And, for some reason, John Cornyn approvingly quoted a far-right secessionist novelist guy.
But while the Republicans hate Thurgood Marshall for extending those damn “special protections” (like regular protections, but for non-white people) to minorities, they want to make it clear that they expect any potential Supreme Court justice to always support the rights of their favorite put-upon minority groups: the United States military, incumbent senators, Republican presidential candidates, and corporations.
After Pat Leahy’s interminable opening questions about how much Kagan loved her parents and how nice and well-respected she is, Sessions began hammering her on the military recruiters thing. The issue was, the military was unable to sign Harvard’s nondiscrimination pledge, because it is, you know, a discriminatory employer. So it had to use the veterans’ organization instead of the Harvard Office of Career Services.
Sessions, in repeatedly asking why Kagan did not grant special treatment to the military, kept asking her why she discriminated against the military and treated our brave recruiters “in a second-class way.” Silly legal progressive — you’re only allowed to treat gay people in a second-class way.
(Kagan was asked if she thought Bush v. Gore was decided correctly. In 2003, she knew that it was not decided correctly. This morning she declined to answer.)
Orrin Hatch questioned Kagan on the Citizens United case. Kagan, obviously, argued that case, which would seem to make her position on the matter of the constitutionality of campaign finance laws known. But she told Hatch that as a judge, she would consider it “settled law.”
Hatch nearly got teary-eyed when discussing the poor corporations of Utah that were discriminated against by campaign finance laws. Why does Kagan hate Utah’s thousands of corporations that are made up of only one person? (Though theoretically this one-person corporation could conduct political speech as a one-person ,,, person.)
The conversation got weird when Hatch seemed to claim that restrictive campaign finance laws were somehow not bad for incumbents:
Kagan says campaign finance laws were “selfless” act of Congress, because all empirical evidence suggests union and corporate money protects incumbents.
“Tell that to Blanche Lincoln,” Hatch says. “Lincoln is one of the nicest people around here who had ten million spent against her by the unions, just because they disagreed with her.”
OK, but … Blanche won. And doesn’t Orrin think money is protected political speech? And if so, isn’t spending money to defeat her because you disagree with her policies … basically the entire point of politics? Unless Orrin wants Kagan to decide that unions aren’t allowed to be mean to his Senate friends, I guess.
Hatch was also outraged that the president criticized the Citizens ruling … while the Supreme Court was in the same room as him. The nerve! The court is very sensitive! Obama should’ve formed a one-man corporation in Utah and bought thousands of TV ads, if he wanted to exercise his right to express an opinion on the decision.
Kagan is expected to be easily confirmed because this whole thing is basically a fun way for the Senate to pass the time without having to pass legislation or anything.
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene.
You Might Also Like
More Related Stories
-
R.I.P. Michael Hastings
-
How Obamacare shortchanges low-wage workers
-
Civil rights groups sue NYPD over Muslim spying
-
Bill Ayers: Obama has committed war crimes
-
How cash secretly rules surveillance policy
-
Kansas secretary of state compares immigration protesters to the KKK
-
SNAP out of it, conservatives!
-
Is Cindy McCain actually a gay "hero"?
-
Ai Weiwei on his incarceration: "They never looked away from me, 24 hours a day”
-
Billion-dollar bioterror detection program under new scrutiny
-
GOP's war on women has a new face: Marsha Blackburn
-
Is there a "liberal bias" in academia?
-
War against Issa heats up, as Cummings releases IRS transcript
-
No, Brazilian riots are not an "overreaction" to fare hikes
-
Former intern sues Atlantic Records
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests
-
Hacktivists strike north of the border
-
House hearing in celebration of NSA spying
-
Idaho GOPer fears gay employees will come "into work in a tutu"
-
Bachmann: Karl Rove is not with the GOP base
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses
Featured Slide Shows
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The protests take on a festive element as police forces move out of the park and square. Wearing a gas mask, this young man dances to traditional Turkish music in front of Taksim Square’s Ataturk Monument.
-
In Gezi Park since March 31st, this protester, originally caught off-guard by the Government’s teargas and water cannons, went out and bought a Russian army mask from WWII, preparing for what was to come.
-
This rambunctious boy seems to be enjoying the chaos. After taking this picture he threw a stone at the already destroyed building in the background.
-
Forming a line, the police face off directly with protesters in Taksim Square. After a while, they retreated and there was a general cheer – a back-and-forth dance that has been common since the beginning of this protest.
-
An elderly woman in Gezi Park reads the news. The tent community occupying the park was violently destroyed on June 16th.
-
Many different groups had set up booths to promote their cause in Taksim Square and Gezi Park. Standing in front of one, this man waves his flag while posing with conviction.
-
Many home-remedies are used to minimize the effects of tear gas. This woman has put a milky solution on her face, removing her mask after the tear gas dissipated. Before sunrise, the police came again for another round of teargasing.
-
People capitalize on the uprising -- selling flags, beer, gas masks, sky lanterns and spray paint to name just a few of the popular items.
-
On Monday morning, June 11, the police execute a strong offensive. Many plain-clothed police officers, like the ones seen here, clash with protesters in the side streets away from the main stand-off in Taksim.
-
The authorities seem to be most aggressive in the night, pushing protesters away from the square and park. After being teargassed this young woman catches her breath with other protesters on Siraselviler Street.
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests (slideshow)
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Photos: Turmoil and tear gas in Instanbul's Gezi Park - Slideshow
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
10 summer food festivals worth the pit stop
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
9 amazing drive-in movie theaters still standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
Related Videos
More Related Stories
-
R.I.P. Michael Hastings
-
How Obamacare shortchanges low-wage workers
-
Civil rights groups sue NYPD over Muslim spying
-
Bill Ayers: Obama has committed war crimes
-
How cash secretly rules surveillance policy
-
Kansas secretary of state compares immigration protesters to the KKK
-
SNAP out of it, conservatives!
-
Is Cindy McCain actually a gay "hero"?
-
Ai Weiwei on his incarceration: "They never looked away from me, 24 hours a day”
-
Billion-dollar bioterror detection program under new scrutiny
-
GOP's war on women has a new face: Marsha Blackburn
-
Is there a "liberal bias" in academia?
-
War against Issa heats up, as Cummings releases IRS transcript
-
No, Brazilian riots are not an "overreaction" to fare hikes
-
Former intern sues Atlantic Records
-
Gripping photos: The people of the Turkey protests
-
Hacktivists strike north of the border
-
House hearing in celebration of NSA spying
-
Idaho GOPer fears gay employees will come "into work in a tutu"
-
Bachmann: Karl Rove is not with the GOP base
-
GOP lawmaker: Extreme abortion ban justified because of masturbating fetuses
Elena Kagan is the 45th Solicitor General of the United States, confirmed in March 2009. Prior to her confirmation, she was the 11th Dean of Harvard Law School. Among her previous positions is a stint at the White House, from 1995-99, where she served as a counselor.
Kagan received her
bachelor's degree, summa cum laude, from Princeton in 1981. She attended Worcester College, Oxford, and then Harvard Law School, where she was supervising editor of the Harvard Law Review, and graduated magna cum laude in 1986.
Most Read
-
Why Sarah Palin actually matters again Joan Walsh
-
GOP plan to appeal to millennials: "Make abortion funny" Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Why didn't anyone help? Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
Lynda Obst: Hollywood's completely broken Lynda Obst
-
To my daughter on Father's Day: Sorry I used to be a sexist Mo Elleithee
-
Rahm Emanuel is losing control of his city Mark Guarino
-
The best of Tumblr porn Tracy Clark-Flory
-
TSA agent allegedly tells teenage girl to "cover herself" Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
Museum that discriminates against people says it is being discriminated against Katie Mcdonough
-
Study: Reading novels makes us better thinkers Tom Jacobs, Pacific Standard

Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

3004 points3005 points3006 points | 444 comments

285 points286 points287 points | 6 comments

60 points61 points62 points | 21 comments
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
-
Banks Caught In How Many Mortgage Settlement Violations? -
Report Finds Obstacles Ahead For Obamacare Rollout - James P. Hoffa: CEOs Want To Hide Riches Through Repeal Of Wage Gap Disclosure Requirement
-
Young Adults Want Health Insurance, Which Is Good News For Obamacare: Survey -
House Committee Advances Immigration Bill Over Dem Objections
-
Missing Michael Hastings -
Heritage Foundation Challenges CBO Immigration Reform Estimates With Controversial Study -
Exclusive: Confidential Administration Document Details Plan To Sell Obamacare Through Social Media -
37 Photos Of Presidents Bro-ing Out - Your Treasury Secretary's Signature No Longer Looks Like A Cupcake


Comments
29 Comments