The silver lining of Arizona’s immigration law
Believe it or not, the new law -- as cruel as it is -- represents a step toward assimilation for Hispanics
Topics: Immigration, War Room, Politics News
Hispanic community members, some from Phoenix, hold hands in prayer to protest against SB1070, Arizona's immigration law, during a vigil in front of the White House in Washington Wednesday, July 7, 2010.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon) (Credit: AP)The apocalyptic language used by opponents of Arizona’s new immigration law — which the Obama administration is now challenging in court — reflects a conviction that, like apartheid or Jim Crow, it’s an unusually blatant violation of civil rights.
In a way, they are right. The harsh and discriminatory law certainly warrants condemnation. But, in a perverse way, it also reflects progress – an ugly but seemingly necessary step toward assimilation for Hispanics.
To appreciate why, it’s important to understand that the nativism the law embodies has been omnipresent throughout American history. And it’s been directed at such a wide variety of immigrant groups that one can’t help but suspect that it’s an unchangeable part of who we are — that the process of being assimilated into American culture inculcates every new immigrant group with the tendency to despise the next.
English settlers, for instance, faced armed resistance from Native Americans — understandably so! — and only a decade after the Constitution was signed, the Alien and Sedition Acts gave the president power to deport resident aliens. Descendents of English immigrants targeted more recent Catholic arrivals, particularly Irish and German residents, even though members of all three of these groups came over largely as indentured servants (which is to say “guest workers”). Catholic immigrants, as papists, were thought to have suspicious ties to a foreign power, and engaged in suspicious activities like forming their own native-language schools (why can’t they just speak American) and living in ethnic enclaves (why do they keep to themselves). Anti-Catholicism justified official and unofficial intolerance, like the draft riots during the Civil War, and resulted in the formation of a political party, the Know-Nothings.
Once Catholics escaped this ghetto, though, Irish settlers out West turned their ire on Chinese immigrants, while Germans targeted Eastern European immigrants for discrimination. Then, once Europeans all became “white people” (a process which took a century and a half for Catholics) they rallied to intern Japanese-Americans during World War II and to keep out Haitians in the 1980s — and there’s the whole weird relationship we have with Mexican immigrants, and good Lord, we haven’t even admitted how many Muslim immigrants we have yet, which should just be a hoot once that’s an issue.
Michael Barthel is a PhD candidate in the communication department at the University of Washington. He has written about pop music for the Awl, Idolator, and the Village Voice. More Michael Barthel.




Republican Virginia Lt. Governor Nominee: Obama Sees World "From A Muslim Perspective"
Rep. Issa Aware Of IRS Investigation Since Last July
French President Hollande Signs Marriage Equality Bill
Obama Group Braces For Progressive Backlash Over Keystone
Comments
72 Comments