White House wants it both ways on Sherrod firing

The White House says it backs her firing from the USDA but also tries to distance itself

Topics: Shirley Sherrod, White House, War Room,

White House wants it both ways on Sherrod firingSecretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack issued a statement today explaining that he asked for Georgia rural development director Shirley Sherrod’s resignation yesterday because “the controversy surrounding her comments would create situations where her decisions, rightly or wrongly, would be called into question making it difficult for her to bring jobs to Georgia.”

As Alex Pareene explained, the controversy Vilsack is referring to was whipped up when Andrew Breitbart released an edited video clip of Sherrod, it was mindlessly picked up by other media, and the Obama administration followed suit.

But now that Breitbart’s story of Sherrod being a racist has been exposed as bogus, the White House is trying to have it both ways: They say they support Vilsack’s decision but at the same time had absolutely nothing to do with his making it.

You Might Also Like

That’s what we were told (the same as other reporters) when we asked the White House about this. “WH did not pressure Sherrod or USDA. It was the Secretary’s decision, as he says,” says a White House official who declined to be named.

That claim differs from Sherrod’s account of things. She told the AP that she was called twice Monday by USDA deputy undersecretary Cheryl Cook, who told her, in the AP’s paraphrase, that “the White House wanted her to resign.”

Either way, the larger truth here is that there’s not much of a meaningful distinction between Vilsack and the White House. It’s all the Obama administration. The administration fired Sherrod, and it’s standing by that decision.

Justin Elliott is a reporter for ProPublica. You can follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    jkrebs04, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada

    akvarog, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.

    jhgraphicsusa, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R., DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    iMAGICations,DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>