This year's electoral tactic relies on distracting attention away from their record with -- boo! -- GOP threats
(updated below – Update II)
Obama claims GOP trying to destroy Social Security
President Barack Obama used the anniversary of Social Security to trumpet Democrats’ support for the popular program and accuse Republicans of trying to destroy it.
Social Security turned 75 last week. . . . But the program is under attack, with some Democrats as well as nearly all Republicans joining the assault. Rumor has it that President Obama’s deficit commission may call for deep benefit cuts, in particular a sharp rise in the retirement age.
It appears that the Democrats intend to try to win the midterm elections by scaring Americans into believeing that a GOP victory would endanger their Social Security benefits — a tactic which Susie Madrak correctly condemns as ”one of the most cynical political moves I’ve seen.” The reason for that characterization is obvious: because, as Madrak explains, echoing Krugman: ”the imminent threat to Social Security right now is from the administration — and its pet Catfood Commission.” Obama’s speech this weekend focused on the GOP’s plan to privatize Social Security, but that plan has zero chance of succeeding: both because only a handful of Republicans (such as Paul Ryan) support it ever since Bush’s privatization efforts were defeated, and because Obama retains veto power to prevent it even with a GOP victory this November. The true threat to Social Security is Obama’s Deficit Commission, which has inexcusably been working in total secrecy throughout the year, cooking up its recommendations to be released in December and likely to be voted on by Congress once the elections are nice and over with.
From the start, that Commission was stacked with people from both parties with a long history of advocating for serious cuts in benefits. The Democratic co-Chair, Erskine Bowles, worked a decade ago with Newt Gingrich to try to privatize Social Security when he was Clinton’s Chief of Staff, and in 1998, was hailed by Business Week as “Corporate America’s Friend in the White House.” Other Obama appointees include David Cote, CEO of the defense contractor giant Honeywell, and several typical corporatist Democrats with histories of explicitly advocating for cutting Social Security (watch this short video with one of them, Alice Rivlin, showing the level of transparency and responsiveness with which the Commission is working). Needless to say, all GOP appointees are also fully on board with Social Security cuts.
Some people (such as Matt Yglesias) hold out the not unreasonable hope that the Commission’s recommendations will be unable to command majority approval in Congress because progressive Democrats will never vote for a plan that includes Social Security cuts, while Republican votes will never be secured if the proposal includes tax increases. But the members of this Commission are old D.C. operatives who are not going to release a proposal which has no chance of being enacted. They’re well-aware of the need to secure Republican votes if it is to pass, and seem intent on securing the approval of GOP Minority Leader John Boehner and his caucus for the recommendations they issue. That doesn’t mean they can achieve that. But given that progressive Democrats will never vote for Social Security cuts, the Commissioners are certainly aware of the need for Republican approval to combine with “centrist” Democrats (and the White House) as the only way to secure enactment, and will undoubtedly shape their recommendations accordingly.
Whatever one thinks of these plans to cut Social Security benefits, it’s just appalling to watch the Democrats try to scare the electorate into voting for them on this basis given that it’s Obama’s Deficit Commission which, by design, is far and away the most likely threat to cut those benefits. That raises the broader point that the Democrats are relying overwhelmingly on a fear-based campaign to win the election: never mind all the bad things about us; don’t worry about what we’re doing with our power: just look over at those scary, evil Republicans!! This is how Rachel Maddow described the Democrats’ midterm tactic last week, as she criticized Obama for continuing to fire gay members of the military rather than issue a moratorium on the policy until it’s repealed:
Why not do that? I’ll tell you why. Because that would take some political capital. That would take some guts.
And liberals, according to this White House, ought to be drug tested if we’re expecting to see that from this White House right now. Stop complaining and be happy for what you have. . . .
I talked at the top of the show tonight with Gail Collins about how one way to motivate your natural base for an election is to make your base afraid of what the other side has to offer. And that is true. That works. That works on both sides. It works for conservatives about liberals and it works for liberals about conservatives.
But one less soul-sucking way to motivate your base and to win an election and to keep winning elections and to, frankly, have history look kindly upon you, is to get your base to cheer for you -- not just to cheer against someone else, but to see you standing up, not just to bad guys with worse ideas than you, but to see you standing up for what is right because you know it is right, because we know you know it’s right, even though you also know standing up for it is hard.
That is how you regain the enthusiasm of your base. That is how you win the respect of your base. That is how you win the respect of the country. And admit it: that is how you win your own self-respect, too.
It’s hard to overstate how often one encounters exactly this mindset. If you write about Obama’s program to assassinate American citizens with no due process, or his horrific killings of civilians around the world, or his campaign-violating denials of due process, or the vast increase in the covert “shadow wars” the country is fighting with no oversight or checks, you’ll invariably be met with this objection: you should stop talking about these things so much because you’re helping the GOP win!!! — as though everything is just one big, continuous election and the things which the people who actually wield political power do with that power are irrelevant. All that matters is doing and saying whatever is necessary — even if you purport to be a commentator or “journalist” — to ensure your party wins. Or, as ”journalist” Jonathan Alter put it last week:
In other words: devote yourself to the Real Goal — saying and doing whatever is necessary to defeat the dastardly Republicans and keep Democrats in power — rather than criticizing the political officials who . . . . actually hold power, decrees this “journalist.” It’s the same reason there are so many blogs devoted to doing little else beyond railing against the latest moronic outbursts of Sarah Palin, or right-wing talk-radio hosts, or obscure GOP backbenchers even though they possess no control over the Government: because Democratic apparatchiks want to ignore what Democrats are doing with the power they’ve been given and instead are relying upon exactly the fear-mongering tactic of distraction which Maddow described. As she says, it’s the same tactic Karl Rove used for years to gin up victories — we may not be good but look over there at those awful, scary liberals — and it’s as common as it is effective. This fear-based polarization perpetually keeps the electorate distracted away from what political leaders — and the permanent factions which control the Government — actually do.
It’s certainly true that elections are about comparative choices, and it’s obviously worthwhile and necessary to understand what the out-of-power party is and what they would do once in power. But it’s at least equally important — I’d say more important — to critique what the party that actually controls the government is doing with that control. The fact that the Democratic electoral strategy depends upon distracting attention away from what they’ve done — “make your base afraid of what the other side has to offer,” as Maddow put it – speaks volumes about that record. It’s long been repulsive to watch the Republicans try to win elections by scaring people into believe that it’s Democrats — rather than themselves — responsible for the nation’s fiscal woes, or posing threats to Medicare, or subverting the Constitution, or making the country “unsafe.” It’s exactly the same watching Obama and the Democrats try to win the election by scaring people into believing that a GOP victory would threaten Social Security when the real threat comes from the Commission created by Obama to do exactly that. And, whatever else is true, our political debates remained mired in little beyond distracting appeals to fear.
UPDATE: Adam Serwer has more on the smug (and dubious) belief among some Democratic loyalists that the Party will hold onto power by managing to be less awful and scary than the Republicans.
UPDATE II: Cenk Uygur was the guest-host today for Ed Schultz and questioned the Chair of the DCCC, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, about the Democrats’ plans for Social Security. Decide for yourself if you think Democrats are prepared to cut Social Security if/when the Deficit Commission recommends those cuts and the Congress is then required to give those recommendations an up-or-down vote without any amendments allowed:
More Related Stories
- Cuomo: "Shame on us" if New York City elects Weiner
- Coburn calls questions about tornado aid "typical Washington B.S."
- Conspiracy theorists clash over London attack
- Voting is not a right
- Destroying the planet for record profits
- Ahead of Obama's speech, U.S. acknowledges four American drone killings
- Pic of the day: Barack Obama at prom
- Anti-Islam backlash in London after machete attack
- Must-see morning clip: Bill O'Reilly visits "The Daily Show"
- Obama’s drone speech will probably be maddening
- Boehner: "Inconceivable" Obama didn't know about IRS targeting
- Obama to announce new effort to close Guantanamo Bay
- House supporters of KXL received $56m from fossil fuel industry
- Judge tells lesbian couple to separate -- or lose kids
- Obama to address drones, Guantánamo
- If Alex Pareene were a cable news executive...
- Portland's senseless war on fluoride
- Graphic video reportedly shows possible London machete attack suspect
- What economists get wrong about the jobs crisis
- Ted Cruz: "I don't trust the Republicans"
- Pa. governor "can't find" any Latinos to work in his administration
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 picsclose X
- 1 of 11
Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
Credit: AP/LM Otero
Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
Credit: AP/Matt Rourke
A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
Credit: AP/Molly Riley
Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite
Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster
O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid
Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield
When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin
A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin
Recent Slide Shows
- 1 of 11