“The Pain Chronicles”: The science of pain

Why are some people impervious to physical suffering while others can't seem to escape it? An author explains

Topics: Neuroscience, Nonfiction, Books,

"The Pain Chronicles": The science of pain

Melanie Thernstrom’s pain began inconspicuously, as a burning ache in her limbs after a long swim. But instead of drifting away over the next few days, the feeling dug in, traversing her neck and shoulder and eventually smothering her entire right arm. She popped aspirin, applied hot compresses, and simply tried to ignore it, but slowly the reality became clear — this pain wasn’t going anywhere. For the next several years, she bounced from doctor to doctor searching for an effective treatment for her mysterious ailment. Despite being young, active and seemingly healthy, Thernstrom had joined the ranks of the more than 70 million Americans who suffer from debilitating chronic pain.

In her new book, “The Pain Chronicles: Cures, Myths, Mysteries, Prayers, Diaries, Brain Scans, Healing, and the Science of Suffering,” Thernstrom, a writer for the New York Times Magazine, shadowed doctors and talked with patients about the science and experience of pain. Despite its being so common, she discovered, chronic pain remains a massive medical enigma, hard to treat or even isolate. She met amputees who complained of a constant ache in their missing limbs, women who felt like their entire bodies were bruised when there was not a scratch on them, and hundreds of others haunted by the invisible and devastating burden of constant pain — all the while pursuing a cure for her own suffering (which turned out to be caused by a degenerative arthritic condition in her spine). Her book examines the human experience of pain through the lenses of science, history, philosophy and memoir, creating a comprehensive and thoroughly engaging portrait of a force that all of us have experienced, but few of us truly understand.

Salon spoke to Thernstrom over the phone about the science behind our suffering, how some people can control pain, and why others are more sensitive than most.

Pain is a very bizarre phenomenon because everyone has felt it, so we all know what it’s like on some level, but at the same time it’s very hard to accurately remember and describe. 

Yes, I find that very interesting. Pain is a non-verbal experience and yet we have only our words to describe it and try to get help. But the fundamental way in which it’s not verbal makes it much more difficult to seek attention and relief — you have to first persuade your physician that you’re in pain and need treatment, and that can be extremely difficult. 

The amount of pain someone is in isn’t directly related to the severity of their injury. Why is that? 

Pain is a very mysterious phenomenon. We think of it as a very accurate measure of tissue damage, the way certain instruments measure the size of an earthquake and tell you if it is going to be big or small. But pain is not like that at all. It’s more like love, a subjective perception in the brain. Sometimes it can tell accurately how severe the injury is, but often it cannot. 

One of the mysteries of chronic pain has always been, why does it worsen over time? If it was actually an accurate reflection of tissue damage, it should get better over time as the tissue heals. But in fact very often patients’ experience belies that. The chronic pain gets worse as the original injury heals and takes on a life of its own. It causes changes in the brain and the nervous system that lead to more pain. A doctor I talked to compared it to water damage to a house. The longer it continues to leak, the more damage will be incurred, and eventually the house will just collapse. 

But despite the severity of chronic pain, often you have almost nothing to show for it physically. And that makes treating pain really subjective. 

A pain specialist once said to me, you have to value a person to value their pain. So it’s no surprise that poor people and minorities are the least likely to have their pain believed and treated. They also often have the fewest resources to pursue pain treatment. And it used to be in earlier eras — peaking in the 19th century — there were all these racist theories about how Africans couldn’t suffer from pain, that they were literally less pain sensitive than white people. The Victorians believed in a hierarchy of pain sensitivity with savages and slaves at the bottom just above animals and then rising up from there. Poor people were less sensitive than members of the upper class and most sensitive of all were white upper-class women. 

However, in contrast to these theories about Africans being less pain sensitive, there is very interesting contemporary research that shows that African-Americans are actually more pain sensitive on average and suffer from greater levels of chronic daily pain. 

Women also suffer from chronic pain at a higher rate. Why? 

All kinds of pain syndromes are more prevalent in women, and women are also more sensitive to pain than men. But there are other issues as well. Women go to the doctor at a higher rate than men, so they are more likely to seek medical attention for pain, but they are less likely to successfully get treatment. There have been studies showing that women are more likely to be referred for counseling or given psychotropic medication, while men are more likely to be prescribed physical therapy or referred for surgery. It seems that men’s reports of pain are often seen as more credible. Also, most pain specialists are male and most pain patients are female, so that is an additional element in play. For women in particular, a great deal of energy often goes into successfully playing the part of someone suffering pain in order to get treatment. 

In your book you describe witnessing a religious ceremony in Malaysia in which pilgrims hung weighted hooks from their chests and performed other rituals that should have been extremely painful–all the while showing no signs at all that they were suffering. How do you explain the fact that some people can undergo experiences like that and feel no pain? 

I was very puzzled by these mystical reports of transcending pain in a religious context. I had read about pilgrims in Hindu festivals mutilating themselves and claiming that they were in no pain or Filipinos enacting these crucifixion rituals at Easter. Honestly, I just didn’t believe it. I knew theoretically that pain is a perception and that the brain can turn it on and off, and in certain states of mind the brain will turn off pain, but it’s very hard to believe unless you see it. 

So I went and witnessed the Hindi festival of Thaipusam in Kuala Lumpur and I saw for myself that they were having fishhooks threaded into their backs and skewered through their cheeks and needles stabbed through their tongues — and they really weren’t in pain. They didn’t even have any of the involuntary signs of pain. They weren’t blinking, they weren’t tearing up, they weren’t gasping. 

We in the West are familiar with this when there is a threat to survival. A flight-or-fight instinct can turn off pain. This is why, when you read an account of a shark victim, often they’ll say that they didn’t feel that their hand was bitten off, they just noticed the water was filled with blood. 

So is that what happens to these people who are skewering themselves? 

Yes, exactly. But instead of a threat to survival they’re being preoccupied with thoughts of God. But it’s the same thing in a trance. All of their attention is directed toward the thing that they want it to be directed towards, and the pain information is not admitted in. It’s thought to be stopped at the level of the spinal cord. They’re actually not feeling any pain. 

Is knowing that people can choose to reject pain like that useful to doctors who study pain, or to you personally as a pain patient? 

It’s very easy for us all to be able to do it in the case of a threat to survival. But to be able to do it in a voluntary sense, that is much more difficult. These pilgrims have a lifetime of training. They have to really and truly believe that God will take away their pain. It is essentially a very strong placebo effect. When you believe that you have pain relief your brain will make that true by not generating a perception of pain. 

It seems like many treatments for chronic pain do involve a placebo effect. Why is that? 

You need your brain to cooperate with the pain treatment and kick in some of its own ability to modulate pain. Even morphine, the gold standard of pain treatment, relies on placebo for part of its effect. If you give someone morphine covertly, without them being aware of it, it’s one-third less effective than if you say, “We’re putting morphine in your IV now. This is a powerful painkiller and you will feel much better soon.” Morphine mimics the brain’s own pain modulation and you want the brain to give you some of its own endorphins and other pain-modulating neurotransmitters. 

But I imagine it must be incredibly difficult if you’ve had chronic pain for a long time to ever convince yourself that something is going to work. 

That is the problem! Chronic pain patients are very poor placebo responders because they expect to be in pain. And one of the big reasons that treatment works much less well for them is because they’re not getting placebo benefits. 

The brain doesn’t just provide positive side effects. The placebo effect also has a sinister evil twin — the nocebo effect. 

Yes. Nocebo is the other side of the coin. We know placebo generates positive effects like painlessness or other kinds of healing based on belief, but the brain can also create negative effects of the same kind. The ultimate nocebo is death by curse, when people who believe that they’ve been cursed really do die after a few days. That is an actual documented phenomenon. 

That brings up an interesting point, which is that being religious can impact how we interact with pain. What exactly does faith do to pain? 

It’s complex and some of the evidence is contradictory, but basically there are negative forms of religious faith and positive forms. Positive forms of faith, such as believing that pain strengthens your faith or brings you closer to God, actually do help people feel better. But negative religiosity, the idea that illness means God has abandoned me or perhaps doesn’t exist, has the power to dramatically harm the health of pain patients. 

Having studied all of these different ways of dealing and interacting with pain in writing this book, what have you found most helpful for treating your own chronic pain? 

In some ways I feel like I’m still waiting for my treatment to be invented. I guess physical therapy has helped me, and understanding pain has helped because it’s given me a framework to evaluate the success of my treatments. Making the psychological shift that I don’t have to be pain-free in order to be happy was huge as well. I thought at the beginning that I have to have my pain cured in order to be happy and now I feel like as long as it’s modulated and moderated, that that is OK. 

In the West in modern times we don’t expect to be in any physical pain. It’s not part of our sense of life, although it has been for most of history, and so therefore to have pain feels wrong, it feels outrageous, it feels upsetting because it seems like a violation of what we think of as a normal life. So I think changing that sense itself helped me. 

All that said, I would still love to be cured.

Ryan Brown is a writer living in Boston.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>