Joe Manchin’s oddly inspiring debate performance
As his opponent sticks to the Tea Party script, West Virginia's governor defends the New Deal/Great Society legacy
Topics: 2010 Elections, War Room, Politics News
Man, did John Raese lay it on thick Monday night. In the only scheduled debate in West Virginia’s Senate race, the GOP nominee matter of factly said he opposes the healthcare reform law because “I don’t like socialism,” repeatedly called global warming a “myth,” reiterated his opposition to the existence of a minimum wage, and summed up his vision for the war in Afghanistan thusly: “We win, you lose.”
In so doing, the 60-year-old businessman, a starchy public performer who has tried and failed to win statewide office three times before, achieved something remarkable: He made Joe Manchin a sympathetic figure to progressives watching at home.
Roughly speaking, Manchin, the second-term governor and Raese’s Democratic opponent, is West Virginia’s answer to Ben Nelson — a veteran pol who labors hard to cater to his state’s conservative sensibilities, often by taking positions that irk and enrage Democratic activists. Manchin opposes abortion, gun control, cap-and-trade, and a second stimulus, supports extending the Bush tax cuts across the board, and takes pains to distance himself from Barack Obama and congressional Democrats. He is also, according to recent polling, in serious danger of losing to Raese in the race to succeed the late Robert Byrd — an outcome that could potentially cost Democrats control of the Senate.
Against that alarming backdrop, Manchin probably didn’t look too bad to the left on Monday, if only because he represents the Democrats’ best and only chance of holding off Raese, one of the more arrogant and charmless Tea Party candidates on the ballot this fall. On question after question, Raese combined the irrational hysteria that now defines the GOP base with a businessman’s polish.
Branding it “pure, unadulterated socialism,” Raese called the healthcare reform law “the worst bill ever to come out of the United States Senate and House.” (I guess the Fugitive Slave and Indian Removal Acts just slipped his mind.) It took one of the minor party candidates on the stage to point out that, if anything, the law represents “capitalism on steroids,” with the government steering millions of new customers to private insurance companies. But details like that don’t matter to Raese or his base; Obama feels like a “socialist” to them, so they throw the term around with abandon. It’s the triumph of truthiness.
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.





No Evidence FBI Is Targeting Chechen Separatists In Boston Bombing Case, Advocates Say
Bill De Blasio Won't Be Distracted By Anthony Weiner
State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
Comments
34 Comments