Nancy Pelosi probably deserved better than this
The soon-to-be-former speaker is proof that being an effective legislative leader won't make you popular
Topics: Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., War Room, 2010 Elections, Politics News
FILE - In this Sept. 30, 2010 file photo, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., listens to a reporters question during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. In these angry political times, Democrats and Republicans agree on next to nothing. China is one exception. Democrats and Republicans alike are accusing each other of cozying up to Beijing and backing policies that send U.S. jobs and IOUs to the world's second largest economy. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen, File)(Credit: AP)As public faces of America’s most chronically maligned institution, congressional leaders are never really that popular. Even Tip O’Neill, whose Irish charm and gruff, grandfatherly demeanor won him his share of fans, was a useful tool for Republican ad makers in the early 1980s. So when it comes to mass opinion, the best advice for a speaker of the House is probably this: Keep quiet and let your lieutenants do the talking — then maybe your image will be as benign as Denny Hastert’s.
But Nancy Pelosi wasn’t interested in blending in. She was 66 years old when she finally claimed the top job in the House in 2007 and 68 when a president from her party came to power. Democrats in Washington had been playing defense since the Gingrich revolution, but finally, with Barack Obama’s inauguration, they had the numbers to make things happen, and she was determined to lead the way.
Asked shortly after Obama’s 2008 victory (in an election in which the Democrats’ majority in the House expanded to 255 seats) what she wanted to achieve in the next two years, Pelosi identified “growing the economy, expanding healthcare, ending dependence on foreign oil and ending the war in Iraq” as her priorities. And she largely delivered.
The story of the first half of Obama’s first term, let’s not forget, is one of partial legislative triumph. On issue after issue, Pelosi’s House produced for the president. The stimulus was larger before the Senate watered it down. Cap-and-trade made it through the House, before dying in the Senate. A stronger healthcare reform package — one with a public insurance option — was pushed through the House, only to be stripped down by the Senate. Ditto for Wall Street reform. And let’s not forget the lower-profile legislation, on fair pay, student loan reform, cash-for-clunkers, and credit card reform, that made it through both chambers. The 111th Congress will be remembered for the way it ended, with a seismic Democratic defeat, but that doesn’t change the fact that it was one of the most productive — ever.
Pelosi deserves enormous credit for this. She was disciplined and organized and asserted unusual control over the chamber. She could also be ruthless, in an effective way. Spying an opportunity after the 2008 election to adopt major climate change legislation, she engineered the ouster of Rep. John Dingell, the longest-serving member of the House and an icon of Rust Belt Democratic politics, from the chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce Committee. Dingell, with his loyalty to Detroit, she concluded, would be an obstacle to stringent emissions standards. In his place, she installed her ally, Henry Waxman, a stanch environmentalist from Southern California.
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.




Koch Brother To Host A Fundraiser For Ken Cuccinelli
IRS Official Refuses To Testify During House Oversight Hearing
Comments
97 Comments