How the Tea Party cost Republicans the Senate
Tea Partiers said they'd rather nominate "pure" candidates than electable ones. And they proved it
Topics: 2010 Elections, War Room, Christine O'Donnell, Tea Parties, Politics News
Delaware Republican Senate nominee Christine OâDonnell during Tea Party Express rally, Sunday, Oct. 31, 2010, in Wilmington, Del. (AP Photo/Rob Carr)(Credit: Rob Carr)As Justin Elliott just noted, results are still outstanding in three Senate contests, but it seems likely that Democrats will end up with 53 seats — a loss of six from their pre-election total. As rough as this is for Democrats, it could have been much, much worse. That it isn’t is entirely the result of the Tea Party.
Take Delaware, where Christine O’Donnell, previously a political gadfly who had attracted little support in two other campaigns for statewide office, was propelled by Tea Party fervor to the Republican Senate nomination. The candidate she defeated, Rep. Mike Castle, had been considered a shoo-in — by political observers, by the Republican establishment, and even by the Democratic establishment (which decided not to put much effort into the contest after Castle emerged as the likely GOP nominee — and led Chris Coons, the unknown Democrat who claimed his party’s nomination by default, by double-digits all year. Until O’Donnell emerged from nowhere to win the September 14 primary over Castle, every Senate projection map listed Delaware as a bankable pick-up for the GOP.
O’Donnell’s primary triumph immediately turned Delaware into a safe seat for Democrats. Coons went from trailing Castle by about 15 points to leading O’Donnell by at least that much. The closest poll of the entire general election campaign still showed O’Donnell losing by ten points, and Coons’ final margin was 17. The bottom-line is obvious: With the GOP establishment’s candidate, Republicans would have gained a seat in Delaware on Tuesday night, but with the Tea Party’s candidate, they blew the chance.
It’s true that O’Donnell struggles can be chalked up to her erratic behavior (claiming political opponents were spying on her from her bushes), her personal financial issues, and the embarrassing clips from her old appearances on Bill Maher’s show that came to light – and not her ideology per se. But she also embodied the spirit of the Tea Party movement, which is best understood as an uprising of the party’s conservative base against its professional political class. Her lack of political seasoning was part of her appeal during the primary, with conservative activists openly admitting that they didn’t care if she cost them the election — at least she hadn’t been in Washington for years and at least she hadn’t voted for TARP!
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.




Obama Faces Dogged Heckler At Drone Speech
This Is The Woman Who Interrupted Obama's Speech
Comments
33 Comments