I guess Rush didn’t like my column

The right-wing radio host tore into me in an on-air rant Monday. Would you believe he got a few things wrong?

Topics: Rush Limbaugh, War Room,

I guess Rush didn't like my column

This afternoon, a day after Salon published my essay about Barack Obama, I had the rare privilege of hearing Rush Limbaugh spend three-and- a-half minutes savaging me as a “stupid babe,” as “some woman at Slate.com….Salon.com,” for daring to claim that Obama believes in good governance and a regulatory infrastructure to tackle the excesses that led to our current economic mess. [Full audio of Limbaugh's rant can be found here.]

Now, I don’t mind being called a “babe,” though one would think that a radio superstar like Rush could afford fact-checkers — you know, the people who do complicated research tasks like google the name “Sasha Abramsky,” look at the websites of the people about to be savaged (in my case it’s particularly, and unsurprisingly easy to find, at www.sashaabramsky.com), and realize that a photo of a person with a goatee is, in most circumstances, a guy and not a “babe.”

Had Rush then concluded that I was a “stupid bastard,” or “stupid dude,” or some such, one might have listened and found him to be uncouth, rabid, nasty… but at least coherent. Since we’re getting personal here, however, let’s call a spade a spade: labeling me a “babe” just seems, well, plain dumb.

As for the more substantive criticism — that I’m stupid — one might conclude from the above-described snafu, that to be charitable, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Except, that would involve me being willing to accept the term “stupid” as a label befitting me as well as Limbaugh — and, sorry Rush, but I’m not willing to go down that route. This one’s all on you.

What I argued in my article was that Obama believes in good governance, and that he’d hoped he could convince people from across the political spectrum to raise the caliber of the political discourse once he was in the White House. I also said was that this was a mistake — that it led Obama to try to find common ground with political adversaries who made a pretty explicit decision not to work toward good policy solutions in the first years of the Obama presidency but to do anything and everything to oppose his policy initiatives so as to make him look weak. Hence the bizarre spectacle of Republican congressmen and senators opposing policies they had previously supported: decrying policies intended to stabilize the financial system that many of them had signed on to when they were initiated by Republican president George Bush; opposing even incremental parts of the healthcare reform package that they had previously advocated; trying to stop Democrats from extending unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed (yes, the hard-hurting people Rush supposedly wants to liberate from Big Government intervention), opposing even minimal cap-and-trade policies designed to rein in greenhouse gas emissions; and so on.



You Might Also Like

This isn’t the politics of good faith, rational compromisers; it’s the politics of ideologues — which is why Limbaugh is so delighted. After all, decades from now, there will likely be a new noun in the language. A limbaugh: meaning a particularly inflexible, dogmatic, unthinking and just plain unpleasant demagogue. This is a man who has made a career out of incivility; and what better tribute to his impact on the national culture than the increasingly uncivil nature of 21st Century American politics?

Actually, now that I think about it, he’s more likely to be immortalized as a verb than a noun — “to limbaugh.” When I was a kid, we used to practice “the limbo,” seeing who could stay on two feet while bending backwards to limbo under a continuously lowered horizontal pole. It was a good game for children, but not nearly as good as the game played by so many adults today. “To limbaugh”: setting the political bar low, dancing under it, and then seeing whether you can get it to go even lower.

All things considered, I’d rather be a stupid babe than a limbaughing limbaugh any day of the week.

Sasha Abramsky is a Nation magazine contributing writer, and a senior fellow at Demos. He is the author, most recently, of "Inside Obama’s Brain." He lives in Sacramento, California.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    jkrebs04, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada

    akvarog, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.

    jhgraphicsusa, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R., DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    iMAGICations,DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>