This week in crazy: Joe Rehyansky
His bigoted editorial on "don't ask, don't tell" is jaw-droppingly ignorant, even for the Daily Caller
Topics: This Week in Crazy, Don't Ask Don't Tell, LGBT, Media Criticism, News
The Daily Caller’s headline for Joe Rehyansky’s editorial on “don’t ask, don’t tell” promises “an immodest proposal.” That implies there will be some sort of knowing satire involved and not just the rambling thoughts of some weird old bigot who spends a lot of time thinking about showering with men.
Mr. Rehyansky’s immodest proposal — I’m going to spoil the end of the column for you — is that gay men (but not lesbians) should be forbidden from serving in the military because they are disease-ridden perverts, and the way to keep them out of the military is for straight soldiers to claim that the constitutional right to privacy protects them from having to shower with queers.
A lot of very weird assertions are made in this piece of work, but one very small moment clearly shows what sort of columnist we’re dealing with, here:
What does all this have to do with force readiness and “Don’t-hint-don’t-wink” or whatever they’re calling it these days?
“They” are calling it “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which is also what they have been calling it since it was enacted in 1993. The nickname for the policy has actually not changed in 17 years.
But to be fair to Mr. Rehyansky, he makes his case with a lot of very good scientific evidence. Like:
Most men who are sexually attracted to other men can and do indulge their promiscuous urges with little or no restraint; i.e., it’s “party time” all the time. My wife and I watched a sad documentary about AIDS a few years ago.
So don’t you question his expertise on “gays” and what they will do in our showers. “A significant population of gays in the military has the potential for disastrous health consequences,” he says, because all the gay people have AIDS and all of them want to look at Joe Rehyansky in the shower:
Now back to that communal shower. It’s no secret that men are generally much more susceptible to sexual arousal through visual stimuli than are most women. Many gays will deny that this is the case with them, but why then is the Internet saturated with gay porn?
Yes, why is that, exactly?
The piece originally ended like so:
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene.





Comments
52 Comments